The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’

[Slade3200]

There's no lie the left won't tell. Dems and their pals in the lying liberal news media are a boil on the human genome.

What do you think is being lied about?

Looks like the issue about Goldberg's smear article on Trump is finally settled!!!

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’

Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anony…

nypost.com

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’



Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anonymous sources were “not good enough” in reporting such as his.

“I share that view that it’s not good enough. But, you know, like other reporters, I’m always balancing out the moral ambiguities and complications after anonymous sourcing with the public’s right to know,” Goldberg said during a Monday evening interview on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

Hayes raised the issue of using unnamed sources with Goldberg while discussing his most recent article, in which he relied on four anonymous accounts.




For the doubters, Goldberg concedes that anonymous sources aren't good enough near the end of the video.....

How does this settle anything?

Goldberg conceded that his "evidence" isn't good enough....

Which leaves you with a dilemma....

Do you believe Goldberg, or claim he's a fucking idiot???

If you thought looking in your drawers and trying to decide what gender you are is confusing, this is sure to send you (and the other Liberals) straight to the mental hospital for treatment!!!!


View attachment 386649

Isn't good enough for what??

Not good enough to prove what he claimed, you idiot!!!

Nothing could fully prove it outside a recording or admission from Trump. Right? Even if the sources came forward you'd be crying foul and doing whatever you can to discredit them, am I right?

That begs the question: Do you believe Tara Reade? Do you believe Mrs. Biden's ex when he said his then wife and creepy Joe were screwing around behind his back?

I haven’t heard both sides of those stories. Do you believe them?

 

[Slade3200]

The DemonRats and their lapdog the Main Stream Media, produce one hoax after another, after another... that's all they do .... they don't care for facts, they will continue doing it until the election, and even beyond , when Trump wins.

We live in very sad times my friends.

I agree with you there, we do live in sad times. It starts at the top and the person up there now is rotten as they come. He is bringing the ugliness out of everybody. Time for a change

Sad times yes, but because of the cheating demonRats, not because of President Trump or patriots, GOD Bless them.

Trump is a ray of light and hope among all the Leftist horror we are seing today.

Trump is in charge; the horror is his.

Fox News Bashes Anonymous Sourcing of Trump Army ‘Losers’ Story, Then Uses Anonymous Sources to Dispute It

Fox spent hours bashing The Atlantic’s anonymous sourcing before citing unnamed sources to slap the report. (Hours later, another Fox reporter confirmed the original story.)

www.thedailybeast.com

Anonymous sources good enough for Fox News.

Good enough for ONE correspondent...

The rest of them considered the article to be garbage...

The one fox reporter confirmed that the story was true.
That 4 unnamed sources had made the accusation.
Not that the accusations were confirmed.

The only way to confirm the accusations are for Trump to admit to them or for there to be a recording. Right? Otherwise you can always say it isn’t confirmed

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

There's no lie the left won't tell. Dems and their pals in the lying liberal news media are a boil on the human genome.

What do you think is being lied about?

Looks like the issue about Goldberg's smear article on Trump is finally settled!!!

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’

Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anony…

nypost.com

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’



Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anonymous sources were “not good enough” in reporting such as his.

“I share that view that it’s not good enough. But, you know, like other reporters, I’m always balancing out the moral ambiguities and complications after anonymous sourcing with the public’s right to know,” Goldberg said during a Monday evening interview on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

Hayes raised the issue of using unnamed sources with Goldberg while discussing his most recent article, in which he relied on four anonymous accounts.




For the doubters, Goldberg concedes that anonymous sources aren't good enough near the end of the video.....

How does this settle anything?

Goldberg conceded that his "evidence" isn't good enough....

Which leaves you with a dilemma....

Do you believe Goldberg, or claim he's a fucking idiot???

If you thought looking in your drawers and trying to decide what gender you are is confusing, this is sure to send you (and the other Liberals) straight to the mental hospital for treatment!!!!


View attachment 386649

Isn't good enough for what??

Not good enough to prove what he claimed, you idiot!!!

Nothing could fully prove it outside a recording or admission from Trump. Right? Even if the sources came forward you'd be crying foul and doing whatever you can to discredit them, am I right?

That begs the question: Do you believe Tara Reade? Do you believe Mrs. Biden's ex when he said his then wife and creepy Joe were screwing around behind his back?

I haven’t heard both sides of those stories. Do you believe them?

I don't believe anything that has no real evidence. When you become the focus of national attention, people come out of the woodwork with all kinds of stories about you. You also failed to answer my question: do you believe the Atlantic story?

 

[Care4all]

There's no lie the left won't tell. Dems and their pals in the lying liberal news media are a boil on the human genome.

What do you think is being lied about?

Looks like the issue about Goldberg's smear article on Trump is finally settled!!!

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’

Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anony…

nypost.com

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’



Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anonymous sources were “not good enough” in reporting such as his.

