The Balfour Declaration

Of course none of all this changes the fact that Britain promised to give away that which was not theirs.

No, they didn't. They promised to support the EXISTING rights of the Jewish people to a national homeland in, you know, their homeland.
and later when you got prior to and after nationhood,Israel was supposed to look after the Palestinians as part of their charter...What a load of absolute BULLSHIT that proved to be
Look after?
Where does it say that?

Are you saying that the Arabs in what was to become Israel were not going to be able to take care of themselves, as Jews always did when living under Christian or Muslim lands?
 
Of course none of all this changes the fact that Britain promised to give away that which was not theirs.

No, they didn't. They promised to support the EXISTING rights of the Jewish people to a national homeland in, you know, their homeland.
and Palestinian,Muslim,christian etc.,rights
And you have not paid attention that in Israel, Arab Christians, Muslims, Bahai and all others have equal rights.

Or maybe you were in Gaza and mistook it for Israel?

Or maybe you do not care to know that in Israel, many Palestinians in East Jerusalem are applying for Israeli citizenship and not wanting to be part of any State of Palestine?

Why would so many Palestinians apply for an Israeli citizenship if they would not be given equal rights in Israel?
 
Of course none of all this changes the fact that Britain promised to give away that which was not theirs.
Colonial occupation / occupation by war and conquest as was the case with the Turks and Arabs is not an Islamist entitlement granting Pal’Istan as an Islamist waqf.
 
Here are some of Abbas’ claims from his missive (“Britain must atone for the Balfour declaration — and 100 years of suffering,”).

Abbas claim:

[Balfour] disregard[ed] the political rights of those who already lived there.

Misleading.

The language used by Abbas (“those who already lived there”) buttresses the broader narrative, advanced repeatedly by Palestinian leaders, in their media and education system, that falsely frames Jews as interlopers with no historical or religious connection to the land of Israel.

In fact, Jews “already lived there” when Balfour was issued. Jews are an indigenous people to the land, and small Jewish communities remained even after their exile in 70 CE, during Byzantine, Muslim and Crusader rule. There has been a continuous Jewish presence in the Land of Israel for more than 3,000 years.

Abbas claim:

For the Palestinian people — my people — the events [Balfour] triggered have been as devastating as they have been far-reaching.

Misleading.

Tragic events for Palestinians didn’t just happen (“triggered”) as a result of Balfour, but were mostly the result of decisions by Palestinian (and Arab) leaders to reject political and territorial compromise, and maintain hostility to a permanent Jewish presence in the land.

Abbas claim:

This British policy, to support Jewish immigration into Palestine while negating the Arab-Palestinian right to self-determination, created severe tensions between European Jewish immigrants and the native Palestinian population.

Misleading.

His mention of British “support” for Jewish immigration omits the subsequent White Paper, which severely restricted such immigration — a fateful decision for untold numbers of Jews who were slaughtered in places like Auschwitz, Treblinka and Sobibor because the doors to Palestine were closed.

Further, suggesting that Jewish immigrants “created tensions” is a creative way of obfuscating continuous Arab violence against Jews, and implicitly suggests that the mere arrival of Jews escaping persecution was a provocation, one that would corrupt the land — a narrative, incidentally, that would likely resonate with far-right Europeans in the context of the current immigration crisis.

(Full article online)

Abbas’ Guardian Op-Ed Illustrates the Dishonesty of the ‘Palestinian Narrative’
 
"Passions were so low that even when a group of pro-Israel protesters blocked the march for a few minutes on Oxford Street, the marchers were happy to wait while police asked them to move, and only some shouted “Zionist pigs!” before being hushed by others.
But this was a rousing success compared to the rally in Ramallah on Thursday."

It doesn't appear that more than 100 people attended. and traffic wasn't even stopped.

(full article online)

Anti-Balfour rallies in London, Ramallah, Gaza, Ankara pathetic failures ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
 
History should not be hyperbole.

An “entire people” was not “uprooted from their homes and condemned to life in squalid refugee camps.” That Palestinians were displaced is not in dispute. However, as over 1.5 million Arab citizens living in Israel today demonstrates, significant numbers of Palestinians remained in Israel after its independence in 1948.

