The Epstein Files

[dudmuck]

Yet no provable mention of anything implicating Him breaking the law.
Why's that?

Other pedophiles now?


Explain supress.


The dems are using to derail His presidency just like moves they did in 45.


Maybe go read the law and figure it out yourself.

 

[Delldude]

Why were His and other's redacted?

Links please.

 

[jc456]

If the name is redacted, how’d you know who it was?

You have a conundrum

 

[markef]

You wouldn't be wrong.

But let's not pretend Republicans are above reproach, either.

Let's also not pretend that democrats care anything at all about bringing justice to Epstein victims. Democrats prove by their actions and words that they only want to see if the Epstein documents can finally provide them something with which to finally take down Trump.

 

[jc456]

Let's also not pretend that democrats care anything at all about bringing justice to Epstein victims. Democrats prove by their actions and words that they only want to see if the Epstein documents can finally provide them something with which to finally take down Trump.

Just remember, democrats know the names of those redacted! Hilarious

 

[markef]

Just remember, democrats know the names of those redacted! Hilarious

They know all the names in the files, but they are not interested in any name but Trump's and that is what they continue searching for in vain.

 

[krichton]

He only fought tooth and nail in your head. He had reservations about innocent people being hurt by the release and he's been right.

Innocent pedophiles you mean. Name one innocent perp hurt by the Epstein files. I'll wait.

as required by the law

The law requires that victims's names be redacted not the people committing the crimes!

Gee, i wonder why.

No need to wonder, we already know why. It's currently molting in the oval office.

What have you learned in the 3 million that you didn't know from the prior releases? And the other 3 million are available to your congress critters. They can be researched by you congresscritters.

Sorry Patrick, but there is no there there

A number of powerful people have been outed, including Trump. Thing is, hundreds of thousands of pages have been redacted. We're not just talking a name here and there to protect a victim, we're talking whole pages. Even congress cannot view these. You don't consider this a major coverup? You don't consider it a coverup when the DOJ is refusing to release nearly half the files? How do you research pages that are completely black? How do you research something that the DOJ is refusing to release, even under the law? What would you be saying if the Biden administration were doing all of this? Hmmm.

 

[Delldude]

The law requires that victims's names be redacted not the people committing the crimes!

If crimes have been committed, why hasn't Massie outed them?

Thing is, hundreds of thousands of pages have been redacted. We're not just talking a name here and there to protect a victim, we're talking whole pages. Even congress cannot view these. You don't consider this a major coverup?

The law Massie and Ro Khanna created stipulates every redaction has to be supported with an explanation and then published in the federal register.

So where's Massies investigation if Congress can't see these?

 

[Rawley]

Innocent pedophiles you mean. Name one innocent perp hurt by the Epstein files. I'll wait.



The law requires that victims's names be redacted not the people committing the crimes!



No need to wonder, we already know why. It's currently molting in the oval office.



A number of powerful people have been outed, including Trump. Thing is, hundreds of thousands of pages have been redacted. We're not just talking a name here and there to protect a victim, we're talking whole pages. Even congress cannot view these. You don't consider this a major coverup? You don't consider it a coverup when the DOJ is refusing to release nearly half the files? How do you research pages that are completely black? How do you research something that the DOJ is refusing to release, even under the law? What would you be saying if the Biden administration were doing all of this? Hmmm.

Name one person, ONE, that you have credible evidence of pedophilia that you've fond in these files. ONE.

 

[jc456]

Let's also not pretend that democrats care anything at all about bringing justice to Epstein victims. Democrats prove by their actions and words that they only want to see if the Epstein documents can finally provide them something with which to finally take down Trump.

Democrats are letting illegals who abuse 8 year olds off by dismissing charges! Know this

 

[dblack]

Name one person, ONE, that you have credible evidence of pedophilia that you've fond in these files. ONE.

Still shillin'?

I wonder if you'll wake up some day and say to yourself, 'Jesus ******* christ - what have I done?'

 

[jc456]

Still shillin'?

I wonder if you'll wake up some day and say to yourself, 'Jesus ******* christ - what have I done?'

So your answer is no!! So you have no evidence to support your claim

There’s this

 

[Delldude]

Still shillin'?

Nah, still waiting on you and Massie.

 

[Rawley]

Still shillin'?

I wonder if you'll wake up some day and say to yourself, 'Jesus ******* christ - what have I done?'

Still throwing your feces against the wall?

Name one person, ONE, that you have credible evidence of pedophilia that you've fond in these files. ONE.