“I share that view that it’s not good enough. But, you know, like other reporters, I’m always balancing out the moral ambiguities and complications after anonymous sourcing with the public’s right to know,” Goldberg said during a Monday evening interview on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

Hayes raised the issue of using unnamed sources with Goldberg while discussing his most recent article, in which he relied on four anonymous accounts.




For the doubters, Goldberg concedes that anonymous sources aren't good enough near the end of the video.....

How does this settle anything?

Goldberg conceded that his "evidence" isn't good enough....

Which leaves you with a dilemma....

Do you believe Goldberg, or claim he's a fucking idiot???

If you thought looking in your drawers and trying to decide what gender you are is confusing, this is sure to send you (and the other Liberals) straight to the mental hospital for treatment!!!!


View attachment 386649

Isn't good enough for what??

I have no time for your faux ignorance.

But you have to admit...

Watching their reaction to this news is hilarious!!

They are squealing like stuck pigs. No matter Dems will move onto the next fake news fabricated story in a couple of days and repeat this whole faux rage act.

I wonder if they know that Goldberg lived in Israel (and was actually in the IDF)???

He has even supported Netanyahu, and he's been a big proponent of Israel bombing Iran!!!!

Now, he's not only made the Democrats look like a bunch of idiots, but I'll bet Bibi wants to have a little talk with him about his stupid ass going rogue.....

Obiwan, president Trump supports Netanyahu...

And Trump is a big proponent of Israel bombing Iran....

So what's the difference between Trump and Goldberg, on the Israeli front?

 

[Slade3200]

There's no lie the left won't tell. Dems and their pals in the lying liberal news media are a boil on the human genome.

What do you think is being lied about?

Looks like the issue about Goldberg's smear article on Trump is finally settled!!!

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’

Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anony…

nypost.com

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’



Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anonymous sources were “not good enough” in reporting such as his.

“I share that view that it’s not good enough. But, you know, like other reporters, I’m always balancing out the moral ambiguities and complications after anonymous sourcing with the public’s right to know,” Goldberg said during a Monday evening interview on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

Hayes raised the issue of using unnamed sources with Goldberg while discussing his most recent article, in which he relied on four anonymous accounts.




For the doubters, Goldberg concedes that anonymous sources aren't good enough near the end of the video.....

How does this settle anything?

Goldberg conceded that his "evidence" isn't good enough....

Which leaves you with a dilemma....

Do you believe Goldberg, or claim he's a fucking idiot???

If you thought looking in your drawers and trying to decide what gender you are is confusing, this is sure to send you (and the other Liberals) straight to the mental hospital for treatment!!!!


View attachment 386649

Isn't good enough for what??

Not good enough to prove what he claimed, you idiot!!!

Nothing could fully prove it outside a recording or admission from Trump. Right? Even if the sources came forward you'd be crying foul and doing whatever you can to discredit them, am I right?

That begs the question: Do you believe Tara Reade? Do you believe Mrs. Biden's ex when he said his then wife and creepy Joe were screwing around behind his back?

I haven’t heard both sides of those stories. Do you believe them?

I don't believe anything that has no real evidence. When you become the focus of national attention, people come out of the woodwork with all kinds of stories about you. You also failed to answer my question: do you believe the Atlantic story?

I believe Trump would absolutely say those things as he has said similar stuff in the past. Whether he said everything claimed in the story, I wouldn’t stand behind it nor would I stand behind anything reported that I didn’t actually hear for myself.

The claims don’t surprise me though, I assumed Trump had these views about troops before the Atlantic story came out. It’s who he is

 

[Billiejeens]

The DemonRats and their lapdog the Main Stream Media, produce one hoax after another, after another... that's all they do .... they don't care for facts, they will continue doing it until the election, and even beyond , when Trump wins.

We live in very sad times my friends.

I agree with you there, we do live in sad times. It starts at the top and the person up there now is rotten as they come. He is bringing the ugliness out of everybody. Time for a change

Sad times yes, but because of the cheating demonRats, not because of President Trump or patriots, GOD Bless them.

Trump is a ray of light and hope among all the Leftist horror we are seing today.

Trump is in charge; the horror is his.

Fox News Bashes Anonymous Sourcing of Trump Army ‘Losers’ Story, Then Uses Anonymous Sources to Dispute It

Fox spent hours bashing The Atlantic’s anonymous sourcing before citing unnamed sources to slap the report. (Hours later, another Fox reporter confirmed the original story.)

www.thedailybeast.com

Anonymous sources good enough for Fox News.

Good enough for ONE correspondent...

The rest of them considered the article to be garbage...

The one fox reporter confirmed that the story was true.
That 4 unnamed sources had made the accusation.
Not that the accusations were confirmed.

The only way to confirm the accusations are for Trump to admit to them or for there to be a recording. Right? Otherwise you can always say it isn’t confirmed

A reasonable person might decide that the 20 or so people that were there and have gone on he record to say it did not happen, would be sufficient.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

There's no lie the left won't tell. Dems and their pals in the lying liberal news media are a boil on the human genome.

What do you think is being lied about?

