The Epstein Files

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Why aren't you arresting and convicting him then?

Because those allegations need to be investigated, first.

 

[jc456]

DO NOT understand Why it maters what political party or no party,
Should we not go after the men
who did these things? & not just the ones you don't like?

sure, why aren't the congressional leaders who've seen all the files done that? Could it be there's no ******* evidence of anything to arrest with?

 

[jc456]

Because those allegations need to be investigated, first.

whoaaaa, what allegations?
The files are the files, why isn't that evidence?
what else needs to be investigated?

all you fuckers with your air time on orangemanbad, and you ain't got anything after ******* 10 years? Even the felony fantasy didn't work for you assholes. Always got a ******* excuse brother.

 

[TruthSeeker112125]

I Believe that if Trump had done No Wrong, that he would be zealous for the "Files" to be Fully Opened, Unredacted, & Presented to the People.

But he has not only consistently sought for the public's attention to be directed elsewhere, he has also verbally attacked those who want a Full Disclosure of the "Files",... Which by the way,.... They went from being a "File on Bondi's Desk",..... To a Massive amount of Data. How big is Bondi's desk???

By the way,.... That "Once it's on the Net' it stays on the Net'" thingy, at least for me, doesn't apply.

I had pics, and a Video of Trump, Clinton, & Epstein, at Epstein's Mansion, laughing, & carrying on about how great it was to be at the party, where several young women were walking around, dressed like "High Dollar Prostitutes". But,.... Now that Video, & the Pics, can not be found!!!

I also can no longer find the Video, of Trump, Melania, & a Reporter, sitting in a tour Bus, looking out the front window of that bus, and Trump talking about the Hot Looking Reporter that was walking up to the Bus,..... He literally stated, with Melania sitting there, that he'd like to "Grab her P*****!", again with Melania sitting there!

 

[MisterBeale]

Marjorie Taylor Greene - "MAGA is Dead. Where Do We Go From Here?"​

 

[jc456]

Marjorie Taylor Greene - "MAGA is Dead. Where Do We Go From Here?"​

The con brainwashing tactic that keeps failing splc. I’m still interested in the payout she got from them

 

[dblack]

The con brainwashing tactic that keeps failing splc. I’m still interested in the payout she got from them

Her dignity.

 

[jc456]

Her dignity.

She did give that up, but at what cost?

 

[jc456]

Marjorie Taylor Greene - "MAGA is Dead. Where Do We Go From Here?"​

Here’s Tom Massie telling you he had names!!! So why doesn’t he publish them? Ask him why big guy

 

[MisterBeale]

Here’s Tom Massie telling you he had names!!! So why doesn’t he publish them? Ask him why big guy

Releasing the names w/o official proof opens him up to litigation. Are you really this dumb?

 

[jc456]

Releasing the names w/o official proof opens him up to litigation. Are you really this dumb?

Oh, so wait everyone else can but him? Haaaaaaaaaahaha. This is what happens to democrats always, excuses, way to act like a democrat.

Let’s ask that differently, why doesn’t Massie hand the names to Patel rather than do that stunt if it’s soooooooo important to him?

The rhetorical answer is he doesn’t have any names, he lied

 

[MisterBeale]

why doesn’t Massie hand the names to Patel

Patel knows

 

[jc456]

Patel knows

He does? Why wouldn’t Massie confirm

 

[Delldude]

Releasing the names w/o official proof opens him up to litigation.

They call that evidence. So with your reasoning there must not be any evidence of wrong doing by 'those' named in the files.

If there is/was evidence criminal charges would be filed. Especially now with all the noise over the files.

 

[MisterBeale]

So with your reasoning there must not be any evidence of wrong doing by 'those' named in the files.

Not necessarily.

The alternative explanation I am going with, which Masse already told us is the case, is that they are not releasing the stuff that would be actionable.

I.E., if criminals are in charge of the evidence, you won't get the evidence.

 

[Delldude]

Not necessarily.

The alternative explanation I am going with, which Masse already told us is the case, is that they are not releasing the stuff that would be actionable.

I.E., if criminals are in charge of the evidence, you won't get the evidence.

He has access to the unredacted files.

He also knows any redactions or non release of information has to be filed and explained to congress.

Massie knows all this. I hear crickets from him and Ro Khanna.

 

[MisterBeale]

He has access to the unredacted files.

DOJ’s Epstein Files Release Reveals Deep Corruption | Guest: Rep. Thomas Massie | Ep 371​

Feb 6, 2026
"The Justice Department just dropped another 3 million pages of documents related to Jeffrey Epstein, hoping to satisfy critics who have been demanding transparency on the Epstein files since Donald Trump’s election. There’s just one problem: The documents conceal the only thing people care about — the names of the perpetrators — while recklessly outing innocent victims. Matt Kibbe and ‪@RepThomasMassie‬ (R-Ky.) discuss whether this botched release is the result of incompetence or malice, whether these emails contain any smoking guns, and what can be done to force further releases from the administration that campaigned on being the most transparent in history."

 

[Delldude]

The documents conceal the only thing people care about — the names of the perpetrators — while recklessly outing innocent victims.

Noise..... like you said, 'official proof' is needed.

Yes they accidentally released some vic's names. It wasn't intentional. With the volume of files that shouldn't be a surprise.

Massies reputation is on the line. He's made lots of noise over the files without anything to really show for it.

 

[OldFlame]

Not necessarily.

The alternative explanation I am going with, which Masse already told us is the case, is that they are not releasing the stuff that would be actionable.

I.E., if criminals are in charge of the evidence, you won't get the evidence.

Neither is he. It's apparently not more important than his political career to him to have the balls to release it all.

 

[jc456]

They call that evidence. So with your reasoning there must not be any evidence of wrong doing by 'those' named in the files.

If there is/was evidence criminal charges would be filed. Especially now with all the noise over the files.

MisterBeale , what is the evidence?