The Big Lie

Faun said:
As many times as you're gonna claim Trump was too retarded to know that was a racist rally, organized by racists, sponsored by racists, promoted by racists, hosted by racists and attended by racists.

Got it. You think that someone would have to be retarded to not agree with you.
Nope, you don't "got it." I don't think that. There are many people who disagree with me here who I don't consider retarded.

That does not change the fact that you people lied and are still lying about what he said.
Nope, the liar is you. Most notably, I'm going by what he actually said. You're going by what you think he actually meant.

That means that the voters were voting, making their choice based on FALSE INFORMATION.
Nope, you're lying again as the information wasn't false. There was a racist rally which led to a confrontation to counter the racists. Racism is evil. Fighting it is noble. Trump equated the two sides and idiotically claimed there were "very fine people on both sides."

Fraud by deception. THe election is thus, not legitimate.
Nope, you're just crazy. :cuckoo:


Trump clearly condemned w.s. You are inventing confusion where there is none. To stonewall in defense of your big lie.


Trump: " -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence. It has no place in America.
After how many days and a barrage of public pressure?I


His remarks occurred after the president came under fire for the way he handled Charlottesville two days ago. Mr. Trump on Saturday condemned hatred "on many sides," which prompted backlash from both Democrats and Republicans alike.​


After zero days. The riot occurred sat morning, to lunch time, Saturday. Expanded quote. I was not trying to trick you.


Trump: "As I said on -- remember, Saturday -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence.



See, here we will see that your complaints are bullshit. You made a point that he waited days to condemn the riot. I just proved that that was not true. Now you will ignore this new information and hold to your position, without any adjustment.


Because, your position is based, at best on blind faith, and at worst on knowingly lying in the fact of clear proof.
What was the display of bigotry from the left?
<crickets>

What was the display of bigotry from the left?


Oh, sorry I missed that post.

Well, are you asking my opinion, or asking me to specify what Trump was referring to?

REgardless, I'm glad you are not denying that Trump was right to denounce the violence and hatred from both sides, including from the left.


The point is, Trump denounced both sides for their bad behavior, the violent and hateful left (antifa/blm) and the violent and hateful right?, (w.s.).

As he well should have.
How about answering the question?


It was a riot. I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to.

He made a statement condemning the violence, bigotry and hate on BOTH sides.


Nit picking over which act of bigotry from the LEFT he was referring to, is fucking stupid.


You are just trying to avoid dealing with the fact that he condemned the violence, bigotry and hatred, as he well should have.


His response was nearly perfect and you are nit picking like the asshole you are.
So what was this display of bigotry on the left he was talking about?


Answered above.

And sure like all the people Trump used eventually he threw Proud Boys under the bus too. No surprise.


Members of the far-right group, who were among Donald Trump’s staunchest fans, are calling him “weak” as more of them were charged for storming the U.S. Capitol.

In a Nov. 8 post in a private channel of the messaging app Telegram, the group urged its followers to attend protests against an election that it said had been fraudulently stolen from Mr. Trump. “Hail Emperor Trump,” the Proud Boys wrote.

But by this week, the group’s attitude toward Mr. Trump had changed. “Trump will go down as a total failure,” the Proud Boys said in the same Telegram channel on Monday.


That has no relevance to anything in this thread. You are bringing it up, BECAUSE it has no relevance.


You people lied. You people lied A BIG LIE.


One big enough to swing the election.


Thus, the election is not legitimate.
There were exit polls…how many people listed Trump’s perceived ambivalence towards racists as a reason not to vote for him? (ambivalence he displayed over and over)
The blob did get the INCEL vote...


You people are weird the way you are focused on INCELs.
 
Faun said:
As many times as you're gonna claim Trump was too retarded to know that was a racist rally, organized by racists, sponsored by racists, promoted by racists, hosted by racists and attended by racists.

Got it. You think that someone would have to be retarded to not agree with you.
Nope, you don't "got it." I don't think that. There are many people who disagree with me here who I don't consider retarded.

That does not change the fact that you people lied and are still lying about what he said.
Nope, the liar is you. Most notably, I'm going by what he actually said. You're going by what you think he actually meant.

That means that the voters were voting, making their choice based on FALSE INFORMATION.
Nope, you're lying again as the information wasn't false. There was a racist rally which led to a confrontation to counter the racists. Racism is evil. Fighting it is noble. Trump equated the two sides and idiotically claimed there were "very fine people on both sides."

Fraud by deception. THe election is thus, not legitimate.
Nope, you're just crazy. :cuckoo:


Trump clearly condemned w.s. You are inventing confusion where there is none. To stonewall in defense of your big lie.


Trump: " -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence. It has no place in America.
After how many days and a barrage of public pressure?I


His remarks occurred after the president came under fire for the way he handled Charlottesville two days ago. Mr. Trump on Saturday condemned hatred "on many sides," which prompted backlash from both Democrats and Republicans alike.​


After zero days. The riot occurred sat morning, to lunch time, Saturday. Expanded quote. I was not trying to trick you.


Trump: "As I said on -- remember, Saturday -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence.



See, here we will see that your complaints are bullshit. You made a point that he waited days to condemn the riot. I just proved that that was not true. Now you will ignore this new information and hold to your position, without any adjustment.


Because, your position is based, at best on blind faith, and at worst on knowingly lying in the fact of clear proof.
What was the display of bigotry from the left?
<crickets>

What was the display of bigotry from the left?


Oh, sorry I missed that post.

Well, are you asking my opinion, or asking me to specify what Trump was referring to?

REgardless, I'm glad you are not denying that Trump was right to denounce the violence and hatred from both sides, including from the left.


The point is, Trump denounced both sides for their bad behavior, the violent and hateful left (antifa/blm) and the violent and hateful right?, (w.s.).

As he well should have.
How about answering the question?


It was a riot. I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to.

He made a statement condemning the violence, bigotry and hate on BOTH sides.


Nit picking over which act of bigotry from the LEFT he was referring to, is fucking stupid.


You are just trying to avoid dealing with the fact that he condemned the violence, bigotry and hatred, as he well should have.


His response was nearly perfect and you are nit picking like the asshole you are.
So what was this display of bigotry on the left he was talking about?


Answered above.
LOLOL

You didn't answer. You evaded answering. Your non-answer was, "I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to."

Thanks for showing he lied about that too.


That is the truth. I don't know what particular act(s) he was referring to.


You are fixating on this, to distract from teh fact that you LIED and are LYING about what TRump said.
And I thanked you for showing he lied. There was nothing bigoted about the lefts' presence there that day. They were there to oppose bigotry and Trump, the idiot that he is, equated them with the right.


Me not knowing what specific actions or events he was referring to, does not show that he lied.


AND, it is worth noting, it really doesn't matter if he was or was not accurate or honest about the action of the lefty rioters.


BECAUSE THE POINT IS, THAT YOU PEOPLE LIED ABOUT WHAT HE SAID.


All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.


Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.


You committed fraud by deception, and thus, the election is not legitimate.
LOL

The one lying about what he said is you. You're the one making up he meant there were non-racists there when he himself never once said that. To cover for your lie, you then claim he was clear about it; but that too is an obvious lie as he made at least 3 separate appearances to clarify his position. And I asked you what was bigoted about the left because he tried to portray both sides as bigoted, which they weren't. That too was a lie.
 
Faun said:
As many times as you're gonna claim Trump was too retarded to know that was a racist rally, organized by racists, sponsored by racists, promoted by racists, hosted by racists and attended by racists.

Got it. You think that someone would have to be retarded to not agree with you.
Nope, you don't "got it." I don't think that. There are many people who disagree with me here who I don't consider retarded.

That does not change the fact that you people lied and are still lying about what he said.
Nope, the liar is you. Most notably, I'm going by what he actually said. You're going by what you think he actually meant.

That means that the voters were voting, making their choice based on FALSE INFORMATION.
Nope, you're lying again as the information wasn't false. There was a racist rally which led to a confrontation to counter the racists. Racism is evil. Fighting it is noble. Trump equated the two sides and idiotically claimed there were "very fine people on both sides."

Fraud by deception. THe election is thus, not legitimate.
Nope, you're just crazy. :cuckoo:


Trump clearly condemned w.s. You are inventing confusion where there is none. To stonewall in defense of your big lie.


Trump: " -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence. It has no place in America.
After how many days and a barrage of public pressure?I


His remarks occurred after the president came under fire for the way he handled Charlottesville two days ago. Mr. Trump on Saturday condemned hatred "on many sides," which prompted backlash from both Democrats and Republicans alike.​


After zero days. The riot occurred sat morning, to lunch time, Saturday. Expanded quote. I was not trying to trick you.


Trump: "As I said on -- remember, Saturday -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence.



See, here we will see that your complaints are bullshit. You made a point that he waited days to condemn the riot. I just proved that that was not true. Now you will ignore this new information and hold to your position, without any adjustment.


Because, your position is based, at best on blind faith, and at worst on knowingly lying in the fact of clear proof.
What was the display of bigotry from the left?
<crickets>

What was the display of bigotry from the left?


Oh, sorry I missed that post.

Well, are you asking my opinion, or asking me to specify what Trump was referring to?

REgardless, I'm glad you are not denying that Trump was right to denounce the violence and hatred from both sides, including from the left.


The point is, Trump denounced both sides for their bad behavior, the violent and hateful left (antifa/blm) and the violent and hateful right?, (w.s.).

As he well should have.
How about answering the question?


It was a riot. I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to.

He made a statement condemning the violence, bigotry and hate on BOTH sides.


Nit picking over which act of bigotry from the LEFT he was referring to, is fucking stupid.


You are just trying to avoid dealing with the fact that he condemned the violence, bigotry and hatred, as he well should have.


His response was nearly perfect and you are nit picking like the asshole you are.
So what was this display of bigotry on the left he was talking about?


Answered above.

And sure like all the people Trump used eventually he threw Proud Boys under the bus too. No surprise.


Members of the far-right group, who were among Donald Trump’s staunchest fans, are calling him “weak” as more of them were charged for storming the U.S. Capitol.

In a Nov. 8 post in a private channel of the messaging app Telegram, the group urged its followers to attend protests against an election that it said had been fraudulently stolen from Mr. Trump. “Hail Emperor Trump,” the Proud Boys wrote.

But by this week, the group’s attitude toward Mr. Trump had changed. “Trump will go down as a total failure,” the Proud Boys said in the same Telegram channel on Monday.


That has no relevance to anything in this thread. You are bringing it up, BECAUSE it has no relevance.


You people lied. You people lied A BIG LIE.


One big enough to swing the election.


Thus, the election is not legitimate.
There were exit polls…how many people listed Trump’s perceived ambivalence towards racists as a reason not to vote for him? (ambivalence he displayed over and over)
The blob did get the INCEL vote...
He got 99.9% of the racist vote. He wasn’t going to trade that for a minuscule increase in the black vote…he HAD to play footsie with the racists that supported him.

Trump lost because of COVID, period. If he had responded more effectively to the pandemic, he would’ve been reelected.


You people are delusional. White Racists have been completely marginalized since the mid 60s. Which is why you people are so focused on fighting them.

Trump would love to have more of the minority vote. Hell, it has been a common point of discussion that without being able to do that, republicans are doomed as a national party.


Your lie here, is part of a larger lie, that republicans are wacist, so that you people can keep your lock on the minority votes.


You are lying assholes like that.
 
Faun said:
As many times as you're gonna claim Trump was too retarded to know that was a racist rally, organized by racists, sponsored by racists, promoted by racists, hosted by racists and attended by racists.

Got it. You think that someone would have to be retarded to not agree with you.
Nope, you don't "got it." I don't think that. There are many people who disagree with me here who I don't consider retarded.

That does not change the fact that you people lied and are still lying about what he said.
Nope, the liar is you. Most notably, I'm going by what he actually said. You're going by what you think he actually meant.

That means that the voters were voting, making their choice based on FALSE INFORMATION.
Nope, you're lying again as the information wasn't false. There was a racist rally which led to a confrontation to counter the racists. Racism is evil. Fighting it is noble. Trump equated the two sides and idiotically claimed there were "very fine people on both sides."

Fraud by deception. THe election is thus, not legitimate.
Nope, you're just crazy. :cuckoo:


Trump clearly condemned w.s. You are inventing confusion where there is none. To stonewall in defense of your big lie.


Trump: " -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence. It has no place in America.
After how many days and a barrage of public pressure?I


His remarks occurred after the president came under fire for the way he handled Charlottesville two days ago. Mr. Trump on Saturday condemned hatred "on many sides," which prompted backlash from both Democrats and Republicans alike.​


After zero days. The riot occurred sat morning, to lunch time, Saturday. Expanded quote. I was not trying to trick you.


Trump: "As I said on -- remember, Saturday -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence.



See, here we will see that your complaints are bullshit. You made a point that he waited days to condemn the riot. I just proved that that was not true. Now you will ignore this new information and hold to your position, without any adjustment.


Because, your position is based, at best on blind faith, and at worst on knowingly lying in the fact of clear proof.
What was the display of bigotry from the left?
<crickets>

What was the display of bigotry from the left?


Oh, sorry I missed that post.

Well, are you asking my opinion, or asking me to specify what Trump was referring to?

REgardless, I'm glad you are not denying that Trump was right to denounce the violence and hatred from both sides, including from the left.


The point is, Trump denounced both sides for their bad behavior, the violent and hateful left (antifa/blm) and the violent and hateful right?, (w.s.).

As he well should have.
How about answering the question?


It was a riot. I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to.

He made a statement condemning the violence, bigotry and hate on BOTH sides.


Nit picking over which act of bigotry from the LEFT he was referring to, is fucking stupid.


You are just trying to avoid dealing with the fact that he condemned the violence, bigotry and hatred, as he well should have.