Looks like the issue about Goldberg's smear article on Trump is finally settled!!!

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’

Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anony…

nypost.com

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’



Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anonymous sources were “not good enough” in reporting such as his.

“I share that view that it’s not good enough. But, you know, like other reporters, I’m always balancing out the moral ambiguities and complications after anonymous sourcing with the public’s right to know,” Goldberg said during a Monday evening interview on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

Hayes raised the issue of using unnamed sources with Goldberg while discussing his most recent article, in which he relied on four anonymous accounts.




For the doubters, Goldberg concedes that anonymous sources aren't good enough near the end of the video.....

How does this settle anything?

Goldberg conceded that his "evidence" isn't good enough....

Which leaves you with a dilemma....

Do you believe Goldberg, or claim he's a fucking idiot???

If you thought looking in your drawers and trying to decide what gender you are is confusing, this is sure to send you (and the other Liberals) straight to the mental hospital for treatment!!!!


View attachment 386649

Isn't good enough for what??

Not good enough to prove what he claimed, you idiot!!!

Nothing could fully prove it outside a recording or admission from Trump. Right? Even if the sources came forward you'd be crying foul and doing whatever you can to discredit them, am I right?

That begs the question: Do you believe Tara Reade? Do you believe Mrs. Biden's ex when he said his then wife and creepy Joe were screwing around behind his back?

I haven’t heard both sides of those stories. Do you believe them?

I don't believe anything that has no real evidence. When you become the focus of national attention, people come out of the woodwork with all kinds of stories about you. You also failed to answer my question: do you believe the Atlantic story?

I believe Trump would absolutely say those things as he has said similar stuff in the past. Whether he said everything claimed in the story, I wouldn’t stand behind it nor would I stand behind anything reported that I didn’t actually hear for myself.

The claims don’t surprise me though, I assumed Trump had these views about troops before the Atlantic story came out. It’s who he is

Outside of what he said about McCain, Trump seems like the most supportive President of our military in our lifetime and never expressed disdain. But you say you aren't surprised.

Then let me ask: Creepy Joe, a well known toucher and hair sniffer of young girls doesn't give you reason to believe that the story of his sexual impropriety is likely, even though as you say, you wouldn't stand behind it?

 

[Care4all]

There's no lie the left won't tell. Dems and their pals in the lying liberal news media are a boil on the human genome.

What do you think is being lied about?

Looks like the issue about Goldberg's smear article on Trump is finally settled!!!

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’

Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anony…

nypost.com

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’



Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anonymous sources were “not good enough” in reporting such as his.

“I share that view that it’s not good enough. But, you know, like other reporters, I’m always balancing out the moral ambiguities and complications after anonymous sourcing with the public’s right to know,” Goldberg said during a Monday evening interview on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

Hayes raised the issue of using unnamed sources with Goldberg while discussing his most recent article, in which he relied on four anonymous accounts.




For the doubters, Goldberg concedes that anonymous sources aren't good enough near the end of the video.....

How does this settle anything?

Goldberg conceded that his "evidence" isn't good enough....

Which leaves you with a dilemma....

Do you believe Goldberg, or claim he's a fucking idiot???

If you thought looking in your drawers and trying to decide what gender you are is confusing, this is sure to send you (and the other Liberals) straight to the mental hospital for treatment!!!!


View attachment 386649

Isn't good enough for what??

Not good enough to prove what he claimed, you idiot!!!

Nothing could fully prove it outside a recording or admission from Trump. Right? Even if the sources came forward you'd be crying foul and doing whatever you can to discredit them, am I right?

That begs the question: Do you believe Tara Reade? Do you believe Mrs. Biden's ex when he said his then wife and creepy Joe were screwing around behind his back?

I haven’t heard both sides of those stories. Do you believe them?

I don't believe anything that has no real evidence. When you become the focus of national attention, people come out of the woodwork with all kinds of stories about you. You also failed to answer my question: do you believe the Atlantic story?

Absolutely! I believe the gist of the story, With or without Goldberg's article....

Trumps actions and mouth, makes it hard not to....

Threats to disown Don Jr, if he joined the Military came from his niece....

Trump's comments on McCain were public.

Trump' s disparaging of the Kahn' s gold star parents, were public....

Trump' s handling and interference in military justice system of the marine being disciplined for murder and other military crimes, being pardoned by him, showed lack of respect for the military.

Trumps bashing of Col Vindman, then firing him, for honoring his oath to the Constitution.

Trump's totally ignoring the Russians putting a bounty on our soldiers serving, not a word to Russia or Putin on it....not even a warning....

Trump bashing the general's that he hired, like Gen Matis and General Kelly....when he has no personal use for them anymore....

Telling the wife of the dead soldier ambushed in Africa, that her husband knew he could be killed when he joined, which was callous.

Trumps father paying off a doctor, to say Trump had bone spurs, to dodge the draft....

There is a long Trump history of disrespecting our military, so the 4 anonymous by name sources saying that Trump said guys in the military who died for our nation were suckers and losers is believable.

