The fear of death within religion and ethics

[deorro 1]

The fear of death within religion and ethics does not lay within the fact that life passes into a sleep within The Lord to await the resurrection unto a life that has no more death. The fear of 'death' in this life does not exist within this reality.

The fear of death within this reality is that 'death' is brought on by an unagreed upon provider. Those who trust in God and The LORD and Christ Messiah as being the Providers for personal life, when 'time' arrives has much less 'fear to death' for this reason alone. They 'trust' in the ones whom they entrusted that 'trust' to... Especially when it comes to the 'time' of their own 'death', or 'falling asleep' in The Lord.

Fear does not live within these forms of trust just like when a loved family member is lying in a bed in a comfortable home near and being surrounded by the loved ones who never showed any form of treachery in their lives.... comfortable and reassuring to fall into sleep, into a sleep in which the wakening only occurs with every other 'awakening' on the entire planet, to feel safe and comfortable enough to close the eyes to say the final ''goodnight' until morning, God willing'.

Fear to and of death exists when these 'comfortablities', 'safeties' do not exist in the life.

The fear that one will have life taken by force, or by thievery or by crime or by intention or because of greed or because of envy... etc.... then fear to and of death exists because of the non agreed upon 'way/one' by whom personal death might be being arranged by. And if not with direct planning then with accidental chances or by and with random possibilities and probabilities. Within these randomness where there is no 'agreed' upon 'death' of personal life, is where the 'fear' to have life 'taken'; hence death, is lived with.


Unbeknownst to many are the 'deaths', the 'taking of lives' of those who were 'objects' to others' 'pranks' providing for unto their personal joys and amusements.


What does a sexual fetish do when being inhibited? It seeks to be satisfied, of course.


There is a vast wide difference, as in day and night, between 'fetish' and 'enslavement'.

Having a fetish is like a cognac drinker who can reserve his/her cognac pleasures of drink for certain occasions. Enslavement is like a cognac drinker who does not have reservations to his/her cognac 'personal times'.


So what is 'whoredom', 'sluttery'? Are these terms about 'reservations'? No. These terms are not about 'personal time joys'. These terms define 'addictions/enslavements' where within are dangers and possible 'deaths'/ or the taking away of lives.

But how would, how could an innocent 'daddy's princess' turn out to be in such whoreish, slutty, danger(s)? By becoming an addict to those 'pleasures'.

Sexual addiction is as real as any other physical and/or substance 'addiction' there is.


So before saying 'addiction' has nothing to do with anything, please look into the matter. When it was said in the past, 'what does meat have anything to do with anything', that was enough for many simple to gain understanding.


Maybe a better, clearer way of putting that question would be, 'what does animal life have to do with anything'..??


A rack of lamb or carré d'agneau is a cut of lamb cut perpendicularly to the spine, and including 16 ribs or chops. At retail, it is usually sold 'single', but may also be sold as a "double rack of lamb", with the ribs on both sides.

Wikipedia

However, one asks, 'prior or after 'death'/the taking of life''?


See with what large letters, the Apostle Paul says, can one 'hide' among and within a 'human population' of 'homo sapiens' who are without 'knowledge' and feel as though 'no wrong is being done'...


Why this 'struggle'?

Easy... The 'undesire' to have the personal 'eating' changed.

The 'undesire' to go from medium-rare steak, which has traces of 'blood' which The Holy Bible advises against, to well-done steak, which has very little, maybe no traces of 'blood' which The Holy Bible advises towards.



But what about 'rights' and freedoms?

Yes. What about my rights to do as I please?

True... and so the same applies to every U.S citizen, young ones included. So what about these infringements if they were to be 'restricted' as to what they could do, what they could watch, whom they could see, etc... ?

How would these NOT be restrictions to personal 'freedoms'?

By this fact. With the taking on of adult responsibilities of 'freedoms' even when still in the ages of 'minority', under 18, etc.. when these youths partake of these 'adult' freedoms reserved for U.S citizen adults, these youths begin to develop a brazenness within their lives and hearts that even their very own parents and relatives begin becoming 'afraid' of. With the perusing of pornographic material online as comfortably as any expert on pornography might go from one material to another, so these youths, because of the availabilities to such access, begin to become 'desensitized' to, to which their own behavior, their own mindsets, their own pursuits, their own demeanor, their own 'ways' of peace and non peace begins to effect the 'home life' they are residing in; even if and even though they might still be in their youth years and not even past the age of legal alcohol purchasing.

As far as the parents' might be held in consideration, their mindset might be, 'God forbid I should start a fist fight with little Billy'.

'Chivalry had died', so they say... and along with this has also died the treating of females as gentlemen and replaced with the brute forces of 'modern' realities of violences and needing to 'be real' to the 'reality' of 'pains', etc.... just like the need to be as 'real' to the 'realities' of declining intelligences and good standing graduation rates.