His response was nearly perfect and you are nit picking like the asshole you are.
So what was this display of bigotry on the left he was talking about?


Answered above.

And sure like all the people Trump used eventually he threw Proud Boys under the bus too. No surprise.


Members of the far-right group, who were among Donald Trump’s staunchest fans, are calling him “weak” as more of them were charged for storming the U.S. Capitol.

In a Nov. 8 post in a private channel of the messaging app Telegram, the group urged its followers to attend protests against an election that it said had been fraudulently stolen from Mr. Trump. “Hail Emperor Trump,” the Proud Boys wrote.

But by this week, the group’s attitude toward Mr. Trump had changed. “Trump will go down as a total failure,” the Proud Boys said in the same Telegram channel on Monday.


That has no relevance to anything in this thread. You are bringing it up, BECAUSE it has no relevance.


You people lied. You people lied A BIG LIE.


One big enough to swing the election.


Thus, the election is not legitimate.
There were exit polls…how many people listed Trump’s perceived ambivalence towards racists as a reason not to vote for him? (ambivalence he displayed over and over)
The blob did get the INCEL vote...
He got 99.9% of the racist vote. He wasn’t going to trade that for a minuscule increase in the black vote…he HAD to play footsie with the racists that supported him.

Trump lost because of COVID, period. If he had responded more effectively to the pandemic, he would’ve been reelected.

Trump lost because of incompetence. If he hadn't been incompetent, he would have probably been re-elected.


If that was true, they would not have put so much effort into lying, and holding on to lies.
 
All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.

Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.
LOLOL

Now you're projecting. In reality, you're the one who started talking about Trump's "very fine people" comment. You're the one who kept posting about it, trying to bait the thread to talk about it; until someone did. You're the one who knew what direction this argument would lead to if someone took your bait. You're the one who hijacked this thread. Now you cry like a baby over trying to get the thread closed due to your actions.
 
Faun said:
As many times as you're gonna claim Trump was too retarded to know that was a racist rally, organized by racists, sponsored by racists, promoted by racists, hosted by racists and attended by racists.

Got it. You think that someone would have to be retarded to not agree with you.
Nope, you don't "got it." I don't think that. There are many people who disagree with me here who I don't consider retarded.

That does not change the fact that you people lied and are still lying about what he said.
Nope, the liar is you. Most notably, I'm going by what he actually said. You're going by what you think he actually meant.

That means that the voters were voting, making their choice based on FALSE INFORMATION.
Nope, you're lying again as the information wasn't false. There was a racist rally which led to a confrontation to counter the racists. Racism is evil. Fighting it is noble. Trump equated the two sides and idiotically claimed there were "very fine people on both sides."

Fraud by deception. THe election is thus, not legitimate.
Nope, you're just crazy. :cuckoo:


Trump clearly condemned w.s. You are inventing confusion where there is none. To stonewall in defense of your big lie.


Trump: " -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence. It has no place in America.
After how many days and a barrage of public pressure?I


His remarks occurred after the president came under fire for the way he handled Charlottesville two days ago. Mr. Trump on Saturday condemned hatred "on many sides," which prompted backlash from both Democrats and Republicans alike.​


After zero days. The riot occurred sat morning, to lunch time, Saturday. Expanded quote. I was not trying to trick you.


Trump: "As I said on -- remember, Saturday -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence.



See, here we will see that your complaints are bullshit. You made a point that he waited days to condemn the riot. I just proved that that was not true. Now you will ignore this new information and hold to your position, without any adjustment.


Because, your position is based, at best on blind faith, and at worst on knowingly lying in the fact of clear proof.
He waited days to condemn the perpetrators of the violence. He just can't bring himself to say bad things about his supporters no matter how heinous they are. (Without intense public pressure)


Later the same day. FROM THE QUOTE YOU REFERENCED.

I was not trying to trick you into that gotcha, You did that to yourself.

Days later, when he was more sure of the details, he got more specific.

The ws are a pathetic fringe in this society. Who have not had a voice in national politics since the early 60s.


Trump's supporters are working class and middle class whites, mostly. That you want to smear them as ws, is you being a racist asshole.
Man, you got it bad...it's kind of sickening to watch. We watched him do it again and again...



Also disgusting that you would downplay a serious threat to our national security.




Cool. You found people that agree with you.


What Trump really says about ws.




Trump: "Those people -- all of those people – excuse me, I’ve condemned neo-Nazis.

Trump: ...the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.

Trump: ...rough, bad people -- neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them.
So it's the Proud Boys and neo-Confederates who are "very fine people."

Thanks for clearing that up.


You are stonewalling. You have been stone cold busted as a liar.


The election was not legitimate because of your lies. YOu stonewalling will not change that.
Nope, Trump never condemned them. That must be who he was talking about since there were no "very fine people" among the Unite the Right racists.


Trump was clear that he was referring to non ws who supported the historical statues.

Your belief that everyone that was there was a ws, is fine.

The bit were you LIE and say he said something he did not say, is you lying.


That you pretend to not understand this, is another lie.
I'm going by what he said and didn't say. He didn't condemn the Proud Boys or the neo-Confederates. He said there were "very fine people on both sides." Now we know who he was talking about on the right. Thanks again for clearing that up.
And you could tell he was being very careful what he said and didn't say. Because what he really wanted to say would frighten you.

...



So, which is it? DId he SAY it or did he "didn't say it", but you know he meant it?

YOU PEOPLE DID NOT SAY WHAT YOU ARE SAYING NOW.


YOU LIED AND SAID THAT HE SAID, "WS ARE VERY FINE PEOPLE".

That is not what he said.


You BELIEVE, that that is what he meant, But when you tell people that he said, what you THINK he meant, that is you LYING.
He said it, but then didn't say it soon enough. And he said something different the day before and after. Or he didn't say anything, which sometimes is saying something.

In the Greek community we have a saying. My silence is your answer

But that is not what you people have said, nor is it your standard position on this issue.

Your position is a lie, ie that he said something he did not say.


That you look at what he said, and deep down, you just "know" that he meant something else, does not give you the right to tell other people that he actually said what you THINK he meant.


AND, it is worth remembering that you are an extremely partisan and ideological lefty, who is probably not a fair judge of what your enemies are thinking.
No, I would admit it if I didn't believe he was being racist. You are the extreme partisan. I'm about as moderate as you're going to find. Sure I lean left but I'm not the left like you are the right.
 
All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.

Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.
LOLOL

Now you're projecting. In reality, you're the one who started talking about Trump's "very fine people" comment. You're the one who kept posting about it, trying to bait the thread to talk about it; until someone did. You're the one who knew what direction this argument would lead to if someone took your bait. Now you cry like a baby over trying to get the thread closed due to your actions.
It's like he's arguing semantics when we all know what Trump was saying. Proud Boys got the message. Us liberals got the message. Only Republicans who want to pretend their party isn't racist and think they are slick try to suggest otherwise. And they work very hard at it. Look how many pages this thread has gone.
 
