The definitive guide to the "Global Warming" scam

You lie about it all the time. You insist the same FUDGE dung posts is accurate...

YOU NEVER QUESTION their "data..."

That's what a "faux skeptic" does... it continues the CO2 FRAUD by insisting FUDGE is accurate data... just like dung does.

YOU NEVER QUESTION their "data..."

YOU NEVER provide any data.
 
YOU NEVER QUESTION their "data..."

YOU NEVER provide any data.



That's pretty funny...

SAP from Mars, Pluto, and Earth.

Jurassic.

Data from the Greenland and Antarctic ice ages blew away your "skeptic" DEFENSE of McBullshit.



What we have here is one Jew Supremacist Zionist Fascist Traitor cheering on another, because both

LIE
Have NO PATRIOTISM to AMERICA
AREN'T "conservative"
CHEER CO2 FRAUD because it is a JEWISH FRAUD on the AMERICAN TAXPAYER
 
That's pretty funny...

SAP from Mars, Pluto, and Earth.

Jurassic.

Data from the Greenland and Antarctic ice ages blew away your "skeptic" DEFENSE of McBullshit.



What we have here is one Jew Supremacist Zionist Fascist Traitor cheering on another, because both

LIE
Have NO PATRIOTISM to AMERICA
AREN'T "conservative"
CHEER CO2 FRAUD because it is a JEWISH FRAUD on the AMERICAN TAXPAYER

That's pretty funny...

SAP from Mars, Pluto, and Earth.


Cool story. So where is your temperature/SAP data from Earth?
Post every day in 2020, pick your US city.

What we have here is one Jew Supremacist Zionist Fascist Traitor cheering on another, because both

What we have is an angry nut, alone in his basement, talking to himself, blaming the Jews for making him look like an idiot. Stop making it so easy for them by posting so much idiocy.

Post some facts, for once, pussy.
 
Isn't "Jewish fascism" an oxymoron? ... two words with opposite meanings ... like "commie conservative" or "Ukrainian Nazi" ...
 
Whoah!!! You literally contradicted yourself!!! 💀💀💀

“Predicted it”??? What’s “it”, Mammaries? That Arctic ice would expand!!
The topic ... that you brought up ... was Antarctic ice. What "it" referred to ... as my context made clear ... was the initial expansion of Antarctic sea ice, followed by it's decline. Which you got totally wrong, and AGW science predicted correctly well ahead of time.

You literally can't grasp basic English. You don't even understand what you parrot, so it's impossible for you to engage in adult conversation.

Back to the kiddie table with you, cult boi.

Notice how an insane antisemite is your only pal here? That's how much of a shit human you're considered to be by the whole board.

NASA made the claim.

In 2014.

My data was from 2024.

You're literally so goddamned stupid, you can't even understand the passage time.

This is stuff a second-grader can grasp, and you can't. Senility, lead poisoning and substance abuse has really done a number on you.
 
Last edited:
The source is the actual hacked emails
No, it's not. Thats why you can't provide the actual source with the actual quote. It's why you tapdance and evade. I ask for a source, you respond with a link to a vague media article that doesn't show the quote, then you lie openly and claim you gave a source.

You're not actually as stupid as you always act. You know the quote is faked. The evasive contortions you're going into now prove that. You're just a 'nadless dishonest coward. The cult told you to lie and commit fraud, so you're doing it.

Remember, you can gaslight your fellow brainwashed cult pals, but God will not be pleased concerning your open devotion to the Lord of Lies. I would not want to be in your shoes. You may think you've made a deal with Satan for a luxury suite in Hell, but he's the Lord of Lies, so he doesn't keep his promises.

Anyways, since you've openly faked a quote and show zero remorse over doing so, that means anything you say on any topic should basically assumed to be a lie (unless independent evidence shows otherwise.). So there's really not point in speaking with you. MY works is done. I've shown you're a pathological liar. At this stage, you're only interesting as an example of how cult devotion rots both mind and soul.
 
The topic ... that you brought up ... was Antarctic ice. What "it" referred to ... as my context made clear ... was the initial expansion of Antarctic sea ice
Boom!!! Exactly as the NASA article I shared, stated. And you claimed it was a “lie”. 100% of the information I have shared has been 100% fact.

Democrats claimed by the end of 2014, the polar ice cap would be gone. Completely melted. Instead, it reached record levels that year. Democrats lied (they always do). They try to get wealthy by creating climate hysteria. Sadly, it works on their minions.
 
