For those of you who have been holding out hopes that Hillary Clinton could be indicted through the criminal investigation currently being undertaken by the FBI... forget about it. It's not going to happen. The fix is in.
First of all, we have Bill Clinton meeting secretly (and unethically) with Loretta Lynch... shortly after blowing that off as a "casual coincidence" where nothing was discussed other than "grandchildren and such" --Lynch informs us that she will essentially do her job and follow the recommendations of the FBI. All of this follows Obama's rather late endorsement of Hillary Clinton as the presumptive Democrat nominee.
Putting two and two together, this means they have been given a heads-up by someone inside the FBI on what is about to go down and Hillary will be completely exonerated of any and all wrongdoing. Obama would never risk his legacy and name to endorse someone who stood any kind of chance of criminal indictment. Lynch would certainly not announce she planned to follow the recommendations of the FBI... unless they knew for a fact that Hillary was about to be let off the hook.
So... there will be no indictment, no special prosecutor and no further investigation into Hillary's emails or violation of the Espionage Act. It's all going to be dismissed, swept under the rug, and the left will discount it as just another right-wing smear attempt that failed. Like it or not, the fix is clearly in and that's what is about to go down.
Hate the smug look at her face these days. Thanks to her corrupt friends in high places and a bias media, she is untouchable no matter what she does. There is no question that she is guilty of deliberate and illegal use of a person server. That wasn't in question. So, there really is no excuse not to press charges. If she claims ignorance, then she's too stupid to be president.
She risked security and did something she was told not to do and that it was against the rules. She did it anyway because no one tells the Queen ***** what to do. She admitted that she did it, but pretended it was no big deal and told everyone to move on. Now, we have Bill Clinton meeting with the woman who has the final say in Hillary's fate. Whether he threatened her or whether they are just good friends, either way it doesn't bode well for justice. Lynch used the same deceptive language the Hillary campaign did when describing the FBI investigation. They say it was a "security inquiry." There is no such thing. It was an FBI criminal investigation. And there is no question that Hillary is guilty of mishandling sensitive information that put our country's security at risk. She did it for her own person convenience, which tells us that she puts her own needs ahead of the country. No surprise there. She also lied and refused to cooperate with the investigation. Only when the evidence was undeniable did she finally confess to going against the law and having a personal server to conduct official business. She dismissed it as a mistake and thinks that should end this.
Lynch should resign. Hillary should have dropped out of the race. A person with an iota of respect for the office would have done so. Hillary is all about herself, not this country.
Even the Benghazi investigation proved poor judgment on Hillary's part. There is likely more to this that she successfully kept covered up, but at the very least, she failed to do her job and there is no question she lied.
Accepting donations from foreign countries, who later received favors from Sec. of State Clinton showed more that bad judgment, it was treasonous to favor hostile countries.
She spent $6 Billion as Sec. of State and claims she lost the receipts.
She has accepted campaign donations from foreign countries, another law broken.
How many laws and rules is Hillary allowed to break? How many lies can she tell and still think she deserves to hold the highest office in our country? She is not worthy.
"Attorney General Loretta Lynch said her impromptu tarmac summit at Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport was a purely social affair. Golf and grandchildren were on the agenda, she said — and not how a home-brew server crammed with classified information ended up in Bill Clinton’s basement.
However, the attorney general normally doesn’t meet with family members of a target in an active FBI criminal investigation.
Hillary is just that — a target in an FBI criminal investigation.
But you’d never know that, listening to Lynch. She borrowed the narrative of the Hillary campaign when she described the FBI criminal investigation as a "security inquiry."
Downplaying the FBI criminal investigation is a deliberate communications strategy of the Clinton campaign. It’s a very bad sign that the person who must approve any grand-jury referral has adopted Hillary’s dishonest language.
Many won’t believe Lynch and Clinton only discussed grandkids and golf in her cozy jet. But I do.
That’s all they needed to discuss for Bill to interfere with a criminal prosecution. Sophisticated insiders don’t need to use clumsy and explicit language. Merely having the tarmac meeting interferes with the investigation, even if golf and grandkids were the only topics discussed.
The tarmac summit sent a signal. It is a signal to all of the hardworking FBI agents who have the goods on Hillary. The attorney general has made it clear what team she is on. The attorney general isn’t on the side of justice. She’s on the Democratic Party team.
This is the unspoken message from Lynch to all of the FBI agents on the case and to all the front-line lawyers at the Justice Department: When you send your recommendation to refer Hillary’s case to the grand jury, you had better realize your burden to convince me I should sign off on a grand-jury request is higher than you thought. These are my friends.
This is standard operating procedure in the Obama Justice Department. When DOJ lawyers were reviewing South Carolina voter-ID laws for pre-clearance under the Voting Rights Act, then-Attorney General Eric Holder gave an interview and speech about the discriminatory nature of voter-ID laws. Like day follows night, the lawyers responsible for the review then blocked South Carolina’s law under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.
It took South Carolina several million dollars in attorney fees to win a federal court case to gain approval — fees the state cannot recover.
I have never believed Hillary will be indicted, even though the case appears fairly easy to make. As I said on "The Kelly File," I suspect a county district attorney could win the case. For a
swarm of seasoned assistant United States attorneys? It seems like a slam dunk.
But that’s not what matters in the age of Obama. An indictment of Hillary would likely increase her popularity with Democrats. It’s Ken Starr all over again. Remember, Bill Clinton became more popular when he was under legal attack.
This saga involves two American values that perhaps are irreconcilable in this mess.
Criminal proceedings should not alter election outcomes. The Justice Department has long had such a policy where proceedings are delayed until after an election — that’s so America doesn’t come to resemble a third-world nation that criminalizes politics.
At the same time, the American ideal says nobody is above the law — even Hillary.
That’s what separates the Anglo-America legal experience from every other legal culture in world history.
This is a marriage of a Clinton-style carnival ride in an age of Obama-style lawlessness. The stars of "no controlling legal authority" are behaving badly in an age of "punishing your enemies and rewarding your friends."
That it is no longer about a dalliance with a White House intern and instead involves national security makes the gangsterism all the more frightening."
http://nypost.com/2016/07/01/how-much-longer-will-lynch-downplay-hillarys-emails/