The Great Ronnie God's Benghazi

[Stephanie]

Gotta cover the Dear Leaders ass, gotta cover the dear leaders ass

and they are going all the back to the 80.s and digging up a dead man to do it

how much more pathetic can they get?

 

[birddog]

Obama would not have got re-elected if he had not lied about Benghazi. He would have lost in a landslide if he had not also lied about Obamacare. Period!

 

[American4Americ]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

Yeah, Reagan did a cut and run. So what? Do radical lefties understand the political axiom that "the cover-up is worse than the crime"? If Hillary and B. Hussein had leveled with the people and admitted that they made a mistake they would have gotten away clean as Reagan. In Lebanon the Marines were blown up by a suicide bomber and it was over in an instant. In Benghazi they had a fighting chance for hours while the president ate pizza and watched it on TV. They blamed it on a freaking you tube video that nobody ever heard of including terrorists. That's where the cover-up comes in and then they tried a cover-up of a freaking cover-up.

The Iran-Contra scandal, along with many other scandals under the Reagan administrations were covered up.

However, most of them weren't scandals, inasmuch they patriotic defenses of America.

 

[Iceweasel]

Libs continuously lie about Benghazi. They lied about what led up to it, the response and now the cover up. No one but them claims the issue was solely about an attack on the embassy.

 

[Freewill]

since WJ Clinton lying is no longer a sin.

 

[Freewill]

Obama would not have got re-elected if he had not lied about Benghazi. He would have lost in a landslide if he had not also lied about Obamacare. Period!

I must disagree. With the economy the way it was he should have lost. With him admitting that Afghanistan was a failure, he should have lost. Benghazi was bad but Stevens was in a war zone and we didn't know he lied till after. But it wasn't the kind of lie to cost an election. Obama won only because he is black, starts out with a 47 percent lead and he was the incumbent.

 

[Sallow]

Yeah, Reagan did a cut and run. So what? Do radical lefties understand the political axiom that "the cover-up is worse than the crime"? If Hillary and B. Hussein had leveled with the people and admitted that they made a mistake they would have gotten away clean as Reagan. In Lebanon the Marines were blown up by a suicide bomber and it was over in an instant. In Benghazi they had a fighting chance for hours while the president ate pizza and watched it on TV. They blamed it on a freaking you tube video that nobody ever heard of including terrorists. That's where the cover-up comes in and then they tried a cover-up of a freaking cover-up.

What mistake did they make?

And what part of this is "leveling" with the American People?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow]Telling Lies - YouTube[/ame]

That was one traitorous lying motherfucking asshole.

And you guys are naming the entire country after him.

What mistake did "they" (Hillary and Hussein) make? You can't figure it out? First of all secretary of state Hillary underestimated the danger that the Benghazi embassy was in and the magic date 9/11 that might trigger an attack. It was her job to make sure embassies were defended. What really happens when you get iconic "2 am call"? Apparently Barry was paralyzed with indecision and the greatest Military in the world never got off the ground to help the Navy Seals and keep the Ambassador safe during a battle that lasted several hours. The worst part of course is the cover-up. Barry might have gotten away with it if he didn't order his staff to circulate a lie about an obscure you tube video that nobody ever saw. The cover-up used to be worse than the crime but when the media circles the wagons things are different.

Lets take a walk down memory lane, shall we?

Remember when Ronnie (Marine Barracks) Reagan accused Libya of being behind the German disco attack? And bombed Libya?

U.S. bombs Libya ? History.com This Day in History ? 4/14/1986

Turns out they weren't involved in that particular attack. In any case..he raised the stakes, right?

Then!

Pan Am Flight 103 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Boom.

What did Brave Ronnie Reagan do?

A whole lot of nothing.

Then?

George W. Bush?

How Libya Got Off the List - Council on Foreign Relations

Nice right? Normalize relations with a nation's who's leader was responsible for one of the worst terrorist attacks against the US.

Obama?

Gaddafi's dead.

But what did conservatives do the further that cause? They made a stink about it.

They cut funding for security.

And when something bad happened? They pointed the finger at the other guy.

Conservatives.

Make war on Americans.

 

[Sallow]

Obama would not have got re-elected if he had not lied about Benghazi. He would have lost in a landslide if he had not also lied about Obamacare. Period!

I must disagree. With the economy the way it was he should have lost. With him admitting that Afghanistan was a failure, he should have lost. Benghazi was bad but Stevens was in a war zone and we didn't know he lied till after. But it wasn't the kind of lie to cost an election. Obama won only because he is black, starts out with a 47 percent lead and he was the incumbent.

What a load of horseshit.

President Obama won because he was the better guy and the better American.

Romney and the conservatives placed their bets on repealing Obamacare and had everything riding on the Supreme Court case, which failed.

