Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Bernie Sanders could replace Trump with this little known loophole:
Bernie Sanders Could Replace President Trump With Little-Known Loophole | The Huffington Post
"Here is exactly what we need to do to save our great society. The information here is what we’ve all been waiting for. By doing this we can make Bernie the president on Inauguration day rather than President-elect Donald Trump."
That wasn't the point the other fool tried to claim. He claimed impeachment wasn't a legal action but a political response, and I corrected him. Now you stroll in totally fucking confused trying to define impeachment in terms of either civil or criminal. Tex, you're unable to read a paragraph and understand what the fucking words mean! You remain all smoke and no fucking fire, Tex!So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
BTW, if one is being tried for "high crimes and misdemeanors" by the Senate with the Chief Justice of SCOTUS presiding it sure doesn't sound like the House impeachment is a civil matter given crimes and misdemeanors are involved! What kind of dictionaries do you folks use down there in Texas? All hat and no fucking cattle there, Tex!
Horseshit Tex! I'll cite the EXACT sentence of yours to which I responded again you horses ass, so you'll be sure to see it AGAIN;That wasn't the point the other fool tried to claim. He claimed impeachment wasn't a legal action but a political response, and I corrected him. Now you stroll in totally fucking confused trying to define impeachment in terms of either civil or criminal. Tex, you're unable to read a paragraph and understand what the fucking words mean! You remain all smoke and no fucking fire, Tex!So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
BTW, if one is being tried for "high crimes and misdemeanors" by the Senate with the Chief Justice of SCOTUS presiding it sure doesn't sound like the House impeachment is a civil matter given crimes and misdemeanors are involved! What kind of dictionaries do you folks use down there in Texas? All hat and no fucking cattle there, Tex!
The difference, as I stated in the post you so graciously quoted out of context, the most serious penalty available to the senate is removal from office, they can't impose fines or order incarceration the way a criminal court could. Of course you already knew that, but couldn't resist being your usual asshole self.
Too fucking poor to pay attention, assHat? You're the one dodging to avoid admitting your blatant ignorance! High Crimes and Misdemeanors committed by a sitting President are punishable CRIMES and are dealt with accordingly as outlined in the Constitution.So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
You're still all fucking bite and no bark, Tex!misdemeanor
n. a lesser crime punishable by a fine and/or county jail time for up to one year. Misdemeanors are distinguished from felonies,...and the discretion of the District Attorney. "High crimes and misdemeanors" referred to in the U.S. Constitution are felonies. ~~ Legal Dictionary - Law.com ~~
Horseshit Tex! I'll cite the EXACT sentence of yours to which I responded again you horses ass, so you'll be sure to see it AGAIN;That wasn't the point the other fool tried to claim. He claimed impeachment wasn't a legal action but a political response, and I corrected him. Now you stroll in totally fucking confused trying to define impeachment in terms of either civil or criminal. Tex, you're unable to read a paragraph and understand what the fucking words mean! You remain all smoke and no fucking fire, Tex!So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
BTW, if one is being tried for "high crimes and misdemeanors" by the Senate with the Chief Justice of SCOTUS presiding it sure doesn't sound like the House impeachment is a civil matter given crimes and misdemeanors are involved! What kind of dictionaries do you folks use down there in Texas? All hat and no fucking cattle there, Tex!
The difference, as I stated in the post you so graciously quoted out of context, the most serious penalty available to the senate is removal from office, they can't impose fines or order incarceration the way a criminal court could. Of course you already knew that, but couldn't resist being your usual asshole self.
Too fucking poor to pay attention, assHat? You're the one dodging to avoid admitting your blatant ignorance! High Crimes and Misdemeanors committed by a sitting President are punishable CRIMES and are dealt with accordingly as outlined in the Constitution.So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
Any impeachment and trial deal with CRIMINALITY you ignorant fuck! Trying "high crimes and misdemeanors" before the Senate with the CJ of SCOTUS is not a "civil action" as you claimed, dipshit! The Article III Courts can also take action if warranted without the taint of double jeopardy, fool! Want to remain stunningly stupid and stubborn and go another round or have you awoken from that stupor of ignorance you're trapped within?
You're still all fucking bite and no bark, Tex!misdemeanor
n. a lesser crime punishable by a fine and/or county jail time for up to one year. Misdemeanors are distinguished from felonies,...and the discretion of the District Attorney. "High crimes and misdemeanors" referred to in the U.S. Constitution are felonies. ~~ Legal Dictionary - Law.com ~~
Bullshit, Tex. That is NOT the topic being addressed that you piggybacked trying to sharp shoot! You're dancing and deflecting to avoid addressing your fucked bullshit errors! What you claimed was;Yep they are punishable crimes but congress doesn't have the power to inflict any punishment beyond removal form office. As I said earlier, impeachment and removal does not preclude prosecution in a criminal court.
