Turks

[rupol2000]

For a long time I could not find information about the Turks, who they are, the question is obviously political.

One of the tribes of the Turks is obviously the tribe of the Rus, the Oghuz, who lived on the territory of the Hetmanate on the right bank of the Dnieper.
They were called Torquay.

But these are not all Turks.

The Turks were allies of the Sassanids against the Ephthalites (Turan). They came from what is obviously falsely considered "Byzantine", from somewhere around here.

The Turkic languages of Central Asia are their languages, it was the Turkic Khaganate.

However, Genghis Khan obviously was not a Turk. Their name was Tatars, these are Tochars, a synonym for Euthalites.

 

[rupol2000]

The peoples of Central Asia who speak Turkic are not Turks, but Turkicized Turans.

And the Turks are obviously Germans. The Rus tribe corresponds to the Guzes, who are Torks.

They apparently came from the region of Hatti, approximately the same place where the Ishkuzes and the Getae were, from which the Goths obviously originate.

 

[rupol2000]

This sounds very strange, but this may just be the explanation for the degeneration of Indo-European grammar in Europe. New-European languages have an analytical agglutinative structure. This is not Indo-European grammar, it may be Turkic.

 

[rupol2000]

They were called Torquay.

This, by the way, may be related to the English Torques.

 

[rupol2000]

And the real Byzantium was obviously somewhere on the territory of Romania and the Danube.

 

[rupol2000]

In fact, modern Turkey is the historical Turks. In this sense, everything is simple.

 

[rupol2000]

In fact, they correspond to the Scythians. The Scythians are now erroneously classified as Indo-Iranians. They correspond to both the Scythian Ishkuz and the Dnieper Scythians(Scythian plowmen).

 

[rupol2000]

Probably the ethnonym "germans" is a distortion from "getmans", hence Hauptman.

Everything converges. Germans are Turks. Paradoxical but true.
This just explains why they fought de facto on the side of Osmans against the Poles (at least the Swedes, Hetmanate and Rus)

 

[rupol2000]

And as for Turan, it was not Turkic before they were attacked by the Turks together with the Sassanids. It was the state of Ephthalites / Yueji / Tokhar, this is the Sarmatian culture and Indo-Aryan languages.

 

[rupol2000]

Moreover, it should be noted that Central Asia is not completely Turkicized. Tajiks speak Persian, and there is even a Sogdian dialect, half of Uzbekistan is inhabited by ethnic Tajiks, the Altaians still do not speak their "native Altaic". During the time of Bolshevism, there was a large-scale campaign of Turkization of Central Asia, so it is not known what percentage of them spoke Turkic before the 1920s.

 

[rupol2000]

And this territory(Turan) for the most part is the primary focus of Aryan culture - this is the Andronovo cultural community (Andronovo, Sintashta, Petrovo, Abashevo). Here, too, everything converges.
This name obviously comes from the name of the bull - Tur. Hence the ancient name of the Crimea Taurida (Turida)

 

[rupol2000]

Of course, the population of this region is now multi-ethnic, mixed with Evenks and Persians, but these are not Turks.

 

[rupol2000]

The Rus tribe corresponds to the Guzes, who are Torks

These alternations are easy to explain: the sound G is a burr R, in French it is an intermediate sound between G and R.

In addition, one of the names of the Scythians is ish(is)-guz
From here Ishkuza