I am reviewing the unnamed FBI agent’s supporting affidavit which was the basis for the initial civil complaint.
There is no doubt at all that Lang was present, was a participant and seems to have been very proud of it.
At paragraph numbered “24,” the agent finally seems to support the claim that Lang acted violently.
To be very clear at this juncture, I absolutely oppose the criminal behavior of any of the Jan 6 protestors (especially the “mob component”) and I offer zero defense for any assault against the law enforcement officers who were there to secure and protect our Capitol.
Therefore, let’s assume (hypothetically) that despite his SCOTUS application, that there is perfectly good reason to try him on the indictment. In fact, let’s go even further: let’s assume that when he does get tried, he is very likely to be convicted (and let’s assume the verdict is perfectly fair and proper).
With that basis, I’m still asking: why is he not entitled to a reasonable bail?