There Is No Such Thing As "Science".....

PC Simple Slow proves she is incapable of critical thinking.
 
PC Simple Slow proves she is incapable of critical thinking.
Let's remind that you claimed that I was part of some anti-truth cult......and I produced 50+ lies and hoaxes from your party, every one of which you believed whole-heartedly.

So, once again, I proved that you side tells any thing but the truth.

Now, you buffoon, which of us belongs to the anti-truth cult?????



Which you like me to product those lies again?
 
We know you are anti critical and thinking and a member of the POT.

You are convicted.
 
We know you are anti critical and thinking and a member of the POT.

You are convicted.
Let's remind that you claimed that I was part of some anti-truth cult......and I produced 50+ lies and hoaxes from your party, every one of which you believed whole-heartedly.

So, once again, I proved that your side tells any thing but the truth.

Now, you buffoon, which of us belongs to the anti-truth cult?????



Which you like me to product those lies again?
 
Oh look, a flat earther.

I appreciate flat earthers who are skeptical about believing something just because they’ve been told.

If you believe in something, you should at least know how to prove it.
 
I'm agnostic as they come, and recognize that there's a significant body of science that leads us back to spirituality.

Tyson is a stone atheist, who seems to worship this tiny realm of the infinitesimally small bandwidths of light and sound, that we can see and hear.

569bd43997a4ee243d6d252c8bf00d11.jpg
Wolfgang Science

Heisenberg failed at creating an atomic bomb for his beloved Nazi Party.
 
I know you mean that as an insult but you don’t realize how wrong you are.

I suppose that’s the fault of the education system that emphasizes rote learning over critical thinking.

You can’t be blamed for thinking that way.
I know you think there's some kinda nobility in "questioning everything" but you couldn't be more wrong here.

It's just dumb in this case.
 
Let's remind that you claimed that I was part of some anti-truth cult......and I produced 50+ lies and hoaxes from your party, every one of which you believed whole-heartedly.

So, once again, I proved that your side tells any thing but the truth.

Now, you buffoon, which of us belongs to the anti-truth cult?????



Which you like me to product those lies again?
You are part of the post-truth world. Don't deny it.
 
You are part of the post-truth world. Don't deny it.
Let's remind that you claimed that I was part of some anti-truth cult......and I produced 50+ lies and hoaxes from your party, every one of which you believed whole-heartedly.

So, once again, I proved that your side tells any thing but the truth.

Now, you buffoon, which of us belongs to the anti-truth cult?????



Which you like me to product those lies again?
 
I said post-truth cult.

You produced some fifty lies from your side.

You almost never tell the truth.

SoSimpleChic is a hoot.
 
I know that, when I want a good opinion on science, I run to the first uneducated, anti intellectual fool I can find.

So here I am.
 
resigned in disgrace after launching a vulgar, profanity-laced diatribe against Trump voters


He was a big big supporter and pusher of Co2 FRAUD.

He hates Trump because Trump, hopefully THIS TIME, will appoint a patriotic American AG and that will end up with QUEEN in a MALE PRISON....
 
.....any longer.

In a recent OP (If You Have Learned Anything At All.....) I wrote about the editor of Scientific American having to resign after a vulgarity-laced rant about the Rigth.
I used it to point out that the Marxists/Democrats have destroyed any legitimacy the magazine, and, actually, science had (the Covid Scam to shut the economy to thwart Trump)>

Now, Bill Maher had Neil deGrasse Tyson on his show and ripped him a new one, holding him up as an example of what I said about 'science.'

I listened and didn't hear anything that can be described as Tyson "embarrassing himself" so what are you talking about? Nor did he mention economics or politics - not in that clip at least.
"As my esteemed colleague Chris Queen noted a few days ago, the editor of Scientific American — formerly a respected, apolitical scientific journal that’s been in publication since 1845 — resigned in disgrace after launching a vulgar, profanity-laced diatribe against Trump voters. Under her watch, Scientific American magazine, which had NEVER made a presidential endorsement before (because, as a scientific journal, why would they?), made their first two: In 2020 (for Joe Biden) and in 2024 (for Kamala Harris).
I don't see the problem here, you'll have to explain. Trump routinely makes derogatory posts and lies on his social media accounts and has been banned in the past for doing it.
But apologists like Neil DeGrasse Tyson don’t think it’s a big deal.
It isn't, at least I don't see what the problem is, perhaps you/someone can explain?
Think about that contradiction: Tyson has dedicated himself to educating people about science! He’s not a celebrity because of his academic work; solely on the basis of his academic work, he’s not a particularly remarkable scientist. Schoolchildren certainly won’t be reading biographies about him in 50 years. Instead, it’s his work as a “science popularizer” in media that’s earned him his fame, wealth, and oodles of royalties.
Yes, and?
Yet somehow, he’s oblivious to the perceptual dangers of Scientific American magazine adopting an anti-Trump partisan stance? Or reappropriating the credibility of “science” to promote partisan political views? Or for their editor to accuse half the country of being fascists?!"

Wake the heck up, Democrat voters.......it's a disease and you have been infected.
Again so what? Trump has said many more derogatory things than Tyson ever has and why should Tyson not express views simply because of his academic qualifications?

You make a large number of weird assumptions here, I doubt you're even aware of that.
 
Last edited:
I'm agnostic as they come, and recognize that there's a significant body of science that leads us back to spirituality.

Tyson is a stone atheist, who seems to worship this tiny realm of the infinitesimally small bandwidths of light and sound, that we can see and hear.

569bd43997a4ee243d6d252c8bf00d11.jpg
Neil Tyson is not an atheist, he's said this several times too in interviews, he regards himself as an agnostic:

 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom