The “Bombshell”: President Trump reached for steering wheel of limo and fought with Secret Service Agents.

[surada]

This article isn't even evidence that it did happen. She's giving hearsay, which is NOT evidence, and the SS has stated they are willing to testify that it did not happen. So, my money is on it didn't happen.

Let them testify.

A Look At Trumpâs Armored SUV And Why That Photo Op Was A Bad Idea

It’s one of the safest modes of transportation on the planet…usually.

www.forbes.com

 

[surada]

It's sworn testimony of hearsay, and hearsay is not evidence. Now if the guy she claims told her that was put under oath and he WAS an actual eyewitness and testified that it happened, THAT would be evidence. Now, she, in sworn testimony, stated several times that TRUMP! was riding in the Beast at the time, correct? Have you SEEN how far it is from the back seat of that thing to the steering wheel and how difficult it would be to do what he's accused of doing? If it wasn't the Beast but an SUV (as some are claiming), then her testimony is false and cannot be believed. This is why hearsay is not considered evidence, it falls apart so quickly. Add to that the SS has stated it is willing to testify that it did NOT happen. If they did that, I would certainly take their word for it over hers, but the last I heard the kangaroo court may not let them testify.

She wasn't in the SUV. She reported what she was told by the secret service guys. Of course they can testify.

 

[hadit]

Let them testify.

A Look At Trumpâs Armored SUV And Why That Photo Op Was A Bad Idea

It’s one of the safest modes of transportation on the planet…usually.

www.forbes.com

It's up to the kangaroo court to allow their bombshell be destroyed.

 

[Coyote]

Do you believe they'll be called to testify?

I don't.

They can volunteer. The republicans can call on them. Also, I heard the committee was going to be talking with them, so we will see. I don’t credit anything that is not under oath.

Secret Service plans to respond to Jan. 6 committee regarding Trump's actions, after Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony

The Secret Service wants to respond "regarding the new allegations surfaced in today's testimony," said Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi.

www.cbsnews.com

 

[Coyote]

It's sworn testimony of hearsay, and hearsay is not evidence. Now if the guy she claims told her that was put under oath and he WAS an actual eyewitness and testified that it happened, THAT would be evidence. Now, she, in sworn testimony, stated several times that TRUMP! was riding in the Beast at the time, correct? Have you SEEN how far it is from the back seat of that thing to the steering wheel and how difficult it would be to do what he's accused of doing? If it wasn't the Beast but an SUV (as some are claiming), then her testimony is false and cannot be believed. This is why hearsay is not considered evidence, it falls apart so quickly. Add to that the SS has stated it is willing to testify that it did NOT happen. If they did that, I would certainly take their word for it over hers, but the last I heard the kangaroo court may not let them testify.

It isn’t a court. And her testimony was given under oath which means she most likely reiterating what she heard.

 

[Flash]

 

[surada]

It's up to the kangaroo court to allow their bombshell be destroyed.

Wait and see if they will throw thier careers away for Trump.

 

[Flash]

They can volunteer. The republicans can call on them. Also, I heard the committee was going to be talking with them, so we will see. I don’t credit anything that is not under oath.

Secret Service plans to respond to Jan. 6 committee regarding Trump's actions, after Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony

The Secret Service wants to respond "regarding the new allegations surfaced in today's testimony," said Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi.

www.cbsnews.com

There is no cross examination in the kangaroo court.

It all the Democrat filth and two batshit crazy Never Trumper RINOs.

 

[Coyote]

There is no cross examination in the kangaroo court.

It all the Democrat filth and two batshit crazy Never Trumper RINOs.

For the upteenth time, this isn’t a court

 

[daveman]

If you believe this story, its YOU who is bitterly clinging to fiction.

I don't believe the story. It's so insanely obvious it's made-up bullshit. Only a retard would believe it -- as we've seen.

 

[daveman]

WTF?
They had them already, from prior hearings that weren't televised.
The Trump regime are turning on each other, like rats, and Trump is going through a box of

View attachment 663744

A day.

You believed Trump tried to strangle his driver, didn't you? Matter of fact -- you STILL believe it.

Leftists are so damn gullible.

 

[daveman]

The Bombshell;

I don’t fucking care that they have weapons, they’re not here to hurt me.," "They’re not here to hurt me. Take the fucking mags away. Let my people in. They can march to the Capitol from here, let the people in and take the mags away.”

You won’t be able to spin that one away lemming.

Is there a recording of him saying that, or is that what the young woman who wasn't there said he said?

 

[daveman]

It makes the left look absolutely terrible when they bring out this kind of horseshit. Democrats have clearly not learned their lesson. They are about to in November.

They'll lose, but they won't learn anything from it -- they'll just cheat and lie even harder.

 

[surada]

You believed Trump tried to strangle his driver, didn't you? Matter of fact -- you STILL believe it.

Leftists are so damn gullible.

Doesn't it sound like Trump bragging?

 

[surada]

Is there a recording of him saying that, or is that what the young woman who wasn't there said he said?

It's what she was told by her boss and another secret service guy.

 

[daveman]

That testimony spanked Trump even harder than Stormy Daniels did.

Hence the butthurt.

You just believe everything you're told without hesitation or question. Don't you dare consider your masters are lying to you.

 

[daveman]

I won't argue the point of whether illegal behavior by trump has been exposed multiple times in the past (it has) or that republicans gave him a pass while admitting he was guilty, but I will say he should be held accountable for his actions.

You mean the actions he actually performed, or the actions Democrat say he did?

That's a vastly different list.

 

[daveman]

Media is already backtracking and calling it an "anecdote":

Because Democrats knew their Useful Idiots -- as we've seen here -- would believe it without question.

 

[daveman]

I'll bet you also believe the pee tape is real.

Enjoy your reality show for idiots.

He's just a Dem Useful Idiot -- he'll believe what he's told to believe.

 

[Mac-7]

Facts are facts. They are only loyal to the truth.

I keep calling for the truth to be established by handwriting experts

You seem to be afraid of that