And those who did not remain? How is it even possible to claim that they all ended up in refugee camps?

As for the claim that the Balfour Declaration was the “death warrant for a historic nation,” this is historical revisionism on multiple levels:

  • There was never a sovereign Palestinian state. The Arabs living under the Ottoman Empire identified with their tribes and with the wider Arab population of the region, including Syria. Were the Palestinians ever a “historic nation?”
  • The Balfour Declaration was not the “death warrant” for Palestinians. Having been offered multiple opportunities to have their own state only to reject them, it is misleading to place the entire blame for the situation of the Palestinians on Balfour.
(full article online)

Historical Hyperbole and False Rape Allegations | HonestReporting
 
The State of Judea was not established; thus, no Judeans or Jews; only Israel and the Israelites.

There is no excuse for the right wing to blame Judeans, in modern times.

Men get results, only wo-men should make excuses.
 
In other words, the ‘protest‘ and messaging given worldwide amplification by the BBC’s Jerusalem Bureau was actually pre-planned political agitprop organised by the Palestinian Authority and the PLO.

“The Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) scheduled demonstrations, events and educational classes in schools across Jerusalem, Ramallah, Gaza, Nablus, Bethlehem, Tubas, Hebron, as well as in Syria and Lebanon.

Most notably, one hundred thousand letters by Palestinian schools were hand-delivered to the British Consulate General in Jerusalem.

PLO Executive Committee Member, Xavier Abu Eid told Palestine Monitor this was the “most symbolic event that took place” across the day.”

The BBC, however, failed to disclose to its audiences the background to the political propaganda it chose to amplify.

(full article online)

BBC’s Bateman amplifies PLO’s Balfour agitprop
 
Even the Ottoman Empire, head of the world's Muslim community, seemed to have acknowledged the right of the Jews to collective revival in their ancestral homeland. On August 12, 1918, Grand Vizier Talaat Pasha, one of the triumvirs who had run the empire since 1913, issued an official communiqué expressing "sympathies for the establishment of a religious and national Jewish center in Palestine by well-organized immigration and colonization" and offering to promote this enterprise "by all means" provided it "does not affect the rights of the non-Jewish population."[8]

Largely modeled on the Balfour Declaration and formulated in a similar process of lengthy discussions with prominent Jewish leaders, Talaat's proclamation came too late to have real significance—two-and-a-half months after its issuance, the Ottomans surrendered to the Allies—and was apparently designed to improve the Muslim empire's bargaining position in the looming postwar peace talks. Yet its issuance was nothing short of extraordinary given the violent Ottoman reaction to anything that smacked of national self-determination, from the Greek war of independence in the 1820s, to the Balkan wars of the 1870s, to the Armenian genocide of World War I. Indeed, only a year before the declaration, the Jewish community in Palestine (or the Yishuv) faced a real risk of extinction from the Ottomans for the very same reason, only to be saved through intervention by Germany, Istanbul's senior war ally.

Arabs Embrace the Declaration
Emir Faisal. Talaat was hardly the only regional potentate to accept the Jewish right to national revival. The leaders of the nascent pan-Arab movement were perfectly amenable to endorsing the Balfour Declaration so long as this seemed to be conducive to their ambitions. And none more so than the Hashemite emirs Faisal and Abdullah who, together with their father, the Sharif of Mecca Hussein ibn Ali, perpetrated the "Great Arab War" against the Ottoman Empire. They were, as it happened, generously rewarded for their endeavors in the form of vast territories several times the size of the British Isles. Yet since these spectacular gains (which comprise the current states of Iraq, Jordan, and parts of Saudi Arabia) only served to whet their appetite, the emirs continued to pursue their imperial ambitions under the pan-Arab guise.

The Hashemite emirs continued to pursue their imperial ambitions under the pan-Arab guise.

Even during the revolt, Faisal began toying with the idea of establishing his own Syrian empire, independent of his father's prospective regional empire. In late 1917 and early 1918, he went so far as to negotiate this option with key members of the Ottoman leadership behind the backs of his father and his British allies. As his terms were rejected by Istanbul, Faisal tried to gain great-power endorsement for his imperial dream, and it was here that his interests seemed to converge with that of the Zionist movement.

On June 4, 1918, Faisal met Chaim Weizmann, the Russia-born, Manchester-based rising head of the Zionist movement. The two struck up an immediate rapport, and the emir readily acknowledged "the necessity for cooperation between Jews and Arabs" and "the possibility of Jewish claims to territory in Palestine." Yet he refused to discuss Palestine's future until such a time "when Arab affairs were more consolidated."[9]

(full article online)

Turks, Arabs Welcomed the Balfour Declaration
Moron

All of that is thoroughly documented, you uneducated Moron.

They had a brain and knew that endorsing the Jewish rights to sovereignty on their own ancient Homeland would be a good thing for all Arabs.
The Al Husseini clan thought otherwise. And all the Arabs lost.
And continue to be the losers.
-----------------

As late as August 1947, al-Wahda newspaper advocated the incorporation of Palestine into "Greater Syria."

Conclusion
Mahmoud Abbas's rejection of the Jewish right to national self-determination, which was acknowledged a hundred years ago by the international community, including the world's foremost Muslim power, leaders of the pan-Arab movement, and ordinary Palestinian Arabs, affords a sad testament to the unchanging nature of the Palestinian leadership's recalcitrance.

It was Hajj Amin Husseini's predication of Palestinian national identity on hatred of the "other" rather than on a distinct shared legacy that "paved the road for the Nakba of Palestinian people and their dispossession and displacement from their land." And it was Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas's persistence in this zero-sum approach, despite their feigned moderation in the Oslo peace charade, which ensured the perpetuation of Palestinian dispersal and statelessness to date. It is only by shedding their century-long revanchist dreams and opting for peace and reconciliation with their Israeli neighbors that Palestinian leaders can end their people's suffering. And what can be a better starting point for this sea change than endorsement of the Balfour Declaration rather than its atavistic denigration?

Turks, Arabs Welcomed the Balfour Declaration
Lying Zionist,you filth never wanted or want Peace...MORON
Stop insulting King Faisal and all other intelligent Arabs.

They had brains and actually spoke to the Jews.

You are just memorex from all the Jew hating sites, books, media you have swallowed your whole life.

Choose life, choose peace.

The Jewish people, never mind if becoming sovereign over one's own ancient homeland is called Zionism or anything else, HAVE the right to live on their ancient homeland even if the Al Husseini, Tamimi, Nasrallah of the world do not want to see Jews being sovereign of their own destiny, but rather, the "Let me have the pleasure of beating up some Jews today" ideology some Arabs have had for the previous 1300 years.

Stop your ignorance. That is the first step.
Sooo if I were a Native American,I am at Liberty to reclaim All of the United States by your analogy then....as I said before Moron
 
Even the Ottoman Empire, head of the world's Muslim community, seemed to have acknowledged the right of the Jews to collective revival in their ancestral homeland. On August 12, 1918, Grand Vizier Talaat Pasha, one of the triumvirs who had run the empire since 1913, issued an official communiqué expressing "sympathies for the establishment of a religious and national Jewish center in Palestine by well-organized immigration and colonization" and offering to promote this enterprise "by all means" provided it "does not affect the rights of the non-Jewish population."[8]

Largely modeled on the Balfour Declaration and formulated in a similar process of lengthy discussions with prominent Jewish leaders, Talaat's proclamation came too late to have real significance—two-and-a-half months after its issuance, the Ottomans surrendered to the Allies—and was apparently designed to improve the Muslim empire's bargaining position in the looming postwar peace talks. Yet its issuance was nothing short of extraordinary given the violent Ottoman reaction to anything that smacked of national self-determination, from the Greek war of independence in the 1820s, to the Balkan wars of the 1870s, to the Armenian genocide of World War I. Indeed, only a year before the declaration, the Jewish community in Palestine (or the Yishuv) faced a real risk of extinction from the Ottomans for the very same reason, only to be saved through intervention by Germany, Istanbul's senior war ally.