Then, Romney pulled one of the most despicable and anti-American acts (In keeping, by the way, with his Mormon Faith SEE: Utah War) and criticized a sitting American President during an ongoing terrorist attack. That's never happened. Hopefully it will never happen again.

The Conservatives lost because their alternative? Was to break everything.

Like they did under Bush.

 

[Sallow]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

Yeah, Reagan did a cut and run. So what? Do radical lefties understand the political axiom that "the cover-up is worse than the crime"? If Hillary and B. Hussein had leveled with the people and admitted that they made a mistake they would have gotten away clean as Reagan. In Lebanon the Marines were blown up by a suicide bomber and it was over in an instant. In Benghazi they had a fighting chance for hours while the president ate pizza and watched it on TV. They blamed it on a freaking you tube video that nobody ever heard of including terrorists. That's where the cover-up comes in and then they tried a cover-up of a freaking cover-up.

The Iran-Contra scandal, along with many other scandals under the Reagan administrations were covered up.

However, most of them weren't scandals, inasmuch they patriotic defenses of America.

Iran contra was no "patriotic defense of America".

It was a blatant attempt to fix an election and later to usurp Congressional Power.

It was a massive breach of the Constitution and an appalling act of treason.

Why Reagan was not impeached and removed from power will be one for the history book.

 

[The T]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

Bravoactual: FALSE Equivocation. Doesn't compare. Yeah Reagan pulled the troops out of there to PROTECT THEM...what did Obama do? Where was he? Where was Hillary?

And Reagan didn't lie...or tell people to lie. He didn't cover it up. He was honest. Obama? Not so much. Go ahead and DROWN in your sea of lies...

YOU FAIL.

JACKASS.

 

[BlindBoo]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

Yeah, Reagan did a cut and run. So what? Do radical lefties understand the political axiom that "the cover-up is worse than the crime"? If Hillary and B. Hussein had leveled with the people and admitted that they made a mistake they would have gotten away clean as Reagan. In Lebanon the Marines were blown up by a suicide bomber and it was over in an instant. In Benghazi they had a fighting chance for hours while the president ate pizza and watched it on TV. They blamed it on a freaking you tube video that nobody ever heard of including terrorists. That's where the cover-up comes in and then they tried a cover-up of a freaking cover-up.

Doesn't there have to be a crime first?

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/21/u...during-benghazi-attack-unacceptable.html?_r=0

The Security personal from the CIA Annex along with dozens of Libyans launched a counter offensive and drove the attackers away from the Consulate building while they searched and rescued everyone except for Stephens and Smith although Smith's body was recovered. Furthermore the unarmed surveillance drone had not arrived and had left by the time the response team arrived from Tripoli. So, no he didn't watch either.

You do know that there were many dozens of protest and riots over that very video.

 

[Avatar4321]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

Yeah, Reagan did a cut and run. So what? Do radical lefties understand the political axiom that "the cover-up is worse than the crime"? If Hillary and B. Hussein had leveled with the people and admitted that they made a mistake they would have gotten away clean as Reagan. In Lebanon the Marines were blown up by a suicide bomber and it was over in an instant. In Benghazi they had a fighting chance for hours while the president ate pizza and watched it on TV. They blamed it on a freaking you tube video that nobody ever heard of including terrorists. That's where the cover-up comes in and then they tried a cover-up of a freaking cover-up.

They are still trying to cover it up. that's the problem here.

 

[Avatar4321]

More flying monkey BS. How many times is this same mantra going to be posted?

Consider, there have been more then one attack on diplomatic facitities under Obama yet only one raises to the level of question.

Consider, that under Clinton we had Blackhawk down. No cry of investigation.

Consider under Obama the SEALS suffered their biggest loss of life when a helicopter was shot down. No call for investigation.

But Benghazi is different then all of the above and the unfortunate deaths under Reagan. No one is saying that it is Obama's responsibility for the detail of the on ground operations. No one is saying that Obama should have personally designed the protection for Steven's. What is being said is that he and Rice lied about the attack. When people lie they have something to hide.

In Benghazi people died and Obama lied, why? The truth would have worked just as well for him, if indeed we know the truth. So in my opinion Stevens was doing something Obama doesn't want us to know about, like running guns.

All that said, there is no comparison to any attack and Benghazi.

Consider..Clinton was impeached.

Consider..Reagan was not.

Consider..Clinton committed a crime.

Consider..Reagan did not.

 

[Dot Com]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

no argument from me. Pretty cut 'n dry.

 

[Faun]

There would be no investigation into Benghazi by Republicans if this were not an election year.

 

[Avatar4321]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

no argument from me. Pretty cut 'n dry.

Why would you argue? That would imply the ability to analyze the actual facts and care about the truth.

 

[whitehall]

What mistake did "they" (Hillary and Hussein) make? You can't figure it out? First of all secretary of state Hillary underestimated the danger that the Benghazi embassy was in and the magic date 9/11 that might trigger an attack. It was her job to make sure embassies were defended. What really happens when you get iconic "2 am call"? Apparently Barry was paralyzed with indecision and the greatest Military in the world never got off the ground to help the Navy Seals and keep the Ambassador safe during a battle that lasted several hours. The worst part of course is the cover-up. Barry might have gotten away with it if he didn't order his staff to circulate a lie about an obscure you tube video that nobody ever saw. The cover-up used to be worse than the crime but when the media circles the wagons things are different.

And yet...seven investigations and a year and a half later....no one found guilty of anything and not any charges against anyone. Surprise surprise.

Seven investigations. Just forty years after Watergate it's sad that you can't find a freaking "investigative journalist" in the whole junk yard. What do you get when government employees investigate themselves?

 

[BlindBoo]

Yeah, Reagan did a cut and run. So what? Do radical lefties understand the political axiom that "the cover-up is worse than the crime"? If Hillary and B. Hussein had leveled with the people and admitted that they made a mistake they would have gotten away clean as Reagan. In Lebanon the Marines were blown up by a suicide bomber and it was over in an instant. In Benghazi they had a fighting chance for hours while the president ate pizza and watched it on TV. They blamed it on a freaking you tube video that nobody ever heard of including terrorists. That's where the cover-up comes in and then they tried a cover-up of a freaking cover-up.

What mistake did they make?

And what part of this is "leveling" with the American People?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHXq8TRejow]Telling Lies - YouTube[/ame]

That was one traitorous lying motherfucking asshole.

And you guys are naming the entire country after him.

What mistake did "they" (Hillary and Hussein) make? You can't figure it out? First of all secretary of state Hillary underestimated the danger that the Benghazi embassy was in and the magic date 9/11 that might trigger an attack. It was her job to make sure embassies were defended. What really happens when you get iconic "2 am call"? Apparently Barry was paralyzed with indecision and the greatest Military in the world never got off the ground to help the Navy Seals and keep the Ambassador safe during a battle that lasted several hours. The worst part of course is the cover-up. Barry might have gotten away with it if he didn't order his staff to circulate a lie about an obscure you tube video that nobody ever saw. The cover-up used to be worse than the crime but when the media circles the wagons things are different.

There is no Embassy in Benghazi. Stephens knew the dangers he was facing and made the decision to travel to Benghazi himself. In case you didn't know the first thing the President did when he was informed of the attack was to order his commanders to use every available DoD asset to protect American lives.

 

[BlindBoo]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

Yeah, Reagan did a cut and run. So what? Do radical lefties understand the political axiom that "the cover-up is worse than the crime"? If Hillary and B. Hussein had leveled with the people and admitted that they made a mistake they would have gotten away clean as Reagan. In Lebanon the Marines were blown up by a suicide bomber and it was over in an instant. In Benghazi they had a fighting chance for hours while the president ate pizza and watched it on TV. They blamed it on a freaking you tube video that nobody ever heard of including terrorists. That's where the cover-up comes in and then they tried a cover-up of a freaking cover-up.

The Iran-Contra scandal, along with many other scandals under the Reagan administrations were covered up.

However, most of them weren't scandals, inasmuch they patriotic defenses of America.

Killing nuns and selling cocaine in the defense of America herself.

 

[whitehall]

Ronald Reagan's Benghazi : The New Yorker.

And what exactly did the great jeilly bean eater, the great taker of naps DO after the Marine Barracks Bombing....he did a CUT AND RUN.

No demands for investigations by Republicans.

No demands for why that b-movie actor turned pol did a cut and run.

Nothing.

Ronald Reagan...coward.

Yeah, Reagan did a cut and run. So what? Do radical lefties understand the political axiom that "the cover-up is worse than the crime"? If Hillary and B. Hussein had leveled with the people and admitted that they made a mistake they would have gotten away clean as Reagan. In Lebanon the Marines were blown up by a suicide bomber and it was over in an instant. In Benghazi they had a fighting chance for hours while the president ate pizza and watched it on TV. They blamed it on a freaking you tube video that nobody ever heard of including terrorists. That's where the cover-up comes in and then they tried a cover-up of a freaking cover-up.

What cover up? Are you saying that the Administration covered up Benghazi so we didn't know about it? Are you saying that the Administration covered up that THEY killed those 4 men?

Yes. The loonie tune you tube gambit was a result of the assumption by the Hussein administration that the media would go along with any propaganda issued from the regime. It probably came as a surprise that the American media wasn't as retro-nazi as the admin hoped it would be.