This quote, "We love the Constitution of the United States that has given us the greatest country in the world" is something I'd like to talk about for a second.
It's only anecdotal, but my personal experience is that the people who say that the most, haven't actually been to very much of the world, or often to any country outside of North America.
I've traveled in, or lived in, more than 30 countries so far, on every inhabited continent (I'm only missing Antarctica, and I've got that planned for 2011). One of the funniest moments of my travel (from a political point of view) was in Australia, on the gold coast, just south of Brisbane.
I was watching the "Outback Spectacular" show (basically a giant indoor rodeo, with great horse-back riding tricks, roping calves, all while you're eating a giant, Aussie steak - great food), and talking to an older Australian guy next to me. He asked me how the show was compared to the shows in America, and I asked him if he'd ever been to the U.S. His answer? "Hell no, I've never left Australia - it's the greatest country in the world". I jokingly (well, not really jokingly) told him, "You'd make a great American, you know!"
America really is a an amazing country - but to claim it's the "greatest country on Earth"? I dunno. The most powerful, sure, but we're not the richest on a per-person basis, we don't live the longest, we're not the most "free" (in terms of individual liberties), we don't have the lowest suicide rate, and we spend more time at war than most other countries outside of Africa. Places like Thailand, Bali (in Indonesia), Peru, Costa Rica, southern India (Kerala, and Goa), and more, are all more relaxed, more tolerant and seem to have generally friendlier, happier inhabitants than much of what I see in the U.S. (and I've been to 48 of the 50 states so far).
So - I'm not so much saying that America isn't the greatest country on Earth, but that to claim that is to sort of show that you probably haven't traveled much, and that you seem to think your personal opinion is some sort of "dogma" of the tea-partiers.
Okay - moving on!
The tea-party protests aren't going to fizzle out yet, and probably will keep simmering at least, until Obama leaves office, probably in 2016. Some of them honestly believe they're protesting for smaller government, less spending, etc., but as somebody pointed out - during eight years of Bush's massive borrowing, and massive growth of government - there was no "tea party" movement.
That leaves a lot of us who might agree with the message with the suspicion that this is just some anti-Obama group. The comparisons of the Democrats' health-plan to that of the Nazis is just... well, it's as bad as the far-left's depiction of Bush as Hitler, which sadly happened at some protests when he was in power. Comparing any American politician or group to the Nazis or Hitler is a sure-fire way to lose your argument (I'm not even going to invoke Godwin's law, here).
I could actually be on board with a legitimate group that was trying to pressure the government into balancing taxes and spending. But the tea-party people seem to be egged on by the clearly-partisan Fox News channel, Beck in particular. Some of the tea-party protesters are constantly invoking the Nazis, or comparing Obama to Stalin, or other things that have nothing to do with their alleged "cause", but really just turn off a lot of us. Any "movement" founded on hate of one guy (and even some of you IN the tea-party movement have to admit that some of the members seem to simply hate Obama) is bound to fail. See, "Kerry's supporers, 2004 Election".
In 2004, the Democrats basically ran on "We hate Bush", and lost. And the tea-party crowd is hurting their own cause - by the ugly nature of their personal attacks, they lose a LOT of support from people who really do want to see balanced budgets, and restrained Federal government.
Sadly, the tea-party crowd is probably going to sabotage the GOP's chances of re-taking the house in 2010, thus ensuring single-party rule through 2012 (or more likely, 2014, since Obama's voters will be at the polls again in 2012).
And that's bad - the Democrats need some kind of sanity-based check on their power (rather than a "Hannity-based" one, ha ha). Every good government needs a potent opposition, but Beck's minions are busy dismantling the current one.