Arabs Embrace the Declaration
Emir Faisal. Talaat was hardly the only regional potentate to accept the Jewish right to national revival. The leaders of the nascent pan-Arab movement were perfectly amenable to endorsing the Balfour Declaration so long as this seemed to be conducive to their ambitions. And none more so than the Hashemite emirs Faisal and Abdullah who, together with their father, the Sharif of Mecca Hussein ibn Ali, perpetrated the "Great Arab War" against the Ottoman Empire. They were, as it happened, generously rewarded for their endeavors in the form of vast territories several times the size of the British Isles. Yet since these spectacular gains (which comprise the current states of Iraq, Jordan, and parts of Saudi Arabia) only served to whet their appetite, the emirs continued to pursue their imperial ambitions under the pan-Arab guise.

The Hashemite emirs continued to pursue their imperial ambitions under the pan-Arab guise.

Even during the revolt, Faisal began toying with the idea of establishing his own Syrian empire, independent of his father's prospective regional empire. In late 1917 and early 1918, he went so far as to negotiate this option with key members of the Ottoman leadership behind the backs of his father and his British allies. As his terms were rejected by Istanbul, Faisal tried to gain great-power endorsement for his imperial dream, and it was here that his interests seemed to converge with that of the Zionist movement.

On June 4, 1918, Faisal met Chaim Weizmann, the Russia-born, Manchester-based rising head of the Zionist movement. The two struck up an immediate rapport, and the emir readily acknowledged "the necessity for cooperation between Jews and Arabs" and "the possibility of Jewish claims to territory in Palestine." Yet he refused to discuss Palestine's future until such a time "when Arab affairs were more consolidated."[9]

(full article online)

Turks, Arabs Welcomed the Balfour Declaration
Moron

All of that is thoroughly documented, you uneducated Moron.

They had a brain and knew that endorsing the Jewish rights to sovereignty on their own ancient Homeland would be a good thing for all Arabs.
The Al Husseini clan thought otherwise. And all the Arabs lost.
And continue to be the losers.
-----------------

As late as August 1947, al-Wahda newspaper advocated the incorporation of Palestine into "Greater Syria."

Conclusion
Mahmoud Abbas's rejection of the Jewish right to national self-determination, which was acknowledged a hundred years ago by the international community, including the world's foremost Muslim power, leaders of the pan-Arab movement, and ordinary Palestinian Arabs, affords a sad testament to the unchanging nature of the Palestinian leadership's recalcitrance.

It was Hajj Amin Husseini's predication of Palestinian national identity on hatred of the "other" rather than on a distinct shared legacy that "paved the road for the Nakba of Palestinian people and their dispossession and displacement from their land." And it was Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas's persistence in this zero-sum approach, despite their feigned moderation in the Oslo peace charade, which ensured the perpetuation of Palestinian dispersal and statelessness to date. It is only by shedding their century-long revanchist dreams and opting for peace and reconciliation with their Israeli neighbors that Palestinian leaders can end their people's suffering. And what can be a better starting point for this sea change than endorsement of the Balfour Declaration rather than its atavistic denigration?

Turks, Arabs Welcomed the Balfour Declaration
Lying Zionist,you filth never wanted or want Peace...MORON
Stop insulting King Faisal and all other intelligent Arabs.

They had brains and actually spoke to the Jews.

You are just memorex from all the Jew hating sites, books, media you have swallowed your whole life.

Choose life, choose peace.

The Jewish people, never mind if becoming sovereign over one's own ancient homeland is called Zionism or anything else, HAVE the right to live on their ancient homeland even if the Al Husseini, Tamimi, Nasrallah of the world do not want to see Jews being sovereign of their own destiny, but rather, the "Let me have the pleasure of beating up some Jews today" ideology some Arabs have had for the previous 1300 years.

Stop your ignorance. That is the first step.
Sooo if I were a Native American,I am at Liberty to reclaim All of the United States by your analogy then....as I said before Moron
Nooooooo........

If one belongs to one of the 500 Nations still living in the USA, or even if members are living in other parts of the world, what each Nation/tribe has a right to is exactly the land they used to live on before the Europeans started to come by the thousands and take over all the best lands on the continent.

That is why it has been documented that there were about 500 Nation/tribes living on what is now US soil.

The Canadian indigenous have the very same rights to the lands they once lived on.

The same with the tribes from Mexico, or any other people living in any part of the Americas which was eventually flooded with Europeans, and then Asians and Africans, leaving the indigenous people without what had been rightfully theirs for thousands of years.
 