I have already cited a quote from a legal dictionary stating that;So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
Now you cite an LII piece back grounding the impeachment and trial process. But you should have read the fucking thing, imbecile, because even your own source is telling you that you're wrong, you dumb fuck! If you had read what you cited, you would/should have noticed what the first line of the first paragraph after the introduction said;"High crimes and misdemeanors" referred to in the U.S. Constitution are felonies. ~~ Legal Dictionary - Law.com ~~
So if a legal dictionary states unequivocally that if a president commits high crimes and misdemeanors he has committed felonies and your LII source states the impeachment trial is a criminal proceeding, just how the FUCK is that a civil action and NOT a criminal action, shit for brains! You hung yourself with your own damn rope, Tex! Wise up and just quit being such a dumb mother fucker, Tex! You'd make a better door stop than a researcher, shorty!What is Impeachment?
Technically, impeachment is the Senate's quasi-criminal proceeding instituted to remove a public officer, not the actual act of removal.
~~ LII's Focus on Impeachment ~~
The congress should impeach Donald Trump for screwing over thousands of people out of their life savings with Trump university and for being a sexual predator.
Do you agree?
If you wish to discuss inane impossibilities, could you at least get your facts right???
The vaunted number 3500 includes ALL lawsuits, filed by Donald Trump and filed against Donald Trump, in the last 4 decades.
He is actively involved in 75 lawsuits today ...... 51 filed by him, and 24 filed against him.
Now, as for the rest of this nonsense .... he cannot --- repeat, CANNOT --- be impeached for actions prior to taking office. Impeachment is for malfeasance in office - high crimes and misdemeanors - in the execution of his office. Impeachment is NOT a legal action - it is a punishment invoked by Congress, and allowed by the Constitution, and is a political action.
So, please .... stop wasting our time with lies and fantasies.
with 3500 lawsuits against him I'm sure he did something
Bullshit, Tex. That is NOT the topic being addressed that you piggybacked trying to sharp shoot! You're dancing and deflecting to avoid addressing your fucked bullshit errors! What you claimed was;Yep they are punishable crimes but congress doesn't have the power to inflict any punishment beyond removal form office. As I said earlier, impeachment and removal does not preclude prosecution in a criminal court.
I have already cited a quote from a legal dictionary stating that;So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
Now you cite an LII piece back grounding the impeachment and trial process. But you should have read the fucking thing, imbecile, because even your own source is telling you that you're wrong, you dumb fuck! If you had read what you cited, you would/should have noticed what the first line of the first paragraph after the introduction said;"High crimes and misdemeanors" referred to in the U.S. Constitution are felonies. ~~ Legal Dictionary - Law.com ~~
So if a legal dictionary states unequivocally that if a president commits high crimes and misdemeanors he has committed felonies and your LII source states the impeachment trial is a criminal proceeding, just how the FUCK is that a civil action and NOT a criminal action, shit for brains! You hung yourself with your own damn rope, Tex! Wise up and just quit being such a dumb mother fucker, Tex! You'd make a better door stop than a researcher, shorty!What is Impeachment?
Technically, impeachment is the Senate's quasi-criminal proceeding instituted to remove a public officer, not the actual act of removal.
~~ LII's Focus on Impeachment ~~
Bullshit, Tex. That is NOT the topic being addressed that you piggybacked trying to sharp shoot! You're dancing and deflecting to avoid addressing your fucked bullshit errors! What you claimed was;Yep they are punishable crimes but congress doesn't have the power to inflict any punishment beyond removal form office. As I said earlier, impeachment and removal does not preclude prosecution in a criminal court.
I have already cited a quote from a legal dictionary stating that;So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
Now you cite an LII piece back grounding the impeachment and trial process. But you should have read the fucking thing, imbecile, because even your own source is telling you that you're wrong, you dumb fuck! If you had read what you cited, you would/should have noticed what the first line of the first paragraph after the introduction said;"High crimes and misdemeanors" referred to in the U.S. Constitution are felonies. ~~ Legal Dictionary - Law.com ~~
So if a legal dictionary states unequivocally that if a president commits high crimes and misdemeanors he has committed felonies and your LII source states the impeachment trial is a criminal proceeding, just how the FUCK is that a civil action and NOT a criminal action, shit for brains! You hung yourself with your own damn rope, Tex! Wise up and just quit being such a dumb mother fucker, Tex! You'd make a better door stop than a researcher, shorty!What is Impeachment?
