The Inuit Green Deal

[ding]

We are still waiting for one single photo documenting "ocean rise."

Still haven't found any, can you explain why....

And everything they teach in universities about geology is lies too, right?

 

[EMH]

^^^^^

anyone notice every time she gets refuted she brings up another bs topic....

 

[ding]

^^^^^

anyone notice every time she gets refuted she brings up another bs topic....

How long have they been teaching lies about geology?

 

[ding]

^^^^^

anyone notice every time she gets refuted she brings up another bs topic....

Universities have been teaching and researching the theory of ice ages for over a century and a half, with the concept gaining prominence and acceptance in the mid-to-late 19th century.

The scientific understanding of ice ages developed through the following key stages:

• Early 19th Century: Geologists in the early 1800s began finding geological clues, such as giant scratch marks on bedrock and misplaced boulders (erratics), that suggested the past presence of vast ice bodies.
• Formal Proposal & Debate: In 1837, Swiss naturalist Louis Agassiz formally proposed his "glacial theory," which was met with initial skepticism. It took several decades of debate and research for the idea to become widely accepted by the international scientific community.
• Scientific Acceptance & Explanation: By the late 1870s, the ice age theory was largely accepted, especially after the work of James Croll, whose 1875 publication Climate and Time offered a credible explanation for the causes of the ice ages.

Since then, the study of ice ages has been a critical part of university curricula in geology, earth sciences, and climate science, with research continuing to refine the understanding of past climate cycles and their drivers.

 

[EMH]

How long have they been teaching lies about geology?

After homO hid the FBI Fraud prosecution in the closet in 2012, she gave the case to CO2 FRAUD, which then re-wrote North American Ice Age into McBullshit Milankovich, easily refuted on both poles here

Thread 'How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?'

May 15, 2023

This is where the climate debate is now stuck.

Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today.

Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very "Dennis Quaid" approach to ice ages - they are lightning fast, quick, and agile. They come and go really fast.

Since 2010, Milankovitch has replaced "North American Ice Age" with the claim that the ice on Chicago recently that was 2.5 miles thick was only 75k years old.

Really....

My side, which is...

• EMH
• Replies: 134
• Forum: Environment

• 

Thread 'The lies of Milankovich Cycles aka McBullshit - where was land mass Antarctica 70 million years ago'

Aug 9, 2023

McBullshit claims Antarctica has been on the South Pole forever, it never moved at all. And, while it is on the South Pole, it has rapidly gone from ice age to tropical paradise and back over and over.... a Dennis Quaid theory for sure...

We know that Antarctica has 70 million year old dinosaur fossils, and clearly they did not live on top of 2+ mile thick ice at -60F...

• EMH
• Replies: 63
• Forum: Environment

• 
• 
• 

 

[EMH]

been teaching and researching the theory of ice ages

This is the correct definition of ice age, and CO2 FRAUD cannot refute one word of it...

Thread 'Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...'

Jun 23, 2023

What is an ICE AGE?

Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice retreats, as if "Day After Tomorrow" movie is accurate... LOL!!! What was North American Ice Age before 2010 is now spun into a series of rapid "ice ages" where it took a mere 75k years for the "ice age" to start in Northern Canada and put 2.5 mile thick glaicers on Chicago. This is "Milankovich"...

• EMH
• Replies: 338
• Forum: Environment

• 
• 
• 

 

[ding]

After homO hid the FBI Fraud prosecution in the closet in 2012, she gave the case to CO2 FRAUD, which then re-wrote North American Ice Age into McBullshit Milankovich, easily refuted on both poles here

Thread 'How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?'

May 15, 2023

This is where the climate debate is now stuck.

Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today.

Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very "Dennis Quaid" approach to ice ages - they are lightning fast, quick, and agile. They come and go really fast.

Since 2010, Milankovitch has replaced "North American Ice Age" with the claim that the ice on Chicago recently that was 2.5 miles thick was only 75k years old.

Really....

My side, which is...

• EMH
• Replies: 134
• Forum: Environment

• 

Thread 'The lies of Milankovich Cycles aka McBullshit - where was land mass Antarctica 70 million years ago'

Aug 9, 2023

McBullshit claims Antarctica has been on the South Pole forever, it never moved at all. And, while it is on the South Pole, it has rapidly gone from ice age to tropical paradise and back over and over.... a Dennis Quaid theory for sure...

We know that Antarctica has 70 million year old dinosaur fossils, and clearly they did not live on top of 2+ mile thick ice at -60F...

• EMH
• Replies: 63
• Forum: Environment

• 
• 
• 

There's so much evidence against you.

 

[EMH]

There's so much evidence against you.

Except you can't find any... not even a single photo of "ocean rise."

 

[ding]

Except you can't find any... not even a single photo of "ocean rise."

You are a moron.

 

[EMH]

You are a moron.

for noticing that you and your allies at CO2 FRAUD cannot show us a single photo documenting ocean "rise?"


LOL!!


and being smart is just parroting the lie about ocean rise and not demanding photos to back it up....


kinda like convicting innocent people of noticing a "woman" has a penis without allowing the jury to see the "woman" naked...

 

[ding]

for noticing that you and your allies at CO2 FRAUD cannot show us a single photo documenting ocean "rise?"


LOL!!


and being smart is just parroting the lie about ocean rise and not demanding photos to back it up....


kinda like convicting innocent people of noticing a "woman" has a penis without allowing the jury to see the "woman" naked...

No, because you have a low IQ.

 

[EMH]

^^^^^


doesn't realize she's lost every point here....

 

[ding]

^^^^^


doesn't realize she's lost every point here....

I'm pretty confident I've made you look like a fool.