"Passions were so low that even when a group of pro-Israel protesters blocked the march for a few minutes on Oxford Street, the marchers were happy to wait while police asked them to move, and only some shouted “Zionist pigs!” before being hushed by others.
But this was a rousing success compared to the rally in Ramallah on Thursday."

It doesn't appear that more than 100 people attended. and traffic wasn't even stopped.

(full article online)

Anti-Balfour rallies in London, Ramallah, Gaza, Ankara pathetic failures ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
I think you delude yourself,Millions worldwide including the UK,totally disagree with you and the despicable treatment of the Palestinians by the Zionist Trash,unless like you they think,Murder,Maiming,Destruction etc.,are OK but they don't,your commentary is just the usual Zionist Terrorist complete denial of the truth and facts....That is why in the UN,many more Countries SUPPORT The PALESTINIANS/PALESTINE THAN THEY DO ZIONIST ISRAEL....IT IS YOU WHO IS A PATHETIC FAILURE
 

All of that is thoroughly documented, you uneducated Moron.

They had a brain and knew that endorsing the Jewish rights to sovereignty on their own ancient Homeland would be a good thing for all Arabs.
The Al Husseini clan thought otherwise. And all the Arabs lost.
And continue to be the losers.
-----------------

As late as August 1947, al-Wahda newspaper advocated the incorporation of Palestine into "Greater Syria."

Conclusion
Mahmoud Abbas's rejection of the Jewish right to national self-determination, which was acknowledged a hundred years ago by the international community, including the world's foremost Muslim power, leaders of the pan-Arab movement, and ordinary Palestinian Arabs, affords a sad testament to the unchanging nature of the Palestinian leadership's recalcitrance.

It was Hajj Amin Husseini's predication of Palestinian national identity on hatred of the "other" rather than on a distinct shared legacy that "paved the road for the Nakba of Palestinian people and their dispossession and displacement from their land." And it was Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas's persistence in this zero-sum approach, despite their feigned moderation in the Oslo peace charade, which ensured the perpetuation of Palestinian dispersal and statelessness to date. It is only by shedding their century-long revanchist dreams and opting for peace and reconciliation with their Israeli neighbors that Palestinian leaders can end their people's suffering. And what can be a better starting point for this sea change than endorsement of the Balfour Declaration rather than its atavistic denigration?

Turks, Arabs Welcomed the Balfour Declaration
Lying Zionist,you filth never wanted or want Peace...MORON
Stop insulting King Faisal and all other intelligent Arabs.

They had brains and actually spoke to the Jews.

You are just memorex from all the Jew hating sites, books, media you have swallowed your whole life.

Choose life, choose peace.

The Jewish people, never mind if becoming sovereign over one's own ancient homeland is called Zionism or anything else, HAVE the right to live on their ancient homeland even if the Al Husseini, Tamimi, Nasrallah of the world do not want to see Jews being sovereign of their own destiny, but rather, the "Let me have the pleasure of beating up some Jews today" ideology some Arabs have had for the previous 1300 years.

Stop your ignorance. That is the first step.
Sooo if I were a Native American,I am at Liberty to reclaim All of the United States by your analogy then....as I said before Moron
Nooooooo........

If one belongs to one of the 500 Nations still living in the USA, or even if members are living in other parts of the world, what each Nation/tribe has a right to is exactly the land they used to live on before the Europeans started to come by the thousands and take over all the best lands on the continent.

That is why it has been documented that there were about 500 Nation/tribes living on what is now US soil.

The Canadian indigenous have the very same rights to the lands they once lived on.

The same with the tribes from Mexico, or any other people living in any part of the Americas which was eventually flooded with Europeans, and then Asians and Africans, leaving the indigenous people without what had been rightfully theirs for thousands of years.
BUT...Israel/Zionist Trash stole the P's Land and tried to ELIMINATE THE PALESTINIANS COMPLETELY...even today in some Israeli Schools they teach?indoctorinate that in 1948 the "LAND"they stole had NO PEOPLE LIVING THERE,IT WAS UNINHABITED.....what a Motely Crew you are,Lying is part of your character...You couldn't lay/lie straight in bed
 
Try to find any record of a specifically Palestinian Arab heritage or civilization in any newspaper or book written before 1950. I've tried. There isn't any.