Technically, impeachment is the Senate's quasi-criminal proceeding instituted to remove a public officer, not the actual act of removal.
~~ LII's Focus on Impeachment ~~
Well child maybe you should look up the definition of "quasi", IT MEANS SIMILAR, NOT THE SAME.
Tell me hero does this sound like a felony?
In the case of Andrew Johnson, the House accused the President, among other things, of speaking disrespectfully of Congress "in a loud voice."
LII's Focus on Impeachment
This shows congress can file an article of impeachment for any damn thing they like. Then it's up to the senate to decide if the accused offense is true and justifies removal.
You can continue in your fantasy that it's a criminal procedure, but like most regressive fantasies you'd be wrong.
Your words above, not mine, fool! Hey shit for brains...regardless of how you try to parse it, the impeachment and trial of a sitting president is NOT A civil action AS YOU CLIAMED WHEN YOU PIGGYBACKED MY POST TO ANOTHER, YOU FUCKING DUMMIE! You're wrong but you are too damn stupidly proud to admit error, Tex!So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
Bullshit, Tex. That is NOT the topic being addressed that you piggybacked trying to sharp shoot! You're dancing and deflecting to avoid addressing your fucked bullshit errors! What you claimed was;Yep they are punishable crimes but congress doesn't have the power to inflict any punishment beyond removal form office. As I said earlier, impeachment and removal does not preclude prosecution in a criminal court.
I have already cited a quote from a legal dictionary stating that;So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
Now you cite an LII piece back grounding the impeachment and trial process. But you should have read the fucking thing, imbecile, because even your own source is telling you that you're wrong, you dumb fuck! If you had read what you cited, you would/should have noticed what the first line of the first paragraph after the introduction said;"High crimes and misdemeanors" referred to in the U.S. Constitution are felonies. ~~ Legal Dictionary - Law.com ~~
So if a legal dictionary states unequivocally that if a president commits high crimes and misdemeanors he has committed felonies and your LII source states the impeachment trial is a criminal proceeding, just how the FUCK is that a civil action and NOT a criminal action, shit for brains! You hung yourself with your own damn rope, Tex! Wise up and just quit being such a dumb mother fucker, Tex! You'd make a better door stop than a researcher, shorty!What is Impeachment?
Technically, impeachment is the Senate's quasi-criminal proceeding instituted to remove a public officer, not the actual act of removal.
~~ LII's Focus on Impeachment ~~
Well child maybe you should look up the definition of "quasi", IT MEANS SIMILAR, NOT THE SAME.
Tell me hero does this sound like a felony?
In the case of Andrew Johnson, the House accused the President, among other things, of speaking disrespectfully of Congress "in a loud voice."
LII's Focus on Impeachment
This shows congress can file an article of impeachment for any damn thing they like. Then it's up to the senate to decide if the accused offense is true and justifies removal.
You can continue in your fantasy that it's a criminal procedure, but like most regressive fantasies you'd be wrong.Your words above, not mine, fool! Hey shit for brains...regardless of how you try to parse it, the impeachment and trial of a sitting president is NOT A civil action AS YOU CLIAMED WHEN YOU PIGGYBACKED MY POST TO ANOTHER, YOU FUCKING DUMMIE! You're wrong but you are too damn stupidly proud to admit error, Tex!So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
You are such a small person and dishonest son-of-a-bitch! If you don't like the definitions in a legal dictionary or other sources including your OWN FUCKING CITATION, write them and tell them you know better than they do and do the rewrites you ego maniacal fuck!
You're still all smoke and no fucking fire, Tex, and you will remain that type of loser until you get help!
Horseshit Tex! I'll cite the EXACT sentence of yours to which I responded again you horses ass, so you'll be sure to see it AGAIN;That wasn't the point the other fool tried to claim. He claimed impeachment wasn't a legal action but a political response, and I corrected him. Now you stroll in totally fucking confused trying to define impeachment in terms of either civil or criminal. Tex, you're unable to read a paragraph and understand what the fucking words mean! You remain all smoke and no fucking fire, Tex!So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
BTW, if one is being tried for "high crimes and misdemeanors" by the Senate with the Chief Justice of SCOTUS presiding it sure doesn't sound like the House impeachment is a civil matter given crimes and misdemeanors are involved! What kind of dictionaries do you folks use down there in Texas? All hat and no fucking cattle there, Tex!
The difference, as I stated in the post you so graciously quoted out of context, the most serious penalty available to the senate is removal from office, they can't impose fines or order incarceration the way a criminal court could. Of course you already knew that, but couldn't resist being your usual asshole self.
