Jeffrey Epstein’s Brother Claims He Heard ‘from a Pretty Good Source’ That Epstein Files Are Being Scrubbed of Republican Names

[Leo123]

Predictable. The moment they cannot find anything against Trump, the files are fake.

Predictable. The moment they cannot find anything against Trump, the files are fake.

They probably already have a 'mission plan' and a name for it. Maybe something like 'Sewer Search.'

 

[g5000]

Jeffrey Epstein’s Brother Claims He Heard ‘from a Pretty Good Source’ That Epstein Files Are Being Scrubbed of Republican Names​

Well, the Epstein estate just released 20,000 pages of emails, and holy shit they have some really eye-popping revelations about Jeffrey's best friend in them.

They aren't even part of the PedoFiles that Trump has had since 2019.

If Trump is scrubbing the PedoFiles of his name, it will be very obvious, like the 18-minute gap, and will blow up in his face, bigly.

 

[wamose]

Here we go again with the liberals favorite source, "told by an unnamed source". Anytime you hear a lib say that, you can be sure there is NO source. It's lust another fabrication from a TDS infected propagandist. MAGA

 

[JimH52]

Here we go again with the liberals favorite source, "told by an unnamed source". Anytime you hear a lib say that, you can be sure there is NO source. It's lust another fabrication from a TDS infected propagandist. MAGA

They need to be unnamed because the Felon in Chief will attack them if they are named. Mafia Bosses do that.

 

[blackhawk]

The pedophiles brother said an unnamed source told him something well that’s as solid as soggy paper.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

If only democrats released the files when they had the chance.

Why didn't democrats release the files over the last 4 years?

Uh because it was still under investigation

 

[Harry Dresden]

They need to be unnamed because the Felon in Chief will attack them if they are named. Mafia Bosses do that.

you mean this guy jimmy?....

....you sure use him a lot....

 

[struth]

The pedophiles brother said an unnamed source told him something well that’s as solid as soggy paper.

If the 60k pages in the Epstein files show us anything, it’s a dem will believe anything an esptein says.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Reminds me of the bible.

There is no evidence to support any of the claims made in the Bible.

The Bible is not self-authenticating; it is simply one of many religious texts. Like those other texts, it itself constitutes no evidence for the existence of a god. Its florid prose and fanciful content do not legitimize it nor distinguish it from other ancient works of literature.

The Bible is historically inaccurate, factually incorrect, inconsistent and contradictory. It was artificially constructed by a group of men in antiquity and is poorly translated, heavily altered and selectively interpreted. Entire sections of the text have been redacted over time.

Except Democrats didn't control the Bible for 4 years. Nice deflection though

The Bible Is The Most Historically Accurate Book - Bible Wisdom Hub

Have you ever wondered about the historical accuracy of the Bible? In a world filled with various historical texts and accounts, the Bible stands out for its

biblewisdomhub.org

 

[struth]

Uh because it was still under investigation

No it wasn’t, Epstein was dead

Why do you lie?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Looks like he was spot on.