The credibility of Barack - and hence Kamala and the Democrats : issue Climate Change

[Toddsterpatriot]

over and over again. The evidence, already provided, is the ice core data.

YOUR TURN

How did your side conclude 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago was only 75k years old when we know

Greenland's mile thick ice has 130k ice core years worth of data halfway down, and Antarctica has 800k not even halfway down as the equal 2.5 miles thick....

You still haven't posted any evidence here that the ice sheet on North America was there for 50 million years in a row. You don't have a 50-million-year ice core.

Come on Beverly, everyone is going to think the Jews gave you a lobotomy when they castrated you.

Prove them wrong. Use your brain to show you still have balls.

Or run away again, pussy.

 

[EMH]

You still haven't posted any evidence here that the ice sheet on North America was there for 50 million years in a row. You don't have a 50-million-year ice core.

Come on Beverly, everyone is going to think the Jews gave you a lobotomy when they castrated you.

Prove them wrong. Use your brain to show you still have balls.

Or run away again, pussy.

The other evidence, besides the ice cores, is the tectonic movement of North America, which put it inside 600 miles to the Pole for the past 30-50 million years....

That's two.

Two to ZERO.

You have provided ZERO EVIDENCE that 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago was only 75k years old


because your fudgebaking FRAUD heroes in the Co2 FRAUD

SIMPLY MADE UP THAT NUMBER AFTER homO hid the FBI FRAUD CASE in the CLOSET in 2012....


all to "discredit" the truth that North America thawed while Greenland froze AT THE SAME TIME, the central part of the FBI's case....

 

[EMH]

It is like 15 straight posts here where Toddster simply lies, dodges, and asks for that already provided.

What's the USMB record for this type of cowardly trolling?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The other evidence, besides the ice cores, is the tectonic movement of North America, which put it inside 600 miles to the Pole for the past 30-50 million years....

That's two.

Two to ZERO.

You have provided ZERO EVIDENCE that 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago was only 75k years old


because your fudgebaking FRAUD heroes in the Co2 FRAUD

SIMPLY MADE UP THAT NUMBER AFTER homO hid the FBI FRAUD CASE in the CLOSET in 2012....


all to "discredit" the truth that North America thawed while Greenland froze AT THE SAME TIME, the central part of the FBI's case....

Nothing you've posted here is evidence for your claims.

You're a bad Beverly!

 

[EMH]

16 and counting


It is perfectly clear that the Co2 FRAUD's claim that 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago in the past few million years was just 75k years old cannot be justified given the data on ice we have. It is a MADE UP NUMBER. That is "climate science" aka "the science," just making stuff up and expecting nobody to notice...

 

[expat_panama]

Post your evidence, right here.

over and over again. The evidence, already provided, is the ice core data....

It's always been my understanding that if a person makes a claim then any presentation of supporting data would be in his interest.

What I often see on these threads is that if someone wants to make a claim w/o supporting numbers that the common ways of avoiding responsibility are tactics like saying "it's already there", "it's common knowledge", or "I'm not doing your research for you". Unless I'm missing something, those all sound to me like evasions.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

16 and counting


It is perfectly clear that the Co2 FRAUD's claim that 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago in the past few million years was just 75k years old cannot be justified given the data on ice we have. It is a MADE UP NUMBER. That is "climate science" aka "the science," just making stuff up and expecting nobody to notice...

Jews got your balls, Jews got your balls.

 

[EMH]

It's always been my understanding that if a person makes a claim then any presentation of supporting data would be in his interest.

What I often see on these threads is that if someone wants to make a claim w/o supporting numbers that the common ways of avoiding responsibility are tactics like saying "it's already there", "it's common knowledge", or "I'm not doing your research for you". Unless I'm missing something, those all sound to me like evasions.

You are either part of Toddster's "team" or you are really close to invalid status.

The Laurentide ice sheet that stretched from Northern Canada down to south of Chicago was 2.5 miles thick. The question is how old was it. Milankovich Cycles says 75k years old.

We have something called ice cores. Every year, continent specific ice ages like Greenland and Antarctica "manufacture" a new layer of ice on top of all the older ones. It is actually quite difficult to argue such glacier is "melting" when we have ice cores....

About Ice Cores | NSF Ice Core Facility

The National Science Foundation Ice Core Facility (NSF-ICF) — formerly the U.S. National Ice Core Laboratory (NICL) — is a facility for storing, curating, and studying meteoric ice cores recovered from the glaciated regions of the world.

icecores.org

The oldest continuous ice core records extend to 130,000 years in Greenland, and 800,000 years in Antarctica.


and those ice cores did not drill to the bottom. Greenland got to about halfway down, Antarctica not even that far. So how old is Greenland's glacier given that it is slightly higher than one mile at its thickest point?

If you answered MORE THAN 130k years old, you would prove your IQ is in fact over 5. In fact Greenland's mile high glaciers are way older than just 130k years.

Antarctica's glaciers are way older than 800k years.

Do you accept this? Or do you need your mommy to help....


So the question for Toddster is HOW did Milankovich conclude 2.5 mile thick ice age glacier was just 75k years old given our ice core data today suggests it was MUCH OLDER than that???


And clearly he has spent two full pages dodging that question....

 

[EMH]

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You are either part of Toddster's "team" or you are really close to invalid status.

The Laurentide ice sheet that stretched from Northern Canada down to south of Chicago was 2.5 miles thick. The question is how old was it. Milankovich Cycles says 75k years old.

We have something called ice cores. Every year, continent specific ice ages like Greenland and Antarctica "manufacture" a new layer of ice on top of all the older ones. It is actually quite difficult to argue such glacier is "melting" when we have ice cores....

About Ice Cores | NSF Ice Core Facility

The National Science Foundation Ice Core Facility (NSF-ICF) — formerly the U.S. National Ice Core Laboratory (NICL) — is a facility for storing, curating, and studying meteoric ice cores recovered from the glaciated regions of the world.

icecores.org

The oldest continuous ice core records extend to 130,000 years in Greenland, and 800,000 years in Antarctica.


and those ice cores did not drill to the bottom. Greenland got to about halfway down, Antarctica not even that far. So how old is Greenland's glacier given that it is slightly higher than one mile at its thickest point?

If you answered MORE THAN 130k years old, you would prove your IQ is in fact over 5. In fact Greenland's mile high glaciers are way older than just 130k years.

Antarctica's glaciers are way older than 800k years.

Do you accept this? Or do you need your mommy to help....


So the question for Toddster is HOW did Milankovich conclude 2.5 mile thick ice age glacier was just 75k years old given our ice core data today suggests it was MUCH OLDER than that???


And clearly he has spent two full pages dodging that question....

Milankovich Cycles says 75k years old.

Are the Milankovich Cycles talking to you right now?

Are you still looking for your evidence, or are you looking for your balls?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Nice map!!
Where is the North Pole on that map?

 

[EMH]

Milankovich Cycles says 75k years old.

Are the Milankovich Cycles talking to you right now?

Are you still looking for your evidence, or are you looking for your balls?

That's your claim, 75k years old. Are you sticking with that or not?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

That's your claim, 75k years old. Are you sticking with that or not?

My claim? How do you figure?

And where is your evidence of 50 million years?

Jews still hiding it from you?

You're still too stupid to find it?

 

[EMH]

Nice map!!
Where is the North Pole on that map?

Just north of the top end of the map.

WE know all land within 600 miles of a pole

Antarctica
Greenland
Ellesmere Island

are in ICE AGE. They are 90%, 7%, and 0.3% of Earth ice today, leaving only 2.7% for sea ice and mountains.

So the duration of the North American Ice Age would be how long the top of North America was within 600 miles of a pole.

EMH estimates 30-50 million.

The North American Plate moves west-southwest at a rate of about one inch per year. This movement is driven by the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, the divergent boundary between the North American Plate and the Eurasian Plate.

12 inches x 5280 feet roughly 63k inches per mile = 63k years per mile x 500 miles = roughly 30+ million years. Go to 750 miles and you get 50 million years....

 

[EMH]

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[EMH]

And where is your evidence of 50 million years?

Last two posts go over tectonic movement, resulting in estimate of 30-50 million years.

Variance is the expansion of the Arctic Ocean, or going backwards in time the contraction, which would've pushed NA closer to the North Pole than Greenland will get, and may shorten Greenland's ice age well below 30 million years.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Just north of the top end of the map.

WE know all land within 600 miles of a pole

Antarctica
Greenland
Ellesmere Island

are in ICE AGE. They are 90%, 7%, and 0.3% of Earth ice today, leaving only 2.7% for sea ice and mountains.

So the duration of the North American Ice Age would be how long the top of North America was within 600 miles of a pole.

EMH estimates 30-50 million.

The North American Plate moves west-southwest at a rate of about one inch per year. This movement is driven by the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, the divergent boundary between the North American Plate and the Eurasian Plate.

12 inches x 5280 feet roughly 63k inches per mile = 63k years per mile x 500 miles = roughly 30+ million years. Go to 650 miles and you get 50 million years....

So the duration of the North American Ice Age would be how long the top of North America was within 600 miles of a pole.

EMH estimates 30-50 million.

EMH is a moron. No one takes his "theories" seriously.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Last two posts go over tectonic movement, resulting in estimate of 30-50 million years.

Variance is the expansion of the Arctic Ocean, or going backwards in time the contraction, which would've pushed NA closer to the North Pole than Greenland will get, and may shorten Greenland's ice age well below 30 million years.

You're funny.

Evidence is something real from someone serious. Not your insane mutterings.

 

[EMH]

So the duration of the North American Ice Age would be how long the top of North America was within 600 miles of a pole.

EMH estimates 30-50 million.

EMH is a moron. No one takes his "theories" seriously.

If you could refute anything, you already would have... so instead all you can do is troll and lie...


Found any land inside 600 miles to a pole not in ice age?

Found any land outside 600 miles to a pole in ice age?



And you are still waffling about whether or not YOU ACCEPT the McBullshit estimate of 75k years old for glaciers 2.5 miles thick...

 

[EMH]

You're funny.

Evidence is something real from someone serious. Not your insane mutterings.

LOL!!!

If you had any way of refuting anything, you wouldn't resort to endlessly posting this type of trolling...

Thanks for expanding the topic. All of USMB has had a big time climate lesson from it....