The Antarctica seems just fine, and very cold as usual

1640414117069.png

 
"Giant fractures in the floating ice of Antarctica’s massive Thwaites Glacier — a fast-melting formation that has become an icon of climate change — could shatter part of the shelf within five years, research suggests. If that happens, in what had been considered a relatively stable part of Thwaites, the glacier could release an armada of icebergs and begin flowing much faster into the ocean, funnelling ice that had been resting on land into the sea, where it would contribute to sea-level rise."
 
If and when the sea rises, all we need to do is pump it back out --
dig some really big lakes or reservoirs in the deserts and run pipelines to wherever we choose.. Use the water through desalination set-ups. The Middle East, US SW, Mexico, Australia.....all these areas having water shortages anyway -- we 'kill two birds with one stone'.

Sell the salt to Canada for their wintery roads.
 
Last edited:
"Giant fractures in the floating ice of Antarctica’s massive Thwaites Glacier — a fast-melting formation that has become an icon of climate change — could shatter part of the shelf within five years, research suggests. If that happens, in what had been considered a relatively stable part of Thwaites, the glacier could release an armada of icebergs and begin flowing much faster into the ocean, funnelling ice that had been resting on land into the sea, where it would contribute to sea-level rise."
Thwaites is very tiny, in context. Most people can not even find it on a map.

antarctica_map.jpg
 
In terms of the port cities of the world, even a one foot rise in sea level is bad, three feet is catastrophic.
oh, and New Orleans sits where? In relation to sea level. How about Venice? Seems Venice has already suffered three feet?

Besides, none of what you state, will happen, because you are ignorant. I am sorry to be the one to say so, but Old Crock, after 50 years of listening to the doom and gloom, and seeing none of it happen, and watching you folks change the goal posts, and then come to realize the solution your side proposes is to manufacture more stuff, that provides us with less energy, manufacturing so much stuff it costs over $100 trillion. And in the process of all this manufacturing we will release more co2 into the atmosphere than mankind has since our entrance on the world stage.

Yes, more CO2 is your solution, more CO2 than is in the atmosphere now, and in the process politicians gain power and riches, and those who are corporations that go along with the democrats plan, get to spend that money and become richer beyond what we the people will ever achieve.

And at that, the grand con, will force most of us into poverty, and the earth will be fine, because this is all a scam based on spending $100 trillion dollars, and more.
 

Forum List

Back
Top