I am reviewing the unnamed FBI agentās supporting affidavit which was the basis for the initial civil complaint.
There is no doubt at all that Lang was present, was a participant and seems to have been very proud of it.
At paragraph numbered ā24,ā the agent finally seems to support the claim that Lang acted violently.
To be very clear at this juncture, I absolutely oppose the criminal behavior of any of the Jan 6 protestors (especially the āmob componentā) and I offer zero defense for any assault against the law enforcement officers who were there to secure and protect our Capitol.
Therefore, letās assume (hypothetically) that despite his SCOTUS application, that there is perfectly good reason to try him on the indictment. In fact, letās go even further: letās assume that when he does get tried, he is very likely to be convicted (and letās assume the verdict is perfectly fair and proper).
With that basis, Iām still asking: why is he not entitled to a reasonable bail?