Faun said:
As many times as you're gonna claim Trump was too retarded to know that was a racist rally, organized by racists, sponsored by racists, promoted by racists, hosted by racists and attended by racists.

Got it. You think that someone would have to be retarded to not agree with you.
Nope, you don't "got it." I don't think that. There are many people who disagree with me here who I don't consider retarded.

That does not change the fact that you people lied and are still lying about what he said.
Nope, the liar is you. Most notably, I'm going by what he actually said. You're going by what you think he actually meant.

That means that the voters were voting, making their choice based on FALSE INFORMATION.
Nope, you're lying again as the information wasn't false. There was a racist rally which led to a confrontation to counter the racists. Racism is evil. Fighting it is noble. Trump equated the two sides and idiotically claimed there were "very fine people on both sides."

Fraud by deception. THe election is thus, not legitimate.
Nope, you're just crazy. :cuckoo:


Trump clearly condemned w.s. You are inventing confusion where there is none. To stonewall in defense of your big lie.


Trump: " -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence. It has no place in America.
After how many days and a barrage of public pressure?I


His remarks occurred after the president came under fire for the way he handled Charlottesville two days ago. Mr. Trump on Saturday condemned hatred "on many sides," which prompted backlash from both Democrats and Republicans alike.​


After zero days. The riot occurred sat morning, to lunch time, Saturday. Expanded quote. I was not trying to trick you.


Trump: "As I said on -- remember, Saturday -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence.



See, here we will see that your complaints are bullshit. You made a point that he waited days to condemn the riot. I just proved that that was not true. Now you will ignore this new information and hold to your position, without any adjustment.


Because, your position is based, at best on blind faith, and at worst on knowingly lying in the fact of clear proof.
He waited days to condemn the perpetrators of the violence. He just can't bring himself to say bad things about his supporters no matter how heinous they are. (Without intense public pressure)


Later the same day. FROM THE QUOTE YOU REFERENCED.

I was not trying to trick you into that gotcha, You did that to yourself.

Days later, when he was more sure of the details, he got more specific.

The ws are a pathetic fringe in this society. Who have not had a voice in national politics since the early 60s.


Trump's supporters are working class and middle class whites, mostly. That you want to smear them as ws, is you being a racist asshole.
Man, you got it bad...it's kind of sickening to watch. We watched him do it again and again...



Also disgusting that you would downplay a serious threat to our national security.




Cool. You found people that agree with you.


What Trump really says about ws.




Trump: "Those people -- all of those people – excuse me, I’ve condemned neo-Nazis.

Trump: ...the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.

Trump: ...rough, bad people -- neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them.
So it's the Proud Boys and neo-Confederates who are "very fine people."

Thanks for clearing that up.


You are stonewalling. You have been stone cold busted as a liar.


The election was not legitimate because of your lies. YOu stonewalling will not change that.
Nope, Trump never condemned them. That must be who he was talking about since there were no "very fine people" among the Unite the Right racists.


Trump was clear that he was referring to non ws who supported the historical statues.

Your belief that everyone that was there was a ws, is fine.

The bit were you LIE and say he said something he did not say, is you lying.


That you pretend to not understand this, is another lie.
I'm going by what he said and didn't say. He didn't condemn the Proud Boys or the neo-Confederates. He said there were "very fine people on both sides." Now we know who he was talking about on the right. Thanks again for clearing that up.
And you could tell he was being very careful what he said and didn't say. Because what he really wanted to say would frighten you.

...



So, which is it? DId he SAY it or did he "didn't say it", but you know he meant it?

YOU PEOPLE DID NOT SAY WHAT YOU ARE SAYING NOW.


YOU LIED AND SAID THAT HE SAID, "WS ARE VERY FINE PEOPLE".

That is not what he said.


You BELIEVE, that that is what he meant, But when you tell people that he said, what you THINK he meant, that is you LYING.
He said it, but then didn't say it soon enough. And he said something different the day before and after. Or he didn't say anything, which sometimes is saying something.

In the Greek community we have a saying. My silence is your answer

But that is not what you people have said, nor is it your standard position on this issue.

Your position is a lie, ie that he said something he did not say.


That you look at what he said, and deep down, you just "know" that he meant something else, does not give you the right to tell other people that he actually said what you THINK he meant.


AND, it is worth remembering that you are an extremely partisan and ideological lefty, who is probably not a fair judge of what your enemies are thinking.
It's not a lie, dumbfuck. There were 2 sides. One side was a bunch of racists who went to rally in an attempt to unite various factions of racists. Trump said some of them were "very fine people."
 
All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.

Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.
LOLOL

Now you're projecting. In reality, you're the one who started talking about Trump's "very fine people" comment. You're the one who kept posting about it, trying to bait the thread to talk about it; until someone did. You're the one who knew what direction this argument would lead to if someone took your bait. Now you cry like a baby over trying to get the thread closed due to your actions.
It's like he's arguing semantics when we all know what Trump was saying. Proud Boys got the message. Us liberals got the message. Only Republicans who want to pretend their party isn't racist and think they are slick try to suggest otherwise. And they work very hard at it. Look how many pages this thread has gone.
He's been trying desperately to get this thread shut down by diverting away from the thread topic.
 
Faun said:
As many times as you're gonna claim Trump was too retarded to know that was a racist rally, organized by racists, sponsored by racists, promoted by racists, hosted by racists and attended by racists.

Got it. You think that someone would have to be retarded to not agree with you.
Nope, you don't "got it." I don't think that. There are many people who disagree with me here who I don't consider retarded.

That does not change the fact that you people lied and are still lying about what he said.
Nope, the liar is you. Most notably, I'm going by what he actually said. You're going by what you think he actually meant.

That means that the voters were voting, making their choice based on FALSE INFORMATION.
Nope, you're lying again as the information wasn't false. There was a racist rally which led to a confrontation to counter the racists. Racism is evil. Fighting it is noble. Trump equated the two sides and idiotically claimed there were "very fine people on both sides."

Fraud by deception. THe election is thus, not legitimate.
Nope, you're just crazy. :cuckoo:


Trump clearly condemned w.s. You are inventing confusion where there is none. To stonewall in defense of your big lie.


Trump: " -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence. It has no place in America.
After how many days and a barrage of public pressure?I


His remarks occurred after the president came under fire for the way he handled Charlottesville two days ago. Mr. Trump on Saturday condemned hatred "on many sides," which prompted backlash from both Democrats and Republicans alike.​


After zero days. The riot occurred sat morning, to lunch time, Saturday. Expanded quote. I was not trying to trick you.


Trump: "As I said on -- remember, Saturday -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence.



See, here we will see that your complaints are bullshit. You made a point that he waited days to condemn the riot. I just proved that that was not true. Now you will ignore this new information and hold to your position, without any adjustment.


Because, your position is based, at best on blind faith, and at worst on knowingly lying in the fact of clear proof.
What was the display of bigotry from the left?
<crickets>

What was the display of bigotry from the left?


