Good to know since you were implying that her opinion doesn’t matter since she’s not American.
I discount her opinion because she has no stake, she isn’t an American. Just like I don’t concern myself what their policies are.
She and her mates were boycotting US goods, and our exports to Canada went up, apparently her opinion isn’t important in Canada either.
Actually American imports were $52 billion in April of 2018. The tariff's went on in April, and immediately American imports started dropping. By November, when NAFTA 2.0 was signed, American exports to Canada had dropped by $2 billion. Given that most exports are done on contractual basis, long in advance, a 2% drop in American exports from an economy as small as ours shows our people stand behind their fellow Canadians and their jobs.
Americans couldn't give a rat's ass about their neighbours' or well being. It's what differeniates our cultures. The "rugged individualist" is considered a selfish asshole in this country. Our Constitution says we must help others.
In the moral world, your attitude is the outlier. The richest nation in the world. A nation which claims to be Christian, treats
REFUGEE CHILDREN LIKE ANIMALS. What is WRONG with you that you think this is somehow the right way to act?
A mass generalization of the followers of the world's largest religion. The most
immoral among us often lead the charge to accuse the religious of leading imperfect lives and pointing out their sins as if such petty "got-cha!" moments will shake our beliefs in Christ and cause us to see some error in our ways for believing in him at all. I know no fellow Christian who believes he or she leads or can ever lead a flawless, sin-free life. Rather, it is only ever the non-believer who would foist such a burden onto the shoulders of a fellow human being. Do you think that to be imperfect in one's mortal life is to be disqualified from being Christian? Who entitled you to hold Christians, individual or collectively to some flawless standard beyond which you yourself are capable of attaining?
Moral Relativists such as yourself seem absolutely enraged by the thought of a Christian whose life history does not embody sin-free perfection. The difference between us, between most Christians and most Moral Relativists is Christians understand they are inherently flawed, will make mistakes and commit sin, and shall be forgiven for those sins, so long as they seek forgiveness in Christ's name. The Moral Relativist on the other hand, even in a state of constant justification for his or her imperfections and sin, is consumed by guilt for their wrongdoing and lacks the higher power from which to ask for forgiveness.
A prime example of your moral relativism is the moral panic and outrage you join in over the illegal immigrant minors housed at our southern borders and elsewhere, while in other recent posts wail and moan
for a woman's right to murder her developing unborn child, who is a unique human being unto itself. Further, you would condemn unborn children to never exist at all, rather than face the same uncertainty of life we all faced after birth. In effect, you would play God over the life developing within you, murder it, yet cry to the heavens over the so-called injustice of our government housing feeding and providing
free medical care to undocumented children, all while thousands of our own children go to sleep on the street homeless each night.
You moral relativists are the worst of the worse hypocrites, and the most dangerous. You seek perfection in the adherence to beliefs of Christians, expect Christians to lead flawless, sinless lives . . . all while justifying away your own sins and atrocities as lesser evils in defiance of personal responsibility, of which your ideology has none, expects none from its followers.