 

[Slade3200]

The DemonRats and their lapdog the Main Stream Media, produce one hoax after another, after another... that's all they do .... they don't care for facts, they will continue doing it until the election, and even beyond , when Trump wins.

We live in very sad times my friends.

I agree with you there, we do live in sad times. It starts at the top and the person up there now is rotten as they come. He is bringing the ugliness out of everybody. Time for a change

Sad times yes, but because of the cheating demonRats, not because of President Trump or patriots, GOD Bless them.

Trump is a ray of light and hope among all the Leftist horror we are seing today.

Trump is in charge; the horror is his.

Fox News Bashes Anonymous Sourcing of Trump Army ‘Losers’ Story, Then Uses Anonymous Sources to Dispute It

Fox spent hours bashing The Atlantic’s anonymous sourcing before citing unnamed sources to slap the report. (Hours later, another Fox reporter confirmed the original story.)

www.thedailybeast.com

Anonymous sources good enough for Fox News.

Good enough for ONE correspondent...

The rest of them considered the article to be garbage...

The one fox reporter confirmed that the story was true.
That 4 unnamed sources had made the accusation.
Not that the accusations were confirmed.

The only way to confirm the accusations are for Trump to admit to them or for there to be a recording. Right? Otherwise you can always say it isn’t confirmed

A reasonable person might decide that the 20 or so people that were there and have gone on he record to say it did not happen, would be sufficient.

That point just makes me laugh. So everybody on that trip is supposed to have heard every statement that Trump made?! Do you think that’s a valid point?

 

[Billiejeens]

The DemonRats and their lapdog the Main Stream Media, produce one hoax after another, after another... that's all they do .... they don't care for facts, they will continue doing it until the election, and even beyond , when Trump wins.

We live in very sad times my friends.

I agree with you there, we do live in sad times. It starts at the top and the person up there now is rotten as they come. He is bringing the ugliness out of everybody. Time for a change

Sad times yes, but because of the cheating demonRats, not because of President Trump or patriots, GOD Bless them.

Trump is a ray of light and hope among all the Leftist horror we are seing today.

Trump is in charge; the horror is his.

Fox News Bashes Anonymous Sourcing of Trump Army ‘Losers’ Story, Then Uses Anonymous Sources to Dispute It

Fox spent hours bashing The Atlantic’s anonymous sourcing before citing unnamed sources to slap the report. (Hours later, another Fox reporter confirmed the original story.)

www.thedailybeast.com

Anonymous sources good enough for Fox News.

Good enough for ONE correspondent...

The rest of them considered the article to be garbage...

The one fox reporter confirmed that the story was true.
That 4 unnamed sources had made the accusation.
Not that the accusations were confirmed.

The only way to confirm the accusations are for Trump to admit to them or for there to be a recording. Right? Otherwise you can always say it isn’t confirmed

A reasonable person might decide that the 20 or so people that were there and have gone on he record to say it did not happen, would be sufficient.

That point just makes me laugh. So everybody on that trip is supposed to have heard every statement that Trump made?! Do you think that’s a valid point?

Laugh away .

 

[Slade3200]

There's no lie the left won't tell. Dems and their pals in the lying liberal news media are a boil on the human genome.

What do you think is being lied about?

Looks like the issue about Goldberg's smear article on Trump is finally settled!!!

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’

Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anony…

nypost.com

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’



Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anonymous sources were “not good enough” in reporting such as his.

“I share that view that it’s not good enough. But, you know, like other reporters, I’m always balancing out the moral ambiguities and complications after anonymous sourcing with the public’s right to know,” Goldberg said during a Monday evening interview on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

Hayes raised the issue of using unnamed sources with Goldberg while discussing his most recent article, in which he relied on four anonymous accounts.




For the doubters, Goldberg concedes that anonymous sources aren't good enough near the end of the video.....

How does this settle anything?

Goldberg conceded that his "evidence" isn't good enough....

Which leaves you with a dilemma....

Do you believe Goldberg, or claim he's a fucking idiot???

If you thought looking in your drawers and trying to decide what gender you are is confusing, this is sure to send you (and the other Liberals) straight to the mental hospital for treatment!!!!


View attachment 386649

Isn't good enough for what??

Not good enough to prove what he claimed, you idiot!!!

Nothing could fully prove it outside a recording or admission from Trump. Right? Even if the sources came forward you'd be crying foul and doing whatever you can to discredit them, am I right?

That begs the question: Do you believe Tara Reade? Do you believe Mrs. Biden's ex when he said his then wife and creepy Joe were screwing around behind his back?

I haven’t heard both sides of those stories. Do you believe them?

I don't believe anything that has no real evidence. When you become the focus of national attention, people come out of the woodwork with all kinds of stories about you. You also failed to answer my question: do you believe the Atlantic story?

I believe Trump would absolutely say those things as he has said similar stuff in the past. Whether he said everything claimed in the story, I wouldn’t stand behind it nor would I stand behind anything reported that I didn’t actually hear for myself.

The claims don’t surprise me though, I assumed Trump had these views about troops before the Atlantic story came out. It’s who he is

Outside of what he said about McCain, Trump seems like the most supportive President of our military in our lifetime and never expressed disdain. But you say you aren't surprised.

Then let me ask: Creepy Joe, a well known toucher and hair sniffer of young girls doesn't give you reason to believe that the story of his sexual impropriety is likely, even though as you say, you wouldn't stand behind it?

Somebody who hugs and touches doesn’t mean they are sexual assaulters. I come from a family of huggers. I grew up hugging and kissing all my relatives when I said hello and goodbye to them. I would hug strangers when I met them. I don’t see joe acting much different than my grandparents acted during gatherings with family and friends. So these creepy joe accusations are pretty disgusting to me.

Of course if somebody makes accusations they should be listened to. But like you said people come out of the woodwork during campaigns so both sides need to be heard.

Trump has made more comments outside of McCain to show his true colors. What he did to John Kelly was very telling and comments he’s made about our generals is telling as well. Care4all has a nice list above.

 

[Obiwan]

The DemonRats and their lapdog the Main Stream Media, produce one hoax after another, after another... that's all they do .... they don't care for facts, they will continue doing it until the election, and even beyond , when Trump wins.

We live in very sad times my friends.

I agree with you there, we do live in sad times. It starts at the top and the person up there now is rotten as they come. He is bringing the ugliness out of everybody. Time for a change

Sad times yes, but because of the cheating demonRats, not because of President Trump or patriots, GOD Bless them.

Trump is a ray of light and hope among all the Leftist horror we are seing today.

Trump is in charge; the horror is his.

Fox News Bashes Anonymous Sourcing of Trump Army ‘Losers’ Story, Then Uses Anonymous Sources to Dispute It

Fox spent hours bashing The Atlantic’s anonymous sourcing before citing unnamed sources to slap the report. (Hours later, another Fox reporter confirmed the original story.)

www.thedailybeast.com

Anonymous sources good enough for Fox News.

Good enough for ONE correspondent...

The rest of them considered the article to be garbage...

The one fox reporter confirmed that the story was true.
That 4 unnamed sources had made the accusation.
Not that the accusations were confirmed.

Actually, from what I could tell, NONE of the sources even wanted their name associated with the allegation ...

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

There's no lie the left won't tell. Dems and their pals in the lying liberal news media are a boil on the human genome.

What do you think is being lied about?

Looks like the issue about Goldberg's smear article on Trump is finally settled!!!

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’

Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anony…

nypost.com

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’



Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anonymous sources were “not good enough” in reporting such as his.

“I share that view that it’s not good enough. But, you know, like other reporters, I’m always balancing out the moral ambiguities and complications after anonymous sourcing with the public’s right to know,” Goldberg said during a Monday evening interview on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

Hayes raised the issue of using unnamed sources with Goldberg while discussing his most recent article, in which he relied on four anonymous accounts.




For the doubters, Goldberg concedes that anonymous sources aren't good enough near the end of the video.....

How does this settle anything?

Goldberg conceded that his "evidence" isn't good enough....

Which leaves you with a dilemma....

Do you believe Goldberg, or claim he's a fucking idiot???

If you thought looking in your drawers and trying to decide what gender you are is confusing, this is sure to send you (and the other Liberals) straight to the mental hospital for treatment!!!!


View attachment 386649

Isn't good enough for what??

Not good enough to prove what he claimed, you idiot!!!

Nothing could fully prove it outside a recording or admission from Trump. Right? Even if the sources came forward you'd be crying foul and doing whatever you can to discredit them, am I right?

That begs the question: Do you believe Tara Reade? Do you believe Mrs. Biden's ex when he said his then wife and creepy Joe were screwing around behind his back?

I haven’t heard both sides of those stories. Do you believe them?

I don't believe anything that has no real evidence. When you become the focus of national attention, people come out of the woodwork with all kinds of stories about you. You also failed to answer my question: do you believe the Atlantic story?

I believe Trump would absolutely say those things as he has said similar stuff in the past. Whether he said everything claimed in the story, I wouldn’t stand behind it nor would I stand behind anything reported that I didn’t actually hear for myself.

The claims don’t surprise me though, I assumed Trump had these views about troops before the Atlantic story came out. It’s who he is

Outside of what he said about McCain, Trump seems like the most supportive President of our military in our lifetime and never expressed disdain. But you say you aren't surprised.

Then let me ask: Creepy Joe, a well known toucher and hair sniffer of young girls doesn't give you reason to believe that the story of his sexual impropriety is likely, even though as you say, you wouldn't stand behind it?

Somebody who hugs and touches doesn’t mean they are sexual assaulters. I come from a family of huggers. I grew up hugging and kissing all my relatives when I said hello and goodbye to them. I would hug strangers when I met them. I don’t see joe acting much different than my grandparents acted during gatherings with family and friends. So these creepy joe accusations are pretty disgusting to me.

Of course if somebody makes accusations they should be listened to. But like you said people come out of the woodwork during campaigns so both sides need to be heard.

Trump has made more comments outside of McCain to show his true colors. What he did to John Kelly was very telling and comments he’s made about our generals is telling as well

We are not talking family members here, we are talking about strange girls, and he's had his nose in their hair sniffing them like a blood hound. Don't tell me that's normal.

Given your bias, you are saying it's likely Trump said those things about our fallen solders but it's not likely hair sniffer was a sexual assaulter. Sounds pretty hypocritical to me. Trump may have had some words about people he disagreed or fought with, but not our military men and women in general.

 

[Obiwan]

There's no lie the left won't tell. Dems and their pals in the lying liberal news media are a boil on the human genome.

What do you think is being lied about?

Looks like the issue about Goldberg's smear article on Trump is finally settled!!!

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’

Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anony…

nypost.com

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’



Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anonymous sources were “not good enough” in reporting such as his.

“I share that view that it’s not good enough. But, you know, like other reporters, I’m always balancing out the moral ambiguities and complications after anonymous sourcing with the public’s right to know,” Goldberg said during a Monday evening interview on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

Hayes raised the issue of using unnamed sources with Goldberg while discussing his most recent article, in which he relied on four anonymous accounts.




For the doubters, Goldberg concedes that anonymous sources aren't good enough near the end of the video.....

How does this settle anything?

Goldberg conceded that his "evidence" isn't good enough....

Which leaves you with a dilemma....

Do you believe Goldberg, or claim he's a fucking idiot???

If you thought looking in your drawers and trying to decide what gender you are is confusing, this is sure to send you (and the other Liberals) straight to the mental hospital for treatment!!!!


View attachment 386649

Isn't good enough for what??

I have no time for your faux ignorance.

But you have to admit...

Watching their reaction to this news is hilarious!!

They are squealing like stuck pigs. No matter Dems will move onto the next fake news fabricated story in a couple of days and repeat this whole faux rage act.

I wonder if they know that Goldberg lived in Israel (and was actually in the IDF)???

He has even supported Netanyahu, and he's been a big proponent of Israel bombing Iran!!!!

Now, he's not only made the Democrats look like a bunch of idiots, but I'll bet Bibi wants to have a little talk with him about his stupid ass going rogue.....

Obiwan, president Trump supports Netanyahu...

And Trump is a big proponent of Israel bombing Iran....

So what's the difference between Trump and Goldberg, on the Israeli front?

For starters, I don't believe that Trump has ever been staying in the West Bank, keeping Palestinians in prison...

Or committing any of the acts that the Democrats say went on there!!!

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

There's no lie the left won't tell. Dems and their pals in the lying liberal news media are a boil on the human genome.

What do you think is being lied about?

Looks like the issue about Goldberg's smear article on Trump is finally settled!!!

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’

Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anony…

nypost.com

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’



Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anonymous sources were “not good enough” in reporting such as his.

“I share that view that it’s not good enough. But, you know, like other reporters, I’m always balancing out the moral ambiguities and complications after anonymous sourcing with the public’s right to know,” Goldberg said during a Monday evening interview on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

Hayes raised the issue of using unnamed sources with Goldberg while discussing his most recent article, in which he relied on four anonymous accounts.




For the doubters, Goldberg concedes that anonymous sources aren't good enough near the end of the video.....

How does this settle anything?

Goldberg conceded that his "evidence" isn't good enough....

Which leaves you with a dilemma....

Do you believe Goldberg, or claim he's a fucking idiot???

If you thought looking in your drawers and trying to decide what gender you are is confusing, this is sure to send you (and the other Liberals) straight to the mental hospital for treatment!!!!


View attachment 386649

Isn't good enough for what??

Not good enough to prove what he claimed, you idiot!!!

Nothing could fully prove it outside a recording or admission from Trump. Right? Even if the sources came forward you'd be crying foul and doing whatever you can to discredit them, am I right?

That begs the question: Do you believe Tara Reade? Do you believe Mrs. Biden's ex when he said his then wife and creepy Joe were screwing around behind his back?

I haven’t heard both sides of those stories. Do you believe them?

I don't believe anything that has no real evidence. When you become the focus of national attention, people come out of the woodwork with all kinds of stories about you. You also failed to answer my question: do you believe the Atlantic story?

Absolutely! I believe the gist of the story, With or without Goldberg's article....

Trumps actions and mouth, makes it hard not to....

Threats to disown Don Jr, if he joined the Military came from his niece....

Trump's comments on McCain were public.

Trump' s disparaging of the Kahn' s gold star parents, were public....

Trump' s handling and interference in military justice system of the marine being disciplined for murder and other military crimes, being pardoned by him, showed lack of respect for the military.

Trumps bashing of Col Vindman, then firing him, for honoring his oath to the Constitution.

Trump's totally ignoring the Russians putting a bounty on our soldiers serving, not a word to Russia or Putin on it....not even a warning....

