- Thread starter
- #41
Do you understand the concept? Then we can be done when you've got it.
Clearly, there is confusion as to what you are saying. As near as I can tell, the 2nd Amendment has no teeth if the populace can't own guns AND belong to the militia. It seems to me that was what the founders intended. This would be especially true if said militia were under the auspices of the federal government. So maybe you could expound on your statements a little more and explain what you are trying to convey to me. Better yet, do you believe the 2nd Amendment gives peaceable law abiding citizens the right to own and possess firearms that a light infantry of the day ought to possess?
Last edited: