What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The FBI and Twitter BS

Lastamender

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
42,557
Reaction score
35,472
Points
3,600
You say that about every election you don't like the results of.

The FBI investigated. It found jackshit that would have changed the outcome. You ignored that too.
The Democrats have been doing it from 2000. every time they lost. Goldfish memory and the biggest organized fraud machine, a pair to draw to.
 

Skylar

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
44,489
Reaction score
10,213
Points
2,030
The Democrats have been doing it from 2000. every time they lost. Goldfish memory and the biggest organized fraud machine. a pair to draw to.

Or, you haven't liked the outcome of these elections. So you imagine elaborate conspiracies for them too.

You really need to expand your primary sources beyond Gateway Pundit and Alex Jones.
 

Markle

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Messages
26,552
Reaction score
8,855
Points
910
Location
Tallahassee, FL

That the FBI, fooled around with Twitter to suppress a nothing story about Hunter Biden is, and always has been, conspiracy seeking Fox News BS, and this article proves it! Elon Musk and his right wing Republican cohorts, with no proof, are looking for evidence against Hunter Biden.

Well, guess what guys; now you got to look elsewhere for a red herring you can actually sell!

Bigly!!!
Don't you wish! Are you this desperate?

Really%20rotfl-M.gif
 

Markle

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Messages
26,552
Reaction score
8,855
Points
910
Location
Tallahassee, FL
So you have no evidence of force or threat.

Got it.
Why would they need force? The major social platforms and legacy media did not want to run the story anyway. The New York Post runs the article and the Democrats flip out and go to their friends at the FBI and other agencies and tell them that news has to be buried.

Even the FBI admits to having advised everyone that the story was bogus, part of a Russian disinformation campaign. Twitter and the rest think they have died and gone to heaven.

You know the information is 100% true but you are just as desperate as the other Democrats. If that news became public and validated, the Democrat party is toast.

Why not resort to being honest?

"Putting It All Together: Looking at all eight of these issues together, our poll found that a total of 17% of Biden’s voters told us they would have changed their vote if they had been aware of one or more of these important stories."

Here's How Many Biden Voters Who Would Have Bolted from Joe If the Media Did Their Job
 
Last edited:

Skylar

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
44,489
Reaction score
10,213
Points
2,030
Why would they need force? The major social platforms and legacy media did not want to run the story anyway. The New York Post runs the article and the Democrats flip out and go to their friends at the FBI and other agencies and tell them that news has to be buried.

Even the FBI
Without mandatory compliance, there are merely requests.....and say, Twitter, choosing to honor those requests. Or not.

That's not a 1st amendment violation
 

SweetSue92

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Messages
25,737
Reaction score
19,840
Points
2,415
Location
USA
Without mandatory compliance, there are merely requests.....and say, Twitter, choosing to honor those requests. Or not.

That's not a 1st amendment violation

Fascinating, and good to know.

So when school resumes, when I say to my students, "It's time for prayer", that's a "mere request" and not a violation. Because you know, the students can decline the request.

Huh. Who knew?
 

Skylar

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
44,489
Reaction score
10,213
Points
2,030
Fascinating, and good to know.

So when school resumes, when I say to my students, "It's time for prayer", that's a "mere request" and not a violation. Because you know, the students can decline the request.

Huh. Who knew?

Is Twitter a part of the government?

For your analogy to work, it would have to be.
 

SweetSue92

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Messages
25,737
Reaction score
19,840
Points
2,415
Location
USA
Is Twitter a part of the government?

For your analogy to work, it would have to be.

Okay, I'll entertain that. I'll have my pastor come and lead the prayer. No problem there, right? I'm a govt employee who gave permission and access, but he's not so...all good.

Gosh. It's a new day in America.
 

Skylar

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
44,489
Reaction score
10,213
Points
2,030
Okay, I'll entertain that. I'll have my pastor come and lead the prayer. No problem there, right? I'm a govt employee who gave permission and access, but he's not so...all good.

Gosh. It's a new day in America.

At a school, yes? The location where all of this is taking place is a government building. You're going to use class time, on the clock, to promote your religion to public school kids.

Is Twitter part of the government? Because if it isn't, your entire analogy collapses.

Try again.
 

SweetSue92

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Messages
25,737
Reaction score
19,840
Points
2,415
Location
USA
At a school, yes? The location where all of this is taking place is a government building. You're going to use class time, on the clock, to promote your religion to public school kids.

Is Twitter part of the government? Because if it isn't, your entire analogy collapses.

Try again.

Oh so the govt can strongarm its way into any private business and infringe on the Bill of Rights? It's okay because the entities are private?

I don't think so pal.
 

Skylar

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
44,489
Reaction score
10,213
Points
2,030
Oh so the govt can strongarm its way into any private business and infringe on the Bill of Rights? It's okay because the entities are private?

I don't think so pal.

So no, Twitter isn't the government.

And your entire analogy goes 'poof'.

That was easy.
 

Markle

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Messages
26,552
Reaction score
8,855
Points
910
Location
Tallahassee, FL
Without mandatory compliance, there are merely requests.....and say, Twitter, choosing to honor those requests. Or not.

That's not a 1st amendment violation
Obviously, comprehension isn't one of your strong suits. That's okay, for some reason, that a very common shortcoming among Democrats.
 

Skylar

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
44,489
Reaction score
10,213
Points
2,030
Obviously, comprehension isn't one of your strong suits. That's okay, for some reason, that a very common shortcoming among Democrats.

Yawning.....note you don't actually disagree with me.

I'll be around if you ever manage to.
 

SweetSue92

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2018
Messages
25,737
Reaction score
19,840
Points
2,415
Location
USA
So no, Twitter isn't the government.

And your entire analogy goes 'poof'.

That was easy.

So amazingly there's no such thing as intimidation anymore? So when, say, the Black Panthers show up at the polls--or the Proud Boys--that's okay because voters can still freely choose what to do?

Same with Twitter, right? Being overrun with every alphabet govt goon org is fine because it's a "free" organization?

hahahah no
 

Uncensored2008

Libertarian Radical
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2011
Messages
110,434
Reaction score
39,458
Points
2,250
Location
Behind the Orange Curtain

Uncensored2008

Libertarian Radical
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2011
Messages
110,434
Reaction score
39,458
Points
2,250
Location
Behind the Orange Curtain
Is Twitter a part of the government?

For your analogy to work, it would have to be.
Is the STASI part of government?

Because Biden's STASI paid twitter to censor stories.
 
Last edited:

💲 Amazon Deals 💲

Forum List

Top