The Great White Grift: How SC Turned School Vouchers Into a White Welfare Scam

No. Tell us what you think about DEI and Affirmative Action. The definition of racism is a belief in the superiority/inferiority based on race. Every argument against DEI, Affirmative action, the black family, black crime, etc., fits that definition.

“Plausible deniability is the ability to deny any involvement in illegal or unethical activities, because there is no clear evidence to prove involvement. The lack of evidence makes the denial credible, or plausible.”

Modern racism is a belief that reflects an underlying prejudice towards black and non-white people in the United States. The difference in contemporary racism from Jim Crow racism is that the attacks focus on a group’s culture instead of claiming genetic superiority. Modern racism is
primarily done online on social media. Modern racists will not express openly racist views. They believe racism is over and that racism is a thing of the past. Modern racism happens like this:

• Avoiding any meaningful contact with the minority group.
• Practicing racial discrimination when the circumstances allow it.
• Rather than criticizing a minority group, those with racist beliefs will attack a policy or action, and use that as an outlet for their attitudes.
• Making a distinction between groups in terms of their ‘values
I will accept your concession that you cannot find anything negative I said about either DEI or Affirmative Action.

Since you cannot, I will repeat what I have said earlier, DEI and Affirmative Action are great ideas for addressing past wrongs, but they must not be allowed to lower the quality of the work being produced. If black workers have been historically banned from working on bridges, by all means increase their number in the construction crews. This must not, however, reduce the quality of the bridges being built. If one collapses while my car is driving over it, I don't care what the ethnic makeup of the crews were, I care that my car is plummeting to the ground. If black people have historically been banned from becoming doctors, by all means increase the number of black doctors, but that must not be allowed to reduce the quality of medical care I receive. If my heart surgeon makes a fatal mistake in my surgery, I don't care what color his skin is, I'm dying.

Do you get the picture? Now, I have stated this position more than once, and since you cannot find anything I have stated to be racist, you must, if you have any integrity at all, admit that I am in fact not a racist.
 
I will accept your concession that you cannot find anything negative I said about either DEI or Affirmative Action.

Since you cannot, I will repeat what I have said earlier, DEI and Affirmative Action are great ideas for addressing past wrongs, but they must not be allowed to lower the quality of the work being produced. If black workers have been historically banned from working on bridges, by all means increase their number in the construction crews. This must not, however, reduce the quality of the bridges being built. If one collapses while my car is driving over it, I don't care what the ethnic makeup of the crews were, I care that my car is plummeting to the ground. If black people have historically been banned from becoming doctors, by all means increase the number of black doctors, but that must not be allowed to reduce the quality of medical care I receive. If my heart surgeon makes a fatal mistake in my surgery, I don't care what color his skin is, I'm dying.

Do you get the picture? Now, I have stated this position more than once, and since you cannot find anything I have stated to be racist, you must, if you have any integrity at all, admit that I am in fact not a racist.
The words in bold show your racism. You make these comments and really don't believe they ae racist. That is evidence of the psychosis on the right.
 
The words in bold show your racism. You make these comments and really don't believe they ae racist. That is evidence of the psychosis on the right.
Are you on record saying that it is acceptable to get lower quality work as long as we get a preferred ethnic makeup? That's not acceptable to most people. Would you be happy driving over a bridge built by less qualified workers, or have a less qualified doctor operating on you?

To put it another way, why is it racist to hold minorities to the same expectations as everyone else?
 
Are you on record saying that it is acceptable to get lower quality work as long as we get a preferred ethnic makeup? That's not acceptable to most people. Would you be happy driving over a bridge built by less qualified workers, or have a less qualified doctor operating on you?

To put it another way, why is it racist to hold minorities to the same expectations as everyone else?
Do you ever consider that less qualified whites were already doing those jobs? Qualifications never seem to enter the mind of the racist when it pertains to whites.
 
Why haven’t we seen a list of these 140 cops?

Why there isn’t a full list​

  • The total number of injured officers (about 140 across agencies) is known, but most names were never publicly released for privacy and safety reasons.
  • Different agencies were involved (United States Capitol Police and Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia), and no single official roster of injured officers has been published.
  • Even recent efforts to create an official honor list have been incomplete or disputed, with some officers missing from recognition lists.

What is publicly known​

While there’s no full list, some individual officers are publicly known because they spoke out, testified, or were highlighted in reporting:

  • Aquilino Gonell — injured and later retired due to those injuries
  • Harry Dunn — testified to Congress about the attack
  • Daniel Hodges — widely known for being crushed in a doorway
  • Michael Fanone — beaten and tased by rioters
And a few names have appeared in reporting about recognition lists or omissions, such as:

  • Samuel Mott
  • Jesse Leasure
  • Carlton Wilhoit III

Bottom line​

  • There is no complete public list of all injured officers.
  • Only partial lists and individual names are available through testimony, media coverage, and recent (still imperfect) memorial efforts.
.

Because it didn't happen.

.
LOLLOLL, every one of the 140 was injured worse than that coward that killed Good.
 

Why there isn’t a full list​

  • The total number of injured officers (about 140 across agencies) is known, but most names were never publicly released for privacy and safety reasons.
  • Different agencies were involved (United States Capitol Police and Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia), and no single official roster of injured officers has been published.
  • Even recent efforts to create an official honor list have been incomplete or disputed, with some officers missing from recognition lists.

What is publicly known​

While there’s no full list, some individual officers are publicly known because they spoke out, testified, or were highlighted in reporting:

  • Aquilino Gonell — injured and later retired due to those injuries
  • Harry Dunn — testified to Congress about the attack
  • Daniel Hodges — widely known for being crushed in a doorway
  • Michael Fanone — beaten and tased by rioters
And a few names have appeared in reporting about recognition lists or omissions, such as:

  • Samuel Mott
  • Jesse Leasure
  • Carlton Wilhoit III

Bottom line​

  • There is no complete public list of all injured officers.
  • Only partial lists and individual names are available through testimony, media coverage, and recent (still imperfect) memorial efforts.

LOLLOLL, every one of the 140 was injured worse than that coward that killed Good.

Pure fantasy. Just like the killed cops lie you believed.
 
15th post
Do you ever consider that less qualified whites were already doing those jobs? Qualifications never seem to enter the mind of the racist when it pertains to whites.
That is what I've been saying all along. If minority workers are superior, they should get the job. All being equal, increase minority representation. What is wrong with that?
 
Back
Top Bottom