The Did Obama Commit Treason Thread and Poll

Did Obama Commit Treason?

  • No

    Votes: 27 32.1%
  • Yes

    Votes: 42 50.0%
  • No, he wasn't even born in America, so he can't be charged

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, you MAGAs are so desperate to deflect from the Trump Epstein Love Fest.

    Votes: 14 16.7%
  • No, Trump Presidential Immunity Rule Applies

    Votes: 6 7.1%
  • No, what's wrong with using US Intel Agencies as an extension of a political party anyway?

    Votes: 2 2.4%
  • Yes, starting with hiding his Kenyan birth. Oh, that makes Dubya a co-conspirator as well

    Votes: 5 6.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 3 3.6%
  • I think I was more useful to humanity during my 2 week timeout from here

    Votes: 6 7.1%

  • Total voters
    84
Wow...you do the whole Joe Friday "Just the facts, Ma'am!" thing and then post that? Do you really want people to take you seriously here, Postman?
Denial is just a river in Egypt.

Federal convictions prove the people at the capitol on January 6th were armed with loaded firearms.
With many more with weapons caches blocks or miles away.

Hence an armed insurrection.
 
Denial is just a river in Egypt.

Federal convictions prove the people at the capitol on January 6th were armed with loaded firearms.
With many more with weapons caches blocks or miles away.

Hence an armed insurrection.
There were protesters in the Capitol building with loaded firearms? And they were convicted for that? Who would that be, Postman?
 
So WHY did trump send his people to the Capitol on J6?

In your words, what was the purpose of "We're gonna march down to the Capitol, and I'll be there with you."
Translate this please.
The Patriots who went to the Capital on J6 were exercising their constitutionally protected right to free speech and to petition their government for a redress of grievances. Anybody who has actually looked at the facts that day knows that. Malicious TDS afflicted dishonest propagandists hatefully try to make that something that it never ever was.
 
There are no biases when it comes to hard facts. And unlike history, instead of a pocket full of historians, you have literally thousands of reporters covering current events.
Really? So if I tell you one fact (that is correct) but leave out two other facts (that are also correct but call into question your narrative) am I displaying bias even though I'm being factual?
 
Show your credible verifiable source to show that he did that. Expect that to take the rest of your life to find.
I dont feed MAGAt sealions, sorry.

Your favorite fat rapist felon led a criminal conspiracy to steal the election, and you dont mind a bit.

That's cultism for ya!
 
Denial is just a river in Egypt.

Federal convictions prove the people at the capitol on January 6th were armed with loaded firearms.
With many more with weapons caches blocks or miles away.

Hence an armed insurrection.
"Weapons caches blocks or miles away."

Why would they have an "armed insurrection" but leave their arms blocks or miles away? That by definition is an UNARMED insurrection at worst! If it was the left it would have been called a "mostly peaceful demonstration" by the Main Stream Media! :)
 
I dont feed MAGAt sealions, sorry.

Your favorite fat rapist felon led a criminal conspiracy to steal the election, and you dont mind a bit.

That's cultism for ya!
Your vocabulary pretty much sums up your intellect I think. Not too impressive. But okay. Since you won't back up your accusations--you have never backed up your accusations so far as I know--we know you can't. Do have a nice day.
 
That has nothing to do with the accuracy of their reporting.

As Lt. Joe Friday would say

Just the facts ma'am.
It has EVERYTHING to do with the accuracy of their reporting. When they allow absolutely nobody on staff with anything other than a 'woke'/liberal/progressive Democrat/Leftist point of view, the spin they put on what they report must always be counted as likely suspect.

The spin on any information put out can affect the accuracy of how they want that information to be received even if the actual words are not necessary incorrect. The most extreme example of that is a 'when did you stop beating your wife?' question. There is absolutely no way to perceive that other than one way--the person is or was a wife beater whether or not that is in any way true.

I am speaking as one who has been trained as a journalist and who is also a historian. The way to twist both to be perceived a specific way is enormous and common among those dealing with propaganda instead of actual verifiable facts/trust/intellectual honesty.
 