To each , I say, their own decision as to what they find more useful and valuable to life; to their own as well as to those near to them; in heart, in spirit and even in home.

... watch little Billy.. His mom is very concerned about his violent outbreaks he's been having; even towards her.. and her being a single mother with no other child might be a reason why their relationship is becoming 'brittle'. Sometimes you can hear her sing to herself..... 'why'....




The LORD and Holy God and Christ Messiah Are not pleased when such single mothers are filled with over anxieties to have their fragile faith be overly 'pressed' upon.

 

[Not2BSubjugated]

The fear of death within religion and ethics does not lay within the fact that life passes into a sleep within The Lord to await the resurrection unto a life that has no more death. The fear of 'death' in this life does not exist within this reality.

The fear of death within this reality is that 'death' is brought on by an unagreed upon provider. Those who trust in God and The LORD and Christ Messiah as being the Providers for personal life, when 'time' arrives has much less 'fear to death' for this reason alone. They 'trust' in the ones whom they entrusted that 'trust' to... Especially when it comes to the 'time' of their own 'death', or 'falling asleep' in The Lord.

Fear does not live within these forms of trust just like when a loved family member is lying in a bed in a comfortable home near and being surrounded by the loved ones who never showed any form of treachery in their lives.... comfortable and reassuring to fall into sleep, into a sleep in which the wakening only occurs with every other 'awakening' on the entire planet, to feel safe and comfortable enough to close the eyes to say the final ''goodnight' until morning, God willing'.

Fear to and of death exists when these 'comfortablities', 'safeties' do not exist in the life.

The fear that one will have life taken by force, or by thievery or by crime or by intention or because of greed or because of envy... etc.... then fear to and of death exists because of the non agreed upon 'way/one' by whom personal death might be being arranged by. And if not with direct planning then with accidental chances or by and with random possibilities and probabilities. Within these randomness where there is no 'agreed' upon 'death' of personal life, is where the 'fear' to have life 'taken'; hence death, is lived with.


Unbeknownst to many are the 'deaths', the 'taking of lives' of those who were 'objects' to others' 'pranks' providing for unto their personal joys and amusements.


What does a sexual fetish do when being inhibited? It seeks to be satisfied, of course.


There is a vast wide difference, as in day and night, between 'fetish' and 'enslavement'.

Having a fetish is like a cognac drinker who can reserve his/her cognac pleasures of drink for certain occasions. Enslavement is like a cognac drinker who does not have reservations to his/her cognac 'personal times'.


So what is 'whoredom', 'sluttery'? Are these terms about 'reservations'? No. These terms are not about 'personal time joys'. These terms define 'addictions/enslavements' where within are dangers and possible 'deaths'/ or the taking away of lives.

But how would, how could an innocent 'daddy's princess' turn out to be in such whoreish, slutty, danger(s)? By becoming an addict to those 'pleasures'.

Sexual addiction is as real as any other physical and/or substance 'addiction' there is.


So before saying 'addiction' has nothing to do with anything, please look into the matter. When it was said in the past, 'what does meat have anything to do with anything', that was enough for many simple to gain understanding.


Maybe a better, clearer way of putting that question would be, 'what does animal life have to do with anything'..??


A rack of lamb or carré d'agneau is a cut of lamb cut perpendicularly to the spine, and including 16 ribs or chops. At retail, it is usually sold 'single', but may also be sold as a "double rack of lamb", with the ribs on both sides.

Wikipedia

However, one asks, 'prior or after 'death'/the taking of life''?


See with what large letters, the Apostle Paul says, can one 'hide' among and within a 'human population' of 'homo sapiens' who are without 'knowledge' and feel as though 'no wrong is being done'...


Why this 'struggle'?

Easy... The 'undesire' to have the personal 'eating' changed.

The 'undesire' to go from medium-rare steak, which has traces of 'blood' which The Holy Bible advises against, to well-done steak, which has very little, maybe no traces of 'blood' which The Holy Bible advises towards.

I'm trying to decide if this is semi-standard vegan instanity, or if you've got a freezer full of dead prostitutes in a dingy cellar somewhere.

Nah, I kid, but it does kinda read like a schizophrenic's journal.

You're certainly correct in that people within our cultural paradigm could stand to eat a lot less meat than the average American meal portioning, but given what kosher slaughter looks like, I do have trouble believing that the old testament aversion to eating blood translates into the western meat addiction being an exceptionally sinful form of gluttony. But, gluttony is gluttony, so regardless of the fact that this screed is worded like something that came out of Kevin Spacey's composition notebook collection in Seven, I suppose you have a point.

 

[deorro 1]

Tell me if you've ever seen such..

if you notice; the ingredients are written in English and Spanish.. and the front, the side is in English only. Go figure... Strange, huh?

