The Absolute Worst Manifestation of Congressional Activity

[DGS49]

These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.

What do we see?

• Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
• Questions that are not relevant,
• Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
• Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
• Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
• False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
• A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
• A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.

Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.

This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.

Democrats are scum.

 

[Oddball]

Further proving that embarrassment is nowhere to be found in the emotional makeup of leftists.

 

[MarcATL]

Another "conservative" whipping themselves up into an anti-Democrat frenzy.

#SMGOP #LOLGOP

 

[Rye Catcher]

These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.

What do we see?

• Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
• Questions that are not relevant,
• Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
• Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
• Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
• False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
• A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
• A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.

Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.

This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.

Democrats are scum.

Another post which needs to be moved to the Rubber Room, or Badlands. The current iteration of the Republican Party has become so toxic as to be unrecognized as the party of Eisenhower or Reagan.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.

What do we see?

• Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
• Questions that are not relevant,
• Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
• Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
• Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
• False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
• A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
• A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.

Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.

This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.

Democrats are scum.

And you think bloviating is reserved only for the Democrats? Sure.
Democrats are doing exactly what I expected them to do. Attempt to find out what her stances are on important issues that go beyond the SC.
Let the American people know exactly what's at stake.

 

[mudwhistle]

These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.

What do we see?

• Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
• Questions that are not relevant,
• Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
• Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
• Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
• False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
• A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
• A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.

Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.

This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.

Democrats are scum.

Democrats are fighting for a health care system they know sucks ass and they didn't want to give up their FEHB for.
They also padded their numbers by covering new immigrants and undocumented aliens, as well as 26 year old children covered under their parent's plans.

 

[Oddball]

These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.

What do we see?

• Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
• Questions that are not relevant,
• Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
• Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
• Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
• False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
• A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
• A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.

Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.

This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.

Democrats are scum.

Another post which needs to be moved to the Rubber Room, or Badlands. The current iteration of the Republican Party has become so toxic as to be unrecognized as the party of Eisenhower or Reagan.

Another super-duper idiot-gram...Nice job, Francis.

 

[Harry Dresden]

there is a reason why they have such a shitty approval rating....

 

[miketx]

These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.

What do we see?

• Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
• Questions that are not relevant,
• Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
• Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
• Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
• False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
• A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
• A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.

Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.

This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.

Democrats are scum.

That walking pos hirono already slandered her as a rapist.

 

[miketx]

These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.

What do we see?

• Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
• Questions that are not relevant,
• Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
• Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
• Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
• False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
• A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
• A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.

Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.

This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.

Democrats are scum.

And you think bloviating is reserved only for the Democrats? Sure.
Democrats are doing exactly what I expected them to do. Attempt to find out what her stances are on important issues that go beyond the SC.
Let the American people know exactly what's at stake.

Whataboutism rears it's stupid head again.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.

What do we see?

• Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
• Questions that are not relevant,
• Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
• Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
• Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
• False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
• A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
• A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.

Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.

This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.

Democrats are scum.

Another post which needs to be moved to the Rubber Room, or Badlands. The current iteration of the Republican Party has become so toxic as to be unrecognized as the party of Eisenhower or Reagan.

^ IDIOT-GRAM: a phrase or one sentence post which lacks substance & is not thoughtful or thought provoking

Hey Mal, I love this Wry imitation!

 

[Rye Catcher]

These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.

What do we see?

• Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
• Questions that are not relevant,
• Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
• Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
• Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
• False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
• A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
• A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.

Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.

This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.

Democrats are scum.

Another post which needs to be moved to the Rubber Room, or Badlands. The current iteration of the Republican Party has become so toxic as to be unrecognized as the party of Eisenhower or Reagan.

^ IDIOT-GRAM: a phrase or one sentence post which lacks substance & is not thoughtful or thought provoking

Hey Mal, I love this Wry imitation!

Frank, don't lie. I coined "idiot-gram" years ago in memory of your ludicrous posts. It seems you and odd dude are built in the same architecture, lacking substance in all of your posts, and not posting anything which will provoke anyone to think or even consider your comments rational.

 

[Rye Catcher]

there is a reason why they have such a shitty approval rating....

Who is they, and what reason do you conclude "they?" have such a shitty approval rating. Oh, and BTW, who gives a shit about approval ratings, the dumbest of the dumb in circle jerks all like each other.

 

[Oddball]

These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.

What do we see?

• Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
• Questions that are not relevant,
• Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
• Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
• Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
• False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
• A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
• A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.

Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.

This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.

Democrats are scum.

Another post which needs to be moved to the Rubber Room, or Badlands. The current iteration of the Republican Party has become so toxic as to be unrecognized as the party of Eisenhower or Reagan.

^ IDIOT-GRAM: a phrase or one sentence post which lacks substance & is not thoughtful or thought provoking

Hey Mal, I love this Wry imitation!

Frank, don't lie. I coined "idiot-gram" years ago in memory of your ludicrous posts. It seems you and odd dude are built in the same architecture, lacking substance in all of your posts, and not posting anything which will provoke anyone to think or even consider your comments rational.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

These ACB hearings are one of the WORST manifestions of what Congress does for the money we pay them. Put a camera in front of these bloviating political whores and we can all see why "we" need to figuratively blow the place up and start over. The ONLY good thing we can see in this instance is that the nominee is not a man, so he can't be slandered as a rapist.

What do we see?

• Speeches having nothing to do with the activity at hand,
• Questions that are not relevant,
• Intentional mischaracterizations of the nominee's past words,
• Questions that the questioner know cannot be answered (with the implication of some nefarious reason for the expected declination to answer),
• Slanders of people not present, mainly the President,
• False characterizations of the proceedings themselves,
• A cornucopia of falsehoods, outright lies, and slanders,
• A complete abandonment of well-known and accepted principles of LOGIC.

Among the WORST travesties in these hearings are pitiful examples of people who need bazillions of dollars in medical care, implying that a heartless Supreme Court strikes down the ACA (which they ALL KNOW WILL NOT HAPPEN BASED ON THE CURRENT CHALLENGE) these people will surely die, and their deaths will be at the hands of the "conservative" Supreme Court.

This nominee has stated, over and over, and the Committee members have repeatedly stated that they understand, that the Court's review of any law HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER IT IS GOOD OR BAD PUBLIC POLICY; that is the role of the Congress.

Democrats are scum.

Another post which needs to be moved to the Rubber Room, or Badlands. The current iteration of the Republican Party has become so toxic as to be unrecognized as the party of Eisenhower or Reagan.

^ IDIOT-GRAM: a phrase or one sentence post which lacks substance & is not thoughtful or thought provoking

Hey Mal, I love this Wry imitation!

Frank, don't lie. I coined "idiot-gram" years ago in memory of your ludicrous posts. It seems you and odd dude are built in the same architecture, lacking substance in all of your posts, and not posting anything which will provoke anyone to think or even consider your comments rational.

This is a Perfect Wry imitation! I hope the other sock posters are taking notes! It's like being an apprentice in the studio of Leonardo DaVinci

 

[Harry Dresden]

there is a reason why they have such a shitty approval rating....

Who is they, and what reason do you conclude "they?" have such a shitty approval rating. Oh, and BTW, who gives a shit about approval ratings, the dumbest of the dumb in circle jerks all like each other.

is that like that circle you are in?...and of course you dont care if they are horrible,you vote for them over and over......

 

[Rye Catcher]

Republican Party Platform of 1956 | The American Presidency Project

www.presidency.ucsb.edu

From the link:


Our Government was created by the people for all the people, and it must serve no less a purpose.

The Republican Party was formed 100 years ago to preserve the Nation's devotion to these ideals.

On its Centennial, the Republican Party again calls to the minds of all Americans the great truth first spoken by Abraham Lincoln: "The legitimate object of Government is to do for a community of people whatever they need to have done but cannot do at all, or cannot so well do, for themselves in their separate and individual capacities. But in all that people can individually do as well for themselves, Government ought not to interfere."

Our great President Dwight D. Eisenhower has counseled us further: "In all those things which deal with people, be liberal, be human. In all those things which deal with people's money, or their economy, or their form of government, be conservative."


While jealously guarding the free institutions and preserving the principles upon which our Republic was founded and has flourished, the purpose of the Republican Party is to establish and maintain a peaceful world and build at home a dynamic prosperity in which every citizen fairly shares.

We shall ever build anew, that our children and their children, without distinction because of race, creed or color, may know the blessings of our free land.


We believe that basic to governmental integrity are unimpeachable ethical standards and irreproachable personal conduct by all people in government. We shall continue our insistence on honesty as an indispensable requirement of public service. We shall continue to root out corruption whenever and wherever it appears.

Does any honest person doubt that Trump and McConnell have lived up to, "governmental integrity are unimpeachable ethical standards and irreproachable personal conduct by all people in government.

 

[Harry Dresden]

yea they suck but so do the democrats....we have 2 useless parties .....why so many of you people cant see that is beyond me....or maybe you do but you dont care...but then that is a characteristic of a party person....

 

[Rye Catcher]

yea they suck but so do the democrats....we have 2 useless parties .....why so many of you people cant see that is beyond me....or maybe you do but you dont care...but then that is a characteristic of a party person....

Gee Harry, you sure are out of touch with reality. For you attention, the once and no more GOP is now a cult, not a party.

 

[Harry Dresden]

yea they suck but so do the democrats....we have 2 useless parties .....why so many of you people cant see that is beyond me....or maybe you do but you dont care...but then that is a characteristic of a party person....

Gee Harry, you sure are out of touch with reality. For you attention, the once and no more GOP is now a cult, not a party.

like i care what the GOP has become.....but you being a die hard democrat means you are in touch right wry?....