Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Only because congress keeps it's cajones in a jar on the upper right shelf and doesn't do it's friggin job. You dinged Obama for taking charge with a do nothing Congress. Well, Trump is doing the same thing just not as smart.But it's trump with the real powerAlso thank god for 'our' right to impeach a imposter and felonious so-called president tRump, who committed treason too many times as a Russian puppet and a antigovernment conspiring GOPer crony in violation of U.S. Constitutional law and the will of the majority.The perpetrator was armed with a knife. This woman would have been dead if not for her 2nd Amendment right. Of course, the left have been waging a disgusting war on women for decades so they wouldn't have cared. In fact, I suspect that's why they want to disarm everyone. More female victims for them. Demand men have access to women's locker rooms, showers, and rest rooms and then disarm them.
Woman leaves would-be attacker bloody and wounded
Be careful what you wish. Have you taken a good look at pence? Remember why most of us didn't vote for McCain? Not because of McCain but there was an even chance his VP would become President. I think if the Congress grows a pair like it is supposed to have they can negate most of Trumps nonsense for the next couple of years.
Wrong again dead wrongThe founders were brilliant men. They built in a system to achieve exactly what you are advocating. Convince people you are right and legally and properly amend the U.S. Constitution. Short of that, you don’t have a leg to stand on.I don't advocate throwing it out but I do suggest we make it comply with the modern times.
Daryl has called it a night......I just proved what I contended. He needs time to digest it.
What you have proven is that you are a nutcase.
The founders supporters are the same that supports trump
They also had a wisdom test for voters that they called a property test
And would not let under 21 vote
Trump will bring a more accurate logic test for voters
Trump will be the hero of the world
Um...no. No, you didn’t. In fact, you actually agreed with me. Here it is again for the class:Ahahahahahaha!!! He couldn’t do it. One can always count on the left to cry “no need” when challenged to provide proof of something!No need. All judicial decisions involve both interpretation and application. As implicit as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.Please cite for us the Article and Section of the U.S. Constitution that grants the Supreme Court the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself.
Don’t worry...I’ll wait.
--------------
Next batter, please.
But I did, cupcake.
Tell us, how many voices do you hear in your head at any given time?You are right, there is actually nothing in the constitution itself that gives the Supreme Court that right.
Patriot is the winner !!!
I couldn't do what, Junior? Prove that the US Supreme Court has the power to interpret and apply law?Ahahahahahaha!!! He couldn’t do it. One can always count on the left to cry “no need” when challenged to provide proof of something!No need. All judicial decisions involve both interpretation and application. As implicit as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.Please cite for us the Article and Section of the U.S. Constitution that grants the Supreme Court the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself.The United States Supreme Court has spent the past 229 years doing just that... interpreting the Constitution.
Don’t worry...I’ll wait.
--------------
Next batter, please.
Sure, Princess, you go right on trying to sell the idea that the US Supreme Court does not interpret and apply law, every day.God I love owning ignorant left-wing lunatics. Give a lefty enough rope and they will hang themselves. Then they run away. I loooooove when they say “no need” when challenged to provide proof to one of their idiotic claims.No need. All judicial decisions involve both interpretation and application. As implicit as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.Please cite for us the Article and Section of the U.S. Constitution that grants the Supreme Court the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself.The United States Supreme Court has spent the past 229 years doing just that... interpreting the Constitution.
Don’t worry...I’ll wait.
--------------
Next batter, please.
If you have to explain it, you've already lost your audience. Silly explanation, by the way....The U.S Constitution that was signed in September of 1787 or the corporate charter constitution via the Act of 1871 that established Washington, D.C as the corporate headquarters of USA.INC? BTW, you can't be both an American citizen AND a U.S citizen...
So... law is not law, but merely "public policy"?...there is soooo much you have absolutely no clue about. USA.INC doesn't have "laws", they pass acts, statutes, codes, ordinances and what is called "public policy"...
Incorrect. I am telling you that you will abide by the laws of the United States. Guaranteed....As far as you telling me that I WILL do "this or that" even if it infringes on my God given right to exist here...
Ahhhhh... got it... that "sociopath" profile is beginning to come into focus.... because 50.0001 percent decided that one of those rights must be restricted? LOL! Yeah, you keep believing that. I didn't exchange my rights for privileges bestowed upon me by this "benevolent" corporate construct that you call "gubermint"...
A communist advocates good in common and the nationalizing of the means of production and forcible enactment of economic policies....If it walks like a duck, quacks like one, has webbed feet and a bill? I don't need an expert to tell me what I see with my own eyes......."I am by no means a 'communist'."...
Hmmmmm.... sociopathic, or paranoid? It's all a Worldwide Joooo-ish Kornspiracy, I tellz ya!...Good for them! They are free to adhere to those "restrictions" to their rights.....doesn't mean that I am obligated to join them. I have no doubt that their willingness to acquiesce to draconian rules is due to false flag staged shootings and attacks like what was done in Europe under "Operation Gladio"....keep the sheeple scared, play on their emotions and they will turn over more control like the DHS capstone drill in Newtown, Ct, the Boston bombing, the Pulse nightclub shooting, etc, etc......."Most Americans who favor more rational firearms control are not 'communists', either"...
Yes. Never fired a shot in anger. Qualified expert with M14, Sharpshooter with M16 and .45 1911. Irrelevant.Were you armed with an army issued rifle then? If so, I am not impressed......"As a matter of fact, I spent a couple of years as a kid, wearing Uncle Sammy green, flipping the bird at the Soviets"...
Oh, you're playing to the gun-owning segment of the audience, all protestations to the contrary notwithstanding.I have no "base" and I have very few peers......"Your irrational characterization will get you nowhere outside of your own base"...
You tell 'em, Sparky....I am not trying to win "converts". I simply provide information and smack on dumb asses like yourself that are utterly clueless...
Tell it to the judge, son... tell it to the judge... if you walk away from the law enforcement encounter, that is.See my first comment and I have already stated very blatantly here that I will not comply with any act, statute, code or ordinance of USA.INC that restricts my rights in any way, shape, manner or form. So, when can I expect you to show up and "enforce"?......"As to being out front, for enforcement purposes... defy the laws of the United States and we'll talk about it" ....
Jesus of Nazareth taught "Love Thy Neighbor" and "Turn the Other Cheek"; not "Turn the Banana Clip Over" ....Jesus doesn't expect his followers to be totally defenseless and he did pick up a whip and ran out the moneychangers that bought up shekels (that didn't have a pagan symbol on it) and then charged a premium for those wanting to donate to their temple...
Me too. On the other hand, we have folks who are happy to poke holes in Right Wing Nutjob arguments using God in connection with firearms....I find it hilarious how leftards lamely use the "Jesus" card in a pathetic attempt to get those to comply...
I'm not trying to sway you. I'm merely poking holes in your arguments about the nature of US law, and God-and-firearms....Allow me to sum it all up, I know what the "end game" is as I have connected enough of the dots to see the big picture. Your lame attempts at rebuttal do not "move or sway" me in the slightest. Hope this helps!
Um...no. No, you didn’t. In fact, you actually agreed with me. Here it is again for the class:Ahahahahahaha!!! He couldn’t do it. One can always count on the left to cry “no need” when challenged to provide proof of something!No need. All judicial decisions involve both interpretation and application. As implicit as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.
--------------
Next batter, please.
But I did, cupcake.
Tell us, how many voices do you hear in your head at any given time?You are right, there is actually nothing in the constitution itself that gives the Supreme Court that right.
Patriot is the winner !!!
The winner of what? How many laws that he wants and can never have? How many things he can't get his own way because the majority of the US Citizens won't allow it? That the Federal Republic stands in spite of him? Wow, if that's winning, go figure.
I couldn't do what, Junior? Prove that the US Supreme Court has the power to interpret and apply law?Ahahahahahaha!!! He couldn’t do it. One can always count on the left to cry “no need” when challenged to provide proof of something!No need. All judicial decisions involve both interpretation and application. As implicit as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.Please cite for us the Article and Section of the U.S. Constitution that grants the Supreme Court the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself.The United States Supreme Court has spent the past 229 years doing just that... interpreting the Constitution.
Don’t worry...I’ll wait.
--------------
Next batter, please.
Sure, Princess, you go right on trying to sell the idea that the US Supreme Court does not interpret and apply law, every day.God I love owning ignorant left-wing lunatics. Give a lefty enough rope and they will hang themselves. Then they run away. I loooooove when they say “no need” when challenged to provide proof to one of their idiotic claims.No need. All judicial decisions involve both interpretation and application. As implicit as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.Please cite for us the Article and Section of the U.S. Constitution that grants the Supreme Court the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself.The United States Supreme Court has spent the past 229 years doing just that... interpreting the Constitution.
Don’t worry...I’ll wait.
--------------
Next batter, please.
