The Chicagoization of America

American_Jihad

Flaming Libs/Koranimals
May 1, 2012
11,534
3,715
350
Gulf of Mex 26.609, -82.220
alcabama03.gif


The Chicagoization of America

April 11, 2013
By Daniel Greenfield

The urban political machine was born in New York but died in Chicago. It’s no longer a separate entity from the rest of the country; one of the inconveniences of urban life along with smog, muggings and excessive regulation. The urban political machine has gone national. It’s here. It’s there. It’s everywhere.

You may disapprove of New York’s soda ban or Chicago’s love affair with gun control or Los Angeles’ pandering to illegal aliens; but what happens in the country’s blighted metropolises no longer stays there. You can live surrounded by ten thousand acres of wilderness on one side and the deep blue sea on the other and it will still find you because the urban political machine has gone national.

The last election was the triumph of the urban political machine. In 2008, Obama ran as a national candidate. In 2012, he ran as the figurehead for the urban political machines and let their voter turnout and voter fraud efforts carry the day. In 2008, he tried inspiring people. In 2012, he ran the same tired campaign run by a hundred corrupt mayors in a hundred cities who know that they can’t lose because the game is rigged and the voters have no choice.

The urban political machine went national in 2012. The old paeans to unity were drowned in a sack. In their place was the usual urban coalition between wealthy liberal elites and poor minorities that has been running major cities into the ground for much of the old 20th and is finishing the job in the 21st. Chicago had thrown presidential elections before; but this was the first time that Chicago found itself running America.

...

It never occurs to them that the rest of the world is filled with starving human collateral and the ruins of old cities. It never occurs to them that Chicago, Detroit and New York are just places where people made things and earned a living. And that a city without an economy is just Somalia or El Salvador with a lot of tall buildings.

America is now being run by the logic of the urban machine. The rules on which the cities run are being applied to the rest of the country when it comes to gun control, health care and race. The rules broke the cities and they are breaking the country. And there is no escaping the rules without breaking the power of the urban political machine that now controls the country.

The Chicagoization of America | FrontPage Magazine

alinskyobamamarx.jpg
 
The Democrats’ Threat to ‘Go Nuclear’

July 12, 2013 By Arnold Ahlert

100817_obama_reid_ap_605-450x312.jpg


Yesterday, in an angry speech given on the Senate floor, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) warned he would go “nuclear” and change the Senate rules in order to end filibusters on President Obama’s executive branch nominations. “Senator [Mitch] McConnell broke his word,” Reid fumed. “The Republican leader has failed to live up to his commitments. He’s failed to do what he said he would do–move nominations by regular order except in extraordinary circumstances. I refuse to unilaterally surrender my right to respond to this breach of faith.” Reid can sanctimoniously frame this effort any way he wants, but his real agenda is to dramatically shift power to the executive office, a move that President Obama is anxious to exploit to impose his radical policies through bureaucratic means.

...

When working towards that resolution, Harry Reid would be very wise to remember one of the oldest political adages ever: what goes around, comes around. Despite their current hubris, Democrats will not control the levers of power forever. They need to think long and hard about the long-term consequences that would arise from the recklessness of invoking the nuclear option — lest they become victims of their own making at some future point in time.

The Democrats? Threat to ?Go Nuclear? | FrontPage Magazine
 
While the dollar plummets and the Union of Sovereign States is being consolidated into a devastating singularity --- if you disagree, you're obviously a racist.

That was settled at Appamatox Court House. Prior to that, it was "the United States are", after that, it is, "the Unitied States is". We are One Nation, Indivisible. And you fruitloops that would try to divide this nation can go straight to hell.
 
Damn. Bush baby put us into two failes wars, and had the nation in freefall toward the Second Great Republican Depression, and all that you dumb fucks can say is that President Obama is fucking up, in spite of the fact that the stock indexes are in record territory, the jobs are coming back, and housing is once again moving forward.

It is you "Conservatives" that are intent on destroying this nation. How many liberals here have said that they cannot wait until this nation self destructs? Many of you "Conservatives" have made that statement. How many liberals here have rooted for the seccession of states, and the destruction of this nation? But a great many of you "Conservatives" have.

Your greatest fear is that President Obama will arrive at 2016 with a nation economically booming, and many more people in this nation with health insurance. All your predicitons of economic doom, in spite of the best efforts of the GOP to make it so, have been shown to be total bullshit. Once again you are going down the road of offending women, hispanics, and anyone that understands any kind of science. And when you lose the next election, you will find some non-issue to blame.
 
While the dollar plummets and the Union of Sovereign States is being consolidated into a devastating singularity --- if you disagree, you're obviously a racist.

That was settled at Appamatox Court House. Prior to that, it was "the United States are", after that, it is, "the Unitied States is". We are One Nation, Indivisible. And you fruitloops that would try to divide this nation can go straight to hell.

The Ninth and Tenth Amendments were repealed at the Appomattox Court House?

Does Article V not preserve the right of the States to hold a Constitutional Convention upon 2/3 of their approval, and then upon 3/4, abolish the Federal Government entirely and establish and ordain a new charter, as is their right as Sovereign States? Was this particular part of Article V repealed at the Appomattox Court House?
 
