The earth is 4.3 billion years old!

[Jessica-stormlover]

Fact!

 

[Orangecat]

That sounds disgusting.
Nature has provided us with a way to reproduce: a male (XY chromosomes) impregnates a female (XX chromosomes) and a new human life is created.
No frankenstein bullshit necessary.

 

[WinterBorn]

That sounds disgusting.
Nature has provided us with a way to reproduce: a male (XY chromosomes) impregnates a female (XX chromosomes) and a new human life is created.
No frankenstein bullshit necessary.

What?

 

[Orangecat]

What?

The OP changed itself. It was a meandering justification for trying to implant a woman’s womb into a man and trying to grow a baby in it.

 

[rampart]

Fact!

no way! what happened to those 6.000 years.

 

[fncceo]

Fact!

It hardly looks a day over 4.2 Billion.

It must moisturize.

 

[luiza]

Fact!

Not really .
Best availble hypothesis and at this point regarded as a supportable theory .

That is , the case for 2+2=4 seems immutable .
Your claimed Fact does not contain the same level of statistical confidence , even though I guess it is 95% plus

 

[rampart]

Not really .
Best availble hypothesis and at this point regarded as a supportable theory .

That is , the case for 2+2=4 seems immutable .
Your claimed Fact does not contain the same level of statistical confidence , even though I guess it is 95% plus

plus or minus a billion years seems close. probably based on space telescope observations, carbon 14 1/2 life don't cut it (they claim 60,000 year limit. seems reasonable. ) and there is no dendrochronology or ice core. that old.

 

[WinterBorn]

The OP changed itself. It was a meandering justification for trying to implant a woman’s womb into a man and trying to grow a baby in it.

Oh ok. I never saw the one with the bullshit. That is why I couldn't make sense of your post. Thanks.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Fact!

Don't you need a link or something? I thought that's how threads work here

 

[rampart]

Oh ok. I never saw the one with the bullshit. That is why I couldn't make sense of your post. Thanks.

i must have missed that as well.

"an age of the earth " may be controversial to some, but 6.000 is not right , no matter how scripture counts years. (and i do not believe for a moment those 900 year old men in genesis, either.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Fact!

Not a "Fact!" at all.

We're not sure how old the Earth is, and how do we define what the Earth is anyway? I'd assume it went through a variety of forms before becoming what it is today.

And how do we actually measure it?

 

[1srelluc]

 

[Votto]

no way! what happened to those 6.000 years.

The Bible does not say the earth is 6000 years old, in fact, I defy you to show me where it say this.

In my view, it is a mistranslation, just like the church back in Galileo's time mistranslated the Bible to think the universe revolves around the earth. Again, it is nowhere in the Bible.

What the Bible does say, is that creation was not done in a matter of days. All it says is that creation took generations, how many it does not say. But then, how do you tell sheep herders how much a billion is?

Genesis 2:4 “These are the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,”

 

[katsteve2012]

OP, when starting a new thread, you need to provide a supporting link as well as sufficient content of your own to advance the conversation.

'USMB Rules and Guidelines'

USMB Rules and Guidelines

USMB Site Guidelines and Regulations List of Current Active Moderators: AyeCantSeeYou Dont Taz Me Bro Coyote katsteve2012 White 6 Registration Guidelines: Individuals are allowed only one (1) account. Anyone found to be in violation risk having all accounts banned. Site Wide Rules And...

www.usmessageboard.com