And there is a contradiction within this paragraph itself. If there was an ancient Palestinian people, then they lived in areas that were considered Palestine before Balfour and San Remo. Which means, they included Transjordan. But Abbas here says that the West Bank and Gaza are 22% of his "historic homeland" - yet they only include areas of British Mandate Palestine, not "Eastern Palestine".

Why does Mahmoud Abbas, so proud of Palestinian heritage, accept a colonialist definition of Palestine that excludes much of what was considered Palestine before 1917?

The answer is he same as to the question of why did the PLO in 1964 explicitly exclude the West Bank and Gaza from areas it claimed as its land. Because Palestinian nationalism was never about creating a state - it was about destroying one. And when Jordan and Egypt controlled parts of British Mandate Palestine, Mahmoud Abbas never claimed those areas as his own.

Only the land that Jews control are the ones that must be "liberated." Arabs controlling part of Palestine was fine.

Which means that Palestinianism is not a national liberation movement. It is an antisemitic movement.

But that isn't politically correct.

(full article online)

Fisking Mahmoud Abbas' anti-Balfour article ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
 
All of the emphasis of articles should be on the international law that followed Balfour and that formed the basis for Israel—the decisions of the winning powers (not just the British) at San Remo and the unanimous decision of the 51 members of the League of Nations to issue the Mandate for Palestine. The League issued the Mandate pursuant to Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, which provided a path towards statehood for peoples previously under Ottoman rule who were not immediately able to stand up a nation of their own. Although it does not use these specific words, the Mandate in effect recognized the Jews as an indigenous people with aboriginal rights.


Emphasis should also be given to the fact that the decisions regarding Palestine were made at the same time that decisions were made to carve five Arabs nations out of the carcass of Ottoman Turkey’s Empire and mirrored decisions redrawing boundaries and changing sovereignties in Europe, Africa, and the Pacific at the end of World War I.


Some people may quibble with my statement that Balfour was “superseded by international law” because both the San Remo decision and the Balfour Declaration refer to it and quote from it. Balfour was a very short and very vague document. The Mandate for Palestine is a long and detailed document that provides for encouragement of Jewish immigration and close settlement on the land. It specifies a Jewish governmental body (but no Arab governmental body) with which the British would interact during the period of the Mandate and which would be the basis for the new state. It addresses a long list of other concerns, for example, access to holy places. So I stand by my statement. A few vague sentences issued by the British were supplanted by a detailed international law adopted unanimously by the League of Nations.


The answer to the question of “What gave the British the right to give land..." is that the British did not give away any land. The disposition of conquered lands at the end of World War I was addressed by international laws that recognized five Arab nations and a single small Jewish nation in the Ottoman Middle East. Few nations on earth have such a nice pedigree in international law as does Israel.

(full article online)

Have the Arabs weaponized Balfour? (Irene) ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
 
"The second event was the Holocaust of Jews at the time of the Nazi movement, which saw the destruction of a large number of the Jews of Europe during World War II, according to Jewish story. This story has been employed by Jews on a large scale as a means of sympathy for them, and they are exaggerating and amplifying this incident so much so that the United Nations issued a 2005 decision to commemorate it on 27 January of each year, despite denials by many historians that dispute the facts and evidence of the gas chambers which are alleged by the promoters of the Holocaust.

The Germans encouraged the Jews to emigrate to Palestine in the 1930s, and the Jews had the sympathy of the whole world and provided assistance and support to them, setting up the Israeli state in Palestine, and Germany paid compensation to Jewish survivors of the Holocaust and the State of Israel and still Israel blackmails Germany and the world with this Holocaust which is unconfirmed historically.

Compare that with the racist the Balfour Declaration, which was approved by the United States, France, Italy formally as well as Japan, and in 1922 and approved by the League of Nations Council on the draft mandate, and the consequent disastrous consequences inflicted on the indigenous Palestinian people people of the land, displacing and killing them and torturing them and alienating them in all around the ground and thousands of Palestinian refugees who found that many countries closed their doors in their faces, ...

