The Epstein Files

[Rawley]

Did Trump happily release those files or did he fight tooth and nail to keep them from being released and was only forced to when they became veto proof after both chambers of congress voted in favor of the bill and the Senate approved? Once you learn your facts things become much clearer.

He only fought tooth and nail in your head. He had reservations about innocent people being hurt by the release and he's been right.

Even the stuff that has been released is heavily redacted.

as required by the law
[/quote] We're talking hundreds of thousands of files, in order to the names of pedophiles in there. Btw, only 3 plus million have been released, not 6 million. The DOJ is refusing to release the rest. Gee, i wonder why.
[/QUOTE]
What have you learned in the 3 million that you didn't know from the prior releases? And the other 3 million are available to your congress critters. They can be researched by you congresscritters.

Sorry Patrick, but there is no there there

 

[georgephillip]

so? what would the savings be today?

For whom, all 13 colonies?

Thirteen Colonies - Wikipedia

 

[georgephillip]

which is why it continues to incrementally increase

Trump seems to be stretching the accepted definition of "incremental?"

"President Donald Trump has proposed a massive Fiscal Year 2027 defense budget of \(\$1.5\) trillion.

"This historic plan—which includes a nearly 42% surge over previous funding levels—prioritizes major expansions in naval shipbuilding, the 'Golden Dome' missile shield, and troop pay raises, while seeking a 10% cut in non-defense programs."

GoogleAI Overciew''

https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/R...eases-the-presidents-fiscal-year-2027-budget/

 

[Frankeneinstein]

For whom, all 13 colonies?

No, for the U.S. today...the savings premise is yours from 1991 till today, I wanted you to give us the savings if it was from 1776...GEEZ-O-PETES, can anyone deny the folly of social education?, this is so simple and you are fumbling it like a logic puzzle.

 

[georgephillip]

No, for the U.S. today...the savings premise is yours from 1991 till today, I wanted you to give us the savings if it was from 1776...GEEZ-O-PETES, can anyone deny the folly of social education?, this is so simple and you are fumbling it like a logic puzzle.

Does your question serve a logical purpose or is it simply a crude attempt at deflection?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Trump seems to be stretching the accepted definition of "incremental?"

well, yes, but not the point.

"President Donald Trump has proposed a massive Fiscal Year 2027 defense budget of \(\$1.5\) trillion.

"This historic plan—which includes a nearly 42% surge over previous funding levels—prioritizes major expansions in naval shipbuilding, the 'Golden Dome' missile shield, and troop pay raises, while seeking a 10% cut in non-defense programs."

GoogleAI Overciew''

and nothing to do with your '1991' claim

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Does your question serve a logical purpose or is it simply a crude attempt at deflection?

it directly follows your 1991 claim, use that as a guideline to determine your answer

 

[georgephillip]

it directly follows your 1991 claim, use that as a guideline to determine your answer

For what logical purpose?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

For what logical purpose?

not a question a logical person need ask but ok...so you can see where the origin of failure in logic stems from.

 

[georgephillip]

well, yes, but not the point.

and nothing to do with your '1991' claim

A direct comparison between US defense spending in 1991 with Fiscal Year 2027 projections has everything to do with the current discussion.

https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/R...eases-the-presidents-fiscal-year-2027-budget/

"The Department of War (DoW) today released President Donald J. Trump's Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27) Defense Budget, which asks for a generational investment of $1.5 trillion to unleash the American Arsenal of Freedom, marking a 42% increase over current funding levels."

 

[Frankeneinstein]

A direct comparison between US defense spending in 1991 with Fiscal Year 2027 projections has everything to do with the current discussion.

and nothing to do with how much we would have saved if it were from 1776

https://www.war.gov/News/Releases/R...eases-the-presidents-fiscal-year-2027-budget/

"The Department of War (DoW) today released President Donald J. Trump's Fiscal Year 2027 (FY27) Defense Budget, which asks for a generational investment of $1.5 trillion to unleash the American Arsenal of Freedom, marking a 42% increase over current funding levels."

Why are you telling me this? has nothing to do with my question

 

[BackAgain]

Imagine this:

US defense spending levels support a zone of global terror that could not have been imagined in 1776 (even by slave-owners)

You are incredibly simplistic.

 

[beagle9]

I rarely see democrats clamoring for democrats to be prosecuted for the crimes exposed in the Epstein files.

It's only about taking Trump down and nothing else. Hell many Democrats are engaging in abominable things without any conscious or morals considered, but Trump trying to do the right thing for the vast majority of Americans is a betrayal after thinking that Trump joined the team back in his hollyweird days when on the Apprentice, and supposedly enjoying the same spoils and celebrity status the left was indulging themselves in after selling their souls.

 

[beagle9]

Does your question serve a logical purpose or is it simply a crude attempt at deflection?

Why don't you get back on topic..

 

[Delldude]

Yeah you’re happy about pedos not being prosecuted.

 

[jc456]

Stop crying.

When you wish upon a star hey cricket

 

[JWBooth]

 

[jc456]

Yeah you’re happy about pedos not being prosecuted.

This is what you are sponsoring

The prosecutor in this video is now who you support! Dismissing a case against an illegal for sexually assaulting a four year old. So spare me your Epstein bullshit. This is now shit you suddenly support

 

[TemplarKormac]

I rarely see democrats clamoring for democrats to be prosecuted for the crimes exposed in the Epstein files.

You wouldn't be wrong.

But let's not pretend Republicans are above reproach, either.

 

[jc456]

That Trump is the star of the Epstein files?

How so?

Hahaha

Your tantrums are getting pretty low IQ these days, son.

Where’s sexual misconduct?