Too fucking poor to pay attention, assHat? You're the one dodging to avoid admitting your blatant ignorance! High Crimes and Misdemeanors committed by a sitting President are punishable CRIMES and are dealt with accordingly as outlined in the Constitution.So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
Any impeachment and trial deal with CRIMINALITY you ignorant fuck! Trying "high crimes and misdemeanors" before the Senate with the CJ of SCOTUS is not a "civil action" as you claimed, dipshit! The Article III Courts can also take action if warranted without the taint of double jeopardy, fool! Want to remain stunningly stupid and stubborn and go another round or have you awoken from that stupor of ignorance you're trapped within?
You're still all fucking bite and no bark, Tex!misdemeanor
n. a lesser crime punishable by a fine and/or county jail time for up to one year. Misdemeanors are distinguished from felonies,...and the discretion of the District Attorney. "High crimes and misdemeanors" referred to in the U.S. Constitution are felonies. ~~ Legal Dictionary - Law.com ~~
The congress should impeach Donald Trump for screwing over thousands of people out of their life savings with Trump university and for being a sexual predator.
Do you agree?
NO, fool, as you should know! The Senate is not an Article III Court, and has circumscribed powers for a trial of impeachment and the punishment imposed. You know the extent of the punishment for a president being found guilty of "HIGH CRIMES and MISDEMEANORS", which are, by their very definition, CRIMES, is removal from office. That is the power granted to the Senate; to adjudicate whether or not the president committed a crime.One question, yes or no answer is all that required. Can the senate impose criminal sanctions such as fines or imprisonment?
Go piss up a rope you fucking know nothing!Horseshit Tex! I'll cite the EXACT sentence of yours to which I responded again you horses ass, so you'll be sure to see it AGAIN;That wasn't the point the other fool tried to claim. He claimed impeachment wasn't a legal action but a political response, and I corrected him. Now you stroll in totally fucking confused trying to define impeachment in terms of either civil or criminal. Tex, you're unable to read a paragraph and understand what the fucking words mean! You remain all smoke and no fucking fire, Tex!So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
BTW, if one is being tried for "high crimes and misdemeanors" by the Senate with the Chief Justice of SCOTUS presiding it sure doesn't sound like the House impeachment is a civil matter given crimes and misdemeanors are involved! What kind of dictionaries do you folks use down there in Texas? All hat and no fucking cattle there, Tex!
The difference, as I stated in the post you so graciously quoted out of context, the most serious penalty available to the senate is removal from office, they can't impose fines or order incarceration the way a criminal court could. Of course you already knew that, but couldn't resist being your usual asshole self.
Too fucking poor to pay attention, assHat? You're the one dodging to avoid admitting your blatant ignorance! High Crimes and Misdemeanors committed by a sitting President are punishable CRIMES and are dealt with accordingly as outlined in the Constitution.So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
Any impeachment and trial deal with CRIMINALITY you ignorant fuck! Trying "high crimes and misdemeanors" before the Senate with the CJ of SCOTUS is not a "civil action" as you claimed, dipshit! The Article III Courts can also take action if warranted without the taint of double jeopardy, fool! Want to remain stunningly stupid and stubborn and go another round or have you awoken from that stupor of ignorance you're trapped within?
You're still all fucking bite and no bark, Tex!misdemeanor
n. a lesser crime punishable by a fine and/or county jail time for up to one year. Misdemeanors are distinguished from felonies,...and the discretion of the District Attorney. "High crimes and misdemeanors" referred to in the U.S. Constitution are felonies. ~~ Legal Dictionary - Law.com ~~
All your foul mouthed and infantile attacks aside, you are simply wrong.
Impeachment is an enumerated function of the legislative branch. As such, it is removed from the judicial branch. There can be NO penalty assignment other than removal from office. It is NOT a judicial action, (by definition).
As for your nonsensical bigger than life all red quote from the legal dictionary, you have misinterpreted it. The quote is a clarification of what "high crimes and misdemeanors" means ---- simply, it is clarifying that "misdemeanors" must be a felony. You cannot impeach a president for jaywalking.
Your whole premise falls apart when you recognize that a president can be impeached for an action, and then tried in a court for the same action. For example, if the president were to murder somebody, he would be impeached (an administrative action), and then he would be tried in federal court. If impeachment were a criminal action, it would violate the "double jeopardy" clause of the constitution.
Now, if you think it is necessary to continue your childish little rant, your foul mouthed attacks, feel free. But, none of that, no matter how red it is or how big it is, changes the fact that you are WRONG.
