Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And...not for nothing, Internet Rambo...but if there were an “armed revolution”, you wouldn’t have a life to get on with. People like me wouldn’t even have to get off the couch. The U.S. military is almost exclusively right-wing. Never seen a special forces operator yet who was left-wing. So...careful what you wish for Internet Rambo.Hurry up with your Armed Revolution so we can get it over with and the rest of us can get on with our lives.
Please cite for us the Article and Section of the U.S. Constitution that grants the Supreme Court the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself.The United States Supreme Court has spent the past 229 years doing just that... interpreting the Constitution.
Correct. Except for military grade weaponry. Oh, and, automatic weapons (in many jurisdictions). And other restrictions already extant....I have the right to own any fucking firearm that I feel is necessary to not only defend me and mine...
It's all about how the Second is interpreted, mine good colleague, and that changes with the times, and the wishes of The People.
You're hallucinating, and, quite possibly, paranoid. Would you pass an obligatory Mental Health Exam as part of firearms licensing?... but to also have them in case little commie fucks like those of your ilk ever support a commie coup...
A great many, in fact, but not from a non-player....Questions?
You and those like you don't get to make that call.....though I am sure you wish you could.
Me? Pass a mental health exam? But of course but it's not a requirement nor would I comply if there was as I am not a de-facto employee of USA.INC.
I do hope, however, that you put your ass out in front to enforce compliance should you little commie fucks insist.
(snicker)
Jesus and self defense? Luke 22 verse 36....
I question all of you people's sanity. I'll have you know I have a paper from the VA Mental Health that states I am sane. Okay, I wasn't always that way but that was just an after affect of the job. But I am certified sane now and have the paper to prove it. But the rest of you are suspected as totally off your friggin rockers until you prove otherwise.
"Question" in one hand and take a shit in the other and see which one fills up first. One of many things about the leftard clown posse of sniveling commies that I find hilarious is the delusions of grandeur that afflicts them.
Leftards honestly believe that those that don't buy into their bullshit have to be "crazy"......examples?
#1 Anyone that isn't on the same page as they are when it comes to hating any and all that sit outside of their "big tent".
#2 Those that don't believe in their "collectivism" and "greater good" Marxist bullshit
#3 Those that want no part of their "social engineering/virtue signaling/politically correct" agenda.
Hell, the leftard clown posse sufferers of "arrested development" that worship at the feet of this corporate construct called "gubermint" amuse and repulse me on a daily basis. Leftards are clowns sans the make-up and a rodeo or circus gig.
Dude...repeating what I say as if it were your own thoughts and words is on the level of a 1st grader. You sound like an idiot. The bolder blue sentence above proves you’re being an immature troll because you’re pissed off over the fact that you just got your ass handed to you.And...not for nothing, Internet Rambo...but if there were an “armed revolution”, you wouldn’t have a life to get on with. People like me wouldn’t even have to get off the couch. The U.S. military is almost exclusively right-wing. Never seen a special forces operator yet who was left-wing. So...careful what you wish for Internet Rambo.Hurry up with your Armed Revolution so we can get it over with and the rest of us can get on with our lives.
Now you are saying you are special forces.
No need.Please cite for us the Article and Section of the U.S. Constitution that grants the Supreme Court the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself.The United States Supreme Court has spent the past 229 years doing just that... interpreting the Constitution.
Don’t worry...I’ll wait.
Indeed. And one of the ways to 'legally alter' a law is for the courts to reverse themselves on an issue.QUOTE] ...Once something is law, it is set in stone (until legally altered)...
Please cite for us the Article and Section of the U.S. Constitution that grants the Supreme Court the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself.The United States Supreme Court has spent the past 229 years doing just that... interpreting the Constitution.
Don’t worry...I’ll wait.
No need. All judicial decisions involve both interpretation and application. As implicit as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.Please cite for us the Article and Section of the U.S. Constitution that grants the Supreme Court the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself.The United States Supreme Court has spent the past 229 years doing just that... interpreting the Constitution.
Don’t worry...I’ll wait.