The Patriots who went to the Capital on J6 were exercising their constitutionally protected right to free speech and to petition their government for a redress of grievances. Anybody who has actually looked at the facts that day knows that. Malicious TDS afflicted dishonest propagandists hatefully try to make that something that it never ever was.
If ONLY that's all they did that day.

Unfortunately they did much more than "Exercise their protected right to free speech" when they busted into the Capitol by breaking thru barriers, windows and doors and beating on Capitol Police.

YOU are being dishonest when you defend the 'breaking INTO the Capitol.'

Was it Legal to break into the Capitol? NO it isn't.
 
If ONLY that's all they did that day.

Unfortunately they did much more than "Exercise their protected right to free speech" when they busted into the Capitol by breaking thru barriers, windows and doors and beating on Capitol Police.

YOU are being dishonest when you defend the 'breaking INTO the Capitol.'

Was it Legal to break into the Capitol? NO it isn't.
There is no way in hell any Patriots started that riot that day. I suppose a few did get caught up in it. And it was a tiny percentage of people that day that were actually involved in any property or physical violence. The tapes of the whole thing that day made that perfectly clear. The vast majority of Patriot who did enter the Capital that day did so peacefully and in a very non threatening way, most through doors opened and/or held open by Capital police. Those had no idea it was in any way illegal for them to be there.

And NOBODY with any sense of ethics or intellectual honesty tries to blame President Trump for the riot happening.
 
There is no way in hell any Patriots started that riot that day.
Such a LAME deflection.
They 'your Patriots' are on video...... and your side has yet to identify ANY person doing damage that was NOT one of 'Your Patriots.'

Breaking thru Barriers......yes, trump supporters
Breaking Window into and inside the Capitol....Yes
Breaking thru Doors, interior and exterior....YES

Quit trying to BLAME this on Antifa, or FBI, or whatever Boogieman haunts you.

Your "patriots" sure as hell did this damage to the Capitol and our Nation.
 
Do you have any credible sources that prove this assertion?
I saw the same tapes everybody else did. The people breaking those windows were not dressed as Patriots, didn't look like Patriots. Were not behaving as Patriots.
 
Such a LAME deflection.
They 'your Patriots' are on video...... and your side has yet to identify ANY person doing damage that was NOT one of 'Your Patriots.'

Breaking thru Barriers......yes, trump supporters
Breaking Window into and inside the Capitol....Yes
Breaking thru Doors, interior and exterior....YES

Quit trying to BLAME this on Antifa, or FBI, or whatever Boogieman haunts you.

Your "patriots" sure as hell did this damage to the Capitol and our Nation.
The evidence is different from your version of facts:

 
The evidence is different from your version of facts:

Bravo.....you found 2, yes just 2, and apparently those 2 started the riot.
If NOT for those 2, the entire day would have remained 'peaceful' like trump said......once.

You are full of shit.
 
I saw the same tapes everybody else did. The people breaking those windows were not dressed as Patriots, didn't look like Patriots. Were not behaving as Patriots.
So no credible source. Just a “no true Scotsman” fallacy.
 
15th post
Bravo.....you found 2, yes just 2, and apparently those 2 started the riot.
If NOT for those 2, the entire day would have remained 'peaceful' like trump said......once.

You are full of shit.
Do you really believe just two ANTIFA members would show up there? How naive is that? But your TDS requires you to believe one thing and you likely don't give a damn whether it's true or not. Wanting it to be true to justify your hatred and the narrative that comes out of it is sufficient for most leftists, those in government, those on television and the media, those on social media, those on message boards.
 
Do you really believe just two ANTIFA members would show up there? How naive is that? But your TDS requires you to believe one thing and you likely don't give a damn whether it's true or not. Wanting it to be true to justify your hatred and the narrative that comes out of it is sufficient for most leftists.
I didn't claim anything about the number of so-called 'infiltrators'. You did.

Do you really believe that a few, you choose the number, infiltrators could influence over 100,000 angry and ignorant team trump cult members?

"Wanting it to be true.' that's you sweetie.
You are clinging to some conspiracy theory that "Antifa" is really to blame.

We saw it on LIVE video, and nothing will ever change that FACT, not even your pathetic LIES.
 
Back
Top Bottom