 

[deorro 1]

The fear of death within religion and ethics does not lay within the fact that life passes into a sleep within The Lord to await the resurrection unto a life that has no more death. The fear of 'death' in this life does not exist within this reality.

The fear of death within this reality is that 'death' is brought on by an unagreed upon provider. Those who trust in God and The LORD and Christ Messiah as being the Providers for personal life, when 'time' arrives has much less 'fear to death' for this reason alone. They 'trust' in the ones whom they entrusted that 'trust' to... Especially when it comes to the 'time' of their own 'death', or 'falling asleep' in The Lord.

Fear does not live within these forms of trust just like when a loved family member is lying in a bed in a comfortable home near and being surrounded by the loved ones who never showed any form of treachery in their lives.... comfortable and reassuring to fall into sleep, into a sleep in which the wakening only occurs with every other 'awakening' on the entire planet, to feel safe and comfortable enough to close the eyes to say the final ''goodnight' until morning, God willing'.

Fear to and of death exists when these 'comfortablities', 'safeties' do not exist in the life.

The fear that one will have life taken by force, or by thievery or by crime or by intention or because of greed or because of envy... etc.... then fear to and of death exists because of the non agreed upon 'way/one' by whom personal death might be being arranged by. And if not with direct planning then with accidental chances or by and with random possibilities and probabilities. Within these randomness where there is no 'agreed' upon 'death' of personal life, is where the 'fear' to have life 'taken'; hence death, is lived with.


Unbeknownst to many are the 'deaths', the 'taking of lives' of those who were 'objects' to others' 'pranks' providing for unto their personal joys and amusements.


What does a sexual fetish do when being inhibited? It seeks to be satisfied, of course.


There is a vast wide difference, as in day and night, between 'fetish' and 'enslavement'.

Having a fetish is like a cognac drinker who can reserve his/her cognac pleasures of drink for certain occasions. Enslavement is like a cognac drinker who does not have reservations to his/her cognac 'personal times'.


So what is 'whoredom', 'sluttery'? Are these terms about 'reservations'? No. These terms are not about 'personal time joys'. These terms define 'addictions/enslavements' where within are dangers and possible 'deaths'/ or the taking away of lives.

But how would, how could an innocent 'daddy's princess' turn out to be in such whoreish, slutty, danger(s)? By becoming an addict to those 'pleasures'.

Sexual addiction is as real as any other physical and/or substance 'addiction' there is.


So before saying 'addiction' has nothing to do with anything, please look into the matter. When it was said in the past, 'what does meat have anything to do with anything', that was enough for many simple to gain understanding.


Maybe a better, clearer way of putting that question would be, 'what does animal life have to do with anything'..??


A rack of lamb or carré d'agneau is a cut of lamb cut perpendicularly to the spine, and including 16 ribs or chops. At retail, it is usually sold 'single', but may also be sold as a "double rack of lamb", with the ribs on both sides.

Wikipedia

However, one asks, 'prior or after 'death'/the taking of life''?


See with what large letters, the Apostle Paul says, can one 'hide' among and within a 'human population' of 'homo sapiens' who are without 'knowledge' and feel as though 'no wrong is being done'...


Why this 'struggle'?

Easy... The 'undesire' to have the personal 'eating' changed.

The 'undesire' to go from medium-rare steak, which has traces of 'blood' which The Holy Bible advises against, to well-done steak, which has very little, maybe no traces of 'blood' which The Holy Bible advises towards.

I'm trying to decide if this is semi-standard vegan instanity, or if you've got a freezer full of dead prostitutes in a dingy cellar somewhere.

Nah, I kid, but it does kinda read like a schizophrenic's journal.

You're certainly correct in that people within our cultural paradigm could stand to eat a lot less meat than the average American meal portioning, but given what kosher slaughter looks like, I do have trouble believing that the old testament aversion to eating blood translates into the western meat addiction being an exceptionally sinful form of gluttony. But, gluttony is gluttony, so regardless of the fact that this screed is worded like something that came out of Kevin Spacey's composition notebook collection in Seven, I suppose you have a point.

Well... let me think... what might I not be getting across that is important to life; my life and life in general, correctly.

First, that the veganity is just as outdated as the virginity .. or something like that from the minds of the readers, possibly?

Second, the notion of death and vices being stored up nicely in freezers, much smaller and more compact than the refrigerator part, and fitly, as skeletons might be in personal closets.

Third, the idea that all these, together, form some kind of 'wrong' that the moralities of The Holy Bible, but not any Constitutional vast majority 'consensus', begins to 'rub' off on the 'majority', once again, wrongly for being 'contrary' to the 'majority' mindset of the current 'time and culture and acceptances' of the 'individuals' which The Holy Bible should NOT contradict as personal 'rights' to do so and be able to be 'comfortable' with... or something to this 'nature', although possibly only in hallucinogenic passing of cloud formations.

