Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who says I'm pissed? BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!Keep trying to convince yourself, queer little girl. If that were even remotely true, you wouldn’t be so pissed off at this turn of event.If the dumb shits want to throw their money away to a hypocritical organization whose morals are in the gutter with Trump, that's up to them. It makes no difference to the gay customers who are getting the last laugh.
The last laugh is most definitely the free market entrepreneurs who are using the queer’s money to destroy the queers.
You should read the bible you pretend to defend. Divorcing and remarrying is adultery. I just quoted it for you above.Getting married isn’t “adultery”.Sure he did. When he remarried the second and third time!Trump didn't ask anyone to make him an adultery cake.
Your own posts say your pissed. Doesn’t take a PhD in psychology to see it.Who says I'm pissed? BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!
This is why the left should never discuss the Bible. The Bible says that remarrying is ok if your wife commits adultery. Do you have indisputable evidence that Ivana Trump never committed adultery?Divorcing and remarrying is adultery.
I read the U.S. Constitution in its entirety almost daily. I read small sections of the Bible daily.You pseuedocons who pretend to defend the bible and the constitution have never read either of them.
I've read the Constitution many times. That's why I am able to kick the ass out of tards who pretend to defend it.I read the U.S. Constitution in its entirety almost daily. I read small sections of the Bible daily.You pseuedocons who pretend to defend the bible and the constitution have never read either of them.
Meanwhile, you’re so profoundly ignorant of both, you don’t even know that Bible is capitalized.
I’ve got $10k right here and now that says you’ve never read the entire U.S. Constitution even once.
Nice end-around, Slick Willy. As I previously stated and am 100% correct on, I have $10k right here and now that says you have never read the entire U.S. Constitution.I've read the Constitution many times.I’ve got $10k right here and now that says you’ve never read the entire U.S. Constitution even once.
Winning!Now...where was I. Oh, yeah. The reality: "All proceeds from same sex marriage will be donated to supporting a prolific adulterer."
First of all, the federal law is 100% unconstitutional. That’s a simple, indisputable fact.What are you talking about? What heterosexual couple has demanded anything from the homosexual community? Most heterosexuals want nothing to do with the queer community.And yet it has been the law of the land for half a century that gays have been forced to serve Christians. That doesn't seem to bother you folks too terribly.
I'm talking about Federal law Rotty old boy. Federal laws since 1964. It is Federal law that no gay owned business can deny service to Christians based on the fact that they are Christians...but I don't see you starting thread after thread sniveling about the "godstapo".
Get that Federal law repealed before you go after state and local laws, Mr. "States Rights".
Second, that still doesn’t explain your bat-shit crazy comment. What heterosexual couple has demanded anything from the homosexual community? Give us a single example of when a homosexual-owned business was forced to enter into a business transaction against their will. You can’t. Because it has never happened.
And if it ever does happen in the future, I’ll be the first to come to the defense of the homosexual(s) that doesn’t want to enter into the business agreement. Private citizens on private property in the private sector have every constitutional right to deny service. Period. End of story. The U.S. Constitution says so.
This is why the left should never discuss the Bible. The Bible says that remarrying is ok if your wife commits adultery. Do you have indisputable evidence that Ivana Trump never committed adultery?Divorcing and remarrying is adultery.
I am not referring to them specifically with regard to tax. I am referring to Christian churches/organization's usage of 501C3. There is a reason behind this, as taxes may not be used to influence church actions for government, while at the same time limiting the amount of political speech coming from the pulpit, against it.Christians have themselves to blame. They were fine when the first civil right legislation included them. They were ecstatic with tax free status. Well, it all comes full circle doesn't it?
This is not a tax free business. They pay taxes like everyone else. They just don't get the same protections as other businesses that pay taxes.
The solution is certainly acceptable. I would go a step further and have couples sign a disclaimer that they understand and are willing to have their payment go to organizations that promote traditional marriage.
However, how many times have you heard churches complain about this restriction?
No, religious leaders lobbied and sought to have their religious freedoms free from discrimination. They sought and won 'accommodation'. Yet when other groups are playing the same game...
As the OP provides an example though, there is more than one way to skin a cat.
First of all, the federal law is 100% unconstitutional. That’s a simple, indisputable fact.What are you talking about? What heterosexual couple has demanded anything from the homosexual community? Most heterosexuals want nothing to do with the queer community.And yet it has been the law of the land for half a century that gays have been forced to serve Christians. That doesn't seem to bother you folks too terribly.