No, it's not. Thats why you can't provide the actual source with the actual quote.
Aaaaand just like that, she’s back to lying 😂

I posted a link to left-wing NBC which included “the actual quote” (which matched what I shared, word-for-word). I’ll do it again just to rub your nose in it, like a dog who went to the bathroom in the house 😄

 
I ask for a source, you respond with a link to a vague media article that doesn't show the quote, then you lie openly and claim you gave a source.
  1. You didn’t “ask for a source” at all. You immediately lied and claimed I made up the quote by combining two separate quotes. Now that I’ve provided a link from left-wing NBC, you’re panicking and trying another angle for your gaslighting
  2. I forgot that your illiteracy makes it very difficult to read a whole news article. So here is a screenshot from that article (along with that link) so everyone can enjoy. As you can see, it is word-for-word what I posted
IMG_4167.jpeg


Man that is sooooo good!! Indisputable proof that the “scientists” falsify their data to ensure government keeps throwing money their way and indisputable proof that you’d lied in every post in this thread. Let me know when you’re ready to admit that you lie every time you post. Everyone can see that…might as well admit it 🤷🏼‍♂️

 
Thats why you can't provide the actual source with the actual quote.
Here is both the “actual source” (the email) along with the “actual quote” (what he wrote, word-for-word):

1737831799667.webp


Every time you deny reality, I’ll share it! More opportunity for people to see it! Relentlessly hammering liars with facts is easy.
 
That's a brazenly faked quote on your part, formed by splicing together two unrelated quotes.
And then of course there is this gem, taken from the hacked emails of “Climategate”! A “scientist” promising to hide the real data, even if he has to “redefine peer-review literature”

IMG_4168.webp


Boy that one has to sting like hell, huh? 🥴
 
And don’t forget about this email, taken from the hacked emails of “Climategate”!!!

View attachment 1070492

This has been the bane of CCC Alarmism ... there's no consequential warming going on, and evidence of warming is elusive ... either twist up the statistics or just invent some data ...

A few scoundrels do this ... for their own glorification ... even Middle Earth had her Grey Charlatan ...
 
Boom!!! Exactly as the NASA article I shared, stated. And you claimed it was a “lie”. 100% of the information I have shared has been 100% fact.
The crazy stuff you say has no relation to anything I type, or to reality in general. Your butthurt over me has caused you to lose your last marble.

Oh, I enjoyed watching you soil yourself seven times, my sweet little bottom. I own your little cult brain, and I'm laughing hard about that, along with everyone else here. Maybe I can get your next poo-flinging tirade up to 8 posts, which would be a new record. You've certainly shown you've got enough crap inside of you.

Democrats claimed by the end of 2014, the polar ice cap would be gone.
See? You're not even pretending to be in touch with reality. The lead-poisoning, brainwashing and senility has really taken a toll on you.

Now, let's discuss and debunk both of your "smoking guns". So sad that you got scammed so easily.

---
From: Phil Jones <p.jones@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 13:31:15 +0000
Dear Ray, Mike and Malcolm,
...I've just completed Mike's Nature trick of adding in the real temps to each series for the last 20 years (ie from 1981 onwards) and from 1961 for Keith's to hide the decline.
Cheers
Phil

This, according to Sarah Palin and US senator James Inhofe, is a smoking gun that shows Jones trying to "hide the decline in temperatures" since 1998. Not so. First, note the date of the email: 1999. It came at the end of a decade of exceptional warmth, in which 1998 was the warmest year on record. There was no decline to hide. And note the words about "adding in the real temperatures". Jones and Mike Mann had been adding real temperatures to the end longer graphs of temperature estimates based on tree rings. The only thing being "hidden" was tree ring data that did not match reality.


From: Phil Jones <p.jones@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: "Michael E. Mann" <mann@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
Date: Thu Jul 8 16:30:16 2004

Mike,
... I can't see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow - even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is !
Cheers
Phil

Jones is writing about two new papers. One, from two known sceptics Ross McKitrick and Pat Michaels, claimed to show a correlation between the geographical patterns of warming and of industrialisation, suggesting that local urbanisation rather than the global influence of greenhouse gases were often key in warming on land.

Jones evidently wanted to use his position as a lead author to keep the paper out of the IPCC report. In the event, the paper was not mentioned in early chapter drafts, but was added to a final version, where its findings were dismissed as "not statistically significant". Critics say that by keeping it out of early drafts, Jones prevented reviewers scrutinising his conclusion.
---

Care to address the facts now? This should be amusing, given your inability to grasp the basics here. Your side took a quote screamingly out of context, knowingly. That's called "lying". And you always support such lying. Tsk, tsk.

Go on. Scream that context doesn't matter. Lie more. You're in this deep, don't stop now.

Anyways, did you have something specific you wanted to accomplish in your SafeSpace here, other than to air your butthurt? It wasn't me that necro'd a dead thread over butthurt, that was all you. All your arguments were debunked right here, many many times, well before 2014, which is the last time your cult updated any of their arguments. So why repeat your failures yet another time?

Remember, crying about how everyone pointed out how stupid you are won't cause people to stop pointing out how stupid you are. Your side has faceplanted at every single thing for over 40 years. That's why you're not taken seriously. Throwing tantrums won't change that. In order to be taken seriously, you have to succeed at your predictions, as AGW science has done. AGW science has global credibility because it's earned it through a stunning record of successful predictions.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom