The Charlie Kirk Assassination Wrecked The Right

Lying lefty ***** rewrite history constantly.

GFY.

Plenty of sickos on the left celebrated Kirk’s murder.
So did plenty of freaks on the right

1000006865.webp
 
MAGAs range from moderates to conservative.
Southern Democrats are usually conservatives.
Muslims are the most conservative.
Progressives are usually Marxists leftists.
Liberals practically don't exist anymore.
MAGAs range from moderate populists easily fooled, out to radical, which is rarely conservative.

Southern Democrats are usually conservatives. Older ones (mostly dead) like my father and grandfather, yes. Southern Dems I know or meet now, tend to be pretty liberal, favoring/perpetuating the kind of government programs, typical giveaways Dems use to buy votes. Definitely not conservative.

Muslims are the most conservative. Beats me. I don't actually know any Muslims, but kind of doubt it, due to their religion and some of the teachings.

Progressives are usually Marxists leftists. 1. I get confused about terms progressive vs liberal and don't even know how to look it up to get a straight, definitive answer, instead of some asshole with an agenda for one side or the other. 2. Marxists are communists, kind of like socialist on steroids and Red Bull, ready to kill everybody to force their "share the wealth" agenda to get control of the wealth, as the most widely known text of Marx was The Communist Manifesto.

Liberals practically don't exist anymore. Yes, they do. There are plenty of them, and when you get too many in one place, it might be time to move, if you lack the votes to maintain sanity at the city level.

Generalizations can be fun, but often lack accuracy.
 
MAGAs range from moderate populists easily fooled, out to radical, which is rarely conservative.

Southern Democrats are usually conservatives. Older ones (mostly dead) like my father and grandfather, yes. Southern Dems I know or meet now, tend to be pretty liberal, favoring/perpetuating the kind of government programs, typical giveaways Dems use to buy votes. Definitely not conservative.

Muslims are the most conservative. Beats me. I don't actually know any Muslims, but kind of doubt it, due to their religion and some of the teachings.

Progressives are usually Marxists leftists. 1. I get confused about terms progressive vs liberal and don't even know how to look it up to get a straight, definitive answer, instead of some asshole with an agenda for one side or the other. 2. Marxists are communists, kind of like socialist on steroids and Red Bull, ready to kill everybody to force their "share the wealth" agenda to get control of the wealth, as the most widely known text of Marx was The Communist Manifesto.

Liberals practically don't exist anymore. Yes, they do. There are plenty of them, and when you get too many in one place, it might be time to move, if you lack the votes to maintain sanity at the city level.

Generalizations can be fun, but often lack accuracy.
Anybody who doesn't pay attention can be easily fooled.
That's why Democrats feel they can lie about everything and get away with it.

You see, you folks hate us so much that you cannot open your mind enough to believe anything good about us.

And you think we're the ones being fooled and running on pure emotion.
 
Your figurehead donny and his administration presents to many examples to ignore, unless you are devoted to the man.

Try to remember, "You Guys" is about 57% of the population, so we may be on to something. Kind of depends on if you prefer the Constitution or executive order off the cuff.
No man. Your corrupt media constantly lies about Trump.
It's designed to keep you pissed off at him so you'll refuse to give him credit for anything good he does.
Because the good he's been doing is drowned out by the lies and false accusations.
 
No man. Your corrupt media constantly lies about Trump.
It's designed to keep you pissed off at him so you'll refuse to give him credit for anything good he does.
Because the good he's been doing is drowned out by the lies and false accusations.
I own no media.
If news if varifiable in isn't a lie, but simply reality you don't like.
Live with it.

Get back on Thread Topic or find another thread

The Charlie Kirk Assassination Wrecked The Right​

 
Tyler Robinson’s actions were clearly inspired by the Left’s hysteric rhetoric



This is IQ<5 bs.

Tyler Robinson is a stooge.

The GOP's biggest problem is that it has way too many IQ<5 morons who can't pass a fourth grade math course.

Supporting Israel, believing 911... the GOP is on the wrong side of 70-30 on both, and the "pushing" by Zionist Fascist Treasonous Liars that "Tyler did it" is right up there with believing a 757 can fly at 600 mph with its nose 8 feet off the ground...
 
I think Trump did a fantastic job of resurrecting the Right and bringing it in unison then turned right around and singlehandedly destroyed it and divided it. It was he who literally said on national television that he "no longer needed" our support (us America First types). The Kirk assassination may have exacerbated it.
 
Saw Erika last night with Weiss?
<~~~~~~>
Indeed, Bari Weiss interviewed Erika Kirk and this is what Weiss said on "CBS Mornings" to discuss why she chose Kirk as her first guest, especially someone who is considered so polarizing.

“Agree with it. Disagree with it, but Turning Point USA is a powerhouse of an organization, and it will have so much to say and influence over the direction of the right, especially after Trump,” she said.
~*~​
“Erika Kirk is a victim of what could be a very, very disturbing version of America,” Weiss said. “Her husband was speaking on a college campus, whether you agreed with him or not, he was practicing the most fundamental of American rights. He was trying to persuade people with words, and then he got a bullet to his neck as he was speaking to someone that disagreed with him.”

No matter what CBS does to clear it's lying and biased attitude, it cannot erase it's past.
 
This is IQ<5 bs.

Tyler Robinson is a stooge.

The GOP's biggest problem is that it has way too many IQ<5 morons who can't pass a fourth grade math course.

Supporting Israel, believing 911... the GOP is on the wrong side of 70-30 on both, and the "pushing" by Zionist Fascist Treasonous Liars that "Tyler did it" is right up there with believing a 757 can fly at 600 mph with its nose 8 feet off the ground...

Da Joooooossss!
Hilarious.
 
I own no media.
If news if varifiable in isn't a lie, but simply reality you don't like.
Live with it.

Get back on Thread Topic or find another thread

The Charlie Kirk Assassination Wrecked The Right​

It's not my fault you wanted to talk about Trump.

The point I wanted to make was because Democrats control 90% of all media.....they get away with lying about people like Charlie Kirk....which resulted in his murder.

Inflammatory, extremist and violent rhetoric caused the murder of Charlie Kirk. Learn to deal with that fact.
 
Last edited:
It does seem like that's around the time things really started becoming unglued. But the party had already come off the rails years before that.

I sure do remember Republican Bobby Jindal warning his fellow Republicans that they were becoming "the stupid party". Unserious, conspiratorial, emotional, manipulated.

Fingers crossed that the party somehow returns to this planet soon. We need two strong and serious parties, and right now we're stuck at zero.

TDSers have been unglued for over ten years.
 
It's not my fault you wanted to talk about Trump.

The point I wanted to make was because Democrats control 90% of all media.....they get away will lying about people like Charlie Kirk....which resulted in his murder.

Inflammatory, extremist and violent rhetoric caused the murder of Charlie Kirk. Learn to deal with that fact.
I saw you got me off topic, so I deleted my post and told you to get back on topic.
This post of yours is on topic.

Controls 90% of the media? Nope.
Most people get most of their news from cable news. Ours it typical. The news tier starts with FOX then CNN, then MSNow (or msnbc or whatever they were told to change their name to), then NEWSMAX. That is a 2:2.
Then probably comes social media new sources. I don't do X. I don't do Truth Social, or Facebook. but it is obvious there is a algorithm designed to feed you inclinations. I get some small amount from YouTube, another algorithm driven source, but has vids to suit any persuasion. Whether the average consumer consumes the mix you like, is your problem, but the real problem, is whether people take time to check multiple sources for, and that is not media controlling the news, often it is reality controlling the news. If you view snippets, you get a snippet view.

You guys are just butt hurt, as you do not control the news reporting.

As for the kirk killing and the conspiracy theories, those theories are filling the void, left by the unbelievable scenario backed by the Administration, but not supported by ballistics, physics, time, available videos and logic. I have no idea who was behind it, but the shooting scenario and capture are BS fantasy story to cover up for something. It reminds me of the JFK assassination, another famous case of a quickly put out scenario, hard to make agree with ballistics, physics, time, available video and logic.
 
I saw you got me off topic, so I deleted my post and told you to get back on topic.
This post of yours is on topic.

Controls 90% of the media? Nope.
Most people get most of their news from cable news. Ours it typical. The news tier starts with FOX then CNN, then MSNow (or msnbc or whatever they were told to change their name to), then NEWSMAX. That is a 2:2.
Then probably comes social media new sources. I don't do X. I don't do Truth Social, or Facebook. but it is obvious there is a algorithm designed to feed you inclinations. I get some small amount from YouTube, another algorithm driven source, but has vids to suit any persuasion. Whether the average consumer consumes the mix you like, is your problem, but the real problem, is whether people take time to check multiple sources for, and that is not media controlling the news, often it is reality controlling the news. If you view snippets, you get a snippet view.

You guys are just butt hurt, as you do not control the news reporting.

As for the kirk killing and the conspiracy theories, those theories are filling the void, left by the unbelievable scenario backed by the Administration, but not supported by ballistics, physics, time, available videos and logic. I have no idea who was behind it, but the shooting scenario and capture are BS fantasy story to cover up for something. It reminds me of the JFK assassination, another famous case of a quickly put out scenario, hard to make agree with ballistics, physics, time, available video and logic.
OR, hear me out

The people who are actually experts in those thing were, in fact, consulted by law enforcement. And they made sense of it.
 
15th post
OR, hear me out

The people who are actually experts in those thing were, in fact, consulted by law enforcement. And they made sense of it.
I have seen several experts, that pretty well make the government story sound like a fairy tale. We will not know, until the trial. Then again, it could get discussed for 50 years.
 
I saw you got me off topic, so I deleted my post and told you to get back on topic.
This post of yours is on topic.

Controls 90% of the media? Nope.
Most people get most of their news from cable news. Ours it typical. The news tier starts with FOX then CNN, then MSNow (or msnbc or whatever they were told to change their name to), then NEWSMAX. That is a 2:2.
Then probably comes social media new sources. I don't do X. I don't do Truth Social, or Facebook. but it is obvious there is a algorithm designed to feed you inclinations. I get some small amount from YouTube, another algorithm driven source, but has vids to suit any persuasion. Whether the average consumer consumes the mix you like, is your problem, but the real problem, is whether people take time to check multiple sources for, and that is not media controlling the news, often it is reality controlling the news. If you view snippets, you get a snippet view.

You guys are just butt hurt, as you do not control the news reporting.

As for the kirk killing and the conspiracy theories, those theories are filling the void, left by the unbelievable scenario backed by the Administration, but not supported by ballistics, physics, time, available videos and logic. I have no idea who was behind it, but the shooting scenario and capture are BS fantasy story to cover up for something. It reminds me of the JFK assassination, another famous case of a quickly put out scenario, hard to make agree with ballistics, physics, time, available video and logic.
Sorry, but nobody should control the media. Neither political party.

You don't know nothing about the motives of the shooter because you use media sources that don't tell you the truth anymore.

The shooter's motives were pretty clear. He was a leftist with a transgender boyfriend. He believes everything bad the media said about Charlie Kirk.

End of story.
 
I have seen several experts, that pretty well make the government story sound like a fairy tale. We will not know, until the trial. Then again, it could get discussed for 50 years.
You've been lied to for so long that you couldn't recognize the truth even if it was force-fed to you.

When the press is full of lies.....you basically believe only what you want to believe. Classic Marxist scenario.
 
It does seem like that's around the time things really started becoming unglued. But the party had already come off the rails years before that.

I sure do remember Republican Bobby Jindal warning his fellow Republicans that they were becoming "the stupid party". Unserious, conspiratorial, emotional, manipulated.

Fingers crossed that the party somehow returns to this planet soon. We need two strong and serious parties, and right now we're stuck at zero.
lol ! socialists [communists]are taking over the dem party .. that's the REAL headline !
 
Back
Top Bottom