Trump bashing the general's that he hired, like Gen Matis and General Kelly....when he has no personal use for them anymore....

Telling the wife of the dead soldier ambushed in Africa, that her husband knew he could be killed when he joined, which was callous.

Trumps father paying off a doctor, to say Trump had bone spurs, to dodge the draft....

There is a long Trump history of disrespecting our military, so the 4 anonymous by name sources saying that Trump said guys in the military who died for our nation were suckers and losers is believable.

Except what you posted is mostly BS. Trump did make some unfortunate statements about McCain when he wasn't thinking, but that was it.

His niece is selling a book and has hatred of Trump. Anything she wrote (with no evidence to back it up) is likely pure BS. Kahn attacked Trump first, not the other way around. Trump always counter punches no matter who it is. Vindman was a deep stater working for the commies in an effort to help them oust Trump. It's now believed that there was no whistleblower at all, it was Vindman all along. You can't keep somebody working for you that's trying to have you removed from office. He was properly transferred which happens in the military all the time.

 

[hadit]

There is nothing to dispute. Of course, we would rather have sources that are named but as your own linked article states,

”The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief then turned the blame on the current commander-in-chief, saying Trump had set a tone of fear in the nation’s capital against speaking out about his alleged misdeeds.

“On the other hand, you are talking about a president who is unlike anything they have ever experienced. I think there is also fear. I think — and we see this across the board in Donald Trump’s Washington — there is a fear on a kind of a superficial level of a Twitter mob. There is also real fear of personal safety, fear for your family, fear for what you put everybody around you through if you started talking about this sort of thing,” he told the MSNBC host.”

There is real fear factor that comes from taking on Trump. Look at this forum with all the lunatics here calling for violence against those that come out against Trump.

Anonymous sources have always been valuable to a democracy. In this case I woild have like the sources to come forward. Having said that I believe every word of the Atlantic story and can understand why they wished to remain anonymous.

When there is a named source that counters what anonymous sources are saying, logic dictates that you believe the named source who is willing to make his career, family, and life targets for crazed leftwingers.

 

[Slade3200]

There's no lie the left won't tell. Dems and their pals in the lying liberal news media are a boil on the human genome.

What do you think is being lied about?

Looks like the issue about Goldberg's smear article on Trump is finally settled!!!

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’

Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anony…

nypost.com

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’



Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anonymous sources were “not good enough” in reporting such as his.

“I share that view that it’s not good enough. But, you know, like other reporters, I’m always balancing out the moral ambiguities and complications after anonymous sourcing with the public’s right to know,” Goldberg said during a Monday evening interview on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

Hayes raised the issue of using unnamed sources with Goldberg while discussing his most recent article, in which he relied on four anonymous accounts.




For the doubters, Goldberg concedes that anonymous sources aren't good enough near the end of the video.....

How does this settle anything?

Goldberg conceded that his "evidence" isn't good enough....

Which leaves you with a dilemma....

Do you believe Goldberg, or claim he's a fucking idiot???

If you thought looking in your drawers and trying to decide what gender you are is confusing, this is sure to send you (and the other Liberals) straight to the mental hospital for treatment!!!!


View attachment 386649

Isn't good enough for what??

Not good enough to prove what he claimed, you idiot!!!

Nothing could fully prove it outside a recording or admission from Trump. Right? Even if the sources came forward you'd be crying foul and doing whatever you can to discredit them, am I right?

That begs the question: Do you believe Tara Reade? Do you believe Mrs. Biden's ex when he said his then wife and creepy Joe were screwing around behind his back?

I haven’t heard both sides of those stories. Do you believe them?

I don't believe anything that has no real evidence. When you become the focus of national attention, people come out of the woodwork with all kinds of stories about you. You also failed to answer my question: do you believe the Atlantic story?

I believe Trump would absolutely say those things as he has said similar stuff in the past. Whether he said everything claimed in the story, I wouldn’t stand behind it nor would I stand behind anything reported that I didn’t actually hear for myself.

The claims don’t surprise me though, I assumed Trump had these views about troops before the Atlantic story came out. It’s who he is

Outside of what he said about McCain, Trump seems like the most supportive President of our military in our lifetime and never expressed disdain. But you say you aren't surprised.

Then let me ask: Creepy Joe, a well known toucher and hair sniffer of young girls doesn't give you reason to believe that the story of his sexual impropriety is likely, even though as you say, you wouldn't stand behind it?

Somebody who hugs and touches doesn’t mean they are sexual assaulters. I come from a family of huggers. I grew up hugging and kissing all my relatives when I said hello and goodbye to them. I would hug strangers when I met them. I don’t see joe acting much different than my grandparents acted during gatherings with family and friends. So these creepy joe accusations are pretty disgusting to me.

Of course if somebody makes accusations they should be listened to. But like you said people come out of the woodwork during campaigns so both sides need to be heard.