I'm talking about Federal law Rotty old boy. Federal laws since 1964. It is Federal law that no gay owned business can deny service to Christians based on the fact that they are Christians...but I don't see you starting thread after thread sniveling about the "godstapo".
Get that Federal law repealed before you go after state and local laws, Mr. "States Rights".
Second, that still doesn’t explain your bat-shit crazy comment. What heterosexual couple has demanded anything from the homosexual community? Give us a single example of when a homosexual-owned business was forced to enter into a business transaction against their will. You can’t. Because it has never happened.
And if it ever does happen in the future, I’ll be the first to come to the defense of the homosexual(s) that doesn’t want to enter into the business agreement. Private citizens on private property in the private sector have every constitutional right to deny service. Period. End of story. The U.S. Constitution says so.This is why the left should never discuss the Bible. The Bible says that remarrying is ok if your wife commits adultery. Do you have indisputable evidence that Ivana Trump never committed adultery?Divorcing and remarrying is adultery.
Gee, you'd think you Trump sucking sycophants should have been able to find Ivanna, Melania or Marla cheating on the homunculus orange blob then wouldn't they...but no. The only evidence of cheating is by spanky Donnie...and right after Melania gave birth too. What would Jesus say about that?
Who says that President Trump doesn’t have evidence of that? Why do you pretend like you know something that you couldn’t possibly have any way of knowing?Gee, you'd think you Trump sucking sycophants should have been able to find Ivanna, Melania or Marla cheating on the homunculus orange blob then wouldn't they...but no.
Jesus would literally say “let he who is without sin cast the first stone”. See, Jesus preached above all else that none of us have a right to judge. That is God’s responsibility and God’s responsibility alone.The only evidence of cheating is by spanky Donnie...and right after Melania gave birth too. What would Jesus say about that?
Against gay marriage? Not me.Well, that will teach them!
Funny as hell the people cheering on the govermethn picking and choosing winners and losers with tariffs are against this.
A person with consistent views would be opposed to both.
Against tariffs? Yes sir.
Against forcing businesses to enter contracts with anyone who demands a contract? That is wrong on many levels.
First of all, the federal law is 100% unconstitutional. That’s a simple, indisputable fact.What are you talking about? What heterosexual couple has demanded anything from the homosexual community? Most heterosexuals want nothing to do with the queer community.And yet it has been the law of the land for half a century that gays have been forced to serve Christians. That doesn't seem to bother you folks too terribly.
I'm talking about Federal law Rotty old boy. Federal laws since 1964. It is Federal law that no gay owned business can deny service to Christians based on the fact that they are Christians...but I don't see you starting thread after thread sniveling about the "godstapo".
Get that Federal law repealed before you go after state and local laws, Mr. "States Rights".
Second, that still doesn’t explain your bat-shit crazy comment. What heterosexual couple has demanded anything from the homosexual community? Give us a single example of when a homosexual-owned business was forced to enter into a business transaction against their will. You can’t. Because it has never happened.
And if it ever does happen in the future, I’ll be the first to come to the defense of the homosexual(s) that doesn’t want to enter into the business agreement. Private citizens on private property in the private sector have every constitutional right to deny service. Period. End of story. The U.S. Constitution says so.This is why the left should never discuss the Bible. The Bible says that remarrying is ok if your wife commits adultery. Do you have indisputable evidence that Ivana Trump never committed adultery?Divorcing and remarrying is adultery.
Gee, you'd think you Trump sucking sycophants should have been able to find Ivanna, Melania or Marla cheating on the homunculus orange blob then wouldn't they...but no. The only evidence of cheating is by spanky Donnie...and right after Melania gave birth too. What would Jesus say about that?
The difference is, there is no goverment regulation or law that says a business owner has to engage in adultery in order to stay in business. There are laws that say participation in gay marriage is mandatory to stay in business.
We warned you that would happen when you supported and worshipped Barack Insane Obama. You didn’t listen.Welcome to Orwell's 1984.
And yet here you are, dancing a jig in support of bigots who judge gays. Casting stones at gays like a wild man.Jesus would literally say “let he who is without sin cast the first stone”. See, Jesus preached above all else that none of us have a right to judge.
Yes my dear. That is absolutely ok. If you want to eliminate a large sector of potential customers, that is your business as a private owner.so it's ok to put a sign on a business saying "no blacks, no jews, no gays"?