NO, fool, as you should know! The Senate is not an Article III Court, and has circumscribed powers for a trial of impeachment and the punishment imposed. You know the extent of the punishment for a president being found guilty of "HIGH CRIMES and MISDEMEANORS", which are, by their very definition, CRIMES, is removal from office. That is the power granted to the Senate; to adjudicate whether or not the president committed a crime.One question, yes or no answer is all that required. Can the senate impose criminal sanctions such as fines or imprisonment?
That makes the impeachment and trial a CRIMINAL PROCESS, you thick headed idiot! It sure as fuck is not a "civil process" as you claimed and for which I took you to task. If you disagree with that, take it up with the legal eagles who say you're wrong, too, which have already been cited!
Tex, you're being stupid. Get on your Shetland pony and ride into the fucking sunset you bloody imbecile!
NO, fool, as you should know! The Senate is not an Article III Court, and has circumscribed powers for a trial of impeachment and the punishment imposed. You know the extent of the punishment for a president being found guilty of "HIGH CRIMES and MISDEMEANORS", which are, by their very definition, CRIMES, is removal from office. That is the power granted to the Senate; to adjudicate whether or not the president committed a crime.One question, yes or no answer is all that required. Can the senate impose criminal sanctions such as fines or imprisonment?
That makes the impeachment and trial a CRIMINAL PROCESS, you thick headed idiot! It sure as fuck is not a "civil process" as you claimed and for which I took you to task. If you disagree with that, take it up with the legal eagles who say you're wrong, too, which have already been cited!
Tex, you're being stupid. Get on your Shetland pony and ride into the fucking sunset you bloody imbecile!
Go piss up a rope you fucking know nothing!Horseshit Tex! I'll cite the EXACT sentence of yours to which I responded again you horses ass, so you'll be sure to see it AGAIN;That wasn't the point the other fool tried to claim. He claimed impeachment wasn't a legal action but a political response, and I corrected him. Now you stroll in totally fucking confused trying to define impeachment in terms of either civil or criminal. Tex, you're unable to read a paragraph and understand what the fucking words mean! You remain all smoke and no fucking fire, Tex!So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
BTW, if one is being tried for "high crimes and misdemeanors" by the Senate with the Chief Justice of SCOTUS presiding it sure doesn't sound like the House impeachment is a civil matter given crimes and misdemeanors are involved! What kind of dictionaries do you folks use down there in Texas? All hat and no fucking cattle there, Tex!
The difference, as I stated in the post you so graciously quoted out of context, the most serious penalty available to the senate is removal from office, they can't impose fines or order incarceration the way a criminal court could. Of course you already knew that, but couldn't resist being your usual asshole self.
Too fucking poor to pay attention, assHat? You're the one dodging to avoid admitting your blatant ignorance! High Crimes and Misdemeanors committed by a sitting President are punishable CRIMES and are dealt with accordingly as outlined in the Constitution.So it would be a civil action, not a criminal action.
Any impeachment and trial deal with CRIMINALITY you ignorant fuck! Trying "high crimes and misdemeanors" before the Senate with the CJ of SCOTUS is not a "civil action" as you claimed, dipshit! The Article III Courts can also take action if warranted without the taint of double jeopardy, fool! Want to remain stunningly stupid and stubborn and go another round or have you awoken from that stupor of ignorance you're trapped within?
You're still all fucking bite and no bark, Tex!misdemeanor
n. a lesser crime punishable by a fine and/or county jail time for up to one year. Misdemeanors are distinguished from felonies,...and the discretion of the District Attorney. "High crimes and misdemeanors" referred to in the U.S. Constitution are felonies. ~~ Legal Dictionary - Law.com ~~
All your foul mouthed and infantile attacks aside, you are simply wrong.
Impeachment is an enumerated function of the legislative branch. As such, it is removed from the judicial branch. There can be NO penalty assignment other than removal from office. It is NOT a judicial action, (by definition).
As for your nonsensical bigger than life all red quote from the legal dictionary, you have misinterpreted it. The quote is a clarification of what "high crimes and misdemeanors" means ---- simply, it is clarifying that "misdemeanors" must be a felony. You cannot impeach a president for jaywalking.
Your whole premise falls apart when you recognize that a president can be impeached for an action, and then tried in a court for the same action. For example, if the president were to murder somebody, he would be impeached (an administrative action), and then he would be tried in federal court. If impeachment were a criminal action, it would violate the "double jeopardy" clause of the constitution.
Now, if you think it is necessary to continue your childish little rant, your foul mouthed attacks, feel free. But, none of that, no matter how red it is or how big it is, changes the fact that you are WRONG.