Trump has made more comments outside of McCain to show his true colors. What he did to John Kelly was very telling and comments he’s made about our generals is telling as well

We are not talking family members here, we are talking about strange girls, and he's had his nose in their hair sniffing them like a blood hound. Don't tell me that's normal.

Given your bias, you are saying it's likely Trump said those things about our fallen solders but it's not likely hair sniffer was a sexual assaulter. Sounds pretty hypocritical to me. Trump may have had some words about people he disagreed or fought with, but not our military men and women in general.

I know what we are talking about. I’ve seen the videos and I told you my take on it. The accusations based on the videos are disgusting and ridiculous. The accusations from the assault accuser should have been heard along with joes side of the story.

Trump is all about the troops because they help him politically and he is taking that side. Dead troops don’t serve his political purposes and I honestly don’t think he is sincere when he visits graves or honors the fallen. I can totally see somebody like Trump calling the fallen suckers for actually going to war and I can see him calling their deaths as a waste. It’s the type of person he is. Again, whether he said what was reported, I don’t know, I didn’t hear it, I simply said that I would not be surprised if it was true and I believe that sources are actually saying he said these things and it’s not just reporters making it up

 

[Nostra]

There is nothing to dispute. Of course, we would rather have sources that are named but as your own linked article states,

”The Atlantic’s editor-in-chief then turned the blame on the current commander-in-chief, saying Trump had set a tone of fear in the nation’s capital against speaking out about his alleged misdeeds.

“On the other hand, you are talking about a president who is unlike anything they have ever experienced. I think there is also fear. I think — and we see this across the board in Donald Trump’s Washington — there is a fear on a kind of a superficial level of a Twitter mob. There is also real fear of personal safety, fear for your family, fear for what you put everybody around you through if you started talking about this sort of thing,” he told the MSNBC host.”

There is real fear factor that comes from taking on Trump. Look at this forum with all the lunatics here calling for violence against those that come out against Trump.

Anonymous sources have always been valuable to a democracy. In this case I woild have like the sources to come forward. Having said that I believe every word of the Atlantic story and can understand why they wished to remain anonymous.

In other words, Trump is a big meanie so it's OK to print bullshit stories about him you can't verify.

 

[Nostra]

There's no lie the left won't tell. Dems and their pals in the lying liberal news media are a boil on the human genome.

What do you think is being lied about?

Looks like the issue about Goldberg's smear article on Trump is finally settled!!!

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’

Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anony…

nypost.com

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg says anonymous sources are ‘not good enough’



Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic and the journalist responsible for the “bombshell” report that President Trump disparaged America’s war dead, conceded that anonymous sources were “not good enough” in reporting such as his.

“I share that view that it’s not good enough. But, you know, like other reporters, I’m always balancing out the moral ambiguities and complications after anonymous sourcing with the public’s right to know,” Goldberg said during a Monday evening interview on MSNBC’s “All In with Chris Hayes.”

Hayes raised the issue of using unnamed sources with Goldberg while discussing his most recent article, in which he relied on four anonymous accounts.




For the doubters, Goldberg concedes that anonymous sources aren't good enough near the end of the video.....

How does this settle anything?

Goldberg conceded that his "evidence" isn't good enough....

Which leaves you with a dilemma....

Do you believe Goldberg, or claim he's a fucking idiot???

If you thought looking in your drawers and trying to decide what gender you are is confusing, this is sure to send you (and the other Liberals) straight to the mental hospital for treatment!!!!


View attachment 386649

Isn't good enough for what??

Not good enough to prove what he claimed, you idiot!!!

Nothing could fully prove it outside a recording or admission from Trump. Right? Even if the sources came forward you'd be crying foul and doing whatever you can to discredit them, am I right?

So you admit he has proven nothing.

 

[Nostra]

The DemonRats and their lapdog the Main Stream Media, produce one hoax after another, after another... that's all they do .... they don't care for facts, they will continue doing it until the election, and even beyond , when Trump wins.

We live in very sad times my friends.

I agree with you there, we do live in sad times. It starts at the top and the person up there now is rotten as they come. He is bringing the ugliness out of everybody. Time for a change

Sad times yes, but because of the cheating demonRats, not because of President Trump or patriots, GOD Bless them.

Trump is a ray of light and hope among all the Leftist horror we are seing today.

Trump is in charge; the horror is his.

Fox News Bashes Anonymous Sourcing of Trump Army ‘Losers’ Story, Then Uses Anonymous Sources to Dispute It

Fox spent hours bashing The Atlantic’s anonymous sourcing before citing unnamed sources to slap the report. (Hours later, another Fox reporter confirmed the original story.)

www.thedailybeast.com

Anonymous sources good enough for Fox News.

Good enough for ONE correspondent...

The rest of them considered the article to be garbage...

The one fox reporter confirmed that the story was true.
That 4 unnamed sources had made the accusation.
Not that the accusations were confirmed.

The only way to confirm the accusations are for Trump to admit to them or for there to be a recording. Right? Otherwise you can always say it isn’t confirmed

Why run with unconfirmed reports?