Last edited:
LOL. One Nation, Indivisable. That is how it is. My great Grandfather fought for that from Fort Donaldson, Shiloh, all the way to New Orleans. And I have worn my nations uniform, have a dd214 that says Honorable, and will not allow fruitloops like you to destroy my nation. It is not your nation, since you obviously are working to destroy it. You have no claim to patriotism, you are a traitor.
 
LOL. One Nation, Indivisable. That is how it is. My great Grandfather fought for that from Fort Donaldson, Shiloh, all the way to New Orleans. And I have worn my nations uniform, have a dd214 that says Honorable, and will not allow fruitloops like you to destroy my nation. It is not your nation, since you obviously are working to destroy it. You have no claim to patriotism, you are a traitor.

So your claim is that the Tenth Amendment and Article V of the Constitution have been repealed?

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

Let's also add in the Ninth Amendment, since the Citizens of the State must also be sovereign in order to enter a social compact (Constitution):
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

According to the Supreme Court:
Thus, the people became Citizens of their respective states. But more importantly, for the first and only time in recorded history, the people were recognized as being the true sovereigns:

It will be sufficient to observe briefly, that the sovereignties in Europe, and particularly in England, exist on feudal principles. That system considers the prince as the sovereign, and the people as his subjects; it regards his person as the object of allegiance... No such ideas obtain here; at the revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects... and have none to govern but themselves...

Chisholm v. Georgia, Dallas' Supreme Court Reports, Vol. 2, Pages

Which is of course derived directly from the Declaration of Independence:
and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do.
 
Last edited:
Lawless immigration amnesty mob seeks Chicago-ization of America

Jun. 19, 2013

bilde

Michelle Malkin / Special to news-press.com

You can try to put “conservative” lipstick on the lawless amnesty mob. In the end, however, it’s still a lawless mob. The big government/big business alliance to protect illegal immigration got a lot of mileage using foolish Republicans Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan as front men. But the true colors of the open-borders, grievance-mongers always show through.

After America said no to a pork-filled security-undermining amnesty bill in 2007, the No Illegal Alien Left Behind lobbyists changed their overtly thuggish tactics. They put down their upside-down American flags, stopped wearing their commie Che Guevara T-shirts and cloaked their radical “Aztlan” aspirations in the less divisive rhetoric of “reform” and “opportunity.”

It was all just an act, of course. Inevitably, the mask has slipped. Over the weekend, illegal alien protesters descended on the private residence of Kansas Secretary of State and immigration enforcement lawyer Kris Kobach. Shouting into a bullhorn and waving their fists from his front porch, the property rights-invaders dubbed Kobach “King of Hate” for his work representing border security activists and federal customs enforcement agents who are fighting the systemic sabotage of immigration law. Thankfully, Kobach, his wife and their four young daughters were not home at the time.

...

Rubio, Ryan and other Republicans who’ve made common cause with these welfare-state goons have betrayed fundamental principles of limited government and the rule of law. They’ve allied themselves with the mob. There’s nothing, not one thing, “conservative” about mass illegal alien amnesty. It’s the complete Chicago-ization of America.


http://www.news-press.com/article/2...ion-amnesty-mob-seeks-Chicago-ization-America

That's how to cut through the moonblow b/s...
 
Last edited:
The article stated that the machine of Chicago started in NY and left, well that was called The Tamney Hall, an Irish bloc of politicians.Have you no history of your poly-sciences?
 
Last edited:
Lawless immigration amnesty mob seeks Chicago-ization of America

Jun. 19, 2013

bilde

Michelle Malkin / Special to news-press.com

You can try to put “conservative” lipstick on the lawless amnesty mob. In the end, however, it’s still a lawless mob. The big government/big business alliance to protect illegal immigration got a lot of mileage using foolish Republicans Marco Rubio and Paul Ryan as front men. But the true colors of the open-borders, grievance-mongers always show through.

After America said no to a pork-filled security-undermining amnesty bill in 2007, the No Illegal Alien Left Behind lobbyists changed their overtly thuggish tactics. They put down their upside-down American flags, stopped wearing their commie Che Guevara T-shirts and cloaked their radical “Aztlan” aspirations in the less divisive rhetoric of “reform” and “opportunity.”

It was all just an act, of course. Inevitably, the mask has slipped. Over the weekend, illegal alien protesters descended on the private residence of Kansas Secretary of State and immigration enforcement lawyer Kris Kobach. Shouting into a bullhorn and waving their fists from his front porch, the property rights-invaders dubbed Kobach “King of Hate” for his work representing border security activists and federal customs enforcement agents who are fighting the systemic sabotage of immigration law. Thankfully, Kobach, his wife and their four young daughters were not home at the time.

...

Rubio, Ryan and other Republicans who’ve made common cause with these welfare-state goons have betrayed fundamental principles of limited government and the rule of law. They’ve allied themselves with the mob. There’s nothing, not one thing, “conservative” about mass illegal alien amnesty. It’s the complete Chicago-ization of America.


http://www.news-press.com/article/2...ion-amnesty-mob-seeks-Chicago-ization-America

That's how to cut through the moonblow b/s...:eusa_angel:
 

Forum List

Back
Top