--------------
Next batter, please.
Dude...repeating what I say as if it were your own thoughts and words is on the level of a 1st grader. You sound like an idiot. The bolder blue sentence above proves you’re being an immature troll because you’re pissed off over the fact that you just got your ass handed to you.Now you are saying you are special forces.And...not for nothing, Internet Rambo...but if there were an “armed revolution”, you wouldn’t have a life to get on with. People like me wouldn’t even have to get off the couch. The U.S. military is almost exclusively right-wing. Never seen a special forces operator yet who was left-wing. So...careful what you wish for Internet Rambo.Hurry up with your Armed Revolution so we can get it over with and the rest of us can get on with our lives.
Ahahahahahaha!!! He couldn’t do it. One can always count on the left to cry “no need” when challenged to provide proof of something!No need. All judicial decisions involve both interpretation and application. As implicit as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.Please cite for us the Article and Section of the U.S. Constitution that grants the Supreme Court the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself.The United States Supreme Court has spent the past 229 years doing just that... interpreting the Constitution.
Don’t worry...I’ll wait.
--------------
Next batter, please.
Snowflake...we don’t operate under the “Articles of Confederation”. The moment the United States constitution was ratified by the states, the “Articles of Confederation” became null and void.It actually goes back to the Articles of Confederation
I know I’m right. Thank you for finally saying something accurate and intelligent.You are right, there is actually nothing in the constitution itself that gives the Supreme Court that right.
Traditions and customs are not law.But tradition and customs do.
Bingo! The U.S. Supreme Court absolutely has the power to strike down anything unconstitutional. That’s the reason for the entire existence. They do not, however, have the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself. The have absolutely zero authority to declare what the constitution “means”.Here is a summary of Marbury V Madison in 1803.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review in the United States, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws, statutes, and some government actions that contravene the U.S. Constitution.
Um...no. No, you didn’t. In fact, you actually agreed with me. Here it is again for the class:Ahahahahahaha!!! He couldn’t do it. One can always count on the left to cry “no need” when challenged to provide proof of something!No need. All judicial decisions involve both interpretation and application. As implicit as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.Please cite for us the Article and Section of the U.S. Constitution that grants the Supreme Court the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself.The United States Supreme Court has spent the past 229 years doing just that... interpreting the Constitution.
Don’t worry...I’ll wait.
--------------
Next batter, please.
But I did, cupcake.
Tell us, how many voices do you hear in your head at any given time?You are right, there is actually nothing in the constitution itself that gives the Supreme Court that right.
God I love owning ignorant left-wing lunatics. Give a lefty enough rope and they will hang themselves. Then they run away. I loooooove when they say “no need” when challenged to provide proof to one of their idiotic claims.No need. All judicial decisions involve both interpretation and application. As implicit as the sun rising in the east and setting in the west.Please cite for us the Article and Section of the U.S. Constitution that grants the Supreme Court the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself.The United States Supreme Court has spent the past 229 years doing just that... interpreting the Constitution.
Don’t worry...I’ll wait.
--------------
Next batter, please.
Those like me?...You and those like you don't get to make that call...
Do you mean loyal American citizens, who abide by the US Constitution and derivative law, and its judicial interpretation?
Actually, yes, We The People, do, indeed, get to make that call; through legislation and its enforcement.
No need to "wish" for something already extant....though I am sure you wish you could...
Yet....Me? Pass a mental health exam? But of course but it's not a requirement...
I have no idea what USA INC is, but, insofar as abiding by the laws of the United States is concerned, you will, indeed, do so....nor would I comply if there was as I am not a de-facto employee of USA.INC...
I am by no means a 'communist'....I do hope, however, that you put your ass out in front to enforce compliance should you little commie fucks insist...
Most Americans who favor more rational firearms control are not 'communists', either.
As a matter of fact, I spent a couple of years as a kid, wearing Uncle Sammy green, flipping the bird at the Soviets.
Your irrational characterization will get you nowhere outside of your own base.
As to being out front, for enforcement purposes... defy the laws of the United States and we'll talk about it.
Go back and look at it again.....Jesus and self defense? Luke 22 verse 36....
He wanted a couple of his disciples to pick up a couple of swords, as a showpiece, to fulfill prophecy.
The very second that his Main Main... Simon-Peter... began to raise a weapon, The Master told him never to do so again.
Do you mean loyal American citizens, who abide by the US Constitution and derivative law, and its judicial interpretation?
Correct. Except for military grade weaponry. Oh, and, automatic weapons (in many jurisdictions). And other restrictions already extant....I have the right to own any fucking firearm that I feel is necessary to not only defend me and mine...
It's all about how the Second is interpreted, mine good colleague, and that changes with the times, and the wishes of The People.
You're hallucinating, and, quite possibly, paranoid. Would you pass an obligatory Mental Health Exam as part of firearms licensing?... but to also have them in case little commie fucks like those of your ilk ever support a commie coup...
A great many, in fact, but not from a non-player....Questions?
You and those like you don't get to make that call.....though I am sure you wish you could.
Me? Pass a mental health exam? But of course but it's not a requirement nor would I comply if there was as I am not a de-facto employee of USA.INC.
I do hope, however, that you put your ass out in front to enforce compliance should you little commie fucks insist.
(snicker)
Jesus and self defense? Luke 22 verse 36....
I question all of you people's sanity. I'll have you know I have a paper from the VA Mental Health that states I am sane. Okay, I wasn't always that way but that was just an after affect of the job. But I am certified sane now and have the paper to prove it. But the rest of you are suspected as totally off your friggin rockers until you prove otherwise.
"Question" in one hand and take a shit in the other and see which one fills up first. One of many things about the leftard clown posse of sniveling commies that I find hilarious is the delusions of grandeur that afflicts them.
Leftards honestly believe that those that don't buy into their bullshit have to be "crazy"......examples?
#1 Anyone that isn't on the same page as they are when it comes to hating any and all that sit outside of their "big tent".
#2 Those that don't believe in their "collectivism" and "greater good" Marxist bullshit
#3 Those that want no part of their "social engineering/virtue signaling/politically correct" agenda.
Hell, the leftard clown posse sufferers of "arrested development" that worship at the feet of this corporate construct called "gubermint" amuse and repulse me on a daily basis. Leftards are clowns sans the make-up and a rodeo or circus gig.
Thank you for the Confirmation. THIS ONE IS CRAZY!!!!
And...not for nothing, Internet Rambo...but if there were an “armed revolution”, you wouldn’t have a life to get on with. People like me wouldn’t even have to get off the couch. The U.S. military is almost exclusively right-wing. Never seen a special forces operator yet who was left-wing. So...careful what you wish for Internet Rambo.Hurry up with your Armed Revolution so we can get it over with and the rest of us can get on with our lives.
Now you are saying you are special forces. Imagine that. Did you just finish watching Rambo once more and it got you to start fantasizing again? At one time, I worked closely with those folks. And there wasn't a hell of a lot of partisan discussion that ever came out of that camp. So, Rambo wannabe, you can stop trying to pass yourself off as my equal. You don't cut the mustard. But you probably just need more frosting.
Snowflake...we don’t operate under the “Articles of Confederation”. The moment the United States constitution was ratified by the states, the “Articles of Confederation” became null and void.It actually goes back to the Articles of Confederation
I know I’m right. Thank you for finally saying something accurate and intelligent.You are right, there is actually nothing in the constitution itself that gives the Supreme Court that right.
Traditions and customs are not law.But tradition and customs do.
Bingo! The U.S. Supreme Court absolutely has the power to strike down anything unconstitutional. That’s the reason for the entire existence. They do not, however, have the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself. The have absolutely zero authority to declare what the constitution “means”.Here is a summary of Marbury V Madison in 1803.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review in the United States, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws, statutes, and some government actions that contravene the U.S. Constitution.
Snowflake...we don’t operate under the “Articles of Confederation”. The moment the United States constitution was ratified by the states, the “Articles of Confederation” became null and void.It actually goes back to the Articles of Confederation
I know I’m right. Thank you for finally saying something accurate and intelligent.You are right, there is actually nothing in the constitution itself that gives the Supreme Court that right.
Traditions and customs are not law.But tradition and customs do.
Bingo! The U.S. Supreme Court absolutely has the power to strike down anything unconstitutional. That’s the reason for the entire existence. They do not, however, have the power to “interpret” the U.S. Constitution itself. The have absolutely zero authority to declare what the constitution “means”.Here is a summary of Marbury V Madison in 1803.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review in the United States, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws, statutes, and some government actions that contravene the U.S. Constitution.
In short,in order to do so, they have to be able to interpret the Constitution. Let's face it, the last few words of the 2nd is ambiguous at best and can be interpreted more than one way by many. And in the court systems it has been throughout the history of this nation. You believe that it was right to rule that people of color could not own firearms? How about the 3/5th law? The US has a history of interpreting the Constitution different as the time goes by. You read the 2nd one way. Another person reads it another way. The Supreme Court reads it somewhere in between as does the various Federal Courts.
You keep blaming the Supreme Court and the other courts that don't go your way. You want to do something to change things? Go after the ones that have not only the power but the obligation to change things. Go after all the levels of the Legislation from local to the Federals. The reason the 2nd amendment can be interpreted in so many ways is that it didn't keep up with the growth of the Federal Republic. The size of the country outgrew it and the size of the weapons also outgrew it. I don't advocate throwing it out but I do suggest we make it comply with the modern times. The 2nd was outdated by 1898 when the weapons and the size of the Military the Feds needed became outdated. The start was actually in 1858 when the first Walker Colt was introduced and it snowballed from there to some really nasty weapons and wars got bigger and bloodier.
I know you disagree. But until this happens, one way or another, the courts will continue to have to interpret the 2nd because the Federal Congress is so fractured there is no way it could muster a 2/3rds vote to update it. In fact, they can't come up with 60 votes in the Senate to determine if it's raining outside or not. And it's not just the snowflakers, it's also the cupcakes.
Correct. Except for military grade weaponry. Oh, and, automatic weapons (in many jurisdictions). And other restrictions already extant.
It's all about how the Second is interpreted, mine good colleague, and that changes with the times, and the wishes of The People.
You're hallucinating, and, quite possibly, paranoid. Would you pass an obligatory Mental Health Exam as part of firearms licensing?
A great many, in fact, but not from a non-player.
You and those like you don't get to make that call.....though I am sure you wish you could.
Me? Pass a mental health exam? But of course but it's not a requirement nor would I comply if there was as I am not a de-facto employee of USA.INC.
I do hope, however, that you put your ass out in front to enforce compliance should you little commie fucks insist.
(snicker)
Jesus and self defense? Luke 22 verse 36....
I question all of you people's sanity. I'll have you know I have a paper from the VA Mental Health that states I am sane. Okay, I wasn't always that way but that was just an after affect of the job. But I am certified sane now and have the paper to prove it. But the rest of you are suspected as totally off your friggin rockers until you prove otherwise.
"Question" in one hand and take a shit in the other and see which one fills up first. One of many things about the leftard clown posse of sniveling commies that I find hilarious is the delusions of grandeur that afflicts them.
Leftards honestly believe that those that don't buy into their bullshit have to be "crazy"......examples?
#1 Anyone that isn't on the same page as they are when it comes to hating any and all that sit outside of their "big tent".
#2 Those that don't believe in their "collectivism" and "greater good" Marxist bullshit
#3 Those that want no part of their "social engineering/virtue signaling/politically correct" agenda.
Hell, the leftard clown posse sufferers of "arrested development" that worship at the feet of this corporate construct called "gubermint" amuse and repulse me on a daily basis. Leftards are clowns sans the make-up and a rodeo or circus gig.
Thank you for the Confirmation. THIS ONE IS CRAZY!!!!
LMAO! And you just validated mine...thanks for playin'.
(snicker)