The credibility of Barack - and hence Kamala and the Democrats : issue Climate Change

[EMH]

Come on, don't let the Jews get you down, post your evidence.

Beverly.

As we have seen before, there is no other source of the LAND NEAR THE POLES theory, just EMH.

The Co2 FRAUD has erased all but one reference to the atmospheric temp FUDGE JOB of 2005.

The Co2 FRAUD, at least through the basic search engines, have erased North American Ice Age.

EMH doesn't take credit for NAIA. NAIA stated that the ice on Canada down to northern central America first started 50 million years ago...

There we are... the "Earlier glaciation" dates back 50 million years. The reason NAIA "ice melt line" moved "north" is because the tectonic plate carrying North America moved SW.

The glaciers on Chicago peaked at 2.5 miles thick. YOUR SIDE, McBullshit, claims they were only 75k years old. Do you stand by that, or are you slipping away, because you are on record ....

How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[expat_panama]

And it is easily refuted.

Really, seriously, all Donald Trump has to do to win the climate debate is ask some questions, because the Co2 FRAUD cannot answer them without admitting Co2 is not the cause of Earth climate change...


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?


BUT SO FAR, EIGHT MONTHS AFTER POSTING THESE IN MEDIA, NOBODY IN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN OR THE "MAGA MEDIA" WILL ASK THEM...

WHICH MEANS A LOT OF THEM AREN'T REALLY "PURE" .... aka Christy, Wray, Sessions etc...

That would make sense if the issue was scientific but in reality it's political and as such, thinking has nothing to do with it. If it did, then I'd simply ask if we got warming, then what is heating up, what is its temperature now, what was it over the past hundred thousand years.

We never get any dialogue w/ questions like that tho...

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

As we have seen before, there is no other source of the LAND NEAR THE POLES theory, just EMH.

The Co2 FRAUD has erased all but one reference to the atmospheric temp FUDGE JOB of 2005.

The Co2 FRAUD, at least through the basic search engines, have erased North American Ice Age.

EMH doesn't take credit for NAIA. NAIA stated that the ice on Canada down to northern central America first started 50 million years ago...

There we are... the "Earlier glaciation" dates back 50 million years. The reason NAIA "ice melt line" moved "north" is because the tectonic plate carrying North America moved SW.

The glaciers on Chicago peaked at 2.5 miles thick. YOUR SIDE, McBullshit, claims they were only 75k years old. Do you stand by that, or are you slipping away, because you are on record ....

How old were the 2.5 mile thick glaciers covering Chicago in the past 20k-5 million years?

This is where the climate debate is now stuck. Every piece of land within 600 miles of a pole is in ice age, everything outside of that is not. Nobody has attempted to dispute that. It is the clear truth of Earth today. Milankovitch Cycles, which I call McBullshit Cycles, take a very...

www.usmessageboard.com

As we have seen before, there is no other source of the LAND NEAR THE POLES theory, just EMH.

Poor, lonely genius. It's a rough life.

The Co2 FRAUD has erased all but one reference to the atmospheric temp FUDGE JOB of 2005.

The Co2 FRAUD, at least through the basic search engines, have erased North American Ice Age.

Sneaky Jews, hiding all the evidence. Poor Beverly is powerless against them.

EMH doesn't take credit for NAIA. NAIA stated that the ice on Canada down to northern central America first started 50 million years ago...

Now post your evidence that there was ice covering North America for 50 million years in a row.

 

[expat_panama]

It is a religion to the believers -
it gives their life meaning.

Sure, many show religious fervor in the subject, but I've found that folks from many different religious back grounds can also agree w/ the climate story. Maybe would could agree that this is a "religiousISH" subject.

 

[EMH]

That would make sense if the issue was scientific but in reality it's political and as such, thinking has nothing to do with it. If it did, then I'd simply ask if we got warming, then what is heating up, what is its temperature now, what was it over the past hundred thousand years.

We never get any dialogue w/ questions like that tho...

These are the worst propagandists/censors/bullies/murderers/science fraud ever in America. The truth is that they NEVER had anything more than the warming of growing urban areas in the actual data. No other real data shows anything.

 

[EMH]

Now post your evidence that there was ice covering North America for 50 million years in a row.

30-50 million years is the amount of time North America was within 600 miles of the North Pole and hence was in ICE AGE as EVERYTHING WITHIN 600 miles of a pole is in ICE AGE today...

North America 50 million years ago was right around where Greenland is today.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

30-50 million years is the amount of time North America was within 600 miles of the North Pole and hence was in ICE AGE as EVERYTHING WITHIN 600 miles of a pole is in ICE AGE today...

North America 50 million years ago was right around where Greenland is today.

30-50 million years is the amount of time North America was within 600 miles of the North Pole

Now post your evidence that it was covered with ice for 50 million years in a row.

 

[EMH]

30-50 million years is the amount of time North America was within 600 miles of the North Pole

Now post your evidence that it was covered with ice for 50 million years in a row.

All of that is in the link to our earlier debate, how old are 2.5 mile thick glaciers on Chicago


YOU and the Co2 FRAUD say 75k years

Barely 1 mile thick glacier on Greenland has 130k years of ice core data, not even halfway down.

Antarctica, with 2.5 mile thick glacier, yielded 800k years of data, and didn't get halfway down....

That's the data, and just HOW did your side come up with 75k years???

LOL!!!!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

All of that is in the link to our earlier debate, how old are 2.5 mile thick glaciers on Chicago


YOU and the Co2 FRAUD say 75k years

Barely 1 mile thick glacier on Greenland has 130k years of ice core data, not even halfway down.