Oh, sorry I missed that post.

Well, are you asking my opinion, or asking me to specify what Trump was referring to?

REgardless, I'm glad you are not denying that Trump was right to denounce the violence and hatred from both sides, including from the left.


The point is, Trump denounced both sides for their bad behavior, the violent and hateful left (antifa/blm) and the violent and hateful right?, (w.s.).

As he well should have.
How about answering the question?


It was a riot. I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to.

He made a statement condemning the violence, bigotry and hate on BOTH sides.


Nit picking over which act of bigotry from the LEFT he was referring to, is fucking stupid.


You are just trying to avoid dealing with the fact that he condemned the violence, bigotry and hatred, as he well should have.


His response was nearly perfect and you are nit picking like the asshole you are.
So what was this display of bigotry on the left he was talking about?


Answered above.
LOLOL

You didn't answer. You evaded answering. Your non-answer was, "I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to."

Thanks for showing he lied about that too.


That is the truth. I don't know what particular act(s) he was referring to.


You are fixating on this, to distract from teh fact that you LIED and are LYING about what TRump said.
And I thanked you for showing he lied. There was nothing bigoted about the lefts' presence there that day. They were there to oppose bigotry and Trump, the idiot that he is, equated them with the right.


Me not knowing what specific actions or events he was referring to, does not show that he lied.


AND, it is worth noting, it really doesn't matter if he was or was not accurate or honest about the action of the lefty rioters.


BECAUSE THE POINT IS, THAT YOU PEOPLE LIED ABOUT WHAT HE SAID.


All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.


Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.


You committed fraud by deception, and thus, the election is not legitimate.
See the sand? Go pound some


Me not knowing what specific actions or events he was referring to, does not show that he lied.


AND, it is worth noting, it really doesn't matter if he was or was not accurate or honest about the action of the lefty rioters.


BECAUSE THE POINT IS, THAT YOU PEOPLE LIED ABOUT WHAT HE SAID.


All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.


Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.


You committed fraud by deception, and thus, the election is not legitimate.
 
The Proud Boys weren't there.
Sell stupid elsewhere.

Proud-Boys-and-Kessler-061817-620x400.jpg


The Proud Boys were instructed by their leadership to NOT attend. Kessler was kicked out of the Proud Boys for being racist.


What part of this are you not getting?


Yes. ws would love to co-opt other groups because they are a fringe movement with no relevance of their own.


Why are you trying to help them?
And yet, they were still there. The Proud Boys don't get a pass just because they ignored their leader.


SUre they do. The few isolated individuals that disobeyed their leader, did not represent the group.

That you can't admit that, or anything, is because your entire position here, is bullshit build on top of lies.


You admit one gleam of truth, and you fear it will all come crashing down.
So Trump supporters get a pass for storming the Capitol if Trump opposed them doing so?


Trump supporters as a group do. THe individuals who did it themselves, are responsible for their actions.

Other people, who had nothing to do with it, either individually or as a group, are not responsible.


NOt sure what part of this, is hard for you to understand.
 
Faun said:
As many times as you're gonna claim Trump was too retarded to know that was a racist rally, organized by racists, sponsored by racists, promoted by racists, hosted by racists and attended by racists.

Got it. You think that someone would have to be retarded to not agree with you.
Nope, you don't "got it." I don't think that. There are many people who disagree with me here who I don't consider retarded.

That does not change the fact that you people lied and are still lying about what he said.
Nope, the liar is you. Most notably, I'm going by what he actually said. You're going by what you think he actually meant.

That means that the voters were voting, making their choice based on FALSE INFORMATION.
Nope, you're lying again as the information wasn't false. There was a racist rally which led to a confrontation to counter the racists. Racism is evil. Fighting it is noble. Trump equated the two sides and idiotically claimed there were "very fine people on both sides."

Fraud by deception. THe election is thus, not legitimate.
Nope, you're just crazy. :cuckoo:


Trump clearly condemned w.s. You are inventing confusion where there is none. To stonewall in defense of your big lie.


Trump: " -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence. It has no place in America.
After how many days and a barrage of public pressure?I


His remarks occurred after the president came under fire for the way he handled Charlottesville two days ago. Mr. Trump on Saturday condemned hatred "on many sides," which prompted backlash from both Democrats and Republicans alike.​


After zero days. The riot occurred sat morning, to lunch time, Saturday. Expanded quote. I was not trying to trick you.


Trump: "As I said on -- remember, Saturday -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence.



See, here we will see that your complaints are bullshit. You made a point that he waited days to condemn the riot. I just proved that that was not true. Now you will ignore this new information and hold to your position, without any adjustment.


Because, your position is based, at best on blind faith, and at worst on knowingly lying in the fact of clear proof.
What was the display of bigotry from the left?
<crickets>

What was the display of bigotry from the left?


Oh, sorry I missed that post.

Well, are you asking my opinion, or asking me to specify what Trump was referring to?

REgardless, I'm glad you are not denying that Trump was right to denounce the violence and hatred from both sides, including from the left.


The point is, Trump denounced both sides for their bad behavior, the violent and hateful left (antifa/blm) and the violent and hateful right?, (w.s.).

As he well should have.
How about answering the question?


It was a riot. I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to.

He made a statement condemning the violence, bigotry and hate on BOTH sides.


Nit picking over which act of bigotry from the LEFT he was referring to, is fucking stupid.


You are just trying to avoid dealing with the fact that he condemned the violence, bigotry and hatred, as he well should have.


His response was nearly perfect and you are nit picking like the asshole you are.
So what was this display of bigotry on the left he was talking about?


Answered above.
LOLOL

You didn't answer. You evaded answering. Your non-answer was, "I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to."

Thanks for showing he lied about that too.


That is the truth. I don't know what particular act(s) he was referring to.


You are fixating on this, to distract from teh fact that you LIED and are LYING about what TRump said.
And I thanked you for showing he lied. There was nothing bigoted about the lefts' presence there that day. They were there to oppose bigotry and Trump, the idiot that he is, equated them with the right.


Me not knowing what specific actions or events he was referring to, does not show that he lied.


AND, it is worth noting, it really doesn't matter if he was or was not accurate or honest about the action of the lefty rioters.


BECAUSE THE POINT IS, THAT YOU PEOPLE LIED ABOUT WHAT HE SAID.


All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.


Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.


You committed fraud by deception, and thus, the election is not legitimate.
See the sand? Go pound some


Me not knowing what specific actions or events he was referring to, does not show that he lied.


AND, it is worth noting, it really doesn't matter if he was or was not accurate or honest about the action of the lefty rioters.


BECAUSE THE POINT IS, THAT YOU PEOPLE LIED ABOUT WHAT HE SAID.


All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.


Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.


You committed fraud by deception, and thus, the election is not legitimate.
We're sick of this. Trump says something nasty or politically incorrect but he says it in a slick way and you think we're stupid? He said there were very fine people at a Klan rally. Get over it.
 
