The Air Leaves the Insurrection Balloon

[Esdraelon]

A reminder that this dispute of election results is nothing new. From another thread/post;

"Which we saw here a couple decades back(2004) with our state(Washington) governor's race between Rossi(R) and Gregoire(D).

Initially Rossi(R) won, but the count was too close to certify and by law required a recount. Seems the auditor office(the vote counters) of King County/Seattle found a box of "misplaced ballots" which shifted the win to the Democrat Gregoire. But the difference was still too close to be valid (guess the Dems weren't good at math back then).

So another "recount" and another box of "misplaced ballots" was found and this time the Dems got their math correct.

So, having done the trial balloon back then, they've been honing the process ever since and "franchised" it nation wide. "

Actually a bit more complicated and convoluted than my glib and shortcut version. Here's the fully tale;

2004 Washington gubernatorial election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Dems have objected to every Presidential election they lost this century

Trumpybear is the only candidate who planned to sow the seeds of doubt on our election system. He is the only candidate to ever claim that if he looses the election it will be because it was RIGGED. Twice!

Their goal is to undermine the US Constitution.

Yet, it was the left that has objected and claimed all but one of the last Presidential elections they lost was illegit this century

Now you're stretching it. Democrats have never rejected the courts decisions and most have always called for the country to unify behind the newly elected president.

Yes Komrades ...
... We must all march in lock-step(Unity) to the "New World Order" of Socialist Totalitarian Order.

So the American tradition of the losing candidate symbolically asking the country to unify behind the winner after a hard fought election is now "marching in lock step to the "New World Order", "Socialist Totalitarian" ?

If that's what your saying Dr. Orwell, Captain Hyperbole agrees 2000%!

That tradition was tossed out the window in 2000 when the left wouldn't accept they lost the election and went out about Bush being illegit, and even went on and on and on and on and on about how the his brother and tour Court was involved in some vast conspiracy....it only got worse in 2016, when they began insurrections across the country started a faux Russian hoax to undermind his admin, called his win illegit, and abused their office with faux impeachments

Imagine their howls of rage when people decide they've had enough of their bullshit and square off against them. Coward snowflake whiners...

 

[Smokin' OP]

Everyone knows it is bullshit.

AND WHY IS THE FUCKING NATIONAL GUARD STILL SURROUNDING THE CAPITOL?

Fuck Democrats.

Because of loony tune RWNJ's.

 

[Smokin' OP]

But I thought it was really ANTIFA and #BlackLivesMatter rioters who were the real insurrectionists...

Why are so many USMB self-professed Conservatives defending these perps?

What did the Capitol goofball squad loot, burn, deface, and/or destroy beside a few windows?

That clearly doesn't matter. It isn't WHAT they did, it's where they did it and the fear it caused the scum in DC. Double-standards are quickly becoming UNACCEPTABLE. I hope that in the not too distant future when some of the fearless minions of the Effa Bee Eye decide to break bad on some poor schmuck who pissed off a politician or a snowflake online, they get a reality check in the form of massed public protests against them pointing out their fecking hypocrisy. They're little more than a modern American version of the Schutzstaffel... thug bastards...

A reminder that this dispute of election results is nothing new. From another thread/post;

"Which we saw here a couple decades back(2004) with our state(Washington) governor's race between Rossi(R) and Gregoire(D).

Initially Rossi(R) won, but the count was too close to certify and by law required a recount. Seems the auditor office(the vote counters) of King County/Seattle found a box of "misplaced ballots" which shifted the win to the Democrat Gregoire. But the difference was still too close to be valid (guess the Dems weren't good at math back then).

So another "recount" and another box of "misplaced ballots" was found and this time the Dems got their math correct.

So, having done the trial balloon back then, they've been honing the process ever since and "franchised" it nation wide. "

Actually a bit more complicated and convoluted than my glib and shortcut version. Here's the fully tale;

2004 Washington gubernatorial election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Dems have objected to every Presidential election they lost this century

Trumpybear is the only candidate who planned to sow the seeds of doubt on our election system. He is the only candidate to ever claim that if he looses the election it will be because it was RIGGED. Twice!

Their goal is to undermine the US Constitution.

Yet, it was the left that has objected and claimed all but one of the last Presidential elections they lost was illegit this century

Now you're stretching it. Democrats have never rejected the courts decisions and most have always called for the country to unify behind the newly elected president.

Yes Komrades ...
... We must all march in lock-step(Unity) to the "New World Order" of Socialist Totalitarian Order.