Um...no. No, you didn’t. In fact, you actually agreed with me. Here it is again for the class:Ahahahahahaha!!! He couldn’t do it. One can always count on the left to cry “no need” when challenged to provide proof of something!
But I did, cupcake.
Tell us, how many voices do you hear in your head at any given time?You are right, there is actually nothing in the constitution itself that gives the Supreme Court that right.
Patriot is the winner !!!
The winner of what? How many laws that he wants and can never have? How many things he can't get his own way because the majority of the US Citizens won't allow it? That the Federal Republic stands in spite of him? Wow, if that's winning, go figure.
You lost in that debate
Sure, Princess, you go right on trying to sell the idea that the US Supreme Court does not interpret and apply law, every day.God I love owning ignorant left-wing lunatics. Give a lefty enough rope and they will hang themselves. Then they run away. I loooooove when they say “no need” when challenged to provide proof to one of their idiotic claims.No need. All judicial decisions involve both interpretation and application. As implicit as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.Please cite for us the Article and Section of the U.S. Constitution that grants the Supreme Court the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself.The United States Supreme Court has spent the past 229 years doing just that... interpreting the Constitution.
Don’t worry...I’ll wait.
--------------
Next batter, please.
How could it possibly be otherwise, than the the SCOTUS must interpret and apply law?
Bought off congress and judges is the problem
All congress and supreme courts themselves and family and friends should be checked to see if they have received money
Bought off congress and judges is the problem
All congress and supreme courts themselves and family and friends should be checked to see if they have received money
Why, because they disagree with you? I don't agree with you either so where is my bribe?
the crooks have learned toSure, Princess, you go right on trying to sell the idea that the US Supreme Court does not interpret and apply law, every day.God I love owning ignorant left-wing lunatics. Give a lefty enough rope and they will hang themselves. Then they run away. I loooooove when they say “no need” when challenged to provide proof to one of their idiotic claims.No need. All judicial decisions involve both interpretation and application. As implicit as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.Please cite for us the Article and Section of the U.S. Constitution that grants the Supreme Court the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself.
Don’t worry...I’ll wait.
--------------
Next batter, please.
How could it possibly be otherwise, than the the SCOTUS must interpret and apply law?
And in the absence of Congress making a specific law, the Supreme Court can also make that law as well as the Executive Branch. For the last 10 years of so, both the Supreme Court and the sitting Presidents have been put into a place where they have had no choice since Congress is a complete mess and can't even handle the tough decisions.
Bought off congress and judges is the problem
All congress and supreme courts themselves and family and friends should be checked to see if they have received money
Why, because they disagree with you? I don't agree with you either so where is my bribe?
Jealousy with lower logic makes for losing debates like withthis one losing
the crooks have learned toSure, Princess, you go right on trying to sell the idea that the US Supreme Court does not interpret and apply law, every day.God I love owning ignorant left-wing lunatics. Give a lefty enough rope and they will hang themselves. Then they run away. I loooooove when they say “no need” when challenged to provide proof to one of their idiotic claims.No need. All judicial decisions involve both interpretation and application. As implicit as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.
--------------
Next batter, please.
How could it possibly be otherwise, than the the SCOTUS must interpret and apply law?
And in the absence of Congress making a specific law, the Supreme Court can also make that law as well as the Executive Branch. For the last 10 years of so, both the Supreme Court and the sitting Presidents have been put into a place where they have had no choice since Congress is a complete mess and can't even handle the tough decisions.
Pay off congress and the Supreme Court
Only true patriots cannot be bought off
Bought off congress and judges is the problem
All congress and supreme courts themselves and family and friends should be checked to see if they have received money
Why, because they disagree with you? I don't agree with you either so where is my bribe?
Jealousy with lower logic makes for losing debates like withthis one losing
You keep inflating your ego. Doesn't bother me one bit. I think a nap is in order, it bothers me so much.
1. This is completely off topicAlso thank god for 'our' right to impeach a imposter and felonious so-called president tRump, who committed treason too many times as a Russian puppet and a antigovernment conspiring GOPer crony in violation of U.S. Constitutional law and the will of the majority.
So that means We the People have spoken. If you can't get 2/3rd's of Congress and 3/4th's of the states, then accept the fact that We the People have spoken. That's how it works.Haven't you taken a look at our current government? They can't find a 2/3rds to agree that it's 2019.The founders were brilliant men. They built in a system to achieve exactly what you are advocating. Convince people you are right and legally and properly amend the U.S. Constitution. Short of that, you don’t have a leg to stand on.I don't advocate throwing it out but I do suggest we make it comply with the modern times.