Faun said:
As many times as you're gonna claim Trump was too retarded to know that was a racist rally, organized by racists, sponsored by racists, promoted by racists, hosted by racists and attended by racists.

Got it. You think that someone would have to be retarded to not agree with you.
Nope, you don't "got it." I don't think that. There are many people who disagree with me here who I don't consider retarded.

That does not change the fact that you people lied and are still lying about what he said.
Nope, the liar is you. Most notably, I'm going by what he actually said. You're going by what you think he actually meant.

That means that the voters were voting, making their choice based on FALSE INFORMATION.
Nope, you're lying again as the information wasn't false. There was a racist rally which led to a confrontation to counter the racists. Racism is evil. Fighting it is noble. Trump equated the two sides and idiotically claimed there were "very fine people on both sides."

Fraud by deception. THe election is thus, not legitimate.
Nope, you're just crazy. :cuckoo:


Trump clearly condemned w.s. You are inventing confusion where there is none. To stonewall in defense of your big lie.


Trump: " -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence. It has no place in America.
After how many days and a barrage of public pressure?I


His remarks occurred after the president came under fire for the way he handled Charlottesville two days ago. Mr. Trump on Saturday condemned hatred "on many sides," which prompted backlash from both Democrats and Republicans alike.​


After zero days. The riot occurred sat morning, to lunch time, Saturday. Expanded quote. I was not trying to trick you.


Trump: "As I said on -- remember, Saturday -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence.



See, here we will see that your complaints are bullshit. You made a point that he waited days to condemn the riot. I just proved that that was not true. Now you will ignore this new information and hold to your position, without any adjustment.


Because, your position is based, at best on blind faith, and at worst on knowingly lying in the fact of clear proof.
What was the display of bigotry from the left?
<crickets>

What was the display of bigotry from the left?


Oh, sorry I missed that post.

Well, are you asking my opinion, or asking me to specify what Trump was referring to?

REgardless, I'm glad you are not denying that Trump was right to denounce the violence and hatred from both sides, including from the left.


The point is, Trump denounced both sides for their bad behavior, the violent and hateful left (antifa/blm) and the violent and hateful right?, (w.s.).

As he well should have.
How about answering the question?


It was a riot. I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to.

He made a statement condemning the violence, bigotry and hate on BOTH sides.


Nit picking over which act of bigotry from the LEFT he was referring to, is fucking stupid.


You are just trying to avoid dealing with the fact that he condemned the violence, bigotry and hatred, as he well should have.


His response was nearly perfect and you are nit picking like the asshole you are.
So what was this display of bigotry on the left he was talking about?


Answered above.
LOLOL

You didn't answer. You evaded answering. Your non-answer was, "I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to."

Thanks for showing he lied about that too.


That is the truth. I don't know what particular act(s) he was referring to.


You are fixating on this, to distract from teh fact that you LIED and are LYING about what TRump said.
And I thanked you for showing he lied. There was nothing bigoted about the lefts' presence there that day. They were there to oppose bigotry and Trump, the idiot that he is, equated them with the right.


Me not knowing what specific actions or events he was referring to, does not show that he lied.


AND, it is worth noting, it really doesn't matter if he was or was not accurate or honest about the action of the lefty rioters.


BECAUSE THE POINT IS, THAT YOU PEOPLE LIED ABOUT WHAT HE SAID.


All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.


Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.


You committed fraud by deception, and thus, the election is not legitimate.
LOL

The one lying about what he said is you. You're the one making up he meant there were non-racists there when he himself never once said that. To cover for your lie, you then claim he was clear about it; but that too is an obvious lie as he made at least 3 separate appearances to clarify his position. And I asked you what was bigoted about the left because he tried to portray both sides as bigoted, which they weren't. That too was a lie.

You are the liar.




Trump I’ve condemned many different groups. But not all of those people were neo-Nazis, believe me. Not all of those people were white supremacists by any stretch. Those people were also there because they wanted to protest the taking down of a statue of Robert E. Lee."

Reporter: "Should that statue be taken down?"

Trump: "Excuse me. If you take a look at some of the groups, and you see -- and you’d know it if you were honest reporters, which in many cases you’re not -- but many of those people were there to protest the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee.
 
Faun said:
As many times as you're gonna claim Trump was too retarded to know that was a racist rally, organized by racists, sponsored by racists, promoted by racists, hosted by racists and attended by racists.

Got it. You think that someone would have to be retarded to not agree with you.
Nope, you don't "got it." I don't think that. There are many people who disagree with me here who I don't consider retarded.

That does not change the fact that you people lied and are still lying about what he said.
Nope, the liar is you. Most notably, I'm going by what he actually said. You're going by what you think he actually meant.

That means that the voters were voting, making their choice based on FALSE INFORMATION.
Nope, you're lying again as the information wasn't false. There was a racist rally which led to a confrontation to counter the racists. Racism is evil. Fighting it is noble. Trump equated the two sides and idiotically claimed there were "very fine people on both sides."

Fraud by deception. THe election is thus, not legitimate.
Nope, you're just crazy. :cuckoo:


Trump clearly condemned w.s. You are inventing confusion where there is none. To stonewall in defense of your big lie.


Trump: " -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence. It has no place in America.
After how many days and a barrage of public pressure?I


His remarks occurred after the president came under fire for the way he handled Charlottesville two days ago. Mr. Trump on Saturday condemned hatred "on many sides," which prompted backlash from both Democrats and Republicans alike.​


After zero days. The riot occurred sat morning, to lunch time, Saturday. Expanded quote. I was not trying to trick you.


Trump: "As I said on -- remember, Saturday -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence.



See, here we will see that your complaints are bullshit. You made a point that he waited days to condemn the riot. I just proved that that was not true. Now you will ignore this new information and hold to your position, without any adjustment.


Because, your position is based, at best on blind faith, and at worst on knowingly lying in the fact of clear proof.
What was the display of bigotry from the left?
<crickets>

What was the display of bigotry from the left?


Oh, sorry I missed that post.

Well, are you asking my opinion, or asking me to specify what Trump was referring to?

REgardless, I'm glad you are not denying that Trump was right to denounce the violence and hatred from both sides, including from the left.


The point is, Trump denounced both sides for their bad behavior, the violent and hateful left (antifa/blm) and the violent and hateful right?, (w.s.).

As he well should have.
How about answering the question?


It was a riot. I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to.

He made a statement condemning the violence, bigotry and hate on BOTH sides.


Nit picking over which act of bigotry from the LEFT he was referring to, is fucking stupid.


You are just trying to avoid dealing with the fact that he condemned the violence, bigotry and hatred, as he well should have.


His response was nearly perfect and you are nit picking like the asshole you are.
So what was this display of bigotry on the left he was talking about?


Answered above.
LOLOL

You didn't answer. You evaded answering. Your non-answer was, "I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to."

Thanks for showing he lied about that too.


That is the truth. I don't know what particular act(s) he was referring to.


