Deny the British empire's crimes? No, we ignore them | George Monbiot
Spreading the love in Kenya.
Interrogation under torture was widespread. Many of the men were anally raped, using knives, broken bottles, rifle barrels, snakes and scorpions. A favourite technique was to hold a man upside down, his head in a bucket of water, while sand was rammed into his rectum with a stick. Women were gang-raped by the guards. People were mauled by dogs and electrocuted. The British devised a special tool which they used for first crushing and then ripping off testicles. They used pliers to mutilate women's breasts. They cut off inmates' ears and fingers and gouged out their eyes. They dragged people behind Land Rovers until their bodies disintegrated. Men were rolled up in barbed wire and kicked around the compound.
Even Guantanamo isnt quite that bad.
What's your point dude? If it is in the past then how this generation could possibly be responsible for it?
There are several points but I suppose the main one is that people are very quick to condemn one group in society for the actions of a few whilst ignoring the actions of others. Are the awful actions of ISIS any worse than those of the British, or American governments ?
I hate hypocrisy although I accept that much of it is based on ignorance.
OK, Tommy ... what were you hoping for, as a result of your thread ?
'Awful actions' is how you describe what ISIS get up to. Yet ... you wanted this thread, obviously, to reflect an equivalence between the old British Empire and the present-day actions of ISIS.
So ... WHY, Tommy ?
You dig up old history - which you may be painting as darker than it really is - and want people to reflect upon history long-since dead and buried. The obvious point is to claim an equivalence between the old Empire and the likes of ISIS today. Why do this, unless you're trying to foment some sort of 'guilt trip' meant to neutralise our resolve to properly tackle ISIS ?
Are we meant to say that the actions of ancestors from several generations ago, for which current generations hold NO responsibility
AT ALL, must stop us from seeing the evil of ISIS and doing something about it in the present-day world ??
Tommy, you
could take the line that, now, we are much better than our ancestors, and therefore eminently fitted to deal with ISIS. This, Tommy, would be the proper and useful line to take. Instead ... what ? We must wallow in your self-contrived guilt trip and think ourselves unfit to do anything on the world stage ?
We are not our ancestors, Tommy. Regardless of any rights or wrongs committed in the long-ago past, the REAL world,
NOW, has issues requiring solutions.
Would you rather we all ran away from those 'issues' ?
And, if we did ... would a 'Tommy' from a future generation post a thread on a discussion site berating us for the 'shameful chapter in our history' when we failed to act ??
Think on that, Tommy ...