The Green New Deal's Bad Science



As usual, the Democrats are spending money on things which do not work.


First step in cleaning it up is to set the date that it must be completely cleaned up. In this case, it's not Nat Gas so much but it's cars and planes along with coal fired electric plants.

Had we continued with the dirty motors in autos and trucks, you wouldn't see gray film over a few cities, you would see black clouds over MOST cities. We have been cleaning up cars and trucks for the last 70+ years. Remember when there was no PCV Valves on engines (it was a straight pipe from the crankcase that just dripped onto the roads and polluted the air. That was a start. And you have to start somewhere or it's never going to get done. It won't even partially get done.
 


As usual, the Democrats are spending money on things which do not work.

Gagging on Gaia

It's not science at all. It is all based on a primitive, mindless superstition that Nature is supernatural, sacred, and inviolable. The dishonest word "pollution" for neutral by-products reflects the fantasy that natural air is best for us and it is a dangerous sacrilege to add anything to it that wasn't there hundreds of years ago. But natural air, "Clean Air," is the most toxic of all atmospheres we've managed to survive in. It is full of viruses, bacteria, and insect carriers of them, all of which "pollution" kills.
 
Gagging on Gaia

It's not science at all. It is all based on a primitive, mindless superstition that Nature is supernatural, sacred, and inviolable. The dishonest word "pollution" for neutral by-products reflects the fantasy that natural air is best for us and it is a dangerous sacrilege to add anything to it that wasn't there hundreds of years ago. But natural air, "Clean Air," is the most toxic of all atmospheres we've managed to survive in. It is full of viruses, bacteria, and insect carriers of them, all of which "pollution" kills.
Were you drugged when you wrote this? Viruses, bacteria and insect carriers? Sacrilege? Suggesting that seeking to keep air unadulterated is a fantasy is idiocy or insanity; take your pick.
 
Gagging on Gaia

It's not science at all. It is all based on a primitive, mindless superstition that Nature is supernatural, sacred, and inviolable. The dishonest word "pollution" for neutral by-products reflects the fantasy that natural air is best for us and it is a dangerous sacrilege to add anything to it that wasn't there hundreds of years ago. But natural air, "Clean Air," is the most toxic of all atmospheres we've managed to survive in. It is full of viruses, bacteria, and insect carriers of them, all of which "pollution" kills.

Having a little Strynine and Arsenic may be a good thing and that means a lot is a good thing according to you.
 
The so-called science w/ the green agenda has become both so shallow and widespread that it's become a widespread insanity. We really do live in interesting times.
1) What is your science education that we should take your opinion over the world's degreed scientists?
2) The Green New Deal is a proposal, not law.
 
I didn't see "The Green New Deal" mentioned. He said the "green agenda." Like carbon credits and taxes in WA state. Outlawing of small ICEs in CA, Laws banning ICEs by 2030-2035 in west coast states--these are laws passed by democrat legislatures, not proposals.
The title of the attached video is "The Green New Deal's Bad Science"
 
The Green New Deal brings more money into the clean up at Oakridge and Hanford ...

You want plutonium in your drinking water? ... fucking idiots ...
My father was involved in the construction of nuclear weapons and visited both Oakridge and Hanford. He would never tell us what he saw there but was clearly horrified by it.
 
Green Renewable Heavy Industry.

Science, tells them we must build more, bigger, use more than mankind has ever used. To give us less electricity than we produce the old fashion way.

Old fashion, the new technology that replaced whale oil and water wheels is called old fashion.

WInd and Solar are so inefficient you can not compare them to fossil fuels are nuclear power, yet the democrats do.

Trillions of tons in natural resources wasted building giant monsterous wind turbines. Billions of solar panels.

Millions if not billions of birds and animals killed.

The Renewable Heavy Industry is designed to destroy
 
Green Renewable Heavy Industry.
The manufacture of wind turbines could qualify as a heavy industry but not solar panels. And if there's something innately evil and harmful about heavy industry, why are you not attacking the steel industry, the copper industry, the aluminum industry, automobile and truck manufacturers, construction of skyscrapers, dams, rockets, concrete, asphalt, wire, paper, and a dozen others?
Science, tells them we must build more, bigger, use more than mankind has ever used. To give us less electricity than we produce the old fashion way.
Science tells us that we have to stop putting GHGs into the atmosphere. Period.
Old fashion, the new technology that replaced whale oil and water wheels is called old fashion.
If it emits GHGs, it needs to be done away with.
WInd and Solar are so inefficient you can not compare them to fossil fuels are nuclear power, yet the democrats do.
I repeat, science tells us that we have to stop putting GHGs ito the atmosphere. Period.
Trillions of tons in natural resources wasted building giant monsterous wind turbines. Billions of solar panels.
Fusion plants will solve all of that. And wind turbines and solar panels will do just fine till then. And they'll both be good for home power solutions. Solar panels covering every roof and a wind turbine in every backyard.
Millions if not billions of birds and animals killed.
You need to get rid of cats and cars if you want to save the wildlife
The Renewable Heavy Industry is designed to destroy

Which would include steel, copper, aluminum automobiles, trucks, skyscrapers, dams, rockets, concrete, asphalt, wire, paper and all the rest, including, of course, the fucking OIL industry. Get rid of all of them. And YOU can be the one trying to put us back into the stone age.
 
My father was involved in the construction of nuclear weapons and visited both Oakridge and Hanford. He would never tell us what he saw there but was clearly horrified by it.

Er ... umm ... the construction of nuclear weapons is a tightly guarded National Secret ... butterflies and hummingbirds around Oakridge horrified your father? ... or was it just the though of visiting Hanford ... that's a nasty wasteland unfit for human habitation ...

MY FATHER was at the other end ... at anchor in Nagasaki Bay the end of August 1945 ... the horror was no bodies ... no smell ... no pestilence or disease ... just rocks with a little discoloring ... [sniff] ... as brave and patriotic and anyone working at Hanford ... if you want my opinion ...
 
Science tells us that we have to stop putting GHGs into the atmosphere. Period.

If it emits GHGs, it needs to be done away with.

I repeat, science tells us that we have to stop putting GHGs ito the atmosphere.
Nothing puts more ghg's in the air than the world's largest industry.

THE RENEWABLE ENERGY INDUSTRY.

Nothing is larger, and nothing gives us so little in return.

Yes, quit using heavy industry to manufacture solar panels and wind turbines
 
The manufacture of wind turbines could qualify as a heavy industry but not solar panels.
Why not solar panels? I have shown you pictures of the heavy industry that manufactures solar panels. Why would ypu ignore facts and repeatedly let me present the facts which makes your argument nothing more than ignorance.

Show us pics of where silica is made from quartz

Show us pics from where silica is turned to silicon

Show us pics from where silicon is turned into polysilicon
 

Forum List

Back
Top