So the American tradition of the losing candidate symbolically asking the country to unify behind the winner after a hard fought election is now "marching in lock step to the "New World Order", "Socialist Totalitarian" ?

If that's what your saying Dr. Orwell, Captain Hyperbole agrees 2000%!

That tradition was tossed out the window in 2000 when the left wouldn't accept they lost the election and went out about Bush being illegit, and even went on and on and on and on and on about how the his brother and tour Court was involved in some vast conspiracy....it only got worse in 2016, when they began insurrections across the country started a faux Russian hoax to undermind his admin, called his win illegit, and abused their office with faux impeachments

Imagine their howls of rage when people decide they've had enough of their bullshit and square off against them. Coward snowflake whiners...

Only ones WHINING are RWNJ's and their dear leader.

 

[Smokin' OP]

Let the armed militia surrounding the Capitol be a reminder that the politicians will take away your guns, while safely hiding behind their own armed militia.

These are just people. They are not Gods. Fuck them. Do not let them take your guns and hide behind theirs.

No, let the NG surrounding the capitol be a reminder the RWNJ's are still out there, ready to do something, as usual, VERY FUCKING STUPID.

 

[struth]

But I thought it was really ANTIFA and #BlackLivesMatter rioters who were the real insurrectionists...

Why are so many USMB self-professed Conservatives defending these perps?

What did the Capitol goofball squad loot, burn, deface, and/or destroy beside a few windows?

That clearly doesn't matter. It isn't WHAT they did, it's where they did it and the fear it caused the scum in DC. Double-standards are quickly becoming UNACCEPTABLE. I hope that in the not too distant future when some of the fearless minions of the Effa Bee Eye decide to break bad on some poor schmuck who pissed off a politician or a snowflake online, they get a reality check in the form of massed public protests against them pointing out their fecking hypocrisy. They're little more than a modern American version of the Schutzstaffel... thug bastards...

A reminder that this dispute of election results is nothing new. From another thread/post;

"Which we saw here a couple decades back(2004) with our state(Washington) governor's race between Rossi(R) and Gregoire(D).

Initially Rossi(R) won, but the count was too close to certify and by law required a recount. Seems the auditor office(the vote counters) of King County/Seattle found a box of "misplaced ballots" which shifted the win to the Democrat Gregoire. But the difference was still too close to be valid (guess the Dems weren't good at math back then).

So another "recount" and another box of "misplaced ballots" was found and this time the Dems got their math correct.

So, having done the trial balloon back then, they've been honing the process ever since and "franchised" it nation wide. "

Actually a bit more complicated and convoluted than my glib and shortcut version. Here's the fully tale;

2004 Washington gubernatorial election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Dems have objected to every Presidential election they lost this century

Trumpybear is the only candidate who planned to sow the seeds of doubt on our election system. He is the only candidate to ever claim that if he looses the election it will be because it was RIGGED. Twice!

Their goal is to undermine the US Constitution.

Yet, it was the left that has objected and claimed all but one of the last Presidential elections they lost was illegit this century

Now you're stretching it. Democrats have never rejected the courts decisions and most have always called for the country to unify behind the newly elected president.

Yes Komrades ...
... We must all march in lock-step(Unity) to the "New World Order" of Socialist Totalitarian Order.

So the American tradition of the losing candidate symbolically asking the country to unify behind the winner after a hard fought election is now "marching in lock step to the "New World Order", "Socialist Totalitarian" ?

If that's what your saying Dr. Orwell, Captain Hyperbole agrees 2000%!

That tradition was tossed out the window in 2000 when the left wouldn't accept they lost the election and went out about Bush being illegit, and even went on and on and on and on and on about how the his brother and tour Court was involved in some vast conspiracy....it only got worse in 2016, when they began insurrections across the country started a faux Russian hoax to undermind his admin, called his win illegit, and abused their office with faux impeachments

Imagine their howls of rage when people decide they've had enough of their bullshit and square off against them. Coward snowflake whiners...

Only ones WHINING are RWNJ's and their dear leader.

 

[Smokin' OP]

But I thought it was really ANTIFA and #BlackLivesMatter rioters who were the real insurrectionists...

Why are so many USMB self-professed Conservatives defending these perps?

What did the Capitol goofball squad loot, burn, deface, and/or destroy beside a few windows?

That clearly doesn't matter. It isn't WHAT they did, it's where they did it and the fear it caused the scum in DC. Double-standards are quickly becoming UNACCEPTABLE. I hope that in the not too distant future when some of the fearless minions of the Effa Bee Eye decide to break bad on some poor schmuck who pissed off a politician or a snowflake online, they get a reality check in the form of massed public protests against them pointing out their fecking hypocrisy. They're little more than a modern American version of the Schutzstaffel... thug bastards...

