They can, but when under pressure from xiden admin it’s called a first amendment violation and fascismGoogle can ban whoever it wants. That’s the way it works.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They can, but when under pressure from xiden admin it’s called a first amendment violation and fascismGoogle can ban whoever it wants. That’s the way it works.
What pressure?They can, but when under pressure from xiden admin it’s called a first amendment violation and fascism
The pressure the executives discussed in their testimonyWhat pressure?
So they just asked.The pressure the executives discussed in their testimony
So they just asked.
Not pressure. Not unconstitutional.
They were in league with Biden & Company.Google can ban whoever it wants. That’s the way it works.
They were in league with Biden & Company.
The fix was in.
Of course, you'll defend the Left censoring people. That's what Leftists do: silence people, one way or another.
So you’re upset about the government asking because you think it sounds like a “subtle threat”, but you’re okay with Trump making straight up threats.They shouldn't ask at all. And asking with a subtle threat is not asking.
Just like saying a teacher "just asked" their student for sex, even if the student is of legal age. You can't be in a position of power and "just ask" for something that is a huge conflict of interest. It is unethical, and borderline illegal.
Sure I mean, the gov't has their future in their hands. They can shut them down with the stroke of a pen, but "just ask" to shadowban nothing but conservatives. Yes, that is illegal and unconstitutional.
Haha, you and your cult are the most terrified sissies on the planet.Yep, a ban, and if that doesn't work, a bullet.
Yes but taking directives from the government on who should be banned is fascism, yes?Google can ban whoever it wants. That’s the way it works.
Yeah, the Twitter files complied by Twitter employees before Musk made the purchase must be right wing propaganda.So they just asked.
Not pressure. Not unconstitutional.
It isn’t a directive from the government.Yes but taking directives from the government on who should be banned is fascism, yes?
So you’re upset about the government asking because you think it sounds like a “subtle threat”, but you’re okay with Trump making straight up threats.
You don’t remember Jimmy Kimmel?By all means, list the media outlets and social media sites that Trump has threatened if they didn't shadowban and outright ban all liberals.
Go.
1.
Haha, you and your cult are the most terrified sissies on the planet.
You want someone to shoot you in the neck? How many conservatives have assassinated liberals lately?
Oh yea, like zero.
You didn’t hear about this one, I guess.
So the collusion was about what's for dinner?It isn’t a directive from the government.