Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 46,618
- 20,282
- 2,173
You should have read it because it explains many precedents she ignored.that doesn’t show where she ignored any precedent…in fact all it did was give the United States partial stay….
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You should have read it because it explains many precedents she ignored.that doesn’t show where she ignored any precedent…in fact all it did was give the United States partial stay….
It shouldn’t have been. Cannon had to ignore a ton of legal precedent (actual precedent) to justify granting a special master.The request for a special master was granted, dumbass.
I’m the one who has brain damage but you can’t seem to grasp the simple meaning of a common phrase.You mean not to anyone who is suffering profound brain damage.
Do we still have a special master?You should have read it because it explains many precedents she ignored.
Was the government in control of the documents?the govt was guarding the documents with fedeal agents
So how did that ruling overrule Cannon's ruling?It shouldn’t have been. Cannon had to ignore a ton of legal precedent (actual precedent) to justify granting a special master.
The appeals court explained how badly she screwed up.
They do.Do we still have a special master?
It doesn't have any clear meaning, moron.I’m the one who has brain damage but you can’t seem to grasp the simple meaning of a common phrase.
i did read it hence why i know it doesn’t support your claimYou should have read it because it explains many precedents she ignored.
it had agents guarding them…so not sure what you meanWas the government in control of the documents?
Cannon knows. She modified her ruling in accordance with the appeals court.So how did that ruling overrule Cannon's ruling?
I apologize. I shouldn’t have given you something you couldn’t understand.i did read it hence why i know it doesn’t support your claim
So you don’t know what it means to be in control of an item?it had agents guarding them…so not sure what you mean
It’s a very simple phrase. You’d have to be incredibly stupid not to gasp it.It doesn't have any clear meaning, moron.
Cannon knows. She modified her ruling in accordance with the appeals court.
![]()
Cannon Strikes Two Provisions of Special Master Order in Response to Eleventh Circuit Ruling
The provisions of Cannons order that were stricken include Paragraph 6, which requires the Special Master to submit interim reports and recommendations to the court throughout their review, as well as Paragraph 5(b)(i)(bb), which requires that classified documents under review be made available...www.lawfareblog.com
It can mean a lot of things, moron.So you don’t know what it means to be in control of an item?
FFS. How obtuse are you?
Was the government in control of the documents? Yes or no.
haha yeah that’s what is happeningI apologize. I shouldn’t have given you something you couldn’t understand.
Simple phrases often refer to very complex subjects. Only dumbasses fail to understand that.It’s a very simple phrase. You’d have to be incredibly stupid not to gasp it.
To a moron, lots of simple things seem unclear.
Tell me some of the different things it could mean in relation to these documents.It can mean a lot of things, moron.
I'm done explaining this to idiots.Tell me some of the different things it could mean in relation to these documents.