otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 46,676
- 15,625
- 2,165
Again post the proof that both victim and attacker were in underwear.If you want to be lied to I cant stop you
Come on fuckup.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Again post the proof that both victim and attacker were in underwear.If you want to be lied to I cant stop you
I never said they wereAgain post the proof that both victim and attacker were in underwear.
Come on fuckup.
Come on parrot.I never said they were
But its been alleged by others who you seem to vehemently hate
If true it means everything being reported by the pro pelosi crowd - meaning cops, FBI, and lib news media - could be a lie
Lets see all the video and clear this thing up
Since you cant refute my logic you resort to personal insults insteadCome on parrot.
Squeal
Run away.Since you cant refute my logic you resort to personal insults instead
So you lose
I have not gone anywhereRun away.
It’s all you have.
I have facts.I have not gone anywhere
You are the one sputtering and spitting
All you have a words from pelosi flunkiesI have facts.
You just have your maga fuckupness.
They had a whole world of conspiracy theories built within hours of this.I have facts.
You just have your maga fuckupness.
It was sources close to the investigation.Who was your original source for him being in his underwear? Did you check your source to see if it was verifiable?
Lefty hates transparency ,then they can't lie about everything ... no video , believe us . Bunch of dicks.I never said they were
But its been alleged by others who you seem to vehemently hate
If true it means everything being reported by the pro pelosi crowd - meaning cops, FBI, and lib news media - could be a lie
Lets see all the video and clear this thing up
See the Big Lie or J6Lefty hates transparency ,then they can't lie about everything ... no video , believe us . Bunch of dicks.
Here's the thing: No, it wasn't. It was never claimed. It was reported in error, but after the reporter retracted it, people kept saying it was there anyway.It was sources close to the investigation.
But again the body cam footage will clear up any disagreement on what police observed.
CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story misstated what clothing the suspect was wearing when officers found him.
andOfficers immediately went inside and were able to restrain DEPAPE. While officers were restraining DEPAPE, Pelosi appeared to be unconscious on the ground. Officers removed a cell phone, cash, clipper cards, and an unidentified card from DEPAPE’s right shorts pocket. DEPAPE provided officers his first and last name. After officers asked DEPAPE if he had an ID on him, DEPAPE said it might be in his backpack on the back porch and later stated his backpack was near the broken glass.
SFPD Officer Colby Wilmes was able to interview a witness, Witness 1, who saw an individual in all black, carrying a large black bag on his back, walking near the Pelosi residence where Witness 1 was parked. Witness 1 was working private security at an address nearby. Witness 1 then heard what sounded like banging on either a door or car and then heard the sirens within a minute or two
I'm sure there has been a lot of erroneous reporting and clearly a lot of changed stories. My assumption is always that breaking news is more accurate than news that has been cleaned up and spun.Here's the thing: No, it wasn't. It was never claimed. It was reported in error, but after the reporter retracted it, people kept saying it was there anyway.
Here is the retraction:
Source: KTVU Fox 2, Least Biased, High Factual Reporting.![]()
Alleged Pelosi intruder has manifesto of conspiracy theories: sources
The alleged home intruder who attacked 82-year-old Paul Pelosi early Friday holds anti-government conspiracy theories, according to sources.www.ktvu.com
Furthermore, the Criminal Complaint says:
and
There is no mention in the Criminal Complaint of DePape being in his underwear, or of a search for his pants.
I'm sure there has been a lot of erroneous reporting and clearly a lot of changed stories. My assumption is always that breaking news is more accurate than news that has been cleaned up and spun.
This altercation was instantly politicized by Democrats, so neither the Media nor government can be fully trusted if at all.
Luckily we have unambiguous laws requiring transparency, so the body cam footage will be released soon. I'm sure you are looking forward to being proved right when we all see what happened.