You are fixating on this, to distract from teh fact that you LIED and are LYING about what TRump said.
And I thanked you for showing he lied. There was nothing bigoted about the lefts' presence there that day. They were there to oppose bigotry and Trump, the idiot that he is, equated them with the right.


Me not knowing what specific actions or events he was referring to, does not show that he lied.


AND, it is worth noting, it really doesn't matter if he was or was not accurate or honest about the action of the lefty rioters.


BECAUSE THE POINT IS, THAT YOU PEOPLE LIED ABOUT WHAT HE SAID.


All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.


Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.


You committed fraud by deception, and thus, the election is not legitimate.
See the sand? Go pound some


Me not knowing what specific actions or events he was referring to, does not show that he lied.


AND, it is worth noting, it really doesn't matter if he was or was not accurate or honest about the action of the lefty rioters.


BECAUSE THE POINT IS, THAT YOU PEOPLE LIED ABOUT WHAT HE SAID.


All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.


Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.


You committed fraud by deception, and thus, the election is not legitimate.
Of course it shows he lied. He claimed the left there that day was bigoted. Even you can't say how they were bigots because they weren't. They were there to counter bigotry.

He lied.

And you simply lack the character to admit he lied even when it's as obvious as him calling anti-bigots, "bigots."
 
All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.

Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.
LOLOL

Now you're projecting. In reality, you're the one who started talking about Trump's "very fine people" comment. You're the one who kept posting about it, trying to bait the thread to talk about it; until someone did. You're the one who knew what direction this argument would lead to if someone took your bait. You're the one who hijacked this thread. Now you cry like a baby over trying to get the thread closed due to your actions.


It is a powerful, THE MOST POWERFUL example of how your side's entire world view and political positions are based on a series of really BIG LIES.


So, yes, I reference it a lot.


He said one thing, you people told the American voters that he said THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF WHAT HE ACTUALLY SAID.



And I don't want the thread closed. I can see that that is one of your goals, because you fear the Truth the way a vampire fears the sun. If not more so.
 
The Proud Boys weren't there.
Sell stupid elsewhere.

Proud-Boys-and-Kessler-061817-620x400.jpg


The Proud Boys were instructed by their leadership to NOT attend. Kessler was kicked out of the Proud Boys for being racist.


What part of this are you not getting?


Yes. ws would love to co-opt other groups because they are a fringe movement with no relevance of their own.


Why are you trying to help them?
And yet, they were still there. The Proud Boys don't get a pass just because they ignored their leader.


SUre they do. The few isolated individuals that disobeyed their leader, did not represent the group.

That you can't admit that, or anything, is because your entire position here, is bullshit build on top of lies.


You admit one gleam of truth, and you fear it will all come crashing down.
So Trump supporters get a pass for storming the Capitol if Trump opposed them doing so?


Trump supporters as a group do. THe individuals who did it themselves, are responsible for their actions.

Other people, who had nothing to do with it, either individually or as a group, are not responsible.


NOt sure what part of this, is hard for you to understand.
Great, then you admit the Proud Boys who attended the rally are responsible for their actions -- and Trump says they're"very fine people."
 
Faun said:
As many times as you're gonna claim Trump was too retarded to know that was a racist rally, organized by racists, sponsored by racists, promoted by racists, hosted by racists and attended by racists.

Got it. You think that someone would have to be retarded to not agree with you.
Nope, you don't "got it." I don't think that. There are many people who disagree with me here who I don't consider retarded.

That does not change the fact that you people lied and are still lying about what he said.
Nope, the liar is you. Most notably, I'm going by what he actually said. You're going by what you think he actually meant.

That means that the voters were voting, making their choice based on FALSE INFORMATION.
Nope, you're lying again as the information wasn't false. There was a racist rally which led to a confrontation to counter the racists. Racism is evil. Fighting it is noble. Trump equated the two sides and idiotically claimed there were "very fine people on both sides."

Fraud by deception. THe election is thus, not legitimate.
Nope, you're just crazy. :cuckoo:


Trump clearly condemned w.s. You are inventing confusion where there is none. To stonewall in defense of your big lie.


Trump: " -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence. It has no place in America.
After how many days and a barrage of public pressure?I


His remarks occurred after the president came under fire for the way he handled Charlottesville two days ago. Mr. Trump on Saturday condemned hatred "on many sides," which prompted backlash from both Democrats and Republicans alike.​


After zero days. The riot occurred sat morning, to lunch time, Saturday. Expanded quote. I was not trying to trick you.


Trump: "As I said on -- remember, Saturday -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence.



See, here we will see that your complaints are bullshit. You made a point that he waited days to condemn the riot. I just proved that that was not true. Now you will ignore this new information and hold to your position, without any adjustment.


Because, your position is based, at best on blind faith, and at worst on knowingly lying in the fact of clear proof.
He waited days to condemn the perpetrators of the violence. He just can't bring himself to say bad things about his supporters no matter how heinous they are. (Without intense public pressure)


Later the same day. FROM THE QUOTE YOU REFERENCED.

I was not trying to trick you into that gotcha, You did that to yourself.

Days later, when he was more sure of the details, he got more specific.

The ws are a pathetic fringe in this society. Who have not had a voice in national politics since the early 60s.


Trump's supporters are working class and middle class whites, mostly. That you want to smear them as ws, is you being a racist asshole.
Man, you got it bad...it's kind of sickening to watch. We watched him do it again and again...



Also disgusting that you would downplay a serious threat to our national security.




Cool. You found people that agree with you.


What Trump really says about ws.




Trump: "Those people -- all of those people – excuse me, I’ve condemned neo-Nazis.

Trump: ...the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists -- because they should be condemned totally.

Trump: ...rough, bad people -- neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them.
So it's the Proud Boys and neo-Confederates who are "very fine people."

Thanks for clearing that up.


You are stonewalling. You have been stone cold busted as a liar.


The election was not legitimate because of your lies. YOu stonewalling will not change that.
Nope, Trump never condemned them. That must be who he was talking about since there were no "very fine people" among the Unite the Right racists.


Trump was clear that he was referring to non ws who supported the historical statues.

Your belief that everyone that was there was a ws, is fine.

The bit were you LIE and say he said something he did not say, is you lying.


That you pretend to not understand this, is another lie.
I'm going by what he said and didn't say. He didn't condemn the Proud Boys or the neo-Confederates. He said there were "very fine people on both sides." Now we know who he was talking about on the right. Thanks again for clearing that up.
And you could tell he was being very careful what he said and didn't say. Because what he really wanted to say would frighten you.

...



So, which is it? DId he SAY it or did he "didn't say it", but you know he meant it?

YOU PEOPLE DID NOT SAY WHAT YOU ARE SAYING NOW.


YOU LIED AND SAID THAT HE SAID, "WS ARE VERY FINE PEOPLE".

That is not what he said.


You BELIEVE, that that is what he meant, But when you tell people that he said, what you THINK he meant, that is you LYING.
He said it, but then didn't say it soon enough. And he said something different the day before and after. Or he didn't say anything, which sometimes is saying something.