The Holocaust of Hitler opened to the Jews the doors of the world, and everyone was looking for ways to rectify this alleged Holocaust, and give them a home on the land of Palestine even though their population did not exceed fifty thousand at the time, while the Holocaust of Balfour displaced Palestinian people and prevented them from establishing their home on their own land and the land of their ancestors."

----------------
This is the sort of stuff that Palestinian Arabs accept as fact.

(full article online)

Pal newspaper: Balfour Declaration worse than Holocaust (which is fake anyway) ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
 
There were lots of stories in the Arab media about the 96th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration on Saturday.

Some demanded that the Arab world sue Great Britain.

Some note the supposed treachery of the 1919 Faisal-Weizmann Agreement that allowed a Jewish home in Palestine while the entire rest of the Middle East went to Arabs.

Hamas even produced a documentary about how Balfour was the beginning of all Arab woes and problems.

No Arabs, as far as I could tell, blamed themselves for any part of their problems.

I found an interesting article in the Palestine Bulletin from January 14, 1930, which shows that at least some Arabs saw the difference between how Jews were building a nation while Arabs did nothing but call meetings to complain about the Jews.

(full article online)

96 years of whining as Arabs mark Balfour anniversary ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
 
The entire idea of partition is antithetical to Balfour who anticipated the Jewish National Home on all of Palestine. Peel attempted to change the rules.

Later on, in discussing holy places as a separate territory, Peel explicitly abrogates Balfour:

" Guarantees as to the rights of the Holy Places and free access thereto (as provided in Article 13 of the existing Mandate), as to transit across the mandated area, and as to non-discrimination in fiscal, economic and other matters should be maintained in accordance with the principles of the Mandate System. But the policy of the Balfour Declaration would not apply; and no question would arise of balancing Arab against Jewish claims or vice versa. All the inhabitants of the territory would stand on an equal footing. The only official language" would be that of the Mandatory Administration. Good and just government without regard for sectional interests would be its basic principle.Balfour implies the the Jewish national home would administer the holy places and allow full access (as Israel does today.) "
-------
Peel wrests that right away.

Finally, it remains fascinating that during this month of non-stop Balfour coverage, so little has been written about the third clause that was supposed to ensure that Jews in other countries would be treated well even with a Jewish national home in historic Israel. The Arabs - including the Arabs of Jordan, who were under British influence - certainly didn't adhere to this clause, and Great Britain did not do anything to enforce that among its Arab friends.

(full article online)

UK diplomat admits "second half of Balfour" doesn't exist - but it SHOULD ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
 
Balfour%20kids%20poster.jpg


Image posted on the official Fatah Facebook page

The image shows Palestinian children holding a poster featuring the PA map of “Palestine” that presents all of Israel as “Palestine” together with the PA areas. To the left a picture of Baron Rothschild is shown, and to the right is a picture of former British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour. In the bottom left of the poster appears the logo of the 100th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration: A white circular logo with a keffiyeh (Arab headdress) pattern on it. Inside the circle appears the number “100” with the PA map of “Palestine” in place of the “1.” A red dot appears on the map with the label “Jerusalem” in English and Arabic. The numbers “00” have an image of what appear to be Palestinian refugees imposed on them. Above and below the number “100” in English and Arabic respectively is the hashtag “#Balfour100,” indicating the 100th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration.

Text on poster:
“The Balfour Promise (i.e., Declaration), the theft of a homeland”

(full article online)

Kids hold poster condemning the Balfour Declaration as the “theft of a homeland,” with map erasing Israel - All Media
 
There were lots of stories in the Arab media about the 96th anniversary of the Balfour Declaration on Saturday.

Some demanded that the Arab world sue Great Britain.

Some note the supposed treachery of the 1919 Faisal-Weizmann Agreement that allowed a Jewish home in Palestine while the entire rest of the Middle East went to Arabs.

Hamas even produced a documentary about how Balfour was the beginning of all Arab woes and problems.

No Arabs, as far as I could tell, blamed themselves for any part of their problems.

I found an interesting article in the Palestine Bulletin from January 14, 1930, which shows that at least some Arabs saw the difference between how Jews were building a nation while Arabs did nothing but call meetings to complain about the Jews.

(full article online)

96 years of whining as Arabs mark Balfour anniversary ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
It sounds like it is Israel that is doing the whining.

 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom