rupol2000
Gold Member
- Aug 22, 2021
- 18,215
- 2,628
- 138
- Banned
- #1
Apparently, the real Turks were associated with the Ottomans and Tork
Most likely these were tribes close to people Rus, Prussians and Rusyns, they had a common policy with the ancient Russian state and lived near Kiev.
Those countries of Central Asia that now speak languages recognized as Turkic lived earlier on the territory of Turan, it was a country that spoke Indo-Iranian languages.
That is, they had nothing to do with the Turks.
How did it turn out that their languages are Turkic?
Perhaps this was due to the Occupation of the Golden Horde by the Timurids?
In addition, it is interesting that the Church Slavonic language is Old Bulgarian, and they also consider the Bulgarians to be Turks. Despite the fact that their ethnonym contains the suffix "Aryan", And modern Bulgarians speak Slavic and are considered Slavs.
Tork people - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Most likely these were tribes close to people Rus, Prussians and Rusyns, they had a common policy with the ancient Russian state and lived near Kiev.
Those countries of Central Asia that now speak languages recognized as Turkic lived earlier on the territory of Turan, it was a country that spoke Indo-Iranian languages.
That is, they had nothing to do with the Turks.
How did it turn out that their languages are Turkic?
Perhaps this was due to the Occupation of the Golden Horde by the Timurids?
In addition, it is interesting that the Church Slavonic language is Old Bulgarian, and they also consider the Bulgarians to be Turks. Despite the fact that their ethnonym contains the suffix "Aryan", And modern Bulgarians speak Slavic and are considered Slavs.
Last edited: