The Arctic Is Melting Faster Than Ever – and It Could Be Ice-Free by 2027

Like the JFK assassination, those who did it put out "faux conspiracy theories" to cover. JFK was offed by

the Mob
the KKK
Cuba
Russia
Organized Labor
the "Banking Cartel"


"Solar Cycle" is exactly that. CO2 FRAUD put that out, and you and I paid for it, so that Fox "FAUX" News could tell their idiot viewers that "Solar Cycle" is "responsible for the warming" never mind THERE IS NO WARMING.


GREENLAND FROZE while NORTH AMERICA THAWED at THE SAME TIME

The SUN had NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT, and NEITHER DID ATMOSPHERE....

the only possible explanation is the correct explanation

TECTONIC DIRECTION

North America moved SOUTHWEST
Greenland moved NORTHWEST



actually the same "vector" on a sphere, where NA crossed its closest to the pole point about 20-30 million years ago and then started moving away from North Pole.
You could be correct and perhaps I am guilty of being significantly deceived by some pretty impressive information that I have been reading, [especially since 2005 when Mr. Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" got me rather focused on this entire question]!

On the other hand over these past fifty years, [since I was brought out of Atheism by TV Evangelist Garner Ted Armostron], I have often found myself to be in error as to how exactly I was understanding statements in the Book of Isaiah. I admit that I do not know exactly and fully what Isaiah meant by the following, but I have to admit that some sort of "Solar Cycle" would seem to be one possibility, [assuming that the English language translation of this verse is accurate]?

26 Moreover the light of the moon will be as the light of the sun, and the light of the sun will be sevenfold, as the light of seven days, in the day when the Lord binds up the hurt of his people, and heals the wounds inflicted by his blow." [Isaiah 30:26, RSV]

 
You could be correct and perhaps I am guilty of being significantly deceived by some pretty impressive information that I have been reading, [especially since 2005 when Mr. Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" got me rather focused on this entire question]!

On the other hand over these past fifty years, [since I was brought out of Atheism by TV Evangelist Garner Ted Armostron], I have often found myself to be in error as to how exactly I was understanding statements in the Book of Isaiah. I admit that I do not know exactly and fully what Isaiah meant by the following, but I have to admit that some sort of "Solar Cycle" would seem to be one possibility, [assuming that the English language translation of this verse is accurate]?
I deeply appreciate your introducing me to an entirely new phrase that I had never before considered at all.

"TECTONIC DIRECTION

North America moved SOUTHWEST
Greenland moved NORTHWEST" [EMH}

I know essentially NOTHING about this angle on this entire topic. Wow!!!!
 
  • Winner
Reactions: EMH
You could be correct and perhaps I am guilty of being significantly deceived by some pretty impressive information that I have been reading, [especially since 2005 when Mr. Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" got me rather focused on this entire question]!

On the other hand over these past fifty years, [since I was brought out of Atheism by TV Evangelist Garner Ted Armostron], I have often found myself to be in error as to how exactly I was understanding statements in the Book of Isaiah. I admit that I do not know exactly and fully what Isaiah meant by the following, but I have to admit that some sort of "Solar Cycle" would seem to be one possibility, [assuming that the English language translation of this verse is accurate]?



We also went to court on that issue, Algore's movie...




  • The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.



"Minor issue" that 90% of Earth ice is actually increasing, no problem, carry on....
 
I deeply appreciate your introducing me to an entirely new phrase that I had never before considered at all.



I know essentially NOTHING about this angle on this entire topic. Wow!!!!



There is a HUGE REASON why that is 100% censored.

THEY CANNOT REFUTE IT.
 
This is why I don't take the climate cabal seriously. Decades of failed doom and gloom predictions and they never admit their theories could simply be wrong. They flippantly dismiss their errors and move on to the next future catastrophe.



It's that dang "hole in the Ozone" causing a sun ray beam to carve up the Arctic Ice! :laugh:
 
I have to admit that some sort of "Solar Cycle" would seem to be one possibility


Over ridiculously long periods of time Sun's output does and will change, but under 1 million year time frame

SUN = CONSTANT


I am also highly skeptical that anything real will change until Sun goes from

H to He now to He to ? when it goes to Red Giant in the future

 
It's that dang "hole in the Ozone" causing a sun ray beam to carve up the Arctic Ice! :laugh:



Please....

O3 absorbs powerful UV. Chlorofluorocarbons were eliminating atmospheric O3. That's true.

Other thing to note.

UV is 10k more powerful than IR. O3 absorbs UV, CO2 absorbs IR... so which absorbs more energy from Sun??
 
You could be correct and perhaps I am guilty of being significantly deceived by some pretty impressive information that I have been reading, [especially since 2005 when Mr. Al Gore's film "An Inconvenient Truth" got me rather focused on this entire question]!

On the other hand over these past fifty years, [since I was brought out of Atheism by TV Evangelist Garner Ted Armostron], I have often found myself to be in error as to how exactly I was understanding statements in the Book of Isaiah. I admit that I do not know exactly and fully what Isaiah meant by the following, but I have to admit that some sort of "Solar Cycle" would seem to be one possibility, [assuming that the English language translation of this verse is accurate]?

I'm not sure Isaiah is the best place to find scientific truths ... Isaiah is a book about the spirit, the spirit of God, and not the flesh ... we can certainly read into the words any and all interpretations we want ... just keep in mind that the Bible was largely complete when Muslims invented science ...

For the English-speaking world ... science starts with Sir Issac Newton ... and "objects in motion tend to stay in motion, objects at rest tend to stay at rest" ... the rest of meteorology involves a whole mess of complicated math ... Navier/Stokes land isn't for the feint-of-heart ... only the truly brave dare trend these tumultuous waters ... er, water vapors ...

Claims of catastrophe violate one or more of the Laws of Thermodynamics ... every ... single ... one ... always keep an eye on that ... folks who don't understand energy flow are easily fooled ...
 
Back
Top Bottom