So, what am I not getting across as being important again?


Oh, right.. the fact that life is not only upon 2 legs with 2 feet with 5 toes on each foot. And that each life with 2 legs with 2 feet with 5 toes upon each foot usually have 'feet' and not 'paws'.

Most humans with paws use 4's to walk upon... well at least very periodically.

So if you're really going to put your paws up, baby, cuz you were born this way, you better lift all fours.... And here I've been, lost obviously, believing that the LGBT community were on the higher end of the intelligence spectrum...


If you're offended, then I also am offended by your lack of courtesy to my personal styles and opinions of normalcy; not necromancy.

Life was so much easier when the 'don't ask/don't tell' policy was in place. Not just the 'don't ask' but also the 'don't tell'. Discrimination law suits do not follow this example of 'don't ask/don't tell', obviously. But man....when 'friends' tell one another 'keep that stuff to yourself'... it's like... where the heck am I? In some kind of 'stranger's' 'house'?

To find a person or a group of persons who are truer to realities than personal pleasures; even to the point of going through a mile of hardship with the one(s) you daily 'hang out' with, is like finding gold. Sooner or later you can trade it in for the 'cash value' but until then, it is 'gold'.


So let's see... what am i missing here?

What am I trying to say within this one life of mine to whomever might be spending some of their daily minutes reading over someone else's hopes of getting important messages across... come in Scotty..

Exactly what I have just said... in the last sentence... in this 1 life of mine.. of and by which these words are being typed onto this page; however it is made possible in 'this' lifetime with this lifetime's available ways to do so. Computer types did not exist in the 60s as prevalently as they do today.

That in this life, given that the average life expectancy of a human being on Earth is approximately 76 years, give or take 5 or 6 or 7... etc... not to be overly precise to years; means......

that the grand finale of this life so wonderfully honed in on personal rights and values and arguments and law suits and battles and embitterments and 3 square meals, and other life forms and personal ways of handling each and every situation there is/are which is/are under the sun and the moon within each fabric day of each life; not just mine with my personal fashion statements and purchases, is..... are you ready ? ......


665,760 hours lived.


Now divide these hours by 24, and you will find that the mathematical equation which aimed to show the number of years that would be was more correctly formulated than randomly picked out; as in some theory of relativity; to and of which, the next portion of this discussion shall be upon; deemingly only if it gets there; God willing.

 

[harmonica]

jesus christ---why don't you put some more in there??!!
..believers fear death just as much as anyone else
..I'm a non-believer --I don't fear death at all

 

[james bond]

I'm a non-believer --I don't fear death at all

The truth is we have supernatural life which God gave to everyone of us. Thus, there is no spiritual death. Only physical death, but with the second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, you are joined again with your spiritually dead (loss of spiritually perfect body) and physical body for atheists. I don't think it's fear so much as everyone seeing proof of God and then experiencing Judgement Day. The rest is metaphor except for Rapture, so we do not know exactly what happens.

 

[fncceo]

The only people who fear death are those who have never lived.

 

[harmonica]

I'm a non-believer --I don't fear death at all

The truth is we have supernatural life which God gave to everyone of us. Thus, there is no spiritual death. Only physical death, but with the second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, you are joined again with your spiritually dead (loss of spiritually perfect body) and physical body for atheists. I don't think it's fear so much as everyone seeing proof of God and then experiencing Judgement Day. The rest is metaphor except for Rapture, so we do not know exactly what happens.

..we've been waiting for the 2nd coming for 2 THOUSAND years!!!! and you still think it will happen???!!!

 

[james bond]

I'm a non-believer --I don't fear death at all

The truth is we have supernatural life which God gave to everyone of us. Thus, there is no spiritual death. Only physical death, but with the second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, you are joined again with your spiritually dead (loss of spiritually perfect body) and physical body for atheists. I don't think it's fear so much as everyone seeing proof of God and then experiencing Judgement Day. The rest is metaphor except for Rapture, so we do not know exactly what happens.

..we've been waiting for the 2nd coming for 2 THOUSAND years!!!! and you still think it will happen???!!!

We do not know when, but will have to be ready for it as much as we can. We will try and be ready, but may not be ready when it actually happens.

Lol. You waited 4.5 billion years and abiogenesis has not happened. Macroevolution has not happened. You've been searching for aliens for about seventy five years and now people are beginning to think SETI is pseudoscience. You got until 2025 until the Russian billionaire quits. He was working with Stephen Hawking, but Hawking died without seeing alien life. NASA plans for Mars have become a joke. We won't be able to colonize Mars. We probably won't be able to colonize the moon. The best we can do is live on a space station. That could be a sign if the astronauts on the station have to return to Earth. That's just my guess.