Carl in Michigan
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2016
- 58,448
- 43,499
- 3,615
There were a few great moments. Of course only from the Republican side
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
like i care what the GOP has become.....but you being a die hard democrat means you are in touch right wry?....yea they suck but so do the democrats....we have 2 useless parties .....why so many of you people cant see that is beyond me....or maybe you do but you dont care...but then that is a characteristic of a party person....
Gee Harry, you sure are out of touch with reality. For you attention, the once and no more GOP is now a cult, not a party.
you are talking like you think i give a dam....like i care what the GOP has become.....but you being a die hard democrat means you are in touch right wry?....yea they suck but so do the democrats....we have 2 useless parties .....why so many of you people cant see that is beyond me....or maybe you do but you dont care...but then that is a characteristic of a party person....
Gee Harry, you sure are out of touch with reality. For you attention, the once and no more GOP is now a cult, not a party.
The Democratic Party is not a lock-step all together party. The D. Party is diverse in color, creed and in ideas. Unlike the Republican Party, when any member won't follow the yellow brick road they are called RINOs.
These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.
What do we see?
Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.
- Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
- Questions that are not relevant,
- Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
- Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
- Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
- False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
- A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
- A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.
This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.
Democrats are scum.
Another post which needs to be moved to the Rubber Room, or Badlands. The current iteration of the Republican Party has become so toxic as to be unrecognized as the party of Eisenhower or Reagan.
These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.
What do we see?
Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.
- Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
- Questions that are not relevant,
- Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
- Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
- Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
- False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
- A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
- A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.
This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.
Democrats are scum.
And you think bloviating is reserved only for the Democrats? Sure.
Democrats are doing exactly what I expected them to do. Attempt to find out what her stances are on important issues that go beyond the SC.
Let the American people know exactly what's at stake.
yea they suck but so do the democrats....we have 2 useless parties .....why so many of you people cant see that is beyond me....or maybe you do but you dont care...but then that is a characteristic of a party person....
Gee Harry, you sure are out of touch with reality. For you attention, the once and no more GOP is now a cult, not a party.
yea they suck but so do the democrats....we have 2 useless parties .....why so many of you people cant see that is beyond me....or maybe you do but you dont care...but then that is a characteristic of a party person....
Gee Harry, you sure are out of touch with reality. For you attention, the once and no more GOP is now a cult, not a party.
^^^ IDIOT-GRAM: a phrase or one sentence post which lacks substance & is not thoughtful or thought provoking.
read without your biases.yea they suck but so do the democrats....we have 2 useless parties .....why so many of you people cant see that is beyond me....or maybe you do but you dont care...but then that is a characteristic of a party person....
Gee Harry, you sure are out of touch with reality. For you attention, the once and no more GOP is now a cult, not a party.
^^^ IDIOT-GRAM: a phrase or one sentence post which lacks substance & is not thoughtful or thought provoking.
He dude, read without your biases. The second phrase within my second sentence was substantive, thoughtful and those who are intelligent and have a good education, thought provoking.
You've won, Moscow Mitch, his band of bitches and trump have manipulated to fuck over democracy in America, and make our Republic into an autocracy. Enjoy your win, if trump by chance is reelected say good-bye to two hundred and thirty years of liberty and freedom.
yea they suck but so do the democrats....we have 2 useless parties .....why so many of you people cant see that is beyond me....or maybe you do but you dont care...but then that is a characteristic of a party person....
Gee Harry, you sure are out of touch with reality. For you attention, the once and no more GOP is now a cult, not a party.
^^^ IDIOT-GRAM: a phrase or one sentence post which lacks substance & is not thoughtful or thought provoking.
He dude, read without your biases. The second phrase within my second sentence was substantive, thoughtful and those who are intelligent and have a good education, thought provoking.
You've won, Moscow Mitch, his band of bitches and trump have manipulated to fuck over democracy in America, and make our Republic into an autocracy. Enjoy your win, if trump by chance is reelected say good-bye to two hundred and thirty years of liberty and freedom.
yea they suck but so do the democrats....we have 2 useless parties .....why so many of you people cant see that is beyond me....or maybe you do but you dont care...but then that is a characteristic of a party person....
Gee Harry, you sure are out of touch with reality. For you attention, the once and no more GOP is now a cult, not a party.
^^^ IDIOT-GRAM: a phrase or one sentence post which lacks substance & is not thoughtful or thought provoking.
He dude, read without your biases. The second phrase within my second sentence was substantive, thoughtful and those who are intelligent and have a good education, thought provoking.
You've won, Moscow Mitch, his band of bitches and trump have manipulated to fuck over democracy in America, and make our Republic into an autocracy. Enjoy your win, if trump by chance is reelected say good-bye to two hundred and thirty years of liberty and freedom.
The very fact that you think that was substantive reveals a severe lack of education.
read without your biases.yea they suck but so do the democrats....we have 2 useless parties .....why so many of you people cant see that is beyond me....or maybe you do but you dont care...but then that is a characteristic of a party person....
Gee Harry, you sure are out of touch with reality. For you attention, the once and no more GOP is now a cult, not a party.
^^^ IDIOT-GRAM: a phrase or one sentence post which lacks substance & is not thoughtful or thought provoking.
He dude, read without your biases. The second phrase within my second sentence was substantive, thoughtful and those who are intelligent and have a good education, thought provoking.
You've won, Moscow Mitch, his band of bitches and trump have manipulated to fuck over democracy in America, and make our Republic into an autocracy. Enjoy your win, if trump by chance is reelected say good-bye to two hundred and thirty years of liberty and freedom.
when are you going to start wry?.....just asking....
no i mean here in this forum.....read without your biases.yea they suck but so do the democrats....we have 2 useless parties .....why so many of you people cant see that is beyond me....or maybe you do but you dont care...but then that is a characteristic of a party person....
Gee Harry, you sure are out of touch with reality. For you attention, the once and no more GOP is now a cult, not a party.
^^^ IDIOT-GRAM: a phrase or one sentence post which lacks substance & is not thoughtful or thought provoking.
He dude, read without your biases. The second phrase within my second sentence was substantive, thoughtful and those who are intelligent and have a good education, thought provoking.
You've won, Moscow Mitch, his band of bitches and trump have manipulated to fuck over democracy in America, and make our Republic into an autocracy. Enjoy your win, if trump by chance is reelected say good-bye to two hundred and thirty years of liberty and freedom.
when are you going to start wry?.....just asking....
Probably in the 4th grade. Just answering.
These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.
What do we see?
Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.
- Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
- Questions that are not relevant,
- Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
- Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
- Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
- False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
- A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
- A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.
This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.
Democrats are scum.
These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.
What do we see?
Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.
- Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
- Questions that are not relevant,
- Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
- Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
- Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
- False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
- A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
- A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.
This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.
Democrats are scum.