Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Probably afraid at this time since SSM is hanging by a thread.
Hang in there, if you want plural marriage, I’m sure your buddies at the LBGTQ will get if for ya.
I heard at the time of the SSM debate in 2014.....that if same sex marriage was allowed, we'd have polygamous marriage right after.
Nothing happened.
Why then would I concern myself with more empty predictions that have an 8 year record of perfect failure?
You were also warned that members of the T in LGBTQ, would try to indoctrinate our children. Pole dancing and lap dancing with minors is kind of what we warned about.
And warned about men wanting in teen girl locker rooms. Yup, that’s happened too.
Hey, with you fetish lovers, time is on your side right?
When one is a lesbian and the other is a gay male. Then, and only then can a gay couple produce a child. Fun fact, even the, the chances they have a gay child is really really slim.What the fuck are you blathering about ? Gay coupls have Children Gay couples are parents. How stupid are you?
So you've just completely abandoned your claims about same sex marriage and inane predictions about polygamous marriage?
If you're going to treat your claims like meaningless garbage to be tossed on the midden heap, surely you'll understand why I treat them the same way.
Nah, it makes just as much, and actually more sense if the participants are mixed sex, then SSM.
Poly marriage, pedophile relationships, bestiality and euthanasia are on the docket. This has to happen because of the arrow on your campaign slogans. Progs spent so much time on MAGA that they blurred what their own slogans are about. The arrow means continue to move.Its been 8 years. If same sex marriage means polyamory marriage...
Where is it?
I remember hearing all that hysterics too, back in 2014.Poly marriage, pedophile relationships, bestiality and euthanasia are on the docket. This has to happen because of the arrow on your campaign slogans. Progs spent so much time on MAGA that they blurred what their own slogans are about. The arrow means continue to move.
More deflection, which is expected. Of that 71% in the poll, how many would feel that if the option to marry someone of the same sex was taken from them, the result would have a negative impact on their life?
Let’s do the same polling on interracial, or just about any other right granted citizens.
Your argument that the denial of same sex marriage would somehow impact the right to marry those of another race just don’t hold water.
The issue is the law goes beyond that, and only protects Clergy, Churches, and Religious organizations, not normal people exercising their 1st amendment rights.
If it just made State governments recognize SSM's issued by other States, I would be fine with it, that's what I thought Obergfell should do.
But that's the point. Most people marry the opposite sex of the same race, but most people don't like it when the bigots try to take that away from people.
Support for interracial marriage was only at 20% when Loving v. Virginia was decided in 1969. In fact, it didn't hit over 50% until 1996!
View attachment 733364
Support for Gay marriage was already close to 60% when Obergefell was decided.
View attachment 733365
The Republicans know this is a loser issue for them. They know this because their corporate masters (The people who really run the GOP) have told them it's a loser and to knock it the fuck off.
Just need a few more cross dressers flaunting their stuff to lil kids and we will proceed from there.
And yet, if we did the man on the street interviews, nearly nobody would feel they would lose anything if not allowed to marry a same sex partner.
You can’t seriously think that’s incorrect?
Holy shit what???Is that really all that you can say after I excoriated you on your shameful and cruel bigotry ? That is just too fucking stupid!! We are seriously done hereWhen one is a lesbian and the other is a gay male. Then, and only then can a gay couple produce a child. Fun fact, even the, the chances they have a gay child is really really slim.
Oh you meant the third person that is ALWAYS required for a same sex couple to have a child with at least some dna of the United couple. Got it, still the couple will have a slim chance of having a gay child.
But Joe? He’s not the sharpest tack in the box.
Gay people have children and are parents.The Canadian Foreign Ministry summoned the Russian ambassador because of the embassy's tweet that the family is a man + a woman + children
"Russian homophobic propaganda is not welcome here!" — the Federal Minister of Canada, an open lesbian Pascal Saint-Onge, indignantly declared.
In response, the Russian Embassy invited the Minister to think and answer how she herself was born.
No. It is perverted. Unamerican.So what?. Some hetero sexual couples can't either. Should they not be able to call it marriage? When did concieving a child become a requirement for marriage?
You tried that in the midterms. It didn't work out so good for you. The way you were carrying on, you'd think there was an army of drag queens attacking.
Or a different race partner. Or a partner that was a lot younger or older. But they would be dead set against someone telling them they couldn't.
I think Americans are a lot more decent than you do. They will do the right thing, EVEN IF THEY DON'T BENEFIT.
Holy shit what???Is that really all that you can say after I excoriated you on your shameful and cruel bigotry ? That is just too fucking stupid!! We are seriously done here