Antarctica, with 2.5 mile thick glacier, yielded 800k years of data, and didn't get halfway down....

That's the data, and just HOW did your side come up with 75k years???

LOL!!!!!

All of that is in the link to our earlier debate

If there is evidence in that link, copy and paste it here, Beverly.

YOU and the Co2 FRAUD say 75k years

If you have evidence that it's not, post it here.

Barely 1 mile thick glacier on Greenland has 130k years of ice core data, not even halfway down.

That disproves the North America glacier took 75k years? Why do you feel that?

Antarctica, with 2.5 mile thick glacier, yielded 800k years of data, and didn't get halfway down....

That means 75k years is disproven? Why do you feel that?

Hurry up, Wesley needs you.

 

[EMH]

Barely 1 mile thick glacier on Greenland has 130k years of ice core data, not even halfway down.

That disproves the North America glacier took 75k years? Why do you feel that?

This is the difference between SCIENCE and CLIMATE "SCIENCE"

The actual DATA regarding HEIGHT OF ICE AGE GLACIER and years blows the 75k number out of the water. The question is how the Co2 FRAUD got to 75k, since the ICE CORES OF TODAY COMPLETELY REFUTE THAT NUMBER.

So explain how the CO2 FRAUD got 75k years old for a 2.5 mile thick glacier THAT MELTED THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

This is the difference between SCIENCE and CLIMATE "SCIENCE"

The actual DATA regarding HEIGHT OF ICE AGE GLACIER and years blows the 75k number out of the water. The question is how the Co2 FRAUD got to 75k, since the ICE CORES OF TODAY COMPLETELY REFUTE THAT NUMBER.

So explain how the CO2 FRAUD got 75k years old for a 2.5 mile thick glacier THAT MELTED THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO....

Post your evidence here.

 

[EMH]

Post your evidence here.

Which evidence are you disputing now??

About Ice Cores | NSF Ice Core Facility

The National Science Foundation Ice Core Facility (NSF-ICF) — formerly the U.S. National Ice Core Laboratory (NICL) — is a facility for storing, curating, and studying meteoric ice cores recovered from the glaciated regions of the world.

icecores.org

The oldest continuous ice core records extend to 130,000 years in Greenland, and 800,000 years in Antarctica.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Which evidence are you disputing now??

About Ice Cores | NSF Ice Core Facility

The National Science Foundation Ice Core Facility (NSF-ICF) — formerly the U.S. National Ice Core Laboratory (NICL) — is a facility for storing, curating, and studying meteoric ice cores recovered from the glaciated regions of the world.

icecores.org

The oldest continuous ice core records extend to 130,000 years in Greenland, and 800,000 years in Antarctica.

Come on Beverly, post your evidence that ice covered North America for 50 million years in a row.

 

[EMH]

Come on Beverly, post your evidence that ice covered North America for 50 million years in a row.

The path of North America tectonically puts it in the 600 miles to the pole zone for that time period.

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The path of North America tectonically puts it in the 600 miles to the pole zone for that time period.

Apparently we really need a "debate" over the term ICE AGE because y'all are all wrong...

What is an ICE AGE? Most apparently still believe it is a terrifying horror movie event where Earth all at once freezes up. The data has never supported such a scenario. Since 2010, there has been a massive effort to re-write Earth climate history into a series of rapid "glaciations" and ice...

www.usmessageboard.com

That's awesome, Beverly, now post your evidence that ice covered North America for 50 million years in a row.

 

[EMH]

That's awesome, Beverly, now post your evidence that ice covered North America for 50 million years in a row.

You have been asked HOW the Co2 FRAUD concluded that 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago was only 75k years old....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You have been asked HOW the Co2 FRAUD concluded that 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago was only 75k years old....

Beverly, go make breakfast for Wesley.

When you get back, I expect to see all the available evidence for your claim.

Posted right here.

 

[EMH]

Beverly, go make breakfast for Wesley.

When you get back, I expect to see all the available evidence for your claim.

Posted right here.

The argument that Milankovich aka McBullshit is wrong when it claims the 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago were only 75k years old starts with ice core data from Greenland and Antarctica, which suggests glaciers on Earth that are 2.5 miles thick are way WAY OLDER than 75k years old.

The debate then shifts to you to justify how that 75k number came to be the official Co2 FRAUD "estimate" of the age of the 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago...

and your left wing Co2 FRAUD FUNDED chickenhawk chosen ass is TOO COWARDLY TO ANSWER THAT....

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The argument that Milankovich aka McBullshit is wrong when it claims the 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago were only 75k years old starts with ice core data from Greenland and Antarctica, which suggests glaciers on Earth that are 2.5 miles thick are way WAY OLDER than 75k years old.

The debate then shifts to you to justify how that 75k number came to be the official Co2 FRAUD "estimate" of the age of the 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago...

and your left wing Co2 FRAUD FUNDED chickenhawk chosen ass is TOO COWARDLY TO ANSWER THAT....

Post your evidence, right here.

 

[EMH]

Post your evidence, right here.

over and over again. The evidence, already provided, is the ice core data.

YOUR TURN

How did your side conclude 2.5 mile thick glacier on Chicago was only 75k years old when we know

Greenland's mile thick ice has 130k ice core years worth of data halfway down, and Antarctica has 800k not even halfway down as the equal 2.5 miles thick....