Tariff ruling.

[pknopp]

Trumps tariffs were picking the pockets of every American.

To be fair, a tax is a tax and we do need to address the debt, right?

 

[Matted Joybeard]

I'll still pay tariffs because I love are country and President Trump!

 

[Dante]

Just released. Trump can not issue tariffs.

Best link I can provide.

Homepage

Independent News & Analysis of the U.S Supreme Court

www.scotusblog.com

Politics?

 

[Winco]

A terrible ruling. Completely wrong.

And NOW you love taxes.


Tariffs are indeed a TAX on the American Consumer.
Didn't you oppose government involvement and higher taxes, in the past?
What happened?

 

[Frankeneinstein]

It's a victory for those who believe in & expect POTUS & Congress to abide by THE CONSTITUTION.

It's just another hoax being put over on the same crowd that keeps falling for them.

 

[Zincwarrior]

The kings new clothes tariffs, have suddenly disappeared.

Don't be so sure. Lets tee what the Miller/Rubio Administration does in response.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Companies wont be unwinding their cost reductions, rehiring people, or lowering prices.

This is a nice profit boost.

I love MAGA rubes

.

What fun it is watching your cult celebrate what it perceives to be a "win".







.

 

[pknopp]

Politics?

Its not a political issue?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Trumps tariffs were picking the pockets of every American.

.

Only those who cannot buy American.






.

 

[mudwhistle]

Trumps tariffs were picking the pockets of every American.

Nope.

Try again.

 

[Winco]

WRONG

View attachment 1221247

If it's a tax on Americans who do you refund it to, dummy?

You KNOW they have records, don't ya?
The importer of course.....


The American Consumer gets fucked again, all because of trump.

 

[MagicMike]

The Supreme Court has no right to override the constitution.

End of story.

Actually the Supreme Court just upheld congress' constitutionally delegated power to levy tariffs.
The Constitution does not give that right to the POTUS, only Congress. Trump's lawyers knew this but they thought they could work a loophole in the Constitution using the Emergency Powers angle.
Well, the High Court just ruled that that is not a valid work around.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

You're the one who said Trump had to refund every nickel. I thought that was a serious thought and didn't realize you were just farting in the wind.

My mistake.

.

It's their super power, farting in the wind.

.

 

[Dante]

The Supreme Court has no right to override the constitution.

End of story.

OMG! DO you actually think about and then read what you post?

 

[task0778]

The Supreme Court on Friday struck down a huge chunk of President Donald Trump’s far-reaching tariff agenda, in a major rebuke of the president’s key economic policy.

The law that undergirds those import duties “does not authorize the President to impose tariffs,” the majority ruled six to three in a decision Trump had been awaiting.

Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the opinion of the court. Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Brett Kavanaugh dissented.

The ruling was silent on whether tariffs that have been paid under the higher rates will need to be refunded.
.
.
Many of those tariffs were invoked using a novel reading of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA. They include Trump’s near-global “reciprocal” tariffs, and separate duties related to the alleged trafficking of deadly drugs into the U.S.

IEEPA does not explicitly mention tariffs, and the court ruling Friday said it the law does not grant the president authority to impose tariffs. Instead, it allows the president to “regulate … importation” of foreign property transactions after declaring a national emergency in order to deal with certain “unusual and extraordinary” threats.

Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs, rebuking president's signature economic policy

Trump, as recently as Thursday, has talked up the consequences of the Supreme Court striking down his tariffs prior to the seismic ruling.

www.cnbc.com

Personally I have opposed tariffs in general no matter who wanted or did them, so I see this as a win for consumers and small businesses.

 

[Zincwarrior]

.

What fun it is watching your cult celebrate what it perceives to be a "win".







.

Please cite in the US Constitution where the power to raise tariffs resides.

 

[Dante]

Actually the Supreme Court just upheld congress' constitutionally delegated power to levy tariffs.
The Constitution does not give that right to the POTUS, only Congress. Trump's lawyers knew this but they thought they could work a loophole in the Constitution using the Emergency Powers angle.
Well, the High Court just ruled that that is not a valid work around.

Good luck getting into a masturbatory back and forth with this one on an important issue like this

 

[mudwhistle]

Its not a political issue?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I'll still pay tariffs because I love are country and President Trump!

.

I have and I do.

.

 

[Dante]

Its not a political issue?

The ruling is a constitutional issue. The point is that threads all saying the same thing will be posted all over the place. Enough!

now grow the eff up