The Attack on Paul Pelosi Gets Curiouser and Curiouser

i’ve literally posted what they said and they’ve been posted on this forum, as well as articles about them, it’s hardly my fault you are not keeping up with this story or intentionally ignoring reports. It’s the Muellwe report all over again you
Very simply...post the 911 call or post the post number it's on.

You can't, you're lying AGAIN
 
Nowhere in that indictment does it mention that Pelosi said "David" was a friend and obviously that indictment DOES mention the 911 call so it WOULD have had he said that
there is no indictment you dumb shit
 
Do you realize how often state and local LE officers do far worse?

Are you saying we can never trust any law enforcement ever?
 
From this day forward he shall be known as Paul "The Hammer" Pelosi :auiqs.jpg:
As long as he doesn’t cross this guy....

1667269439373.jpeg

Not as young as he used to be, but still a pretty tough guy.
 
Read the attached and shut the fuck up ya lying wing nuts
Hey asshole, why is the glass from the “break in” spread out almost 2 feet OUTSIDE the house and none inside? Oops. No alarm from any “break in” either. Refusal to release any footage . But you need to lie anyway because....cult.
 
Nowhere in that indictment does it mention that Pelosi said "David" was a friend
The police's own account reports that when Paul called to report the problem, HE referred to the attacker by name calling him a friend.

So Lessee if we got it all right so far:
  1. The attacker breaks a glass window to get in, yet the glass was broken from the inside out and other things suggest he was just let straight in through the front door.
  2. Despite having a list of supposed people he planned to attack, he had no weapons worse than a hammer, came only wearing underwear, and doesn't even bother knowing that Nancy wasn't even home despite her being the alleged goal of his attack.
  3. After being let it, and in the middle of an attack, he excuses Paul to go to the bathroom to take a leak where he was able to call the police.
  4. The police arrive expecting to only give a wellness check, and it isn't till then that the fight actually starts, in front of the police, with BOTH men having hammers!
  5. The two men are fighting in their underwear, apparently know each other, and both have hammers.
  6. Despite this being a common break in as far as SF goes, the FBI immediately gets involved, yet if this were anyone else, you'd be doing good just to get the cops to show up!
  7. Going against standard procedure, the police have still not released neither the 911 tape to the public nor the police camera video.
  8. They hold the man with no bail saying he is too dangerous preventing him from speaking to the public directly despite there being no evidence nor precedent to suggest he is any particular danger compared to other criminals.
  9. Despite being the Speaker and their being worth hundreds of millions, they did not have even a K-Mart security system, no security cameras and no guards.
  10. Every effort is being used to pass off this bizarre case that could only happen to a democrat, as somehow being connected to Trump and MAGA as a last ditch effort for democrats to try to salvage something from the election!
 
A hammer attack is “hilarious “?

What the fuck is wrong with you people
I guess any attack on a Democrat elitist is traumatic to a Leftist, but assaults and murder using a hammer are more frequent than assaults using a pistol are commonplace in America. No Big Deal to us plebians.
That aside there are a lot of questions regarding this supposed attack.
DePape is questionably psychotic and addicted to drugs. e definitely isn't Maga nor conservative. he is a male prostitute, pedophile and an illegal alien.. Funny, there was no mention that DePape was also in is underwear. Why is that?
Let's see what the Quisling Media will attempt to cover-up
 
Last edited:
The police's own account reports that when Paul called to report the problem, HE referred to the attacker by name calling him a friend.

So Lessee if we got it all right so far:
  1. The attacker breaks a glass window to get in, yet the glass was broken from the inside out and other things suggest he was just let straight in through the front door.
  2. Despite having a list of supposed people he planned to attack, he had no weapons worse than a hammer, came only wearing underwear, and doesn't even bother knowing that Nancy wasn't even home despite her being the alleged goal of his attack.
  3. After being let it, and in the middle of an attack, he excuses Paul to go to the bathroom to take a leak where he was able to call the police.
  4. The police arrive expecting to only give a wellness check, and it isn't till then that the fight actually starts, in front of the police, with BOTH men having hammers!
  5. The two men are fighting in their underwear, apparently know each other, and both have hammers.
  6. Despite this being a common break in as far as SF goes, the FBI immediately gets involved, yet if this were anyone else, you'd be doing good just to get the cops to show up!
  7. Going against standard procedure, the police have still not released neither the 911 tape to the public nor the police camera video.
  8. They hold the man with no bail saying he is too dangerous preventing him from speaking to the public directly despite there being no evidence nor precedent to suggest he is any particular danger compared to other criminals.
  9. Despite being the Speaker and their being worth hundreds of millions, they did not have even a K-Mart security system, no security cameras and no guards.
  10. Every effort is being used to pass off this bizarre case that could only happen to a democrat, as somehow being connected to Trump and MAGA as a last ditch effort for democrats to try to salvage something from the election!

I laughed reading all this....yep. We're supposed to buy this and not only that, if we don't there's something wronger than wrong about us, SHAME ON US SHAME

hahahahah sure
 
So because one FBI lawyer lied on a FISA warrant that he would have gotten anyway … nothing that the FBI does can ever be trusted?

Like I said lame
Do you realize how often state and local LE officers do far worse?

Are you saying we can never trust any law enforcement ever?
The founders did not set up a government for us to trust, they set up a government for us to monitor and prevent from having excessive power. Damn right law enforcement is not to be trusted, but should be closely watched and well-regulated by involved citizens. I'm responding to this:

Read the attached and shut the fuck up ya lying wing nuts

Uh, no.

That's why we gave local LE body cameras. They protect the good cops from false accusations, and give citizens a way to prove a bad cop was bad.

As soon as we see the footage from the SFPD body cameras at the Pelosi house, we'll start to get at the truth. Of course, it has often turned out that body camera footage is much more fragile than other digital footage and frequently gets lost or accidently destroyed. Any predictions about when we'll see that footage from the Pelosi house?

Does every law enforcement officer lie every time they open their mouths? Of course not. But based on their track record, trusting the DOJ/FBI to ruin a man's life based on their word would be ludicrous.
 
Still lying.

DEFunded SF police does not want to admit it sends cops to guard Paul's in house gay coke whore sessions and has for years...

The cops searched the whore before allowing the whore to dope and gay off with Paul.
You`re still doing the QAnut thing?
 

Forum List

Back
Top