Thanks Trump, for destroying the GOP

[kaz]

I never voted for Bush, dweeb, I voted for Browne in 2000 and Badarnak in 2004. I am not a slave of the parties. Republicans and Democrats, all that exist in your tiny little mine

Unlike you I don't like throwing my vote in the toilet I'll vote for the best person who has a chance

That's what my mother said when I voted for Browne instead of Bush, she said "you're helping that man Al Gore get elected."

I told her what I will tell you. Voting between Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum isn't choosing, they are the same. I am saying clearly I want something better, not just to pick my warden

your mother was right, its just a good thing that more people do not suffer your delusions.

My vote is mine, not your or my mother's. And mathematically, voting for Browne wasn't a vote for Gore. And which one was better again? Tweedle Dum or Tweedle Dee?

And BTW, W was a disaster for the country.

- Trillions in the middle east that the countries we benefited most stabbed us in the back over

- Failing to defend his policies let the left grab the narrative and that's how we got Obama and Obamacare

- A liberal's wet dream of socialist spending that Gore never would have gotten by the Republicans. The prescription drug social security welfare benefit, no child gets ahead, the TSA, the so called "transportation bill" Christmas tree, signing the blatantly unconstitutional so called welfare reform bill.

If I had that vote to do over, I'd have voted for Gore

I voted for gwb in 2000 and have been beating myself up over it ever since

yes, another left winger who was a Republican. Apparently the vote for W was unanimous, I don't know how he lost the popular vote, it was amazing

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

I see you're trying to burnish your creds for the award, the annual "Stupidest Poster of the Year."

Have no fear....you're a shoo-in.


Stop worrying.....everyone knows you're a moron.




Spoiler alert: do not....DO NOT....under punishment of education....peruse the following!
You've been warned.



"With the fall of the Soviet Union and communist governments in Eastern Europe, too many have the impression that Marxism, the religion of communism, is dead. Hardly. It is alive and well in many countries still, such as North Korea, China, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, a gaggle of African countries, and in the minds of many South American political leaders. However, of most importance to the future of democracy, communism still pollutes the thinking of a vast multitude of Western academics and intellectuals.
...Marxist regimes murdered nearly 110 million people from 1917 to 1987.
The killing machine that is Marxism



Now...what did that moron say???
Oh...yeah...""Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

You may simply be dishonest, but methinks you actually believe the crap you post. Maybe instead of parroting some obscure author you might actually try to read some real history, in terms of news articles, historical biographies, personal letters and the works of those such as Marx who you despise and yet do not understand.

BTW, starting a post by calling me stupid and a moron isn't a rebuttal nor does it even hint at some evidence you read my post or have ever considered Communism in theory, and how it comports to the practice of despots who ordered mass murder, those who ruled and rule the nations you (or the obscure author claimed) were Communists. Mass murder of people isn't based on an economic theory, it is savagery and accomplished by evil men who came to power by force, vote or accident of birth.

Simple minded people like you, and those who support Trump see a world beyond their comprehension and have never climbed even half way to the top of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Of course that is expected of narcissists, others fall prey to the hate and fear rhetoric of the demagogue. and those who write books revising history (a genre in which you have a good deal of familiarity).

MORE????

You need more, before you monogram "Moron" on all of your overalls????


Sure:
Marxist socialism is, in theory, what was being practiced by all of the countries that we call "Communist". The objective of Marxist socialism is to use the State to prepare society for communism by communalizing all of the productive forces of the society, i.e. by making all of the means of production public property.
Communism and Marxism - rationalrevolution.net
www.rationalrevolution.net/war/communism_and_marxism.htm


Communism includes a variety of schools of thought, which broadly include Marxism, anarchism(anarchist communism), and the political ideologies grouped around both. Communism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



C'mon now......one more time!
Repeat this:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

Everyone needs a good laugh......and folks laughing at you wouldn't be a new experience, would it.

It would be a new experience, as I've always been able to lessen tensions by being self effacing and using wry humor. As a narcissist you have no clue as to how effective that can be, nor any understanding of why so many on this forum find you at best to be a tedious partisan.

Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden, and in - for example - the Soviet System and China they have suffered under despotic rule? I can't believe you are so stupid as to not comprehend such an obvious issue, thus I must continue to believe you are a perfidious and dishonest partisan troll.

Gads, you're a dunce.

Please, dunce.....write this again:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."



OK.....this is almost as good:

"Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

Even stupid people think you are a moron.


And now for reality:
"Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.


a. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981


b. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publicly advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.

I love providing education to Liberals who have been deprived of same in government schools, and I don't mind shredding attempts by Liberals to rebut same...but the most fun is spotlighting your infirmities.
I used to be surprised at how truly stupid you Leftists are.....but you have disabused me of that.
Now I treat it as humor.



C'mon....one more time.....say it again: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"; genocide has been the practice of evil men and exists even today in ISIS and not explicitly stated but inherit in the words of many white men running today for the nomination in their party to be the next POTUS.

Let me mentor you with what may seem to be a childish link, but one which is clear as to the thinking of Marx and Engels at least in their words and efforts to publish the Manifesto. Note that racism, slavery and murder are not explicit in this summary, nor in the Manifesto itself. If Marx, born a Jew, was an antisemite it would not be uncommon for many in the mid 19th Century and even today are antisemites. No where is genocide a practice unless one comports revolution as a form of it.

SparkNotes: The Communist Manifesto: Summary

Once again, Socialism in Western Europe is market based and egalitarian - China and Russia - each having a power elite which pulls the strings is not an example of the latter even though both have market economies (note: not free markets, as the State does not have absolute control of the economy). The RED SCARE is ironic in the sense that both China an Russia are run by conservatives, and like the US, all reject equal rights, rejecting Pluralism (listen to Trump and Cruz as examples and evidence) and resistant to change.

"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

I see you're trying to burnish your creds for the award, the annual "Stupidest Poster of the Year."

Have no fear....you're a shoo-in.


Stop worrying.....everyone knows you're a moron.




Spoiler alert: do not....DO NOT....under punishment of education....peruse the following!
You've been warned.



"With the fall of the Soviet Union and communist governments in Eastern Europe, too many have the impression that Marxism, the religion of communism, is dead. Hardly. It is alive and well in many countries still, such as North Korea, China, Cuba, Vietnam, Laos, a gaggle of African countries, and in the minds of many South American political leaders. However, of most importance to the future of democracy, communism still pollutes the thinking of a vast multitude of Western academics and intellectuals.
...Marxist regimes murdered nearly 110 million people from 1917 to 1987.
The killing machine that is Marxism



Now...what did that moron say???
Oh...yeah...""Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

You may simply be dishonest, but methinks you actually believe the crap you post. Maybe instead of parroting some obscure author you might actually try to read some real history, in terms of news articles, historical biographies, personal letters and the works of those such as Marx who you despise and yet do not understand.

BTW, starting a post by calling me stupid and a moron isn't a rebuttal nor does it even hint at some evidence you read my post or have ever considered Communism in theory, and how it comports to the practice of despots who ordered mass murder, those who ruled and rule the nations you (or the obscure author claimed) were Communists. Mass murder of people isn't based on an economic theory, it is savagery and accomplished by evil men who came to power by force, vote or accident of birth.

Simple minded people like you, and those who support Trump see a world beyond their comprehension and have never climbed even half way to the top of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Of course that is expected of narcissists, others fall prey to the hate and fear rhetoric of the demagogue. and those who write books revising history (a genre in which you have a good deal of familiarity).

MORE????

You need more, before you monogram "Moron" on all of your overalls????


Sure:
Marxist socialism is, in theory, what was being practiced by all of the countries that we call "Communist". The objective of Marxist socialism is to use the State to prepare society for communism by communalizing all of the productive forces of the society, i.e. by making all of the means of production public property.
Communism and Marxism - rationalrevolution.net
www.rationalrevolution.net/war/communism_and_marxism.htm


Communism includes a variety of schools of thought, which broadly include Marxism, anarchism(anarchist communism), and the political ideologies grouped around both. Communism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



C'mon now......one more time!
Repeat this:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

Everyone needs a good laugh......and folks laughing at you wouldn't be a new experience, would it.

It would be a new experience, as I've always been able to lessen tensions by being self effacing and using wry humor. As a narcissist you have no clue as to how effective that can be, nor any understanding of why so many on this forum find you at best to be a tedious partisan.

Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden, and in - for example - the Soviet System and China they have suffered under despotic rule? I can't believe you are so stupid as to not comprehend such an obvious issue, thus I must continue to believe you are a perfidious and dishonest partisan troll.

Gads, you're a dunce.

Please, dunce.....write this again:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."



OK.....this is almost as good:

"Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

Even stupid people think you are a moron.


And now for reality:
"Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.


a. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981


b. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publicly advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.

I love providing education to Liberals who have been deprived of same in government schools, and I don't mind shredding attempts by Liberals to rebut same...but the most fun is spotlighting your infirmities.
I used to be surprised at how truly stupid you Leftists are.....but you have disabused me of that.
Now I treat it as humor.



C'mon....one more time.....say it again: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"; genocide has been the practice of evil men and exists even today in ISIS and not explicitly stated but inherit in the words of many white men running today for the nomination in their party to be the next POTUS.

Let me mentor you with what may seem to be a childish link, but one which is clear as to the thinking of Marx and Engels at least in their words and efforts to publish the Manifesto. Note that racism, slavery and murder are not explicit in this summary, nor in the Manifesto itself. If Marx, born a Jew, was an antisemite it would not be uncommon for many in the mid 19th Century and even today are antisemites. No where is genocide a practice unless one comports revolution as a form of it.

SparkNotes: The Communist Manifesto: Summary

Once again, Socialism in Western Europe is market based and egalitarian - China and Russia - each having a power elite which pulls the strings is not an example of the latter even though both have market economies (note: not free markets, as the State does not have absolute control of the economy). The RED SCARE is ironic in the sense that both China an Russia are run by conservatives, and like the US, all reject equal rights, rejecting Pluralism (listen to Trump and Cruz as examples and evidence) and resistant to change.

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"

Excellent!
Exposing the asininity of posters is one of my guilty pleasures.....but it would be redundant in your case.

Lest any reader mistake your ability at a keyboard as representing either education or intelligence, this one sentence alone should identify your lack of either.
"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"



"Marxism–Leninismis a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of Marxism and Leninism, and seeks to establish socialist statesand develop them further. Marxist–Leninists espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of Marxism and Leninism, but generally they support the idea of avanguard party,one-party rule,state-dominance over the economy,internationalism, opposition tobourgeois democracy, and opposition tocapitalism.

It remains the official ideology of the ruling parties of China, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam, and was the official ideology of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union(CPSU) and the other ruling parties making up the Eastern Bloc.....

Marxism–Leninism first became a distinct philosophical movement in the Soviet Union during the 1920s, when Joseph Stalinand his supporters gained control of the Russian Communist Party (bolsheviks)."
Marxism–Leninism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia





And, on to the larger point....that particular phrase suggested by what you have under your hat....

...why is it that Democrat voters, Obama supporters, have the knee-jerk reaction to support and serve as apologists for Marxism, communism, and Stalin....

...yet snarl with anger at the mention of Nazis and Hitler???

1. Both doctrines can be traced to your fav, Karl Marx
2. By every single metric....Stalin and communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism,
3. Stalin slaughtered more than Hitler
4. And the Democrat Party stands for the very same things that the Communist Party did.

Clearly, indoctrination is indelible.....you serve as proof.


In short, I'm glad to see you're not letting education get in the way of your ignorance

First of all, you're an idiot. And second...nah, that pretty much covers it.

 

[kaz]

That's what my mother said when I voted for Browne instead of Bush, she said "you're helping that man Al Gore get elected."

I told her what I will tell you. Voting between Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum isn't choosing, they are the same. I am saying clearly I want something better, not just to pick my warden

your mother was right, its just a good thing that more people do not suffer your delusions.

My vote is mine, not your or my mother's. And mathematically, voting for Browne wasn't a vote for Gore. And which one was better again? Tweedle Dum or Tweedle Dee?

And BTW, W was a disaster for the country.

- Trillions in the middle east that the countries we benefited most stabbed us in the back over

- Failing to defend his policies let the left grab the narrative and that's how we got Obama and Obamacare

- A liberal's wet dream of socialist spending that Gore never would have gotten by the Republicans. The prescription drug social security welfare benefit, no child gets ahead, the TSA, the so called "transportation bill" Christmas tree, signing the blatantly unconstitutional so called welfare reform bill.

If I had that vote to do over, I'd have voted for Gore

amazingly stupid. if the prophet algore had been elected you would have a thermostat in your house controlled by the central government, gas would be $10/gallon, and the unemployment rate would be 40%. and, BTW, the ice caps would not have melted.

Bush was not great, but he was much better than Gore or Kerry would have been.

Sure, if Al Gore or W had been elected dictator, Al Gore would have been worse. But I already addressed the shortcoming in that logic. The Republicans would have fought Gore, not fought for him like they did for W's spending orgy. And you ignored my points on his military policies completely

at Berkley now getting her PhD in French

You mean it does involve the tongue?

So RW, I may have zero respect for your intelligence, but I didn't expect sexual references from you about my daughter. That really the way you want to play it?

 

[Wry Catcher]

You may simply be dishonest, but methinks you actually believe the crap you post. Maybe instead of parroting some obscure author you might actually try to read some real history, in terms of news articles, historical biographies, personal letters and the works of those such as Marx who you despise and yet do not understand.

BTW, starting a post by calling me stupid and a moron isn't a rebuttal nor does it even hint at some evidence you read my post or have ever considered Communism in theory, and how it comports to the practice of despots who ordered mass murder, those who ruled and rule the nations you (or the obscure author claimed) were Communists. Mass murder of people isn't based on an economic theory, it is savagery and accomplished by evil men who came to power by force, vote or accident of birth.

Simple minded people like you, and those who support Trump see a world beyond their comprehension and have never climbed even half way to the top of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Of course that is expected of narcissists, others fall prey to the hate and fear rhetoric of the demagogue. and those who write books revising history (a genre in which you have a good deal of familiarity).

MORE????

You need more, before you monogram "Moron" on all of your overalls????


Sure:
Marxist socialism is, in theory, what was being practiced by all of the countries that we call "Communist". The objective of Marxist socialism is to use the State to prepare society for communism by communalizing all of the productive forces of the society, i.e. by making all of the means of production public property.
Communism and Marxism - rationalrevolution.net
www.rationalrevolution.net/war/communism_and_marxism.htm


Communism includes a variety of schools of thought, which broadly include Marxism, anarchism(anarchist communism), and the political ideologies grouped around both. Communism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



C'mon now......one more time!
Repeat this:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

Everyone needs a good laugh......and folks laughing at you wouldn't be a new experience, would it.

It would be a new experience, as I've always been able to lessen tensions by being self effacing and using wry humor. As a narcissist you have no clue as to how effective that can be, nor any understanding of why so many on this forum find you at best to be a tedious partisan.

Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden, and in - for example - the Soviet System and China they have suffered under despotic rule? I can't believe you are so stupid as to not comprehend such an obvious issue, thus I must continue to believe you are a perfidious and dishonest partisan troll.

Gads, you're a dunce.

Please, dunce.....write this again:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."



OK.....this is almost as good:

"Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

Even stupid people think you are a moron.


And now for reality:
"Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.


a. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981


b. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publicly advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.

I love providing education to Liberals who have been deprived of same in government schools, and I don't mind shredding attempts by Liberals to rebut same...but the most fun is spotlighting your infirmities.
I used to be surprised at how truly stupid you Leftists are.....but you have disabused me of that.
Now I treat it as humor.



C'mon....one more time.....say it again: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"; genocide has been the practice of evil men and exists even today in ISIS and not explicitly stated but inherit in the words of many white men running today for the nomination in their party to be the next POTUS.

Let me mentor you with what may seem to be a childish link, but one which is clear as to the thinking of Marx and Engels at least in their words and efforts to publish the Manifesto. Note that racism, slavery and murder are not explicit in this summary, nor in the Manifesto itself. If Marx, born a Jew, was an antisemite it would not be uncommon for many in the mid 19th Century and even today are antisemites. No where is genocide a practice unless one comports revolution as a form of it.

SparkNotes: The Communist Manifesto: Summary

Once again, Socialism in Western Europe is market based and egalitarian - China and Russia - each having a power elite which pulls the strings is not an example of the latter even though both have market economies (note: not free markets, as the State does not have absolute control of the economy). The RED SCARE is ironic in the sense that both China an Russia are run by conservatives, and like the US, all reject equal rights, rejecting Pluralism (listen to Trump and Cruz as examples and evidence) and resistant to change.

You may simply be dishonest, but methinks you actually believe the crap you post. Maybe instead of parroting some obscure author you might actually try to read some real history, in terms of news articles, historical biographies, personal letters and the works of those such as Marx who you despise and yet do not understand.

BTW, starting a post by calling me stupid and a moron isn't a rebuttal nor does it even hint at some evidence you read my post or have ever considered Communism in theory, and how it comports to the practice of despots who ordered mass murder, those who ruled and rule the nations you (or the obscure author claimed) were Communists. Mass murder of people isn't based on an economic theory, it is savagery and accomplished by evil men who came to power by force, vote or accident of birth.

Simple minded people like you, and those who support Trump see a world beyond their comprehension and have never climbed even half way to the top of Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs. Of course that is expected of narcissists, others fall prey to the hate and fear rhetoric of the demagogue. and those who write books revising history (a genre in which you have a good deal of familiarity).

MORE????

You need more, before you monogram "Moron" on all of your overalls????


Sure:
Marxist socialism is, in theory, what was being practiced by all of the countries that we call "Communist". The objective of Marxist socialism is to use the State to prepare society for communism by communalizing all of the productive forces of the society, i.e. by making all of the means of production public property.
Communism and Marxism - rationalrevolution.net
www.rationalrevolution.net/war/communism_and_marxism.htm


Communism includes a variety of schools of thought, which broadly include Marxism, anarchism(anarchist communism), and the political ideologies grouped around both. Communism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



C'mon now......one more time!
Repeat this:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

Everyone needs a good laugh......and folks laughing at you wouldn't be a new experience, would it.

It would be a new experience, as I've always been able to lessen tensions by being self effacing and using wry humor. As a narcissist you have no clue as to how effective that can be, nor any understanding of why so many on this forum find you at best to be a tedious partisan.

Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden, and in - for example - the Soviet System and China they have suffered under despotic rule? I can't believe you are so stupid as to not comprehend such an obvious issue, thus I must continue to believe you are a perfidious and dishonest partisan troll.

Gads, you're a dunce.

Please, dunce.....write this again:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."



OK.....this is almost as good:

"Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

Even stupid people think you are a moron.


And now for reality:
"Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.


a. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981


b. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publicly advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.

I love providing education to Liberals who have been deprived of same in government schools, and I don't mind shredding attempts by Liberals to rebut same...but the most fun is spotlighting your infirmities.
I used to be surprised at how truly stupid you Leftists are.....but you have disabused me of that.
Now I treat it as humor.



C'mon....one more time.....say it again: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"; genocide has been the practice of evil men and exists even today in ISIS and not explicitly stated but inherit in the words of many white men running today for the nomination in their party to be the next POTUS.

Let me mentor you with what may seem to be a childish link, but one which is clear as to the thinking of Marx and Engels at least in their words and efforts to publish the Manifesto. Note that racism, slavery and murder are not explicit in this summary, nor in the Manifesto itself. If Marx, born a Jew, was an antisemite it would not be uncommon for many in the mid 19th Century and even today are antisemites. No where is genocide a practice unless one comports revolution as a form of it.

SparkNotes: The Communist Manifesto: Summary

Once again, Socialism in Western Europe is market based and egalitarian - China and Russia - each having a power elite which pulls the strings is not an example of the latter even though both have market economies (note: not free markets, as the State does not have absolute control of the economy). The RED SCARE is ironic in the sense that both China an Russia are run by conservatives, and like the US, all reject equal rights, rejecting Pluralism (listen to Trump and Cruz as examples and evidence) and resistant to change.

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"

Excellent!
Exposing the asininity of posters is one of my guilty pleasures.....but it would be redundant in your case.

Lest any reader mistake your ability at a keyboard as representing either education or intelligence, this one sentence alone should identify your lack of either.
"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"



"Marxism–Leninismis a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of Marxism and Leninism, and seeks to establish socialist statesand develop them further. Marxist–Leninists espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of Marxism and Leninism, but generally they support the idea of avanguard party,one-party rule,state-dominance over the economy,internationalism, opposition tobourgeois democracy, and opposition tocapitalism.

It remains the official ideology of the ruling parties of China, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam, and was the official ideology of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union(CPSU) and the other ruling parties making up the Eastern Bloc.....

Marxism–Leninism first became a distinct philosophical movement in the Soviet Union during the 1920s, when Joseph Stalinand his supporters gained control of the Russian Communist Party (bolsheviks)."
Marxism–Leninism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia





And, on to the larger point....that particular phrase suggested by what you have under your hat....

...why is it that Democrat voters, Obama supporters, have the knee-jerk reaction to support and serve as apologists for Marxism, communism, and Stalin....

...yet snarl with anger at the mention of Nazis and Hitler???

1. Both doctrines can be traced to your fav, Karl Marx
2. By every single metric....Stalin and communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism,
3. Stalin slaughtered more than Hitler
4. And the Democrat Party stands for the very same things that the Communist Party did.

Clearly, indoctrination is indelible.....you serve as proof.


In short, I'm glad to see you're not letting education get in the way of your ignorance

First of all, you're an idiot. And second...nah, that pretty much covers it.

Well, golly gee, thanks so much for sharing. "by every single metric....Stalin and Communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism" strikes me as as an odd statement - at least you didn't claim Stalin and Communism wasn't 'worser' than Hitler and the Nazi Regime. Evil is what characterized both men and numbers can't account for the evil done under both totalitarian systems ruled by despots.

But what I find most odd is you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin and his regime. I've always sensed you are a fascist, this is more evidence to support such a theory.

 

[PoliticalChic]

MORE????

You need more, before you monogram "Moron" on all of your overalls????


Sure:
Marxist socialism is, in theory, what was being practiced by all of the countries that we call "Communist". The objective of Marxist socialism is to use the State to prepare society for communism by communalizing all of the productive forces of the society, i.e. by making all of the means of production public property.
Communism and Marxism - rationalrevolution.net
www.rationalrevolution.net/war/communism_and_marxism.htm


Communism includes a variety of schools of thought, which broadly include Marxism, anarchism(anarchist communism), and the political ideologies grouped around both. Communism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



C'mon now......one more time!
Repeat this:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

Everyone needs a good laugh......and folks laughing at you wouldn't be a new experience, would it.

It would be a new experience, as I've always been able to lessen tensions by being self effacing and using wry humor. As a narcissist you have no clue as to how effective that can be, nor any understanding of why so many on this forum find you at best to be a tedious partisan.

Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden, and in - for example - the Soviet System and China they have suffered under despotic rule? I can't believe you are so stupid as to not comprehend such an obvious issue, thus I must continue to believe you are a perfidious and dishonest partisan troll.

Gads, you're a dunce.

Please, dunce.....write this again:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."



OK.....this is almost as good:

"Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

Even stupid people think you are a moron.


And now for reality:
"Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.


a. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981


b. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publicly advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.

I love providing education to Liberals who have been deprived of same in government schools, and I don't mind shredding attempts by Liberals to rebut same...but the most fun is spotlighting your infirmities.
I used to be surprised at how truly stupid you Leftists are.....but you have disabused me of that.
Now I treat it as humor.



C'mon....one more time.....say it again: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"; genocide has been the practice of evil men and exists even today in ISIS and not explicitly stated but inherit in the words of many white men running today for the nomination in their party to be the next POTUS.

Let me mentor you with what may seem to be a childish link, but one which is clear as to the thinking of Marx and Engels at least in their words and efforts to publish the Manifesto. Note that racism, slavery and murder are not explicit in this summary, nor in the Manifesto itself. If Marx, born a Jew, was an antisemite it would not be uncommon for many in the mid 19th Century and even today are antisemites. No where is genocide a practice unless one comports revolution as a form of it.

SparkNotes: The Communist Manifesto: Summary

Once again, Socialism in Western Europe is market based and egalitarian - China and Russia - each having a power elite which pulls the strings is not an example of the latter even though both have market economies (note: not free markets, as the State does not have absolute control of the economy). The RED SCARE is ironic in the sense that both China an Russia are run by conservatives, and like the US, all reject equal rights, rejecting Pluralism (listen to Trump and Cruz as examples and evidence) and resistant to change.

MORE????

You need more, before you monogram "Moron" on all of your overalls????


Sure:
Marxist socialism is, in theory, what was being practiced by all of the countries that we call "Communist". The objective of Marxist socialism is to use the State to prepare society for communism by communalizing all of the productive forces of the society, i.e. by making all of the means of production public property.
Communism and Marxism - rationalrevolution.net
www.rationalrevolution.net/war/communism_and_marxism.htm


Communism includes a variety of schools of thought, which broadly include Marxism, anarchism(anarchist communism), and the political ideologies grouped around both. Communism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



C'mon now......one more time!
Repeat this:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

Everyone needs a good laugh......and folks laughing at you wouldn't be a new experience, would it.

It would be a new experience, as I've always been able to lessen tensions by being self effacing and using wry humor. As a narcissist you have no clue as to how effective that can be, nor any understanding of why so many on this forum find you at best to be a tedious partisan.

Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden, and in - for example - the Soviet System and China they have suffered under despotic rule? I can't believe you are so stupid as to not comprehend such an obvious issue, thus I must continue to believe you are a perfidious and dishonest partisan troll.

Gads, you're a dunce.

Please, dunce.....write this again:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."



OK.....this is almost as good:

"Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

Even stupid people think you are a moron.


And now for reality:
"Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.


a. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981


b. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publicly advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.

I love providing education to Liberals who have been deprived of same in government schools, and I don't mind shredding attempts by Liberals to rebut same...but the most fun is spotlighting your infirmities.
I used to be surprised at how truly stupid you Leftists are.....but you have disabused me of that.
Now I treat it as humor.



C'mon....one more time.....say it again: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"; genocide has been the practice of evil men and exists even today in ISIS and not explicitly stated but inherit in the words of many white men running today for the nomination in their party to be the next POTUS.

Let me mentor you with what may seem to be a childish link, but one which is clear as to the thinking of Marx and Engels at least in their words and efforts to publish the Manifesto. Note that racism, slavery and murder are not explicit in this summary, nor in the Manifesto itself. If Marx, born a Jew, was an antisemite it would not be uncommon for many in the mid 19th Century and even today are antisemites. No where is genocide a practice unless one comports revolution as a form of it.

SparkNotes: The Communist Manifesto: Summary

Once again, Socialism in Western Europe is market based and egalitarian - China and Russia - each having a power elite which pulls the strings is not an example of the latter even though both have market economies (note: not free markets, as the State does not have absolute control of the economy). The RED SCARE is ironic in the sense that both China an Russia are run by conservatives, and like the US, all reject equal rights, rejecting Pluralism (listen to Trump and Cruz as examples and evidence) and resistant to change.

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"

Excellent!
Exposing the asininity of posters is one of my guilty pleasures.....but it would be redundant in your case.

Lest any reader mistake your ability at a keyboard as representing either education or intelligence, this one sentence alone should identify your lack of either.
"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"



"Marxism–Leninismis a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of Marxism and Leninism, and seeks to establish socialist statesand develop them further. Marxist–Leninists espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of Marxism and Leninism, but generally they support the idea of avanguard party,one-party rule,state-dominance over the economy,internationalism, opposition tobourgeois democracy, and opposition tocapitalism.

It remains the official ideology of the ruling parties of China, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam, and was the official ideology of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union(CPSU) and the other ruling parties making up the Eastern Bloc.....

Marxism–Leninism first became a distinct philosophical movement in the Soviet Union during the 1920s, when Joseph Stalinand his supporters gained control of the Russian Communist Party (bolsheviks)."
Marxism–Leninism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia





And, on to the larger point....that particular phrase suggested by what you have under your hat....

...why is it that Democrat voters, Obama supporters, have the knee-jerk reaction to support and serve as apologists for Marxism, communism, and Stalin....

...yet snarl with anger at the mention of Nazis and Hitler???

1. Both doctrines can be traced to your fav, Karl Marx
2. By every single metric....Stalin and communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism,
3. Stalin slaughtered more than Hitler
4. And the Democrat Party stands for the very same things that the Communist Party did.

Clearly, indoctrination is indelible.....you serve as proof.


In short, I'm glad to see you're not letting education get in the way of your ignorance

First of all, you're an idiot. And second...nah, that pretty much covers it.

Well, golly gee, thanks so much for sharing. "by every single metric....Stalin and Communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism" strikes me as as an odd statement - at least you didn't claim Stalin and Communism wasn't 'worser' than Hitler and the Nazi Regime. Evil is what characterized both men and numbers can't account for the evil done under both totalitarian systems ruled by despots.

But what I find most odd is you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin and his regime. I've always sensed you are a fascist, this is more evidence to support such a theory.

"But what I find most odd is you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin and his regime. I've always sensed you are a fascist, this is more evidence to support such a theory."

Well.....look at you, you little worm, trying to wiggle out of this:"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

Let's review:

1. You said this: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

2. And, as though that wasn't stupid enough, you said this: "Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

That was you standing up for a pathological, homicidal murderer.'



3. I said this:"By every single metric....Stalin and communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism,..."

4. I never said what you claimed I said, this: "...you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin..."
I never said thing that would remotely indicate support of evil.
You are the only one who did that.

5. So....tell me.....on what basis do you find Stalin more favorable to you than Hitler.....
Notice I didn't identify either with Marx...because both ideologies come from Marx.


Both Nazism and Communism are Leftwing......as you are.

Now,,,,,show some appreciation for the education I provide to you....and answer the question: on what basis do you find Stalin more favorable to you than Hitler.....?

 

[Wry Catcher]

from the bush book of critical thinking you voted in and supported a true moron and now you make obama sound worse??? America laughs at you obama, america haters

I never voted for Bush, dweeb, I voted for Browne in 2000 and Badarnak in 2004. I am not a slave of the parties. Republicans and Democrats, all that exist in your tiny little mine

Unlike you I don't like throwing my vote in the toilet I'll vote for the best person who has a chance

That's what my mother said when I voted for Browne instead of Bush, she said "you're helping that man Al Gore get elected."

I told her what I will tell you. Voting between Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum isn't choosing, they are the same. I am saying clearly I want something better, not just to pick my warden

your mother was right, its just a good thing that more people do not suffer your delusions.

My vote is mine, not your or my mother's. And mathematically, voting for Browne wasn't a vote for Gore. And which one was better again? Tweedle Dum or Tweedle Dee?

And BTW, W was a disaster for the country.

- Trillions in the middle east that the countries we benefited most stabbed us in the back over

- Failing to defend his policies let the left grab the narrative and that's how we got Obama and Obamacare

- A liberal's wet dream of socialist spending that Gore never would have gotten by the Republicans. The prescription drug social security welfare benefit, no child gets ahead, the TSA, the so called "transportation bill" Christmas tree, signing the blatantly unconstitutional so called welfare reform bill.

If I had that vote to do over, I'd have voted for Gore

A Libertarian's "Wet Dream" (I'm almost embarrassed to quote this phrase) is that each man and woman is an island and the bonds that hold society together are the chains of tyranny. Anyone with an imagination (or who has read Lord of the Fly's) understands the human species is a social animal and that

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes;"
​

It is any surprise that the Libertarian's running for POTUS in 2000 received less than 1% of the popular vote?

 

[kaz]

A Libertarian's "Wet Dream" (I'm almost embarrassed to quote this phrase) is that each man and woman is an island and the bonds that hold society together are the chains of tyranny

You need to actually learn what it is if you want to post on the subject without flaunting your ignorance. This is just bull

 

[Wry Catcher]

A Libertarian's "Wet Dream" (I'm almost embarrassed to quote this phrase) is that each man and woman is an island and the bonds that hold society together are the chains of tyranny

You need to actually learn what it is if you want to post on the subject without flaunting your ignorance. This is just bull

A subtle ad hominem, but let's put my so called ignorance to the test. I have read the following in detail, have you?

Platform

The Platform of the Libertarian Party is deficient of keen practical sense.

 

[Wry Catcher]

It would be a new experience, as I've always been able to lessen tensions by being self effacing and using wry humor. As a narcissist you have no clue as to how effective that can be, nor any understanding of why so many on this forum find you at best to be a tedious partisan.

Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden, and in - for example - the Soviet System and China they have suffered under despotic rule? I can't believe you are so stupid as to not comprehend such an obvious issue, thus I must continue to believe you are a perfidious and dishonest partisan troll.

Gads, you're a dunce.

Please, dunce.....write this again:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."



OK.....this is almost as good:

"Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

Even stupid people think you are a moron.


And now for reality:
"Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.


a. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981


b. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publicly advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.

I love providing education to Liberals who have been deprived of same in government schools, and I don't mind shredding attempts by Liberals to rebut same...but the most fun is spotlighting your infirmities.
I used to be surprised at how truly stupid you Leftists are.....but you have disabused me of that.
Now I treat it as humor.



C'mon....one more time.....say it again: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"; genocide has been the practice of evil men and exists even today in ISIS and not explicitly stated but inherit in the words of many white men running today for the nomination in their party to be the next POTUS.

Let me mentor you with what may seem to be a childish link, but one which is clear as to the thinking of Marx and Engels at least in their words and efforts to publish the Manifesto. Note that racism, slavery and murder are not explicit in this summary, nor in the Manifesto itself. If Marx, born a Jew, was an antisemite it would not be uncommon for many in the mid 19th Century and even today are antisemites. No where is genocide a practice unless one comports revolution as a form of it.

SparkNotes: The Communist Manifesto: Summary

Once again, Socialism in Western Europe is market based and egalitarian - China and Russia - each having a power elite which pulls the strings is not an example of the latter even though both have market economies (note: not free markets, as the State does not have absolute control of the economy). The RED SCARE is ironic in the sense that both China an Russia are run by conservatives, and like the US, all reject equal rights, rejecting Pluralism (listen to Trump and Cruz as examples and evidence) and resistant to change.

It would be a new experience, as I've always been able to lessen tensions by being self effacing and using wry humor. As a narcissist you have no clue as to how effective that can be, nor any understanding of why so many on this forum find you at best to be a tedious partisan.

Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden, and in - for example - the Soviet System and China they have suffered under despotic rule? I can't believe you are so stupid as to not comprehend such an obvious issue, thus I must continue to believe you are a perfidious and dishonest partisan troll.

Gads, you're a dunce.

Please, dunce.....write this again:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."



OK.....this is almost as good:

"Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

Even stupid people think you are a moron.


And now for reality:
"Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.


a. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981


b. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publicly advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.

I love providing education to Liberals who have been deprived of same in government schools, and I don't mind shredding attempts by Liberals to rebut same...but the most fun is spotlighting your infirmities.
I used to be surprised at how truly stupid you Leftists are.....but you have disabused me of that.
Now I treat it as humor.



C'mon....one more time.....say it again: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"; genocide has been the practice of evil men and exists even today in ISIS and not explicitly stated but inherit in the words of many white men running today for the nomination in their party to be the next POTUS.

Let me mentor you with what may seem to be a childish link, but one which is clear as to the thinking of Marx and Engels at least in their words and efforts to publish the Manifesto. Note that racism, slavery and murder are not explicit in this summary, nor in the Manifesto itself. If Marx, born a Jew, was an antisemite it would not be uncommon for many in the mid 19th Century and even today are antisemites. No where is genocide a practice unless one comports revolution as a form of it.

SparkNotes: The Communist Manifesto: Summary

Once again, Socialism in Western Europe is market based and egalitarian - China and Russia - each having a power elite which pulls the strings is not an example of the latter even though both have market economies (note: not free markets, as the State does not have absolute control of the economy). The RED SCARE is ironic in the sense that both China an Russia are run by conservatives, and like the US, all reject equal rights, rejecting Pluralism (listen to Trump and Cruz as examples and evidence) and resistant to change.

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"

Excellent!
Exposing the asininity of posters is one of my guilty pleasures.....but it would be redundant in your case.

Lest any reader mistake your ability at a keyboard as representing either education or intelligence, this one sentence alone should identify your lack of either.
"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"



"Marxism–Leninismis a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of Marxism and Leninism, and seeks to establish socialist statesand develop them further. Marxist–Leninists espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of Marxism and Leninism, but generally they support the idea of avanguard party,one-party rule,state-dominance over the economy,internationalism, opposition tobourgeois democracy, and opposition tocapitalism.

It remains the official ideology of the ruling parties of China, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam, and was the official ideology of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union(CPSU) and the other ruling parties making up the Eastern Bloc.....

Marxism–Leninism first became a distinct philosophical movement in the Soviet Union during the 1920s, when Joseph Stalinand his supporters gained control of the Russian Communist Party (bolsheviks)."
Marxism–Leninism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia





And, on to the larger point....that particular phrase suggested by what you have under your hat....

...why is it that Democrat voters, Obama supporters, have the knee-jerk reaction to support and serve as apologists for Marxism, communism, and Stalin....

...yet snarl with anger at the mention of Nazis and Hitler???

1. Both doctrines can be traced to your fav, Karl Marx
2. By every single metric....Stalin and communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism,
3. Stalin slaughtered more than Hitler
4. And the Democrat Party stands for the very same things that the Communist Party did.

Clearly, indoctrination is indelible.....you serve as proof.


In short, I'm glad to see you're not letting education get in the way of your ignorance

First of all, you're an idiot. And second...nah, that pretty much covers it.

Well, golly gee, thanks so much for sharing. "by every single metric....Stalin and Communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism" strikes me as as an odd statement - at least you didn't claim Stalin and Communism wasn't 'worser' than Hitler and the Nazi Regime. Evil is what characterized both men and numbers can't account for the evil done under both totalitarian systems ruled by despots.

But what I find most odd is you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin and his regime. I've always sensed you are a fascist, this is more evidence to support such a theory.

"But what I find most odd is you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin and his regime. I've always sensed you are a fascist, this is more evidence to support such a theory."

Well.....look at you, you little worm, trying to wiggle out of this:"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

Let's review:

1. You said this: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

2. And, as though that wasn't stupid enough, you said this: "Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

That was you standing up for a pathological, homicidal murderer.'



3. I said this:"By every single metric....Stalin and communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism,..."

4. I never said what you claimed I said, this: "...you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin..."
I never said thing that would remotely indicate support of evil.
You are the only one who did that.

5. So....tell me.....on what basis do you find Stalin more favorable to you than Hitler.....
Notice I didn't identify either with Marx...because both ideologies come from Marx.


Both Nazism and Communism are Leftwing......as you are.

Now,,,,,show some appreciation for the education I provide to you....and answer the question: on what basis do you find Stalin more favorable to you than Hitler.....?

I don't find mass murder's or those that enable them (such as the NRA) favorable. I posted and you chose to ignore and spin your tail of ad hominems by claiming I did; the truth being I defined both Hitler and Stalin as evil, not one or the other "worser" as have you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gads, you're a dunce.

Please, dunce.....write this again:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."



OK.....this is almost as good:

"Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

Even stupid people think you are a moron.


And now for reality:
"Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.


a. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981


b. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publicly advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.

I love providing education to Liberals who have been deprived of same in government schools, and I don't mind shredding attempts by Liberals to rebut same...but the most fun is spotlighting your infirmities.
I used to be surprised at how truly stupid you Leftists are.....but you have disabused me of that.
Now I treat it as humor.



C'mon....one more time.....say it again: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"; genocide has been the practice of evil men and exists even today in ISIS and not explicitly stated but inherit in the words of many white men running today for the nomination in their party to be the next POTUS.

Let me mentor you with what may seem to be a childish link, but one which is clear as to the thinking of Marx and Engels at least in their words and efforts to publish the Manifesto. Note that racism, slavery and murder are not explicit in this summary, nor in the Manifesto itself. If Marx, born a Jew, was an antisemite it would not be uncommon for many in the mid 19th Century and even today are antisemites. No where is genocide a practice unless one comports revolution as a form of it.

SparkNotes: The Communist Manifesto: Summary

Once again, Socialism in Western Europe is market based and egalitarian - China and Russia - each having a power elite which pulls the strings is not an example of the latter even though both have market economies (note: not free markets, as the State does not have absolute control of the economy). The RED SCARE is ironic in the sense that both China an Russia are run by conservatives, and like the US, all reject equal rights, rejecting Pluralism (listen to Trump and Cruz as examples and evidence) and resistant to change.

Gads, you're a dunce.

Please, dunce.....write this again:
"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."



OK.....this is almost as good:

"Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

Even stupid people think you are a moron.


And now for reality:
"Early socialists publically advocated genocide, in the 19th and 20th centuries. It first appeared in Marx's journal, Rheinishe Zeitung, in January of 1849. When the socialist class war happens, there will be primitive societies in Europe, two stages behind- not even capitalist yet- the Basques, the Bretons, the Scottish Highlanders, the Serbs, and others he calls 'racial trash,' and they will have to be destroyed because, being two stages behind in the class struggle, it will be impossible to bring them up to being revolutionary."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge University.


a. "The classes and races, too weak to master the new conditions of life, must give way...they must perish in the revolutionary holocaust." Karl Marx, People's Paper, April 16, 1856, Journal of the History of Idea, 1981


b. "Before Marx, no other European thinker publicly advocated racial extermination. He was the first."
George Watson.

I love providing education to Liberals who have been deprived of same in government schools, and I don't mind shredding attempts by Liberals to rebut same...but the most fun is spotlighting your infirmities.
I used to be surprised at how truly stupid you Leftists are.....but you have disabused me of that.
Now I treat it as humor.



C'mon....one more time.....say it again: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"; genocide has been the practice of evil men and exists even today in ISIS and not explicitly stated but inherit in the words of many white men running today for the nomination in their party to be the next POTUS.

Let me mentor you with what may seem to be a childish link, but one which is clear as to the thinking of Marx and Engels at least in their words and efforts to publish the Manifesto. Note that racism, slavery and murder are not explicit in this summary, nor in the Manifesto itself. If Marx, born a Jew, was an antisemite it would not be uncommon for many in the mid 19th Century and even today are antisemites. No where is genocide a practice unless one comports revolution as a form of it.

SparkNotes: The Communist Manifesto: Summary

Once again, Socialism in Western Europe is market based and egalitarian - China and Russia - each having a power elite which pulls the strings is not an example of the latter even though both have market economies (note: not free markets, as the State does not have absolute control of the economy). The RED SCARE is ironic in the sense that both China an Russia are run by conservatives, and like the US, all reject equal rights, rejecting Pluralism (listen to Trump and Cruz as examples and evidence) and resistant to change.

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"

Excellent!
Exposing the asininity of posters is one of my guilty pleasures.....but it would be redundant in your case.

Lest any reader mistake your ability at a keyboard as representing either education or intelligence, this one sentence alone should identify your lack of either.
"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"



"Marxism–Leninismis a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of Marxism and Leninism, and seeks to establish socialist statesand develop them further. Marxist–Leninists espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of Marxism and Leninism, but generally they support the idea of avanguard party,one-party rule,state-dominance over the economy,internationalism, opposition tobourgeois democracy, and opposition tocapitalism.

It remains the official ideology of the ruling parties of China, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam, and was the official ideology of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union(CPSU) and the other ruling parties making up the Eastern Bloc.....

Marxism–Leninism first became a distinct philosophical movement in the Soviet Union during the 1920s, when Joseph Stalinand his supporters gained control of the Russian Communist Party (bolsheviks)."
Marxism–Leninism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia





And, on to the larger point....that particular phrase suggested by what you have under your hat....

...why is it that Democrat voters, Obama supporters, have the knee-jerk reaction to support and serve as apologists for Marxism, communism, and Stalin....

...yet snarl with anger at the mention of Nazis and Hitler???

1. Both doctrines can be traced to your fav, Karl Marx
2. By every single metric....Stalin and communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism,
3. Stalin slaughtered more than Hitler
4. And the Democrat Party stands for the very same things that the Communist Party did.

Clearly, indoctrination is indelible.....you serve as proof.


In short, I'm glad to see you're not letting education get in the way of your ignorance

First of all, you're an idiot. And second...nah, that pretty much covers it.

Well, golly gee, thanks so much for sharing. "by every single metric....Stalin and Communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism" strikes me as as an odd statement - at least you didn't claim Stalin and Communism wasn't 'worser' than Hitler and the Nazi Regime. Evil is what characterized both men and numbers can't account for the evil done under both totalitarian systems ruled by despots.

But what I find most odd is you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin and his regime. I've always sensed you are a fascist, this is more evidence to support such a theory.

"But what I find most odd is you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin and his regime. I've always sensed you are a fascist, this is more evidence to support such a theory."

Well.....look at you, you little worm, trying to wiggle out of this:"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

Let's review:

1. You said this: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

2. And, as though that wasn't stupid enough, you said this: "Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

That was you standing up for a pathological, homicidal murderer.'



3. I said this:"By every single metric....Stalin and communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism,..."

4. I never said what you claimed I said, this: "...you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin..."
I never said thing that would remotely indicate support of evil.
You are the only one who did that.

5. So....tell me.....on what basis do you find Stalin more favorable to you than Hitler.....
Notice I didn't identify either with Marx...because both ideologies come from Marx.


Both Nazism and Communism are Leftwing......as you are.

Now,,,,,show some appreciation for the education I provide to you....and answer the question: on what basis do you find Stalin more favorable to you than Hitler.....?

I don't find mass murder's or those that enable them (such as the NRA) favorable. I posted and you chose to ignore and spin your tail of ad hominems by claiming I did; the truth being I defined both Hitler and Stalin as evil, not one or the other "worser" as have you.

1. Did you say this: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

2. And this:"Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

3. "In introducing the Black Book, lead author Stephane Courtois, Director of Research at theCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique(CNRS) in Paris, offers the following rough breakdown of the numbers of people that communism killed:

USSR -- 20 million

China -- 65 million

Vietnam -- 1 million

North Korea -- 2 million

Cambodia -- 2 million

Eastern Europe -- 1 million

Latin America -- 150,000

Africa -- 1.7 million

Afghanistan -- 1.5 million

Communist movements, parties not in power -- 10,000

In total, this is not far short of 100 million deaths at the hands of a single ideology. Nothing like this has ever happened before.

But, in his book A Century of Violence in Soviet Russia, he reminds us not to forget the 5.5 million victims of famine in the Civil War and the 5 million in the artificial famine of the 1930s. Other respected authorities offer even higher numbers.
[There's your downtrodden, you moron.]


To talk openly about the history of communism is to talk openly about the history of the Left. And even among those who were not communists themselves, vast swathes inside the Leftist tradition stayed far too close to the communists for comfort.
[That would be you.]
So, how many did Communism kill? - The Commentator



Hey....just admit you're an imbecile so we can all go home....m'kay?

 

[Wry Catcher]

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"; genocide has been the practice of evil men and exists even today in ISIS and not explicitly stated but inherit in the words of many white men running today for the nomination in their party to be the next POTUS.

Let me mentor you with what may seem to be a childish link, but one which is clear as to the thinking of Marx and Engels at least in their words and efforts to publish the Manifesto. Note that racism, slavery and murder are not explicit in this summary, nor in the Manifesto itself. If Marx, born a Jew, was an antisemite it would not be uncommon for many in the mid 19th Century and even today are antisemites. No where is genocide a practice unless one comports revolution as a form of it.

SparkNotes: The Communist Manifesto: Summary

Once again, Socialism in Western Europe is market based and egalitarian - China and Russia - each having a power elite which pulls the strings is not an example of the latter even though both have market economies (note: not free markets, as the State does not have absolute control of the economy). The RED SCARE is ironic in the sense that both China an Russia are run by conservatives, and like the US, all reject equal rights, rejecting Pluralism (listen to Trump and Cruz as examples and evidence) and resistant to change.

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"; genocide has been the practice of evil men and exists even today in ISIS and not explicitly stated but inherit in the words of many white men running today for the nomination in their party to be the next POTUS.

Let me mentor you with what may seem to be a childish link, but one which is clear as to the thinking of Marx and Engels at least in their words and efforts to publish the Manifesto. Note that racism, slavery and murder are not explicit in this summary, nor in the Manifesto itself. If Marx, born a Jew, was an antisemite it would not be uncommon for many in the mid 19th Century and even today are antisemites. No where is genocide a practice unless one comports revolution as a form of it.

SparkNotes: The Communist Manifesto: Summary

Once again, Socialism in Western Europe is market based and egalitarian - China and Russia - each having a power elite which pulls the strings is not an example of the latter even though both have market economies (note: not free markets, as the State does not have absolute control of the economy). The RED SCARE is ironic in the sense that both China an Russia are run by conservatives, and like the US, all reject equal rights, rejecting Pluralism (listen to Trump and Cruz as examples and evidence) and resistant to change.

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"

Excellent!
Exposing the asininity of posters is one of my guilty pleasures.....but it would be redundant in your case.

Lest any reader mistake your ability at a keyboard as representing either education or intelligence, this one sentence alone should identify your lack of either.
"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"



"Marxism–Leninismis a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of Marxism and Leninism, and seeks to establish socialist statesand develop them further. Marxist–Leninists espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of Marxism and Leninism, but generally they support the idea of avanguard party,one-party rule,state-dominance over the economy,internationalism, opposition tobourgeois democracy, and opposition tocapitalism.

It remains the official ideology of the ruling parties of China, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam, and was the official ideology of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union(CPSU) and the other ruling parties making up the Eastern Bloc.....

Marxism–Leninism first became a distinct philosophical movement in the Soviet Union during the 1920s, when Joseph Stalinand his supporters gained control of the Russian Communist Party (bolsheviks)."
Marxism–Leninism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia





And, on to the larger point....that particular phrase suggested by what you have under your hat....

...why is it that Democrat voters, Obama supporters, have the knee-jerk reaction to support and serve as apologists for Marxism, communism, and Stalin....

...yet snarl with anger at the mention of Nazis and Hitler???

1. Both doctrines can be traced to your fav, Karl Marx
2. By every single metric....Stalin and communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism,
3. Stalin slaughtered more than Hitler
4. And the Democrat Party stands for the very same things that the Communist Party did.

Clearly, indoctrination is indelible.....you serve as proof.


In short, I'm glad to see you're not letting education get in the way of your ignorance

First of all, you're an idiot. And second...nah, that pretty much covers it.

Well, golly gee, thanks so much for sharing. "by every single metric....Stalin and Communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism" strikes me as as an odd statement - at least you didn't claim Stalin and Communism wasn't 'worser' than Hitler and the Nazi Regime. Evil is what characterized both men and numbers can't account for the evil done under both totalitarian systems ruled by despots.

But what I find most odd is you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin and his regime. I've always sensed you are a fascist, this is more evidence to support such a theory.

"But what I find most odd is you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin and his regime. I've always sensed you are a fascist, this is more evidence to support such a theory."

Well.....look at you, you little worm, trying to wiggle out of this:"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

Let's review:

1. You said this: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

2. And, as though that wasn't stupid enough, you said this: "Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

That was you standing up for a pathological, homicidal murderer.'



3. I said this:"By every single metric....Stalin and communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism,..."

4. I never said what you claimed I said, this: "...you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin..."
I never said thing that would remotely indicate support of evil.
You are the only one who did that.

5. So....tell me.....on what basis do you find Stalin more favorable to you than Hitler.....
Notice I didn't identify either with Marx...because both ideologies come from Marx.


Both Nazism and Communism are Leftwing......as you are.

Now,,,,,show some appreciation for the education I provide to you....and answer the question: on what basis do you find Stalin more favorable to you than Hitler.....?

I don't find mass murder's or those that enable them (such as the NRA) favorable. I posted and you chose to ignore and spin your tail of ad hominems by claiming I did; the truth being I defined both Hitler and Stalin as evil, not one or the other "worser" as have you.

1. Did you say this: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

2. And this:"Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

3. "In introducing the Black Book, lead author Stephane Courtois, Director of Research at theCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique(CNRS) in Paris, offers the following rough breakdown of the numbers of people that communism killed:

USSR -- 20 million

China -- 65 million

Vietnam -- 1 million

North Korea -- 2 million

Cambodia -- 2 million

Eastern Europe -- 1 million

Latin America -- 150,000

Africa -- 1.7 million

Afghanistan -- 1.5 million

Communist movements, parties not in power -- 10,000

In total, this is not far short of 100 million deaths at the hands of a single ideology. Nothing like this has ever happened before.

But, in his book A Century of Violence in Soviet Russia, he reminds us not to forget the 5.5 million victims of famine in the Civil War and the 5 million in the artificial famine of the 1930s. Other respected authorities offer even higher numbers.
[There's your downtrodden, you moron.]


To talk openly about the history of communism is to talk openly about the history of the Left. And even among those who were not communists themselves, vast swathes inside the Leftist tradition stayed far too close to the communists for comfort.
[That would be you.]
So, how many did Communism kill? - The Commentator



Hey....just admit you're an imbecile so we can all go home?

Your biases + your single mindedness (closed mind) limit your ability to reason. As has been said over and over again there are liars, damn liars and statistics. How many of those deaths were related to the preservation of the powering elite, and nothing to do with Communism, per se? How many killed by Stalin, a result of his experience in his formative years (read his bios)? Your simplistic thinking corrupts reality and combined with your narcissism creates someone - much like Stalin - who in a word is a misanthrope.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"

Excellent!
Exposing the asininity of posters is one of my guilty pleasures.....but it would be redundant in your case.

Lest any reader mistake your ability at a keyboard as representing either education or intelligence, this one sentence alone should identify your lack of either.
"Marxism had nothing to the with the murder of millions"



"Marxism–Leninismis a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of Marxism and Leninism, and seeks to establish socialist statesand develop them further. Marxist–Leninists espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of Marxism and Leninism, but generally they support the idea of avanguard party,one-party rule,state-dominance over the economy,internationalism, opposition tobourgeois democracy, and opposition tocapitalism.

It remains the official ideology of the ruling parties of China, Cuba, Laos, and Vietnam, and was the official ideology of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union(CPSU) and the other ruling parties making up the Eastern Bloc.....

Marxism–Leninism first became a distinct philosophical movement in the Soviet Union during the 1920s, when Joseph Stalinand his supporters gained control of the Russian Communist Party (bolsheviks)."
Marxism–Leninism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia





And, on to the larger point....that particular phrase suggested by what you have under your hat....

...why is it that Democrat voters, Obama supporters, have the knee-jerk reaction to support and serve as apologists for Marxism, communism, and Stalin....

...yet snarl with anger at the mention of Nazis and Hitler???

1. Both doctrines can be traced to your fav, Karl Marx
2. By every single metric....Stalin and communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism,
3. Stalin slaughtered more than Hitler
4. And the Democrat Party stands for the very same things that the Communist Party did.

Clearly, indoctrination is indelible.....you serve as proof.


In short, I'm glad to see you're not letting education get in the way of your ignorance

First of all, you're an idiot. And second...nah, that pretty much covers it.

Well, golly gee, thanks so much for sharing. "by every single metric....Stalin and Communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism" strikes me as as an odd statement - at least you didn't claim Stalin and Communism wasn't 'worser' than Hitler and the Nazi Regime. Evil is what characterized both men and numbers can't account for the evil done under both totalitarian systems ruled by despots.

But what I find most odd is you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin and his regime. I've always sensed you are a fascist, this is more evidence to support such a theory.

"But what I find most odd is you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin and his regime. I've always sensed you are a fascist, this is more evidence to support such a theory."

Well.....look at you, you little worm, trying to wiggle out of this:"Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

Let's review:

1. You said this: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

2. And, as though that wasn't stupid enough, you said this: "Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

That was you standing up for a pathological, homicidal murderer.'



3. I said this:"By every single metric....Stalin and communism was far worse than Hitler and Nazism,..."

4. I never said what you claimed I said, this: "...you, by comparison, find Hitler and the Nazi Regime less culpable of evil than Stalin..."
I never said thing that would remotely indicate support of evil.
You are the only one who did that.

5. So....tell me.....on what basis do you find Stalin more favorable to you than Hitler.....
Notice I didn't identify either with Marx...because both ideologies come from Marx.


Both Nazism and Communism are Leftwing......as you are.

Now,,,,,show some appreciation for the education I provide to you....and answer the question: on what basis do you find Stalin more favorable to you than Hitler.....?

I don't find mass murder's or those that enable them (such as the NRA) favorable. I posted and you chose to ignore and spin your tail of ad hominems by claiming I did; the truth being I defined both Hitler and Stalin as evil, not one or the other "worser" as have you.

1. Did you say this: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

2. And this:"Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"

3. "In introducing the Black Book, lead author Stephane Courtois, Director of Research at theCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique(CNRS) in Paris, offers the following rough breakdown of the numbers of people that communism killed:

USSR -- 20 million

China -- 65 million

Vietnam -- 1 million

North Korea -- 2 million

Cambodia -- 2 million

Eastern Europe -- 1 million

Latin America -- 150,000

Africa -- 1.7 million

Afghanistan -- 1.5 million

Communist movements, parties not in power -- 10,000

In total, this is not far short of 100 million deaths at the hands of a single ideology. Nothing like this has ever happened before.

But, in his book A Century of Violence in Soviet Russia, he reminds us not to forget the 5.5 million victims of famine in the Civil War and the 5 million in the artificial famine of the 1930s. Other respected authorities offer even higher numbers.
[There's your downtrodden, you moron.]


To talk openly about the history of communism is to talk openly about the history of the Left. And even among those who were not communists themselves, vast swathes inside the Leftist tradition stayed far too close to the communists for comfort.
[That would be you.]
So, how many did Communism kill? - The Commentator



Hey....just admit you're an imbecile so we can all go home?

Your biases + your single mindedness (closed mind) limit your ability to reason. As has been said over and over again there are liars, damn liars and statistics. How many of those deaths were related to the preservation of the powering elite, and nothing to do with Communism, per se? How many killed by Stalin, a result of his experience in his formative years (read his bios)? Your simplistic thinking corrupts reality and combined with your narcissism creates someone - much like Stalin - who in a word is a misanthrope.

Your problem is with my depth of education, and your dearth of same.

Everything I posted was linked and sourced....plus....even most government high school grads know this is simply absurd:
1. You said this: "Marxism had nothing to do with the murders of millions..."

2. And, as though that wasn't stupid enough, you said this: "Do you not understand that Marx supported the down trodden"


Be sure to let me know when you're ready to admit to being an imbecile.

Time's a wastin.'

 

[Oldstyle]

The USPS by law has to deliver everywhere. UPS and Fed Ex do not. If a route isn't profitable then they aren't going to provide service there. The USPS has no choice. It's one of the reasons why their business model is more expensive than UPS and Fed Ex!

You really know nothing about this topic, Faun...and prove it more conclusively with each successive post!

More nonsense. Do you ever stop making shit up in your failed attempt to support your idiocy?

They use the USPS because it's cheaper ...

For FedEx and UPS, a Cheaper Route: the Post Office

They use USPS because the Postal Service by law has to deliver everywhere. So Fed Ex and UPS deliver on profitable routes and uses the Postal Service to deliver to addresses that are not profitable. The only reason the USPS survives with that business "model" is that they get billions from the US Treasury in loans that they will never pay back.

And yet, I just posted an article stating they use the USPS because it's cheaper. You're more demented than i thought if you think I'm taking your word over a factual article.

LOL...it's only "cheaper" because the Postal Service is essentially subsidized by the US Treasury! What part of that concept can't you wrap your oh so small brain around!

No, you're still wrong. It's cheaper because they don't have to turn a profit.

It's "cheaper" because part of the cost is picked up by us...what part of that can't you understand? If the Postal Service couldn't borrow money that they'll never pay back from the US Treasury then they wouldn't be able to stay in business delivering for that amount.

 

[Faun]

More nonsense. Do you ever stop making shit up in your failed attempt to support your idiocy?

They use the USPS because it's cheaper ...

For FedEx and UPS, a Cheaper Route: the Post Office

They use USPS because the Postal Service by law has to deliver everywhere. So Fed Ex and UPS deliver on profitable routes and uses the Postal Service to deliver to addresses that are not profitable. The only reason the USPS survives with that business "model" is that they get billions from the US Treasury in loans that they will never pay back.

And yet, I just posted an article stating they use the USPS because it's cheaper. You're more demented than i thought if you think I'm taking your word over a factual article.

LOL...it's only "cheaper" because the Postal Service is essentially subsidized by the US Treasury! What part of that concept can't you wrap your oh so small brain around!

No, you're still wrong. It's cheaper because they don't have to turn a profit.

No, you're still wrong, if the USPS wasn't subsidized by the federal government, it would not be cheaper.

You still have no ******* clue what you're talking about. You actually think making shit up as you go along is a cogent argument.

Up until about 10 years ago, the post office was completely self-sufficient from selling postage stamps and charging for their services. They received no federal subsidies and they were still far cheaper than private competition. They're only receiving Federal subsidies now because they've been losing money over the last 10 years due to competition with the private sector and the internet. Even with federal subsidies, they still get the job done cheaper. Again, because there is no markup for profit.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Trump tells the people what they want to hear, demagogues lead by appealing to the emotions and prejudices of the people, at least those persons who are biddable and ruled by their emotions.

what politician does not tell people what they want to hear?....

I can't answer that beyond what I've posted many times: watch their feet, not their lips (it is not what they say, it is what they do).

The GOP of the past needs to be destroyed, Poach more RINOs...

Then what?

Sit on your hands while the opposing party is in the white house?
And if the Dems decide to do the same?

When and where does anything get accomplished?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

If I recall...you folks on the left declared the GOP "dead" back in 2008 when Barry won the Oval Office and the Democrats had huge majorities in both the House and Senate. So how did that work out again?

It worked out to a two term democratic president and another democrat on deck to step in.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

More nonsense. Do you ever stop making shit up in your failed attempt to support your idiocy?

They use the USPS because it's cheaper ...

For FedEx and UPS, a Cheaper Route: the Post Office

They use USPS because the Postal Service by law has to deliver everywhere. So Fed Ex and UPS deliver on profitable routes and uses the Postal Service to deliver to addresses that are not profitable. The only reason the USPS survives with that business "model" is that they get billions from the US Treasury in loans that they will never pay back.

And yet, I just posted an article stating they use the USPS because it's cheaper. You're more demented than i thought if you think I'm taking your word over a factual article.

LOL...it's only "cheaper" because the Postal Service is essentially subsidized by the US Treasury! What part of that concept can't you wrap your oh so small brain around!

No, you're still wrong. It's cheaper because they don't have to turn a profit.

It's "cheaper" because part of the cost is picked up by us...what part of that can't you understand? If the Postal Service couldn't borrow money that they'll never pay back from the US Treasury then they wouldn't be able to stay in business delivering for that amount.

Except they don't borrow money. They were very profitable before Repub in Congress decided they should fund their retiree funds for the next 75 years.

Be Careful What You Assume | USPS Office of Inspector General

 

[kaz]

A Libertarian's "Wet Dream" (I'm almost embarrassed to quote this phrase) is that each man and woman is an island and the bonds that hold society together are the chains of tyranny

You need to actually learn what it is if you want to post on the subject without flaunting your ignorance. This is just bull

A subtle ad hominem, but let's put my so called ignorance to the test. I have read the following in detail, have you?

Platform

The Platform of the Libertarian Party is deficient of keen practical sense.

Ignoring your fallacy that the Libertarian party speaks for all libertarians, it still doesn't say that.

You're applying the old adage, if you can't dazzle them with your wit, baffle them with your bull shit. Oh yeah, here's a link that doesn't support what I said, read it! Bam!

 

[Rustic]

Trump tells the people what they want to hear, demagogues lead by appealing to the emotions and prejudices of the people, at least those persons who are biddable and ruled by their emotions.

what politician does not tell people what they want to hear?....

I can't answer that beyond what I've posted many times: watch their feet, not their lips (it is not what they say, it is what they do).

The GOP of the past needs to be destroyed, Poach more RINOs...

Then what?

Sit on your hands while the opposing party is in the white house?
And if the Dems decide to do the same?

When and where does anything get accomplished?

More laws and bills passed = less freedom

 

[Little-Acorn]

Thanks Trump, for destroying the GOP


Nice try... but Trump isn't the one destroying the Republican party.

The destruction started decades ago, long before Trump ever appeared on the scene. And it's been consistently done by the "leaders" of the Republican party.