Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And progressives ignoring the parts they don't like is so fucking much better.
The 2nd part does not rely on the 1st part. I have a RKBA that is not to be infringed. $1000 in fees and a 3-6 month wait period is infringement.
You are just cheap....millions of New Yorkers have guns
Not in NYC, and not handguns.
Again, how about we just tack on $100 for an abortion in fees, and add a 10 day wait period?
You need to stop being so cheap and just cough up the money
After Hillary gets her liberal court, you will have to join a militia to buy a gun
you didn't answer the question.
Hack.
Here is the uniform you can wear when Hillary's court makes you join a militia to buy guns. After all, you need to be well regulated
You are just cheap....millions of New Yorkers have guns
Not in NYC, and not handguns.
Again, how about we just tack on $100 for an abortion in fees, and add a 10 day wait period?
You need to stop being so cheap and just cough up the money
After Hillary gets her liberal court, you will have to join a militia to buy a gun
you didn't answer the question.
Hack.
Here is the uniform you can wear when Hillary's court makes you join a militia to buy guns. After all, you need to be well regulated
Running to argumentum ad absurdum as usual, dippy.
When have I ever posted about not wanting any government?
Not in NYC, and not handguns.
Again, how about we just tack on $100 for an abortion in fees, and add a 10 day wait period?
You need to stop being so cheap and just cough up the money
After Hillary gets her liberal court, you will have to join a militia to buy a gun
you didn't answer the question.
Hack.
Here is the uniform you can wear when Hillary's court makes you join a militia to buy guns. After all, you need to be well regulated
Running to argumentum ad absurdum as usual, dippy.
When have I ever posted about not wanting any government?
Better stock up on your guns....
The Hillary Court is going to be strict on the Constitution and require "Well regulated militias"
You need to stop being so cheap and just cough up the money
After Hillary gets her liberal court, you will have to join a militia to buy a gun
you didn't answer the question.
Hack.
Here is the uniform you can wear when Hillary's court makes you join a militia to buy guns. After all, you need to be well regulated
Running to argumentum ad absurdum as usual, dippy.
When have I ever posted about not wanting any government?
Better stock up on your guns....
The Hillary Court is going to be strict on the Constitution and require "Well regulated militias"
That would be the wrong interpretation of the amendment. State's have the right to form militias, the PEOPLE retain the right to keep and bear arms.
you didn't answer the question.
Hack.
Here is the uniform you can wear when Hillary's court makes you join a militia to buy guns. After all, you need to be well regulated
Running to argumentum ad absurdum as usual, dippy.
When have I ever posted about not wanting any government?
Better stock up on your guns....
The Hillary Court is going to be strict on the Constitution and require "Well regulated militias"
That would be the wrong interpretation of the amendment. State's have the right to form militias, the PEOPLE retain the right to keep and bear arms.
Don't you believe in a free state? Well regulated militias are necessary
But you will not be required to join a militia to buy guns. Of course, if you want a handgun or AR-15 you will need to be well regulated. Otherwise you can buy yourself a nice musket....just like our founders anticipated
Here is the uniform you can wear when Hillary's court makes you join a militia to buy guns. After all, you need to be well regulated
Running to argumentum ad absurdum as usual, dippy.
When have I ever posted about not wanting any government?
Better stock up on your guns....
The Hillary Court is going to be strict on the Constitution and require "Well regulated militias"
That would be the wrong interpretation of the amendment. State's have the right to form militias, the PEOPLE retain the right to keep and bear arms.
Don't you believe in a free state? Well regulated militias are necessary
But you will not be required to join a militia to buy guns. Of course, if you want a handgun or AR-15 you will need to be well regulated. Otherwise you can buy yourself a nice musket....just like our founders anticipated
Then I guess government should limit you to a printing press or your own voice when it comes to your free speech rights.....
and you can't take regulated from the first part, which applies to the militia, and the right of the States to have them, and apply it to the part where the PEOPLE retain the RKBA.
Running to argumentum ad absurdum as usual, dippy.
When have I ever posted about not wanting any government?
Better stock up on your guns....
The Hillary Court is going to be strict on the Constitution and require "Well regulated militias"
That would be the wrong interpretation of the amendment. State's have the right to form militias, the PEOPLE retain the right to keep and bear arms.
Don't you believe in a free state? Well regulated militias are necessary
But you will not be required to join a militia to buy guns. Of course, if you want a handgun or AR-15 you will need to be well regulated. Otherwise you can buy yourself a nice musket....just like our founders anticipated
Then I guess government should limit you to a printing press or your own voice when it comes to your free speech rights.....
and you can't take regulated from the first part, which applies to the militia, and the right of the States to have them, and apply it to the part where the PEOPLE retain the RKBA.
You are twisting the second amendment.
A liberal court will straighten you out
a more PROGRESSIVE STATIST america. you idiots left the classical liberal boat a long time ago.
No such thing as a classical liberal. Liberalism is a function of its time and the issues they face
Wrong. When one prefers government to enforce morality and thought, one cannot be liberal.
Government enforcing morality is not liberal?
Which world do you live in?
No, it is not classically liberal. Classic Liberalism encourages freedom of expression and thought. Modern progressive Statism (under the cover of the word liberal) does not.
Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties and political freedom with representative democracy under the rule of law and emphasizes economic freedom.[1][2]
Classical liberalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
No such thing as "Classical Liberalism"
The liberalism of our founders existed in the views and morals of the day.....nothing "classical" about it
They supported slavery, opposed the equal rights of women yet were still the greatest "liberals" of their day
A liberal court will mean
End of the death penalty
How? What cases now going through the lower courts?
End of Citizens United
They won't touch that case, the supreme court already ruled on it.
Rollback of Heller
At work, what's that
Protection of abortion rights
Who has been attacking them?
Protection of gay rights
Again gay marriage already legal.
I
Yes, that describes your arguments well, marty.You are just cheap....millions of New Yorkers have guns
Not in NYC, and not handguns.
Again, how about we just tack on $100 for an abortion in fees, and add a 10 day wait period?
You need to stop being so cheap and just cough up the money
After Hillary gets her liberal court, you will have to join a militia to buy a gun
you didn't answer the question.
Hack.
Here is the uniform you can wear when Hillary's court makes you join a militia to buy guns. After all, you need to be well regulated
Running to argumentum ad absurdum as usual, dippy. When have I ever posted about not wanting any government?
How the first liberal Supreme Court in a generation could reshape America
Dylan Matthews on August 22, 2016, wrote, in “How the first liberal Supreme Court in a generation could reshape America”, that “Odds are that very soon, the Supreme Court will become something it hasn’t been in nearly 50 years: made up of a majority of Democratic-appointed justices.
Ever since Abe Fortas’s resignation in 1969, the Court has either been split down the middle or, more often, made up primarily of Republican appointees. Some of those Republican appointees nonetheless turned out to be liberals, but even taking that into account, the Court hasn’t been majority liberal since 1971, when William Rehnquist and Lewis Powell joined. That hasn’t stopped the Court from evolving in a progressive direction at times. In 1973, GOP appointee Harry Blackmun authored Roe v. Wade, drawing only two dissents; from 1996’s Romer v. Evans to 2015’s Obergefell v. Hodges, Anthony Kennedy and the Court’s liberals steadily expanded the rights of LGBTQ Americans.
But for the most part, over the past half-century liberals have been playing defense as an organized and well-planned movement of conservatives has limited the scope of rights trumpeted by liberals, expanded the power of the state in criminal justice, and issued more business-friendly rulings on campaign finance and regulatory issues. The Court ruled that states didn't have to give poor black and Latino school districts the same funding as rich white districts. It ruled that school resegregation achieved through white flight to wealthy suburbs was just fine. It ruled that despite declaring abortion a fundamental right, that didn’t mean Medicaid had to extend that right to poor women, and then it reversed course on treating abortion as a fundamental right at all. It struck down the death penalty but then brought it back four years later.”
A new court appointed by Clinton might improve prison conditions, possibly stop executions permanently, enact finance campaign laws that would gut Citizens United. Abortion rights would be defended. It might defend voting rights and damage gerrymandering. The LGBT question would be put to rest for two generations.
All liberals love the Constitution.....we wrote itNo such thing as a classical liberal. Liberalism is a function of its time and the issues they face
Wrong. When one prefers government to enforce morality and thought, one cannot be liberal.
Government enforcing morality is not liberal?
Which world do you live in?
No, it is not classically liberal. Classic Liberalism encourages freedom of expression and thought. Modern progressive Statism (under the cover of the word liberal) does not.
Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties and political freedom with representative democracy under the rule of law and emphasizes economic freedom.[1][2]
Classical liberalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
No such thing as "Classical Liberalism"
The liberalism of our founders existed in the views and morals of the day.....nothing "classical" about it
They supported slavery, opposed the equal rights of women yet were still the greatest "liberals" of their day
There are still "classic" liberals that love the Constitution and have a innate distrust of power in govt. Don't mind the fixes to the Constitution DONE LEGALLY. They are called Libertarians. True story..
Most states already don't use the death penalty. Only Jesusland insists on itA liberal court will mean
End of the death penalty
How? What cases now going through the lower courts?
End of Citizens United
They won't touch that case, the supreme court already ruled on it.
Rollback of Heller
At work, what's that
Protection of abortion rights
Who has been attacking them?
Protection of gay rights
Again gay marriage already legal.
I
End of the death penalty
How? What cases now going through the lower courts?
End of Citizens United
They won't touch that case, the supreme court already ruled on it.
Rollback of Heller
At work, what's that
Protection of abortion rights
Who has been attacking them?
Protection of gay rights
Again gay marriage already legal.
You will get used to your militiaBetter stock up on your guns....
The Hillary Court is going to be strict on the Constitution and require "Well regulated militias"
That would be the wrong interpretation of the amendment. State's have the right to form militias, the PEOPLE retain the right to keep and bear arms.
Don't you believe in a free state? Well regulated militias are necessary
But you will not be required to join a militia to buy guns. Of course, if you want a handgun or AR-15 you will need to be well regulated. Otherwise you can buy yourself a nice musket....just like our founders anticipated
Then I guess government should limit you to a printing press or your own voice when it comes to your free speech rights.....
and you can't take regulated from the first part, which applies to the militia, and the right of the States to have them, and apply it to the part where the PEOPLE retain the RKBA.
You are twisting the second amendment.
A liberal court will straighten you out
I am reading it the right way. The People have the RKBA. Its actually very simple.
Ignorant and wrong.No such thing as a classical liberal. Liberalism is a function of its time and the issues they face
Wrong. When one prefers government to enforce morality and thought, one cannot be liberal.
Government enforcing morality is not liberal?
Which world do you live in?
No, it is not classically liberal. Classic Liberalism encourages freedom of expression and thought. Modern progressive Statism (under the cover of the word liberal) does not.
Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties and political freedom with representative democracy under the rule of law and emphasizes economic freedom.[1][2]
Classical liberalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
No such thing as "Classical Liberalism"
The liberalism of our founders existed in the views and morals of the day.....nothing "classical" about it
They supported slavery, opposed the equal rights of women yet were still the greatest "liberals" of their day
There are still "classic" liberals that love the Constitution and have a innate distrust of power in govt. Don't mind the fixes to the Constitution DONE LEGALLY. They are called Libertarians. True story..
Before we know it, he'll be bitching about how the militia is regulated, even though the constitution mandates it.You will get used to your militiaThat would be the wrong interpretation of the amendment. State's have the right to form militias, the PEOPLE retain the right to keep and bear arms.
Don't you believe in a free state? Well regulated militias are necessary
But you will not be required to join a militia to buy guns. Of course, if you want a handgun or AR-15 you will need to be well regulated. Otherwise you can buy yourself a nice musket....just like our founders anticipated
Then I guess government should limit you to a printing press or your own voice when it comes to your free speech rights.....
and you can't take regulated from the first part, which applies to the militia, and the right of the States to have them, and apply it to the part where the PEOPLE retain the RKBA.
You are twisting the second amendment.
A liberal court will straighten you out
I am reading it the right way. The People have the RKBA. Its actually very simple.
All liberals love the Constitution.....we wrote itWrong. When one prefers government to enforce morality and thought, one cannot be liberal.
Government enforcing morality is not liberal?
Which world do you live in?
No, it is not classically liberal. Classic Liberalism encourages freedom of expression and thought. Modern progressive Statism (under the cover of the word liberal) does not.
Classical liberalism is a political ideology and a branch of liberalism which advocates civil liberties and political freedom with representative democracy under the rule of law and emphasizes economic freedom.[1][2]
Classical liberalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
No such thing as "Classical Liberalism"
The liberalism of our founders existed in the views and morals of the day.....nothing "classical" about it
They supported slavery, opposed the equal rights of women yet were still the greatest "liberals" of their day
There are still "classic" liberals that love the Constitution and have a innate distrust of power in govt. Don't mind the fixes to the Constitution DONE LEGALLY. They are called Libertarians. True story..
