Swedish covidiot strategy flops -people die

From the link:

However, Sweden has only had the highest death rate over the past week, with Belgium, Spain, Italy, the UK and France, still ahead over the entire course of the pandemic.

Lets wait and see what the final result is a year from now

Waiting a year to do what? Decide that social distancing and staying at home provide the surest methods to prevent becoming infected?!!.
According to the story sweden still has fewer deaths per million than the UK or US
Countries that had no strategy at all. They are a lot worse than those countries who took it seriously. New Zealand comes to mind.
Every country on your list took the chinese disease seriously

including sweden
Nope. The UK response has been criminally negligent and the US has been stymied from lack of leadership. Your goon squad has been trumpeting Swedwns approach for months as a lever to open up your economy too soon. Now it appears that chickens are coming home to roost and you are all pissed about it.
would you say the same thing is the UK was governed by socialists?

I suspect not
I would think the outcomes would be a lot better.
 
From the link:

However, Sweden has only had the highest death rate over the past week, with Belgium, Spain, Italy, the UK and France, still ahead over the entire course of the pandemic.

Lets wait and see what the final result is a year from now

Waiting a year to do what? Decide that social distancing and staying at home provide the surest methods to prevent becoming infected?!!.
According to the story sweden still has fewer deaths per million than the UK or US
Countries that had no strategy at all. They are a lot worse than those countries who took it seriously. New Zealand comes to mind.
Every country on your list took the chinese disease seriously

including sweden
Nope. The UK response has been criminally negligent and the US has been stymied from lack of leadership. Your goon squad has been trumpeting Swedwns approach for months as a lever to open up your economy too soon. Now it appears that chickens are coming home to roost and you are all pissed about it.
criminally negligent for a NATURAL disaster!!!
hahahahahahhahahaha
Tommy hates everyone except Karl Marx and Nikolai Lennon
 
From the link:

However, Sweden has only had the highest death rate over the past week, with Belgium, Spain, Italy, the UK and France, still ahead over the entire course of the pandemic.

Lets wait and see what the final result is a year from now

Waiting a year to do what? Decide that social distancing and staying at home provide the surest methods to prevent becoming infected?!!.
According to the story sweden still has fewer deaths per million than the UK or US
Countries that had no strategy at all. They are a lot worse than those countries who took it seriously. New Zealand comes to mind.
Every country on your list took the chinese disease seriously

including sweden
Nope. The UK response has been criminally negligent and the US has been stymied from lack of leadership. Your goon squad has been trumpeting Swedwns approach for months as a lever to open up your economy too soon. Now it appears that chickens are coming home to roost and you are all pissed about it.
criminally negligent for a NATURAL disaster!!!
hahahahahahhahahaha
Tommy hates everyone except Karl Marx and Nikolai Lennon
and me..he likes me--right Tommy?
 
From the link:

However, Sweden has only had the highest death rate over the past week, with Belgium, Spain, Italy, the UK and France, still ahead over the entire course of the pandemic.

Lets wait and see what the final result is a year from now

Waiting a year to do what? Decide that social distancing and staying at home provide the surest methods to prevent becoming infected?!!.
According to the story sweden still has fewer deaths per million than the UK or US
Countries that had no strategy at all. They are a lot worse than those countries who took it seriously. New Zealand comes to mind.
New Zealand is a great country.
Costa-Rica-coronavirus-cases-May-20-2020.png
Its also a very troubled country with rising homelessness and declining standard of living thanks to close economic ties to china

I recommend you watch this video for your own information


American globalists think our declining living standards are due entirely to greedy Wall Street bankers or some other simplistic answer

many of the problems seen around the world are caused in part by chinese mercantilism

take the euros for instance

they are about to adopt chinese 5g technology because its a few dollars cheaper than Nokia and Ericcson can provide

how stupid is that?


Our declining living standards, that is the ability of too many American Families unable to send their kids to college, nor are they able to have enough savings to live without any income for two months, are the product of high federal taxes and the elimination of too many deductions.

The Federal Income Tax needs to become more progressive, not less, as the recent tax fraud passed by the lame duck H. or Rep. did in the fall of 2017 and signed by Trump in December 2017


too many American Families unable to send their kids to college,

Does the endless flow of tax dollars to colleges make college cheaper or more expensive?

the product of high federal taxes and the elimination of too many deductions.

What does the typical median earnings family pay in federal income taxes?
When did they pay less than they do now?


Your first question is stupid, clearly you've never purchased a college text book. Or the cost just to apply to a college and when accepted the cost for room and board. Tax Dollars go to Public Colleges and Universities (do taxes support private colleges and Universities?). My experience at CAL and SFSU -both public schools- were not as costly when I attended, but I couldn't have afforded a Private University even then.

I can't answer your next two questions, my income is well above the typical median earnings. What I do know, beginning with Reagan's tax bill was that I experienced the full deductions for health care, and interest on loans, Union Dues and (in my case) the cost for a telephone disappeared.

In Ryan's Tax Fraud, signed by trump, 2/3 of the cuts went to Corporations and those in the top two tax brackets, and 1/3 went to the working men and women. The they made sure that the 1/3 disappeared in 10 years, and the 2/3 continue for ever. Of course the deductions for State Income Tax and Real Estate Taxes were cut to $10k to those of us who live in California.


clearly you've never purchased a college text book. Or the cost just to apply to a college and when accepted the cost for room and board. Tax Dollars go to Public Colleges and Universities (do taxes support private colleges and Universities?).

That's not what I'm talking about.
If you give students limitless amounts of federal student loans,
does that make college cheaper or more expensive?

What I do know, beginning with Reagan's tax bill was that I experienced the full deductions for health care, and interest on loans, Union Dues and (in my case) the cost for a telephone disappeared.

Yup. And the top rate dropped to 28%

and 1/3 went to the working men and women.

So you lied.
You lied when you said American families were paying higher taxes than they used to.

The they made sure that the 1/3 disappeared in 10 years,

Pelosi could write a bill today to make the 1/3 permanent.
Why doesn't she?


S1: If you give students limitless amounts of federal student loans,
does that make college cheaper or more expensive?

Initially more expensive, yet post graduate degrees are usually lead to high paid jobs, law, medicine, for examples.

S2: Initially my taxes were higher, since my real estate taxes and state income taxes were limited to a paltry deduction of $10k; these deduction will sunset in 2025. History tells us that local bond issues, fees and taxes (such as sales) will rise.

Grow up, I didn't lie I stated I couldn't make any analysis of the millions of people living in various states how this tax bill had an effect on every individual / family.

S3: The Speaker could pass a tax reform bill, but Moscow Mitch would never bring it up in the Senate. BTW. he's opposed to providing more dollars to the working men and women who have lost their jobs. I hope that asshole loses along with trump in Nov.
 
S1: If you give students limitless amounts of federal student loans,
does that make college cheaper or more expensive?

Initially more expensive, yet post graduate degrees are usually lead to high paid jobs, law, medicine, for examples.

S2: Initially my taxes were higher, since my real estate taxes and state income taxes were limited to a paltry deduction of $10k; these deduction will sunset in 2025. History tells us that local bond issues, fees and taxes (such as sales) will rise.

Grow up, I didn't lie I stated I couldn't make any analysis of the millions of people living in various states how this tax bill had an effect on every individual / family.

S3: The Speaker could pass a tax reform bill, but Moscow Mitch would never bring it up in the Senate. BTW. he's opposed to providing more dollars to the working men and women who have lost their jobs. I hope that asshole loses along with trump in Nov.

Initially more expensive,

Thanks for admitting the truth.

yet post graduate degrees are usually lead to high paid jobs, law, medicine, for examples.

People with high paying jobs are helped while the majority are harmed.

History tells us that local bond issues, fees and taxes (such as sales) will rise.

Why?

I didn't lie I stated I couldn't make any analysis of the millions of people living in various states how this tax bill had an effect on every individual / family.

You stated they were harmed, their taxes were too high, because of reduced progressivity.

The Speaker could pass a tax reform bill, but Moscow Mitch would never bring it up in the Senate. BTW.

Mitch wouldn't bring up a bill that made middle class tax cuts permanent?

Are you shitting me? Pelosi would pick up dozens of additional seats.
Dems would win control of the Senate.

You can't believe that claim.
 