A reminder that this dispute of election results is nothing new. From another thread/post;

"Which we saw here a couple decades back(2004) with our state(Washington) governor's race between Rossi(R) and Gregoire(D).

Initially Rossi(R) won, but the count was too close to certify and by law required a recount. Seems the auditor office(the vote counters) of King County/Seattle found a box of "misplaced ballots" which shifted the win to the Democrat Gregoire. But the difference was still too close to be valid (guess the Dems weren't good at math back then).

So another "recount" and another box of "misplaced ballots" was found and this time the Dems got their math correct.

So, having done the trial balloon back then, they've been honing the process ever since and "franchised" it nation wide. "

Actually a bit more complicated and convoluted than my glib and shortcut version. Here's the fully tale;

2004 Washington gubernatorial election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Dems have objected to every Presidential election they lost this century

Trumpybear is the only candidate who planned to sow the seeds of doubt on our election system. He is the only candidate to ever claim that if he looses the election it will be because it was RIGGED. Twice!

Their goal is to undermine the US Constitution.

Yet, it was the left that has objected and claimed all but one of the last Presidential elections they lost was illegit this century

Now you're stretching it. Democrats have never rejected the courts decisions and most have always called for the country to unify behind the newly elected president.

Yes Komrades ...
... We must all march in lock-step(Unity) to the "New World Order" of Socialist Totalitarian Order.

So the American tradition of the losing candidate symbolically asking the country to unify behind the winner after a hard fought election is now "marching in lock step to the "New World Order", "Socialist Totalitarian" ?

If that's what your saying Dr. Orwell, Captain Hyperbole agrees 2000%!

That tradition was tossed out the window in 2000 when the left wouldn't accept they lost the election and went out about Bush being illegit, and even went on and on and on and on and on about how the his brother and tour Court was involved in some vast conspiracy....it only got worse in 2016, when they began insurrections across the country started a faux Russian hoax to undermind his admin, called his win illegit, and abused their office with faux impeachments

Imagine their howls of rage when people decide they've had enough of their bullshit and square off against them. Coward snowflake whiners...

Only ones WHINING are RWNJ's and their dear leader.

But I thought it was really ANTIFA and #BlackLivesMatter rioters who were the real insurrectionists...

Why are so many USMB self-professed Conservatives defending these perps?

What did the Capitol goofball squad loot, burn, deface, and/or destroy beside a few windows?

That clearly doesn't matter. It isn't WHAT they did, it's where they did it and the fear it caused the scum in DC. Double-standards are quickly becoming UNACCEPTABLE. I hope that in the not too distant future when some of the fearless minions of the Effa Bee Eye decide to break bad on some poor schmuck who pissed off a politician or a snowflake online, they get a reality check in the form of massed public protests against them pointing out their fecking hypocrisy. They're little more than a modern American version of the Schutzstaffel... thug bastards...

A reminder that this dispute of election results is nothing new. From another thread/post;

"Which we saw here a couple decades back(2004) with our state(Washington) governor's race between Rossi(R) and Gregoire(D).

Initially Rossi(R) won, but the count was too close to certify and by law required a recount. Seems the auditor office(the vote counters) of King County/Seattle found a box of "misplaced ballots" which shifted the win to the Democrat Gregoire. But the difference was still too close to be valid (guess the Dems weren't good at math back then).

So another "recount" and another box of "misplaced ballots" was found and this time the Dems got their math correct.

So, having done the trial balloon back then, they've been honing the process ever since and "franchised" it nation wide. "

Actually a bit more complicated and convoluted than my glib and shortcut version. Here's the fully tale;

2004 Washington gubernatorial election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Dems have objected to every Presidential election they lost this century

Trumpybear is the only candidate who planned to sow the seeds of doubt on our election system. He is the only candidate to ever claim that if he looses the election it will be because it was RIGGED. Twice!

Their goal is to undermine the US Constitution.

Yet, it was the left that has objected and claimed all but one of the last Presidential elections they lost was illegit this century

Now you're stretching it. Democrats have never rejected the courts decisions and most have always called for the country to unify behind the newly elected president.

Yes Komrades ...
... We must all march in lock-step(Unity) to the "New World Order" of Socialist Totalitarian Order.

So the American tradition of the losing candidate symbolically asking the country to unify behind the winner after a hard fought election is now "marching in lock step to the "New World Order", "Socialist Totalitarian" ?

If that's what your saying Dr. Orwell, Captain Hyperbole agrees 2000%!

That tradition was tossed out the window in 2000 when the left wouldn't accept they lost the election and went out about Bush being illegit, and even went on and on and on and on and on about how the his brother and tour Court was involved in some vast conspiracy....it only got worse in 2016, when they began insurrections across the country started a faux Russian hoax to undermind his admin, called his win illegit, and abused their office with faux impeachments

Imagine their howls of rage when people decide they've had enough of their bullshit and square off against them. Coward snowflake whiners...

Only ones WHINING are RWNJ's and their dear leader.

60 different court cases.
Whining to the Georgia secretary of state.
Insurrection.

 

[Mac1958]

Everyone knows it is bullshit. AND WHY IS THE FUCKING NATIONAL GUARD STILL SURROUNDING THE CAPITOL? Fuck Democrats.

Because of loony tune RWNJ's.

They're angry that their domestic terrorism will no longer be easy.

 

[Muhammed]

Nobody wants people in jail who were just idiot followers. Now they will face repercussions in their lives in terms of their jobs and families, or they may cult up with QAnon/Trumpstettes.

Nobody wants anyone in jail who were there for no better reason, than that the Capitol Police removed barricades and waved them in.

It's kinda difficult to make the case that the crowd of patriots protesting election fraud entered a restricted area when there is no prominent signs at the entrance saying it's a restricted area and Capitol security indicated that were allowed in the building.

 

[colfax_m]

It's kinda difficult to make the case that the crowd of patriots protesting election fraud entered a restricted area when there is no prominent signs at the entrance saying it's a restricted area and Capitol security indicated that were allowed in the building.

What were the Capitol security indicating here?

 

[struth]

But I thought it was really ANTIFA and #BlackLivesMatter rioters who were the real insurrectionists...

Why are so many USMB self-professed Conservatives defending these perps?

What did the Capitol goofball squad loot, burn, deface, and/or destroy beside a few windows?

That clearly doesn't matter. It isn't WHAT they did, it's where they did it and the fear it caused the scum in DC. Double-standards are quickly becoming UNACCEPTABLE. I hope that in the not too distant future when some of the fearless minions of the Effa Bee Eye decide to break bad on some poor schmuck who pissed off a politician or a snowflake online, they get a reality check in the form of massed public protests against them pointing out their fecking hypocrisy. They're little more than a modern American version of the Schutzstaffel... thug bastards...

A reminder that this dispute of election results is nothing new. From another thread/post;

"Which we saw here a couple decades back(2004) with our state(Washington) governor's race between Rossi(R) and Gregoire(D).

Initially Rossi(R) won, but the count was too close to certify and by law required a recount. Seems the auditor office(the vote counters) of King County/Seattle found a box of "misplaced ballots" which shifted the win to the Democrat Gregoire. But the difference was still too close to be valid (guess the Dems weren't good at math back then).

So another "recount" and another box of "misplaced ballots" was found and this time the Dems got their math correct.

So, having done the trial balloon back then, they've been honing the process ever since and "franchised" it nation wide. "

Actually a bit more complicated and convoluted than my glib and shortcut version. Here's the fully tale;

2004 Washington gubernatorial election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Dems have objected to every Presidential election they lost this century

Trumpybear is the only candidate who planned to sow the seeds of doubt on our election system. He is the only candidate to ever claim that if he looses the election it will be because it was RIGGED. Twice!

Their goal is to undermine the US Constitution.

Yet, it was the left that has objected and claimed all but one of the last Presidential elections they lost was illegit this century

Now you're stretching it. Democrats have never rejected the courts decisions and most have always called for the country to unify behind the newly elected president.

Yes Komrades ...
... We must all march in lock-step(Unity) to the "New World Order" of Socialist Totalitarian Order.

So the American tradition of the losing candidate symbolically asking the country to unify behind the winner after a hard fought election is now "marching in lock step to the "New World Order", "Socialist Totalitarian" ?

If that's what your saying Dr. Orwell, Captain Hyperbole agrees 2000%!

That tradition was tossed out the window in 2000 when the left wouldn't accept they lost the election and went out about Bush being illegit, and even went on and on and on and on and on about how the his brother and tour Court was involved in some vast conspiracy....it only got worse in 2016, when they began insurrections across the country started a faux Russian hoax to undermind his admin, called his win illegit, and abused their office with faux impeachments

Imagine their howls of rage when people decide they've had enough of their bullshit and square off against them. Coward snowflake whiners...

Only ones WHINING are RWNJ's and their dear leader.

But I thought it was really ANTIFA and #BlackLivesMatter rioters who were the real insurrectionists...

Why are so many USMB self-professed Conservatives defending these perps?

What did the Capitol goofball squad loot, burn, deface, and/or destroy beside a few windows?

That clearly doesn't matter. It isn't WHAT they did, it's where they did it and the fear it caused the scum in DC. Double-standards are quickly becoming UNACCEPTABLE. I hope that in the not too distant future when some of the fearless minions of the Effa Bee Eye decide to break bad on some poor schmuck who pissed off a politician or a snowflake online, they get a reality check in the form of massed public protests against them pointing out their fecking hypocrisy. They're little more than a modern American version of the Schutzstaffel... thug bastards...

A reminder that this dispute of election results is nothing new. From another thread/post;

"Which we saw here a couple decades back(2004) with our state(Washington) governor's race between Rossi(R) and Gregoire(D).

Initially Rossi(R) won, but the count was too close to certify and by law required a recount. Seems the auditor office(the vote counters) of King County/Seattle found a box of "misplaced ballots" which shifted the win to the Democrat Gregoire. But the difference was still too close to be valid (guess the Dems weren't good at math back then).

So another "recount" and another box of "misplaced ballots" was found and this time the Dems got their math correct.

So, having done the trial balloon back then, they've been honing the process ever since and "franchised" it nation wide. "

Actually a bit more complicated and convoluted than my glib and shortcut version. Here's the fully tale;

2004 Washington gubernatorial election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Dems have objected to every Presidential election they lost this century

Trumpybear is the only candidate who planned to sow the seeds of doubt on our election system. He is the only candidate to ever claim that if he looses the election it will be because it was RIGGED. Twice!

Their goal is to undermine the US Constitution.

Yet, it was the left that has objected and claimed all but one of the last Presidential elections they lost was illegit this century

Now you're stretching it. Democrats have never rejected the courts decisions and most have always called for the country to unify behind the newly elected president.

Yes Komrades ...
... We must all march in lock-step(Unity) to the "New World Order" of Socialist Totalitarian Order.

So the American tradition of the losing candidate symbolically asking the country to unify behind the winner after a hard fought election is now "marching in lock step to the "New World Order", "Socialist Totalitarian" ?

If that's what your saying Dr. Orwell, Captain Hyperbole agrees 2000%!

That tradition was tossed out the window in 2000 when the left wouldn't accept they lost the election and went out about Bush being illegit, and even went on and on and on and on and on about how the his brother and tour Court was involved in some vast conspiracy....it only got worse in 2016, when they began insurrections across the country started a faux Russian hoax to undermind his admin, called his win illegit, and abused their office with faux impeachments

Imagine their howls of rage when people decide they've had enough of their bullshit and square off against them. Coward snowflake whiners...

Only ones WHINING are RWNJ's and their dear leader.

60 different court cases.
Whining to the Georgia secretary of state.
Insurrection.

what's your point? the dems filed numerous court cases this century when they wouldn't accept the results...they set the standard...heck they took one all the way to the SCOTUS

again what's your point about the SoS of GA? You all did that in FL, Ohio, etc

and insurrections? You all started that on election day in 2016...and did it for four years...stop already....

 

[colfax_m]

what's your point? the dems filed numerous court cases this century when they wouldn't accept the results...they set the standard...heck they took one all the way to the SCOTUS

again what's your point about the SoS of GA? You all did that in FL, Ohio, etc

and insurrections? You all started that on election day in 2016...and did it for four years...stop already....

You know what’s the major difference between Democratic challenges and Republican challenges?

Democrats are almost always the ones trying to get votes counted. Republicans are almost always the ones trying to get them thrown out.

Commitment to democracy isn’t easy, especially when you lose.

 

[Muhammed]

It's kinda difficult to make the case that the crowd of patriots protesting election fraud entered a restricted area when there is no prominent signs at the entrance saying it's a restricted area and Capitol security indicated that were allowed in the building.

What were the Capitol security indicating here?
View attachment 474962

Letting the patriots in.

 

[BlindBoo]

A reminder that this dispute of election results is nothing new. From another thread/post;

"Which we saw here a couple decades back(2004) with our state(Washington) governor's race between Rossi(R) and Gregoire(D).

Initially Rossi(R) won, but the count was too close to certify and by law required a recount. Seems the auditor office(the vote counters) of King County/Seattle found a box of "misplaced ballots" which shifted the win to the Democrat Gregoire. But the difference was still too close to be valid (guess the Dems weren't good at math back then).

So another "recount" and another box of "misplaced ballots" was found and this time the Dems got their math correct.

So, having done the trial balloon back then, they've been honing the process ever since and "franchised" it nation wide. "

Actually a bit more complicated and convoluted than my glib and shortcut version. Here's the fully tale;

2004 Washington gubernatorial election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Dems have objected to every Presidential election they lost this century

Trumpybear is the only candidate who planned to sow the seeds of doubt on our election system. He is the only candidate to ever claim that if he looses the election it will be because it was RIGGED. Twice!

Their goal is to undermine the US Constitution.

Yet, it was the left that has objected and claimed all but one of the last Presidential elections they lost was illegit this century

Now you're stretching it. Democrats have never rejected the courts decisions and most have always called for the country to unify behind the newly elected president.

Yes Komrades ...
... We must all march in lock-step(Unity) to the "New World Order" of Socialist Totalitarian Order.

So the American tradition of the losing candidate symbolically asking the country to unify behind the winner after a hard fought election is now "marching in lock step to the "New World Order", "Socialist Totalitarian" ?

If that's what your saying Dr. Orwell, Captain Hyperbole agrees 2000%!

Oh yeah, I recall SHillary Clinton saying something like that back in 2016, just before denouncing all those chanting "Resist", "Not my President" from 2016 to 2020.

Or was that just a long running fantasy series on the Sci-Fy channel?

If you Left-winger losers didn't have double standards, you'd have no standards at all.

Remind me again why we need the non-productive, economic parasites and deadwood of the Regressive Left here in the USA undermining our economy and Constitution.

There is a big difference in conceding the election and promising to fight with every available legal, constitutional means to regain the presidency in the next election and the losing side loudly proclaiming it was rigged or massive fraud. Then, after losing nearly all the court challenges in every single state, they persisted past the point of reasonable doubt. Those in the government who supported the effort to disingenuously pushed the big lie should be voted out of office in the coming elections.

 

[struth]

what's your point? the dems filed numerous court cases this century when they wouldn't accept the results...they set the standard...heck they took one all the way to the SCOTUS

again what's your point about the SoS of GA? You all did that in FL, Ohio, etc

and insurrections? You all started that on election day in 2016...and did it for four years...stop already....

You know what’s the major difference between Democratic challenges and Republican challenges?

Democrats are almost always the ones trying to get votes counted. Republicans are almost always the ones trying to get them thrown out.

Commitment to democracy isn’t easy, especially when you lose.

ah...not really...the entire DNC was pushing for votes NOT to be counted in 2000...they wanted to keep our soldiers from overseas votes from counting...can't get more patriotic then that....tell our soldiers they just don't matter

Gore campaign 'trying to block military votes'

www.telegraph.co.uk

You continue to be parroting propagandist talking points about your party and the GOP, but very ignorant on reality

https://www.cnn.com/2015/11/02/politics/bush-gore-military-ballots

 

[BlindBoo]

A reminder that this dispute of election results is nothing new. From another thread/post;

"Which we saw here a couple decades back(2004) with our state(Washington) governor's race between Rossi(R) and Gregoire(D).

Initially Rossi(R) won, but the count was too close to certify and by law required a recount. Seems the auditor office(the vote counters) of King County/Seattle found a box of "misplaced ballots" which shifted the win to the Democrat Gregoire. But the difference was still too close to be valid (guess the Dems weren't good at math back then).

So another "recount" and another box of "misplaced ballots" was found and this time the Dems got their math correct.

So, having done the trial balloon back then, they've been honing the process ever since and "franchised" it nation wide. "

Actually a bit more complicated and convoluted than my glib and shortcut version. Here's the fully tale;

2004 Washington gubernatorial election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Dems have objected to every Presidential election they lost this century

Trumpybear is the only candidate who planned to sow the seeds of doubt on our election system. He is the only candidate to ever claim that if he looses the election it will be because it was RIGGED. Twice!

Their goal is to undermine the US Constitution.

Yet, it was the left that has objected and claimed all but one of the last Presidential elections they lost was illegit this century

Now you're stretching it. Democrats have never rejected the courts decisions and most have always called for the country to unify behind the newly elected president.

Yes Komrades ...
... We must all march in lock-step(Unity) to the "New World Order" of Socialist Totalitarian Order.

So the American tradition of the losing candidate symbolically asking the country to unify behind the winner after a hard fought election is now "marching in lock step to the "New World Order", "Socialist Totalitarian" ?

If that's what your saying Dr. Orwell, Captain Hyperbole agrees 2000%!

That tradition was tossed out the window in 2000 when the left wouldn't accept they lost the election and went out about Bush being illegit, and even went on and on and on and on and on about how the his brother and tour Court was involved in some vast conspiracy....it only got worse in 2016, when they began insurrections across the country started a faux Russian hoax to undermind his admin, called his win illegit, and abused their office with faux impeachments

Imagine their howls of rage when people decide they've had enough of their bullshit and square off against them. Coward snowflake whiners...

If you feel froggy, jump.

 

[BlindBoo]

A reminder that this dispute of election results is nothing new. From another thread/post;

"Which we saw here a couple decades back(2004) with our state(Washington) governor's race between Rossi(R) and Gregoire(D).

Initially Rossi(R) won, but the count was too close to certify and by law required a recount. Seems the auditor office(the vote counters) of King County/Seattle found a box of "misplaced ballots" which shifted the win to the Democrat Gregoire. But the difference was still too close to be valid (guess the Dems weren't good at math back then).

So another "recount" and another box of "misplaced ballots" was found and this time the Dems got their math correct.

So, having done the trial balloon back then, they've been honing the process ever since and "franchised" it nation wide. "

Actually a bit more complicated and convoluted than my glib and shortcut version. Here's the fully tale;

2004 Washington gubernatorial election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Dems have objected to every Presidential election they lost this century

Trumpybear is the only candidate who planned to sow the seeds of doubt on our election system. He is the only candidate to ever claim that if he looses the election it will be because it was RIGGED. Twice!

Their goal is to undermine the US Constitution.

Yet, it was the left that has objected and claimed all but one of the last Presidential elections they lost was illegit this century

Now you're stretching it. Democrats have never rejected the courts decisions and most have always called for the country to unify behind the newly elected president.

Yes Komrades ...
... We must all march in lock-step(Unity) to the "New World Order" of Socialist Totalitarian Order.

So the American tradition of the losing candidate symbolically asking the country to unify behind the winner after a hard fought election is now "marching in lock step to the "New World Order", "Socialist Totalitarian" ?

If that's what your saying Dr. Orwell, Captain Hyperbole agrees 2000%!

That tradition was tossed out the window in 2000 when the left wouldn't accept they lost the election and went out about Bush being illegit, and even went on and on and on and on and on about how the his brother and tour Court was involved in some vast conspiracy....it only got worse in 2016, when they began insurrections across the country started a faux Russian hoax to undermind his admin, called his win illegit, and abused their office with faux impeachments

It was the closest election in history and hinged on one state with less than a thousand votes separating the two. After it went to the Supreme Court, Gore not only publicly conceded but presided over the EC count on Jan 6th 2001, where he had to put down objections from House members of his own party before announcing the victory for President Bush.

 

[colfax_m]

It's kinda difficult to make the case that the crowd of patriots protesting election fraud entered a restricted area when there is no prominent signs at the entrance saying it's a restricted area and Capitol security indicated that were allowed in the building.

What were the Capitol security indicating here?
View attachment 474962

Letting the patriots in.

Falling back to a more defensible position.

Why don’t you show what happened next?

https://static.scientificamerican.com/sciam/cache/file/0CA197DB-612A-4129-81F9720EBA3ED02B_source.jpg?w=590&h=800&46299ACA-E27E-4284-B85056D0B109437A

 

[BlindBoo]

Nobody wants people in jail who were just idiot followers. Now they will face repercussions in their lives in terms of their jobs and families, or they may cult up with QAnon/Trumpstettes.

Nobody wants anyone in jail who were there for no better reason, than that the Capitol Police removed barricades and waved them in.

It's kinda difficult to make the case that the crowd of patriots protesting election fraud entered a restricted area when there is no prominent signs at the entrance saying it's a restricted area and Capitol security indicated that were allowed in the building.

Well yeah, except for having to beat the real patriots guarding the building bloody. No signs telling them this is a no beating the guards bloody zone.

 

[struth]

A reminder that this dispute of election results is nothing new. From another thread/post;

"Which we saw here a couple decades back(2004) with our state(Washington) governor's race between Rossi(R) and Gregoire(D).

Initially Rossi(R) won, but the count was too close to certify and by law required a recount. Seems the auditor office(the vote counters) of King County/Seattle found a box of "misplaced ballots" which shifted the win to the Democrat Gregoire. But the difference was still too close to be valid (guess the Dems weren't good at math back then).

So another "recount" and another box of "misplaced ballots" was found and this time the Dems got their math correct.

So, having done the trial balloon back then, they've been honing the process ever since and "franchised" it nation wide. "

Actually a bit more complicated and convoluted than my glib and shortcut version. Here's the fully tale;

2004 Washington gubernatorial election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Dems have objected to every Presidential election they lost this century

Trumpybear is the only candidate who planned to sow the seeds of doubt on our election system. He is the only candidate to ever claim that if he looses the election it will be because it was RIGGED. Twice!

Their goal is to undermine the US Constitution.

Yet, it was the left that has objected and claimed all but one of the last Presidential elections they lost was illegit this century

Now you're stretching it. Democrats have never rejected the courts decisions and most have always called for the country to unify behind the newly elected president.

Yes Komrades ...
... We must all march in lock-step(Unity) to the "New World Order" of Socialist Totalitarian Order.

So the American tradition of the losing candidate symbolically asking the country to unify behind the winner after a hard fought election is now "marching in lock step to the "New World Order", "Socialist Totalitarian" ?

If that's what your saying Dr. Orwell, Captain Hyperbole agrees 2000%!

That tradition was tossed out the window in 2000 when the left wouldn't accept they lost the election and went out about Bush being illegit, and even went on and on and on and on and on about how the his brother and tour Court was involved in some vast conspiracy....it only got worse in 2016, when they began insurrections across the country started a faux Russian hoax to undermind his admin, called his win illegit, and abused their office with faux impeachments

It was the closest election in history and hinged on one state with less than a thousand votes separating the two. After it went to the Supreme Court, Gore not only publicly conceded but presided over the EC count on Jan 6th 2001, where he had to put down objections from House members of his own party before announcing the victory for President Bush.

Good for him.....but the Dems certainly attempted not to count votes, objected in the House....and continued to all Bush illegit.

You know all the things you all suggested you didn't do, and say the GOP is violating the Constitution for doing.

and no, it wasn't the closest in "history" 5 of the closest Presidential elections in US history

 

[Oddball]

A reminder that this dispute of election results is nothing new. From another thread/post;

"Which we saw here a couple decades back(2004) with our state(Washington) governor's race between Rossi(R) and Gregoire(D).

Initially Rossi(R) won, but the count was too close to certify and by law required a recount. Seems the auditor office(the vote counters) of King County/Seattle found a box of "misplaced ballots" which shifted the win to the Democrat Gregoire. But the difference was still too close to be valid (guess the Dems weren't good at math back then).

So another "recount" and another box of "misplaced ballots" was found and this time the Dems got their math correct.

So, having done the trial balloon back then, they've been honing the process ever since and "franchised" it nation wide. "

Actually a bit more complicated and convoluted than my glib and shortcut version. Here's the fully tale;

2004 Washington gubernatorial election - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The Dems have objected to every Presidential election they lost this century

Trumpybear is the only candidate who planned to sow the seeds of doubt on our election system. He is the only candidate to ever claim that if he looses the election it will be because it was RIGGED. Twice!

Their goal is to undermine the US Constitution.

Yet, it was the left that has objected and claimed all but one of the last Presidential elections they lost was illegit this century

Now you're stretching it. Democrats have never rejected the courts decisions and most have always called for the country to unify behind the newly elected president.

Yes Komrades ...
... We must all march in lock-step(Unity) to the "New World Order" of Socialist Totalitarian Order.

So the American tradition of the losing candidate symbolically asking the country to unify behind the winner after a hard fought election is now "marching in lock step to the "New World Order", "Socialist Totalitarian" ?

If that's what your saying Dr. Orwell, Captain Hyperbole agrees 2000%!

Oh yeah, I recall SHillary Clinton saying something like that back in 2016, just before denouncing all those chanting "Resist", "Not my President" from 2016 to 2020.

Or was that just a long running fantasy series on the Sci-Fy channel?

If you Left-winger losers didn't have double standards, you'd have no standards at all.

Remind me again why we need the non-productive, economic parasites and deadwood of the Regressive Left here in the USA undermining our economy and Constitution.

There is a big difference in conceding the election and promising to fight with every available legal, constitutional means to regain the presidency in the next election and the losing side loudly proclaiming it was rigged or massive fraud. Then, after losing nearly all the court challenges in every single state, they persisted past the point of reasonable doubt. Those in the government who supported the effort to disingenuously pushed the big lie should be voted out of office in the coming elections.

No court challenge was lost, and you know it....The two cases that actually bothered to look at evidence ruled in favor of Trump.

Speaking of being disingenuous.