 

[krichton]

If crimes have been committed, why hasn't Massie outed them?


The law Massie and Ro Khanna created stipulates every redaction has to be supported with an explanation and then published in the federal register.

So where's Massies investigation if Congress can't see these?

Six names have been outed so far, which had been redacted previously

An explanation doesn't have to be valid, they just have to give one.

 

[jc456]

Six names have been outed so far, which had been redacted previously

An explanation doesn't have to be valid, they just have to give one.

Names with sexual abuse to minors?
Haaaaaaaaaahaha suuuurrrrree

You remain a sheep

 

[Delldude]

An explanation doesn't have to be valid, they just have to give one.

Cut the bullshit.

(2) All redactions must be accompanied by a written jus-
tification published in the Federal Register and submitted to
Congress.

(3) To the extent that any covered information would oth-
erwise be redacted or withheld as classified information under
this section, the Attorney General shall declassify that classi-
fied information to the maximum extent possible.

(A) If the Attorney General makes a determination
that covered information may not be declassified and made
available in a manner that protects the national security
of the United States, including methods or sources related
to national security, the Attorney General shall release an
unclassified summary for each of the redacted or withheld
classified information.

(4) All decisions to classify any covered information after
July 1, 2025 shall be published in the Federal Register and
submitted to Congress, including the date of classification, the
identity of the classifying authority, and an unclassified sum-
mary of the justification.

SEC. 3. REPORT TO CONGRESS.
Within 15 days of completion of the release required under
Section 2, the Attorney General shall submit to the House and Sen-
ate Committees on the Judiciary a report listing:
(1) All categories of records released and withheld.
(2) A summary of redactions made, including legal basis.
(3) A list of all government officials and politically exposed
persons named or referenced in the released materials, with no
redactions permitted under subsection (b)(1)

 

[krichton]

Name one person, ONE, that you have credible evidence of pedophilia that you've fond in these files. ONE.

Prince Andrew has already been arrested, although for different reasons, but what the files revealed is that he sent in email to Maxwell asking if she had any "new inappropiate friends" for him. That's of course on top of what we know about him and how he was sued by Virginia Guiffre for sexually abusing her as a minor and won. Sultan Sulayem was exposed for saying he loved "Epstein's torture video." Les Wexner has been revealed as an Epstein co conspirator by the FBI in 2019.

It's amazing how sick in the head every Magat on this forum is for running cover for Epstein's child sex ring after spending years screaming about child sex rings.

 

[krichton]

Cut the bullshit.

(2) All redactions must be accompanied by a written jus-
tification published in the Federal Register and submitted to
Congress.

(3) To the extent that any covered information would oth-
erwise be redacted or withheld as classified information under
this section, the Attorney General shall declassify that classi-
fied information to the maximum extent possible.

(A) If the Attorney General makes a determination
that covered information may not be declassified and made
available in a manner that protects the national security
of the United States, including methods or sources related
to national security, the Attorney General shall release an
unclassified summary for each of the redacted or withheld
classified information.

(4) All decisions to classify any covered information after
July 1, 2025 shall be published in the Federal Register and
submitted to Congress, including the date of classification, the
identity of the classifying authority, and an unclassified sum-
mary of the justification.

SEC. 3. REPORT TO CONGRESS.
Within 15 days of completion of the release required under
Section 2, the Attorney General shall submit to the House and Sen-
ate Committees on the Judiciary a report listing:
(1) All categories of records released and withheld.
(2) A summary of redactions made, including legal basis.
(3) A list of all government officials and politically exposed
persons named or referenced in the released materials, with no
redactions permitted under subsection (b)(1)

People's names have been redacted and hidden in the files, "for no apparent reason." This has been revealed by the House Committe on Oversight. Cut the bullshit indeed. What you're citing is expectation, not the reality. Let's not be so naive.

 

[Rawley]

Prince Andrew has already been arrested, although for different reasons, but what the files revealed is that he sent in email to Maxwell asking if she had any "new inappropiate friends" for him. That's of course on top of what we know about him and how he was sued by Virginia Guiffre for sexually abusing her as a minor and won. Sultan Sulayem was exposed for saying he loved "Epstein's torture video." Les Wexner has been revealed as an Epstein co conspirator by the FBI in 2019.

And the reason your vegetable God didn't prosecute Prince Andrew, Sultan Sulayem and Les Wexner? Serious question. Please answer seriously

It's amazing how sick in the head every Magat on this forum is for running cover for Epstein's child sex ring after spending years screaming about child sex rings.

You poopyhead.