In the Greek community we have a saying. My silence is your answer

But that is not what you people have said, nor is it your standard position on this issue.

Your position is a lie, ie that he said something he did not say.


That you look at what he said, and deep down, you just "know" that he meant something else, does not give you the right to tell other people that he actually said what you THINK he meant.


AND, it is worth remembering that you are an extremely partisan and ideological lefty, who is probably not a fair judge of what your enemies are thinking.
No, I would admit it if I didn't believe he was being racist. You are the extreme partisan. I'm about as moderate as you're going to find. Sure I lean left but I'm not the left like you are the right.


I believe that you believe it.

My point is, that when you tell someone what you THINK he meant, instead of what he actually said,


that is you lying.


And, in this context, taht was a very powerful lie.
 
Faun said:
As many times as you're gonna claim Trump was too retarded to know that was a racist rally, organized by racists, sponsored by racists, promoted by racists, hosted by racists and attended by racists.

Got it. You think that someone would have to be retarded to not agree with you.
Nope, you don't "got it." I don't think that. There are many people who disagree with me here who I don't consider retarded.

That does not change the fact that you people lied and are still lying about what he said.
Nope, the liar is you. Most notably, I'm going by what he actually said. You're going by what you think he actually meant.

That means that the voters were voting, making their choice based on FALSE INFORMATION.
Nope, you're lying again as the information wasn't false. There was a racist rally which led to a confrontation to counter the racists. Racism is evil. Fighting it is noble. Trump equated the two sides and idiotically claimed there were "very fine people on both sides."

Fraud by deception. THe election is thus, not legitimate.
Nope, you're just crazy. :cuckoo:


Trump clearly condemned w.s. You are inventing confusion where there is none. To stonewall in defense of your big lie.


Trump: " -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence. It has no place in America.
After how many days and a barrage of public pressure?I


His remarks occurred after the president came under fire for the way he handled Charlottesville two days ago. Mr. Trump on Saturday condemned hatred "on many sides," which prompted backlash from both Democrats and Republicans alike.​


After zero days. The riot occurred sat morning, to lunch time, Saturday. Expanded quote. I was not trying to trick you.


Trump: "As I said on -- remember, Saturday -- we condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence.



See, here we will see that your complaints are bullshit. You made a point that he waited days to condemn the riot. I just proved that that was not true. Now you will ignore this new information and hold to your position, without any adjustment.


Because, your position is based, at best on blind faith, and at worst on knowingly lying in the fact of clear proof.
What was the display of bigotry from the left?
<crickets>

What was the display of bigotry from the left?


Oh, sorry I missed that post.

Well, are you asking my opinion, or asking me to specify what Trump was referring to?

REgardless, I'm glad you are not denying that Trump was right to denounce the violence and hatred from both sides, including from the left.


The point is, Trump denounced both sides for their bad behavior, the violent and hateful left (antifa/blm) and the violent and hateful right?, (w.s.).

As he well should have.
How about answering the question?


It was a riot. I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to.

He made a statement condemning the violence, bigotry and hate on BOTH sides.


Nit picking over which act of bigotry from the LEFT he was referring to, is fucking stupid.


You are just trying to avoid dealing with the fact that he condemned the violence, bigotry and hatred, as he well should have.


His response was nearly perfect and you are nit picking like the asshole you are.
So what was this display of bigotry on the left he was talking about?


Answered above.
LOLOL

You didn't answer. You evaded answering. Your non-answer was, "I have no idea what particular act(s) he was referring to."

Thanks for showing he lied about that too.


That is the truth. I don't know what particular act(s) he was referring to.


You are fixating on this, to distract from teh fact that you LIED and are LYING about what TRump said.
And I thanked you for showing he lied. There was nothing bigoted about the lefts' presence there that day. They were there to oppose bigotry and Trump, the idiot that he is, equated them with the right.


Me not knowing what specific actions or events he was referring to, does not show that he lied.


AND, it is worth noting, it really doesn't matter if he was or was not accurate or honest about the action of the lefty rioters.


BECAUSE THE POINT IS, THAT YOU PEOPLE LIED ABOUT WHAT HE SAID.


All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.


Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.


You committed fraud by deception, and thus, the election is not legitimate.
LOL

The one lying about what he said is you. You're the one making up he meant there were non-racists there when he himself never once said that. To cover for your lie, you then claim he was clear about it; but that too is an obvious lie as he made at least 3 separate appearances to clarify his position. And I asked you what was bigoted about the left because he tried to portray both sides as bigoted, which they weren't. That too was a lie.

You are the liar.




Trump I’ve condemned many different groups. But not all of those people were neo-Nazis, believe me. Not all of those people were white supremacists by any stretch. Those people were also there because they wanted to protest the taking down of a statue of Robert E. Lee."

Reporter: "Should that statue be taken down?"

Trump: "Excuse me. If you take a look at some of the groups, and you see -- and you’d know it if you were honest reporters, which in many cases you’re not -- but many of those people were there to protest the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee.
I don't know how many times we need to go over this ... but ... he didn't condemn the Proud Boys and he didn't condemn the neo-Confederates. So now we know who he thinks are "very fine people."
 
All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.

Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.
LOLOL

Now you're projecting. In reality, you're the one who started talking about Trump's "very fine people" comment. You're the one who kept posting about it, trying to bait the thread to talk about it; until someone did. You're the one who knew what direction this argument would lead to if someone took your bait. You're the one who hijacked this thread. Now you cry like a baby over trying to get the thread closed due to your actions.


It is a powerful, THE MOST POWERFUL example of how your side's entire world view and political positions are based on a series of really BIG LIES.


So, yes, I reference it a lot.


He said one thing, you people told the American voters that he said THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF WHAT HE ACTUALLY SAID.



And I don't want the thread closed. I can see that that is one of your goals, because you fear the Truth the way a vampire fears the sun. If not more so.
Yes, he said there were "very fine people" among a group of racists.
 
All you are doing here, is trying to distract from that fact, and/or get the thread so bogged down, that is gets closed.

Because you know that you have no real defense for your actions AND you know that the op's point is correct.
LOLOL

Now you're projecting. In reality, you're the one who started talking about Trump's "very fine people" comment. You're the one who kept posting about it, trying to bait the thread to talk about it; until someone did. You're the one who knew what direction this argument would lead to if someone took your bait. Now you cry like a baby over trying to get the thread closed due to your actions.
It's like he's arguing semantics when we all know what Trump was saying. Proud Boys got the message. Us liberals got the message. Only Republicans who want to pretend their party isn't racist and think they are slick try to suggest otherwise. And they work very hard at it. Look how many pages this thread has gone.


When he said he was NOT talking about ws. and you people told the voters that he WAS talking about ws,


that is not "semantics", that is you people lying.


If we were wacist, as you retards keep insisting we are, then why are you defending an obvious lie, instead of presenting real evidence of it?


MMMMM?
 

Forum List

Back
Top