Very well then live your faith as you choose.
I have no "faith"..actual evidence debunks the noah myth completely!
Does it? You have personally determined what the dimensions of a Biblical cubit are and have done the pretty complicated formulas to determine the total height, weight, capacity, and engineered stability of the Ark? You have personally researched how the simple sheep herders, farmers, and fishermen of that day could have come up with the dimensions and specifications for the Ark listed in the Bible? (That alone in their day was pretty impressive.) And then you have done the botanical and biological research to learn what creatures might not have needed an ark to survive a massive global flood and which ones would have needed rescue?
Or do you depend on others to tell you what the actual evidence is that debunks the concept of the Ark?
And you say you have no faith?
News flash. You may believe that the Biblical account is bunk, but it is a belief that requires faith in something that you didn't figure out all by yourself.
another classic false assumption.
the arks' stats: 450ft long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet high.
if it existed it would not be sufficiently large to hold 2 of every land creature, non ocean going birds,amphibians and any other living thing that could not live in brackish or salt water.
also the techniques and technology need to build the ark were non existent at the time of it's alleged construction,
n genesis 6:13-16, the bible gives these measuremeants: "The length of the ark [shall be] three hundred cubits, the breadth of it fifty cubits, and the height of it thirty cubits."
the widely accepted value of a cubit would give conservative measurements of 450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet high.
here is a link to one of the largest functioning wooden ships ever built, a six-masted schooner called "wyoming" --
http://uh.edu/engines/epi2492.htm
the actual ship, not including the jib boom or anything, was about 330 feet long and 50 feet wide with a 33 foot hold depth, so noah's ark allegedly was about 50 percent bigger than the wyoming.
the wyoming would visibly undulate with the rolling waves in the water because it was so long, even with its 90 diagonal iron cross-bracings on each side. this twisting would allow water into the hold and it required pumps to make sure it didn't sink. it eventually sunk anyway.
you want fries with that?