S1: If you give students limitless amounts of federal student loans,
does that make college cheaper or more expensive?

Initially more expensive, yet post graduate degrees are usually lead to high paid jobs, law, medicine, for examples.

S2: Initially my taxes were higher, since my real estate taxes and state income taxes were limited to a paltry deduction of $10k; these deduction will sunset in 2025. History tells us that local bond issues, fees and taxes (such as sales) will rise.

Grow up, I didn't lie I stated I couldn't make any analysis of the millions of people living in various states how this tax bill had an effect on every individual / family.

S3: The Speaker could pass a tax reform bill, but Moscow Mitch would never bring it up in the Senate. BTW. he's opposed to providing more dollars to the working men and women who have lost their jobs. I hope that asshole loses along with trump in Nov.

Initially more expensive,

Thanks for admitting the truth.

yet post graduate degrees are usually lead to high paid jobs, law, medicine, for examples.

People with high paying jobs are helped while the majority are harmed.

History tells us that local bond issues, fees and taxes (such as sales) will rise.

Why?

I didn't lie I stated I couldn't make any analysis of the millions of people living in various states how this tax bill had an effect on every individual / family.

You stated they were harmed, their taxes were too high, because of reduced progressivity.

The Speaker could pass a tax reform bill, but Moscow Mitch would never bring it up in the Senate. BTW.

Mitch wouldn't bring up a bill that made middle class tax cuts permanent?

Are you shitting me? Pelosi would pick up dozens of additional seats.
Dems would win control of the Senate.

You can't believe that claim.

I'm sick and tired of you and your willful ignorance. If you want to believe taxes in America are equally & fairly apportioned that is up to you, and is not reality.
 
S1: If you give students limitless amounts of federal student loans,
does that make college cheaper or more expensive?

Initially more expensive, yet post graduate degrees are usually lead to high paid jobs, law, medicine, for examples.

S2: Initially my taxes were higher, since my real estate taxes and state income taxes were limited to a paltry deduction of $10k; these deduction will sunset in 2025. History tells us that local bond issues, fees and taxes (such as sales) will rise.

Grow up, I didn't lie I stated I couldn't make any analysis of the millions of people living in various states how this tax bill had an effect on every individual / family.

S3: The Speaker could pass a tax reform bill, but Moscow Mitch would never bring it up in the Senate. BTW. he's opposed to providing more dollars to the working men and women who have lost their jobs. I hope that asshole loses along with trump in Nov.

Initially more expensive,

Thanks for admitting the truth.

yet post graduate degrees are usually lead to high paid jobs, law, medicine, for examples.

People with high paying jobs are helped while the majority are harmed.

History tells us that local bond issues, fees and taxes (such as sales) will rise.

Why?

I didn't lie I stated I couldn't make any analysis of the millions of people living in various states how this tax bill had an effect on every individual / family.

You stated they were harmed, their taxes were too high, because of reduced progressivity.

The Speaker could pass a tax reform bill, but Moscow Mitch would never bring it up in the Senate. BTW.

Mitch wouldn't bring up a bill that made middle class tax cuts permanent?

Are you shitting me? Pelosi would pick up dozens of additional seats.
Dems would win control of the Senate.

You can't believe that claim.

I'm sick and tired of you and your willful ignorance. If you want to believe taxes in America are equally & fairly apportioned that is up to you, and is not reality.

If you want to believe taxes in America are equally & fairly apportioned that is up to you,


Equally?
Not even close.
The top 10% of taxpayers pay over 70% of all Federal Income Taxes collected.

Now tell me more about McConnell refusing to bring a tax cut to the floor.
Funniest thing I've heard all month!!!
 

Sweden has now overtaken the UK, Italy and Belgium to have the highest coronavirus per capita death rate in the world, throwing its decision to avoid a strict lockdown into further doubt.

According to figures collated by the Our World in Data website, Sweden had 6.08 deaths per million inhabitants per day on a rolling seven-day average between May 13 and May 20.


This is the highest in the world, above the UK, Belgium and the US, which have 5.57, 4.28 and 4.11 respectively.

Well, well, well. What a fucking disaster. Stay home,stay safe.

Lies of paid by NWO presstitutes and corrupted politicians.
 

Forum List

Back
Top