Thank You Iran

[Flanders]

The UN-loving global government crowd is losing control:

How the White House lost control on Iran
By Jennifer Rubin April 14 at 6:24 PM

How the White House lost control on Iran - The Washington Post​

I always held scant hope that UN-loving traitors in Congress would ever pass HR 1146 —— now HR 75. Happily, hope is growing thanks to Iran. Iran, with the help of the global government crowd, will do it for us. That’s why you gotta love the Iran deal when the rubber meets the road:

1. Iran walks out of the UN if it does not get the bomb as promised.

2. Iran gets the bomb and drops it on Israel —— effectively blowing up the United Nations in the process. (Sorry about that, Israel)

You cannot get a better deal for Americans, for America’s independence, and for free people everywhere if you loved HR 1146 —— reintroduced as HR 75.

American Sovereignty Restoration Act 2013

Text of H.R. 75 American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2013 Introduced version - GovTrack.us​

 

[Manonthestreet]

Muslims want the land and prefer their slaughter and atrocities to be up close and personal.... I can see them bombing others.....probably not Israel

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The credit goes to the Repubs for telling Iran they could have any weapon they want. Its all about the right's sabotage. They want to undermine, weaken and endanger the US so they can have their ground war.

Seven countries are working with President Obama to effect a peaceful resolution and all that work will be for nothing because of Republican treason.

 

[cnm]

Hopefully Iran and the other negotiating powers will freeze out the US so the batshit crazies become totally irrelevant.

 

[Manonthestreet]

The credit goes to the Repubs for telling Iran they could have any weapon they want. Its all about the right's sabotage. They want to undermine, weaken and endanger the US so they can have their ground war.

Seven countries are working with President Obama to effect a peaceful resolution and all that work will be for nothing because of Republican treason.

Actually they opose it too which is why it wasn't signed

 

[Flanders]

The credit goes to the Repubs for telling Iran they could have any weapon they want. Its all about the right's sabotage.

Hopefully Iran and the other negotiating powers will freeze out the US so the batshit crazies become totally irrelevant.

To Luddly Neddite & cnm: Why is that Lefties applaud bipartisanship whenever it helps Democrats betray the country, but piss and moan in unison whenever UNANIMOUS bipartisanship protects the country:

When was the last time a congressional middle finger to The One was unanimously displayed? 19-0. Good lord.

Oh my: Senate Foreign Relations Committee unanimously backs bill demanding congressional vote on Iran deal
posted at 4:41 pm on April 14, 2015 by Allahpundit

Oh my Senate Foreign Relations Committee unanimously backs bill demanding congressional vote on Iran deal Hot Air​

Or you are simply angry because Congress is inserting the red part right up your guy’s rear end!

 

[Roudy]

We have the weakest dumbest administration in a century and Iran saw its opportunity to fool the world and do what North Korea did. Any objective and knowledgable knows that based on its past behavior, Iran would have definitely violated the terms of the deal, and the "snap back" provision of the sanctions was bullshit, they would not snap back because the Europeans would stand to loose hundreds of billions should trade with Iran cease.

Iran is just using its threats towards Israel as a distraction for the Muslim world. The Iranians know that Israel can turn Iran into charcoal in less than half an hour should it attempt anything.

Iran will first use a nuclear weapon as blackmail to overthrow the Sunni Saudis and enact a take over of Islam's holiest sites via its Shiite terrorist proxies in Yemen. Which is why the Sunni nations now fighting the Shiites in Yemen will unite with Israel and allow Israeli use of their airfields to bomb Iran.

The conflicts in the Middle East, including the Israeli Palestinian conflict are all about Islamic intolerance, always has, always will be.

 

[irosie91]

face it folks----nothing is changed by DA TALKS -----Iran will make a bomb and
which will INSPIRE Shiite shit WORLD WIDE----to give up their asses for allah
in more and more suicide operations. Sit tight----wait for videos of the mushroom
cloud produced by the TEST BOMB-------and shortly thereafter ----a huge
plethora of exploding asses

 

[Roudy]

The Sunnis will never let Iran get the bomb. Unfortately for the Iranian people, a vast majority of which want the Mullahs to be removed, many will be needlessly killed because the country has been held hostage by a radical Islamic terrorist regime for over 35 years.

 

[Bleipriester]

face it folks----nothing is changed by DA TALKS -----Iran will make a bomb and
which will INSPIRE Shiite shit WORLD WIDE----to give up their asses for allah
in more and more suicide operations. Sit tight----wait for videos of the mushroom
cloud produced by the TEST BOMB-------and shortly thereafter ----a huge
plethora of exploding asses

If Iran has the bomb, it has the bomb since years. But If Iran has the bomb since years and not yet tried to nuke Israel off the map, where is the threat?
Just look at Iran´s nuclear partnership with North Korea.

 

[irosie91]

The Sunnis will never let Iran get the bomb. Unfortately for the Iranian people, a vast majority of which want the Mullahs to be removed, many will be needlessly killed because the country has been held hostage by a radical Islamic terrorist regime for over 35 years.

It is by heavenly decree-----that SUNNIS far out number----Shiites-----I am
sure of it------I knew it when I first glanced at the little ugly ferret-----
ACHMADINEJAD-----especially when that NUT-----announced in the UN ---
before the entire array of different nations----"ISLAM IS THE RELIGION FOR
THE WHOLE WORLD" can someone explain to me where were the men
with the straight-jackets-----from Bellevue hospital----had they fallen
asleep in the padded rooms?

 

[Roudy]

face it folks----nothing is changed by DA TALKS -----Iran will make a bomb and
which will INSPIRE Shiite shit WORLD WIDE----to give up their asses for allah
in more and more suicide operations. Sit tight----wait for videos of the mushroom
cloud produced by the TEST BOMB-------and shortly thereafter ----a huge
plethora of exploding asses

If Iran has the bomb, it has the bomb since years. But If Iran has the bomb since years and not yet tried to nuke Israel off the map, where is the threat?
Just look at Iran´s nuclear partnership with North Korea.

Remember that N. Korea had many technical issues the first few times it conducted test detonations. Iran of course cannot even conduct tests, so if it does have the bomb, it might not be a functional one.

 

[irosie91]

face it folks----nothing is changed by DA TALKS -----Iran will make a bomb and
which will INSPIRE Shiite shit WORLD WIDE----to give up their asses for allah
in more and more suicide operations. Sit tight----wait for videos of the mushroom
cloud produced by the TEST BOMB-------and shortly thereafter ----a huge
plethora of exploding asses

If Iran has the bomb, it has the bomb since years. But If Iran has the bomb since years and not yet tried to nuke Israel off the map, where is the threat?
Just look at Iran´s nuclear partnership with North Korea.

captain blei-----lay off the rum----you are getting befuddled. Iran did not
make it yet------soon ---but not yet. Even then it will not nuke Israel--
Iranians are very careful people------Iran will find all sorts of uses for
FISS and FUSE by-products (they are also thrifty)

 

[Bleipriester]

face it folks----nothing is changed by DA TALKS -----Iran will make a bomb and
which will INSPIRE Shiite shit WORLD WIDE----to give up their asses for allah
in more and more suicide operations. Sit tight----wait for videos of the mushroom
cloud produced by the TEST BOMB-------and shortly thereafter ----a huge
plethora of exploding asses

If Iran has the bomb, it has the bomb since years. But If Iran has the bomb since years and not yet tried to nuke Israel off the map, where is the threat?
Just look at Iran´s nuclear partnership with North Korea.

Remember that N. Korea had many technical issues the first few times it conducted test detonations. Iran of course cannot even conduct tests, so if it does have the bomb, it might not be a functional one.

These are tactical nukes anyway. Not suitable for wiping out a country.

 

[Bleipriester]

face it folks----nothing is changed by DA TALKS -----Iran will make a bomb and
which will INSPIRE Shiite shit WORLD WIDE----to give up their asses for allah
in more and more suicide operations. Sit tight----wait for videos of the mushroom
cloud produced by the TEST BOMB-------and shortly thereafter ----a huge
plethora of exploding asses

If Iran has the bomb, it has the bomb since years. But If Iran has the bomb since years and not yet tried to nuke Israel off the map, where is the threat?
Just look at Iran´s nuclear partnership with North Korea.

captain blei-----lay off the rum----you are getting befuddled. Iran did not
make it yet------soon ---but not yet. Even then it will not nuke Israel--
Iranians are very careful people------Iran will find all sorts of uses for
FISS and FUSE by-products (they are also thrifty)

Yeah, this is what we hear since many years. Iran close to nuke...

 

[Flanders]

If Iran has the bomb, it has the bomb since years. But If Iran has the bomb since years and not yet tried to nuke Israel off the map, where is the threat?
Just look at Iran´s nuclear partnership with North Korea.

To Bleipriester: The threat is real for the future. The issue is our dangerous foreign policy more than it is about an imminent threat from Iran and/or North Korea. See this thread:

Organized Nuclear a.k.a. Organized Crime US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Remember that N. Korea had many technical issues the first few times it conducted test detonations. Iran of course cannot even conduct tests, so if it does have the bomb, it might not be a functional one.

To Roudy: Do not ignore the evolution of a weapon. The torpedo is good example.

Sinking of USS Housatonic - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia​

More recently, John Kerry opposed the MDS (Missile Defense Shield) before North Korea tested its first nuclear weapon in 2006. North Korea now has the nucleus for ICBMs.

​

You can bet that Kim Jong-un will not arm his rockets with pamphlets extolling the virtues of Communism.

When Kerry ran for president, I assume he did not know how close North Korea was to joining the nuclear club. Even if Kerry did not know in 2004, he was wrong because he did know that China and Russian had long range ballistic missiles.

Taqiyya the Liar cut funding for the MDS. To reduce funding for the MDS slows, and possibly stops, the evolution of the Missile Defense Shield.

Taqiyya the Liar also said he will support the MDS if the technology proves workable. In doublespeak “workable” means stopping every missile fired at America and its allies. Logically, the MDS is not working if 90 missiles are stopped out of a 100 missiles fired.

“If it ain’t perfect it is no good” has always been the way Democrats opposed the MDS. (Has-To-Be-Perfect does not apply to welfare state programs.)

The flaw in 'Has-To-Be-Perfect' thinking is that defensive technology evolves in the same way technology evolved for any offensive weapon you’d care to name.

None of today’s weapons started out 100 percent effective. The military application for WW I fighter planes is the ancestor of long-range bombers. Put that fact in context: America might very well have lost the Cold War were it not for the Strategic Air Command.

Considering UN inspection are abject failures , the US better start concentrating on stopping delivery systems instead of the B.S. about stopping nuclear proliferation? Since that opportunity is gone forever, the MDS is absolutely necessary in the face of nuclear and ballistic missile proliferation.

 

[Roudy]

If Iran has the bomb, it has the bomb since years. But If Iran has the bomb since years and not yet tried to nuke Israel off the map, where is the threat?
Just look at Iran´s nuclear partnership with North Korea.

To Bleipriester: The threat is real for the future. The issue is our dangerous foreign policy more than it is about an imminent threat from Iran and/or North Korea. See this thread:

Organized Nuclear a.k.a. Organized Crime US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Remember that N. Korea had many technical issues the first few times it conducted test detonations. Iran of course cannot even conduct tests, so if it does have the bomb, it might not be a functional one.

To Roudy: Do not ignore the evolution of a weapon. The torpedo is good example.

Sinking of USS Housatonic - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia​

More recently, John Kerry opposed the MDS (Missile Defense Shield) before North Korea tested its first nuclear weapon in 2006. North Korea now has the nucleus for ICBMs.

​

You can bet that Kim Jong-un will not arm his rockets with pamphlets extolling the virtues of Communism.

When Kerry ran for president, I assume he did not know how close North Korea was to joining the nuclear club. Even if Kerry did not know in 2004, he was wrong because he did know that China and Russian had long range ballistic missiles.

Taqiyya the Liar cut funding for the MDS. To reduce funding for the MDS slows, and possibly stops, the evolution of the Missile Defense Shield.

Taqiyya the Liar also said he will support the MDS if the technology proves workable. In doublespeak “workable” means stopping every missile fired at America and its allies. Logically, the MDS is not working if 90 missiles are stopped out of a 100 missiles fired.

“If it ain’t perfect it is no good” has always been the way Democrats opposed the MDS. (Has-To-Be-Perfect does not apply to welfare state programs.)

The flaw in 'Has-To-Be-Perfect' thinking is that defensive technology evolves in the same way technology evolved for any offensive weapon you’d care to name.

None of today’s weapons started out 100 percent effective. The military application for WW I fighter planes is the ancestor of long-range bombers. Put that fact in context: America might very well have lost the Cold War were it not for the Strategic Air Command.

Considering UN inspection are abject failures , the US better start concentrating on stopping delivery systems instead of the B.S. about stopping nuclear proliferation? Since that opportunity is gone forever, the MDS is absolutely necessary in the face of nuclear and ballistic missile proliferation.

Agreed. The Sunni Arabs will give Israel all access it needs to conduct a successful operation. Remember, there were rumors about a year ago that Israelis were using Saudi airfields to practice a strike on Iran.

 

[irosie91]

[QUOTE="Bleipriester, post:
These are tactical nukes anyway. Not suitable for wiping out a country.[/QUOTE]

what does that ^^^^^^ mean?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Muslims want the land and prefer their slaughter and atrocities to be up close and personal.... I can see them bombing others.....probably not Israel

nice fairy tale there. Its only the united states government and Israel who are bombing others with their slaughter and atrocities.

Yeah Israel gets so much special treatment for their slaughtering of children everyday so of course it wont be them.

wakey wakey.

Newer you tube video about AIPAC US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[irosie91]

[QUOTE="Bleipriester, post:
These are tactical nukes anyway. Not suitable for wiping out a country.

what does that ^^^^^^ mean?[/QUOTE]

I appreciate your appreciation Flanders BUT WHAT DOES IT MEAN?